# Wellmatics — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 21-0030
- **title:** Wellmatics — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2021-08-19
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 21-0030 response to Wellmatics concerning 172.406, 173.304.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0030.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0030.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0030
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/75746/210030.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
August 19, 2021
Mr. Joshua Howk
Wellmatics
6770 McHard Road
Houston, TX 77053
Reference No. 21-0030
Dear Mr. Howk:
This letter is in response to your March 22, 2021, letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to labeling and marking
requirements for jet perforating guns (JPGs). You provide an overview of your process for JPG
loading and preparation for transportation and state that, when multiple JPGs are palletized, the
required labels and markings are not always visible and/or may not be applied. Furthermore, you
provide images of a potential solution; specifically, an extended threaded end cap design that
would allow space for placement of the required label(s) and marking(s) without having to
remove the JPG from a pallet. You ask whether the placement of a label and marking on the
extended threaded end cap—for each individual JPG on a pallet—meets the labeling and
marking requirements of the HMR.
The answer is yes. As provided in §§ 172.304 and 172.406, respectively, each marking must be
printed on or affixed to the surface of a package or on a label, tag, or sign; and each label must be
printed on or affixed to a surface (other than the bottom) of the package or containment device
containing the hazardous material and near the proper shipping name marking.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Provided each individual JPG on a pallet is labeled and marked—either on the body of the JPG
or on its extended threaded end cap—this practice would be in compliance with the HMR.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Cardez
21-0030
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Subject: Date: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA); Hazmat Interps
FW: Interpretation request for explosive label sticker placement on jet perforating guns
Monday, March 22, 2021 3:55:48 PM
Attachments: image008.png
image001.png
image011.png
image012.png
image013.png
Good afternoon Alice,
Please see the request for a letter of interpretation below. Please contact our office with any
questions.
Thank you,
Sarah, HMIC
From: Joshua Howk [mailto:josh.howk@wellmatics.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 1:40 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Interpretation request for explosive label sticker placement on jet perforating guns
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not click on links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
United States
To Whom it may concern:
Wellmatics is a manufacturer for the oil and gas industry and provides products
to service companies for perforating in oil and gas wells.
These products include perforating systems and assemblies.
We are looking for an interpretation on the explosive labeling of jet perforating
guns sticker placement location.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Here is some information that will give detail to what interpretation we are
requesting.
The physical perforating gun is comprised of three parts. Outside tubular body
or carrier, inner charge holder tube or strip, and threaded end protectors on both
ends.
These are sent to the users by manufacturers on pallets and or racking for the
user to load explosives into for oilfield perforating operations.
This is the steps followed by the users to load and prepare for transport:
Following API RP 67 for explosive loading
· The user would remove one of the threaded end caps to pull out the inner
charge tube and or strip.
· The user would take the inner charge tube or strip out of the carrier or outer
tube body.
· Then the user will load explosive shape charges and detonating cord in the
inner charge tube or strip holder.
· The user will insert back into the carrier or outer tube body.
· The user will replace the threaded end cap to hold inner charge tube or strip in
place
We now have a loaded jet perforating gun-

<<<PAGE 5>>>

The label sticker that shows the explosive classification, UN number, description,
and company address is placed on the carrier outside tube.
With typical pallets and or racking there are between 50-100 loaded perforating
guns for each pallet or rack.
The users are moving thousands of these per week, and we have noticed a few
observations.
The user is responsible for attaching the label sticker to each unit to comply the
regulation for labeling for transportation.
The problem arises as the physicality and time of moving these in order to label
each one individually- this is not happening.
We are seeing only partial labeling of the guns on the pallet, labeling the exterior
only, and or worse not being labeled at all.
Wellmatics strongly recommends to the user to comply with the individual labeling
but has no authority in the matter so we are seeking to engineer a solution to prevent
a lack of compliance.
In order to label each individual gun body the user must physically remove from
the pallet that they are provided on.
This should but often does not happen and the reasoning is listed below:
This creates a potential dropped object once they cut the band or strap as they
can roll to the floor.
This also creates a potential hand and or finger injury as there are multiple pinch
points when stacking and unstacking
This also creates a potential back injury as the user is moving thousands of these

<<<PAGE 6>>>

weekly with average gun weighing 15-50 lbs. each
Time it takes to physically unsecure each gun, move each gun to label, and then
place back on pallet and secure for transport .
What Wellmatics solution to this is to extend the threaded end cap protector to
accept the sticker so that the user can leave the gun bodies secured to the pallets
only have to move the charge tube or strip to load which is significantly lighter.
The threaded gun label end protector would allow the user to visibly show each
gun has a sticker as these are not hidden in a stacked configuration.
When an inspection occurs the inspector could identify immediately the label
on the threaded end cap and would not have to un secure the stacked gun
bodies in the event they wanted to do a full inspection of each individual
perforating gun.
What interpretation Wellmatics is looking for is -Will the label sticker if
placed on the threaded end cap be considered compliant for individually
labeled jet perforating guns?
Thank you,
Joshua Howk
6770 McHard Road

<<<PAGE 7>>>

Houston, TX 77053
WELLMATICS
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6755
