# Oilmen’s Truck Tanks — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 21-0001
- **title:** Oilmen’s Truck Tanks — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2021-05-17
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 21-0001 response to Oilmen’s Truck Tanks concerning 171.2, 173.150.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0001.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0001.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0001
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/75041/210001.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
May 17, 2021
Robert Strong
Design Certifying Engineer
Oilmen’s Truck Tanks
140 Cedar Springs Rd
Spartanburg, SC 29304
Reference No. 21-0001
Dear Mr. Strong:
This letter is in response to your December 31, 2020, email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the motor vehicle
transportation of packages containing diesel fuel and gasoline connected via piping.
Specifically, you describe two scenarios, and ask whether the described package arrangements
meet the requirements of the HMR. Additionally, you ask a question regarding the HMR’s
hazard communication requirements for each scenario.
Scenario #1: You describe a package arrangement consisting of multiple refueling tanks, each
tank with a capacity of 119 gallons. The tanks are connected via piping with ball valves capable
of isolating each tank. The material intended for transportation in this scenario is diesel fuel.
Although not explicitly described, for the purposes of this response, it is assumed that the diesel
fuel in question has a flash point at or above 38 °C (100 °F), and, therefore, is eligible for the
combustible liquid exception found in § 173.150(f).
Scenario #2: You describe a package arrangement consisting of multiple 119-gallon metal
refueling tanks manufactured in accordance with Department of Transportation DOT special
permit (DOT-SP) 14227. The tanks are connected via piping with ball valves capable of
isolating each tank. The material intended for transportation in this scenario is gasoline.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. You ask whether the package arrangement described in Scenario #1 meets the
requirements of the HMR.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

A1. The answer is yes, if the ball valves separating the individual tanks are in a closed
position while in transportation. If there are no stop valves on each individual outlet
preventing the flow of lading between tanks, and free flow between tanks is allowed
during transportation, then the tanks would be considered a single bulk package and the
requirements of § 173.150(f)(3) would apply, including marking and placarding. A
hazardous material classed as a combustible liquid in a non-bulk package (capacity less
than or equal to 119 gallons) is not subject to the requirements of the HMR (see
§ 173.150(f)(2)).
Q2. You ask whether the packaging arrangement described in Scenario #2 meets the
requirements of the HMR.
A2. The answer is no. DOT-SP 14227 prohibits manifolded packages; see section 7.c.(3) in
the enclosed copy. Please note that packages connected by piping or tubing are
considered “manifolded” for the purpose of DOT SP-14227, regardless of whether the
valves are in the open or closed position.
Q3. For both scenarios, you ask whether placards are required on all four sides of each of the
individual tanks, or all four sides of the transport vehicle.
A3. For Scenario #1 - No hazard communication is required, either on the tanks or the
transport vehicle, if the valves are closed because non-bulk packages (119 gallons or less)
containing a combustible liquid are not subject to the HMR requirements, including
hazard communication for highway transportation. However, if any free flow exists
between tanks during transportation, the individual tanks attached to the motor vehicle
are considered a single bulk packaging (e.g., portable tank, IBC, or cargo tank, depending
on how the packaging is constructed and used in transportation) and must comply with all
applicable requirements including placarding requirements for a particular bulk package
and the transport vehicle.
For Scenario #2 - The hazard communication requirements for DOT-SP 14227 packages
are included in paragraph 7.c.(5) of the special permit, specifically that each tank must be
marked and placarded in accordance with the requirements for Intermediate Bulk
Containers (IBCs). However, the manifolded packages do not comply with the
requirements of DOT-SP 14227, and, therefore, are not in compliance with the HMR (see
§ 171.2(g)).
Please note, the requirements for a commercial driver’s license (CDL) (See 49 CFR Part 383) are
under the purview of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). FMCSA is the
lead Federal government agency responsible for regulating and providing safety oversight of
commercial motor vehicles.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

You may wish to contact FMCSA should you require clarification of any requirements relevant
to CDLs.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Patrick
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Hazmat Interps
Subject: FW: Interpretation Letter Request
Date: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:33:01 PM
Attachments: fueler piping.png
UPDATED TO
21-0001 FROM
20-0098
Hello,
See below and attached picture request for interpretation.
Thanks,
Jonathon, HMIC
From: Raynor, T'Mia (PHMSA)
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 1:48 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Interpretation Letter Request
T’Mia Raynor
Webmaster
PHMSA Office of the CIO (PHF-30)
Desk: (202) 366-9818 | Mobile: (202) 580-9447
From: Robert Strong <rstrong@trucktanks.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 8:00:31 AM
To: PHMSA Pipelinesafety <PHMSA.Pipelinesafety@dot.gov>
Cc: PHMSA Website Manager <PHMSAWebsiteManager@dot.gov>
Subject: Interpretation Letter Request
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not click on links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning,
I would like to request a formal letter of interpretation for the following questions.
I have two questions regarding a further interpretation of Interpretations 88-0026 and 15-0135.
These Interpretations state that a tank is not considered manifolded together with other tanks if a
stop valve is used between the tanks and in the closed positions. When applying this to multiple
individual tanks on a flatbed, as shown in the attached figure, the two following cases arise.
The first case is hauling diesel in 2 (or more) 119 gallon individual tanks on a flat bed, with ball valves
on the outlet piping of each tank, connected to a single pump, as shown in the attached figure. The
driver in this case would not have a CDL or a HAZMAT endorsement since the truck would be less
than 33,000 lbs GVWR.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

The second case is hauling gas in 2 (or more) 119 gallon individual tanks manufactured under DOT-
SP 14227. These tanks are also connected in the same manner as the first case, with a ball valve
between each of the individual tanks and the pump, as shown in the attached figure. The driver in
this case would also not have a CDL or a HAZMAT endorsement since the truck would have a GVWR
less than 33,000 lbs.
Are both of these cases compliant with HAZMAT regulations and would be considered legal for the
transportation of diesel in case 1 and gas in case 2?
Also, if these cases are HAZMAT compliant, are the placarding requirements in this case limited to
each of the individual tanks being placarded on all 4 sides, or do all 4 sides of the transport vehicle
need to be placarded as well?
Best,
Robert Strong, Eng.D.
Design Certifying Engineer
Oilmen’s Truck Tanks
140 Cedar Springs Rd.
Spartanburg, SC 29304
864-699-7521 (Direct)
863-278-3677 (Cell)
www.trucktanks.com
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 7623
