# Imperative Chemical Partners — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 21-0096
- **title:** Imperative Chemical Partners — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2021-12-16
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 21-0096 response to Imperative Chemical Partners concerning 172.301, 177.834, 178.703.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0096.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0096.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0096
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/76206/210096.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
December 16, 2021
Shawn Melson
Manager, DOT
Imperative Chemical Partners
5014 Ashton Audrey
San Antonio, TX. 78249
Reference No. 21-0096
Dear Mr. Melson:
This letter is in response to your September 16, 2021, email and subsequent phone conversation
requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180)
applicable to the orientation of intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) loaded on a motor vehicle
and to the hazard label visibility. Specifically, you describe loading IBCs containing flammable,
combustible, or corrosive material onto a highway motor vehicle. The vehicle bears the required
placards and ID number markings for the commodity in the IBCs on each side and each end of
the vehicle. The IBCs themselves are labeled on two opposing sides, rather than bearing
placards, and are marked in accordance with § 172.301(a), as authorized in § 172.514(c)(4).
Further, you describe and provide diagrams for two loading orientations. In both orientations,
the valve of each IBC faces the valve of an adjacent IBC and one label on each IBC and the UN
identification (ID) number and proper shipping name marking required by § 172.301(a) directly
faces the side of another IBC.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. You ask if the HMR prohibits IBCs from being loaded into a transport vehicle with their
valves facing “inwards,” toward other IBC valves.
A1. The answer is no. In accordance with § 177.834(a), packages having valves or other
fittings must be loaded in a manner to minimize the likelihood of damage during
transportation.
Q2. You ask if it is permissible for the UN ID number and proper shipping name markings
required by § 172.301(a) to face “inwards,” toward another IBC in the same direction as
the IBC valves.
A2. The answer is yes. Provided the marking is unobscured by labels or attachments, the
HMR do not prohibit the UN ID number and proper shipping name markings required by
§ 172.301(a) from facing other packages when loaded onto a motor vehicle.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Q3. You ask if it is permissible for the hazard label to face “inwards,” toward another IBC in
the same direction as the IBC valves.
A3. The answer is yes. Provided the label is unobscured by markings or attachments, the
HMR do not prohibit the hazard label from facing other packages when loaded onto
a motor vehicle.
Q4. You ask if the HMR prohibit the IBC specification markings required by § 178.703 from
being loaded in an orientation that is not visible from the outside of the motor vehicle.
A4. The answer is no. The HMR do not require packages to be loaded onto or into a motor
vehicle and oriented in a manner such that the packaging specification marking(s) are
visible from outside of a motor vehicle.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Patrick
21-0096
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Hazmat Interps
Subject: FW: Imperative Chemical Partners-Formal Interpretation Request
Date: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:00:10 PM
Attachments: image429366.png
IBC INTERPRETATION.pdf
Attached is a request for letter of interpretation.
Mailing address is:
Shawn Melson, DOT Manager
c/o Imperative Chemical Partners
5014 Ashton Audrey
San Antonio, TX. 78249
Thanks,
Jonathon, HMIC
From: Shawn Melson <ShawnMelson@imperativechemicals.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 2:48 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Imperative Chemical Partners-Formal Interpretation Request
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not click on links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Formal Interpretation Request,
“I do not believe PHMSA has issued any guidance or a formal interpretation related to
my request therefor, I am requesting a new formal letter of interpretation to be issued
regarding the attached scenario.”
SHAWN MELSON
MANAGER, DOT
Mobile: (210) 378-7219
Office: (877) 523-3147
Email: ShawnMelson@imperativechemicals.com
www.imperativechemicals.com

<<<PAGE 4>>>

U.S. DOT
Attn: PHH-10
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20590
PHMSA Office of Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Division
Dear Office of Hazardous Material Standards,
Most of our bulk transportation occurs in composite Intermediate Bulk Container (IBC’s) that are
UN31HA1’s. The products transported consist of Class 3 Flammable liquids, Class 8 Corrosive liquids,
and Combustible liquids. As allowed by 172.400, we label the two opposing sides of the IBC’s except for
Combustible liquids which we placard for.
My first question addresses the positioning of the IBC’s on the transport vehicles and the valve location
once loaded. I’ve included two diagrams with the first showing the IBC’s loaded in a single row and the
valves facing one another. The second diagram shows the IBC’s loaded in a double-row configuration
with the valves facing inboard. The “X’s” show the valve locations along with the labels on the two
opposing sides and the transport vehicle placarded on all 4 sides.
HMR 177.834(a) states, “Packages having valves or other fittings must be loaded in a manner to
minimize the likelihood of damage during transportation.” The first question is this. Is there anywhere
within the HMR’s that would prohibit IBC valves from facing inward towards one another. By facing
inward, they valves are offered protection from accidents, either vehicular or during loading/unloading.
Also, they’re protected from tampering.
Question #1: Is there a prohibition against the valves from facing inward?
If there is not a prohibition against the valves from facing inward, I then present 3 additional questions.
Question #2: 172.304(a)(3) states, “The markings required in this subpart-must be unobscured by labels
or attachments. Being that we are labeling our IBC’s, we are also marking them in accordance with
172.301(a). If the valves are facing towards one another in the single row example, would we be in
violation of 172.304(a)(3)?
Question #3: 172.406(f) states, “Visibility. A label must be clearly visible and may not be obscured by
markings or attachments. If the valves are facing one another in the single row example, would we be in
violation of 172.406(f), even though the IBC body isn’t a marking or attachment?
Question #4: Is there anything within 178.700, Subpart N that would prohibit the required IBC markings
found in 178.703 from being visible from the outside?
Sincerely
Shawn Melson, DOT Manager

<<<PAGE 5>>>

= Valve Locations
1789
Front of Vehicle
1789
Rear of Vehicle
1789
LOADED IN SINGLE ROW, IBC DIAGRAM
= Valve Locations
1789
Front of Vehicle
1789
1789
Rear of Vehicle
1789
LOADED IN DOUBLE ROWS, IBC DIAGRAM
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 7012
