# Hydro-Test Products, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 21-0101
- **title:** Hydro-Test Products, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2022-01-19
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 21-0101 response to Hydro-Test Products, Inc. concerning 171.8, 180.209, 180.215.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0101.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0101.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0101
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/76226/210101.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
January 19, 2022
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Carlos Graca
Hydro-Test Products, Inc.
85 Hudson Road
Stow, MA 01775
Reference No. 21-0101
Dear Mr. Graca:
This letter is in response to your November 2, 2021, email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to recordkeeping
requirements for the visual inspection used to requalify cylinders. In your email, you note that
§ 180.209(g) allows for an external visual inspection to be performed in lieu of a periodic
hydrostatic test and requires the results to be recorded and maintained in conformance with
§ 180.215. However, you note that the recordkeeping requirements include reference to more
information than can be provided by an external visual inspection (e.g., actual test pressure).
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. You ask what information must be recorded for a visual inspection performed in
accordance with § 180.209(g).
A1. A person who requalifies a cylinder using an external visual inspection only needs to
provide information specified in § 180.215(b) relevant to an external visual inspection.
Information such as expansion, test pressure, verification, or calibrated cylinder values do
not need to be recorded as part of the recordkeeping requirements.
Q2. You ask whether the manufacturing date and gas service must be recorded during the
external visual inspection.
A2. The answer is yes. See answer “A3” for Letter of Interpretation, Ref. No. 21-0100.
Q3. You note a seemingly circular reference among §§ 180.209(g) and 180.215, CGA C-6,
and CGA C-6.3, and ask for clarity on which regulations to follow when performing
an external visual inspection of a cylinder.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

A3. Section 180.209 provides requirements for the requalification of cylinders. Paragraph (g)
provides conditions that allow for an external visual inspection requalification of a
cylinder that is in specialized service. CGA C-6 and CGA C-6.3 are industry developed
standards for the performance of a visual inspection and have been incorporated by
reference into the HMR and thus—by definition—are made part of the HMR.
(See § 171.8 for the definition of incorporated by reference.) Because of reliance on
visual inspections as a means to requalify these cylinders, reference is made to these
standards to ensure that visual inspections are performed properly and consistently by
requalifiers. Finally, reference to § 180.215 provides a reminder of the requirements for
reporting and recordkeeping of requalified cylinders. Thus, all are regulations that
should be followed in accordance with § 180.209(g).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Baker
21-0101
From: Patrick, Eamonn (PHMSA)
To: Hazmat Interps
Cc: DerKinderen, Dirk (PHMSA); Foster, Glenn (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Recording Requirements
Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 8:49:36 AM
Attachments: Interpretation letter2.pdf
From: Carlos Graca <Carlos@hydro-test.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2021 8:27 AM
To: Patrick, Eamonn (PHMSA) <eamonn.patrick@dot.gov>
Subject: RE: Recording Requirements
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not click on links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear sir,
I do hope that you have received my previous email concerning the recording of a proof test under
CFR49 section 180.215. We are also getting several questions from the cylinder re-qualification
industry regarding the recording of a visual inspection when allowed to be performed in lieu of a
pressure test in accordance with section 180.209(g). Attached is a request for clarification and
interpretation concerning the recording requirements under CFR49, section 180.215. I would very
much appreciate an expedited reply. Please contact the undersigned with any questions.
Thank you and I look forward to hearing back from PHMSA on this and my previous request
Carlos Graca
Hydro-Test Products, Inc.
85 Hudson Rd
Stow, MA USA 01775
978-897-4647 ext.14
Email: cgraca@hydro-test.com
www.hydro-test.com
From: Carlos Graca
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 2:34 PM

<<<PAGE 4>>>

To: eamonn.patrick@dot.gov; hazmatinterps@dot.gov
Subject: Recording Requirements
Dear Patrick,
Attached is a request for clarification and interpretation concerning the recording requirements
under CFR49, section 180.215. I would very much appreciate an expedited reply. Please contact the
undersigned with any questions. Thank you and I look forward to hearing back from PHMSA.
Best regards,
Carlos Graca
Hydro-Test Products, Inc.
85 Hudson Rd
Stow, MA USA 01775
978-897-4647 ext.14
Email: carlos@hydrotest.com

<<<PAGE 5>>>

Standards and Rulemaking Division
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration, Attn: PHH-10
U.S. Department of Transportation
East Building 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Re: Test record forms
Dear sir, we are getting several questions from the cylinder re-qualification industry regarding the
recording of a visual inspection when allowed to be performed in lieu of a pressure test in accordance
with section 180.209(g).
Our questions are as follows:
1) There are no expansion values, test pressures, verification or calibrated cylinder used during a
visual inspection. However, section 180.209(g) does reference that “results be recorded and maintained
in accordance with section 180.215.” This is impossible as 180.215 has many fields that are not
applicable to a visual inspection re-qualification. What fields must be recorded?
2) Does the “manufacturing date” and “gas service” are they required to be listed?
3) As with the proof test this referenced compressed gas pamphlet(s), C-6 and C-6.3, do not show the
new requirements under 180.215. They do however reference 180.215, yet the regulations in
180.209(g), states to reference those CGA pamphlets. By strictly going by the CGA pamphlets and
180.209(g) a circle of confusion is completed with no answers, as both are referring to each other. What
regulations do we follow? I again ask if a pamphlet should be referenced if it shows samples that do not
comply with the regulations referencing them??
I appreciate your time and quick reply to this and my previous request.
Sincerely,
Carlos Graca
Cylinder Re-Qualification Training Manager
85 Hudson Road Stow, Massachusetts 01775 USA
Tel # Tel # Tel # Tel # 800-225-9488 / 978-897-4647 Fax # Fax # Fax # Fax # 978-897-1942 Email Email Email Email: Carlos@Hydro-test.com
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6795
