# Evonik Corporation — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 21-0105
- **title:** Evonik Corporation — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2021-11-17
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 21-0105 response to Evonik Corporation concerning 172.101.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0105.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0105.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-21-0105
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/76096/210105.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
November 17, 2021
Mr. Robert Miller
Evonik Corporation
7201 Hamilton Blvd
Allentown, PA 18195
Reference No. 21-0105
Dear Mr. Miller:
This letter is in response to your November 15, 2021, email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the shipment of
hydrogen peroxide aqueous solutions. You ask whether the hazardous materials descriptions for
“UN2014, Hydrogen, peroxide, aqueous solutions with more than 40 percent but not more than
60 percent hydrogen peroxide (stabilized as necessary), 5.1 (8), PG II” and “UN2014, Hydrogen,
peroxide, aqueous solutions with not less than 20 percent but not more than 40 percent hydrogen
peroxide (stabilized as necessary), 5.1 (8), PG II” could have the text “stabilized as necessary” in
italics.
The answer is yes. As currently provided in § 172.101 of the Hazardous Materials Table (HMT),
the HMR list the hazardous materials descriptions for “UN2014” as follows:
• UN2014, Hydrogen, peroxide, aqueous solutions with more than 40 percent but not more
than 60 percent hydrogen peroxide (stabilized as necessary)
• UN2014, Hydrogen, peroxide, aqueous solutions with not less than 20 percent but not
more than 40 percent hydrogen peroxide (stabilized as necessary)
However, there was an inadvertent editorial error made when the HM-219C1 final rule published
in November 2020 that removed the italics from each description in the HMT. The Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) can confirm that this was an inadvertent
editorial error and these descriptions should read as:
1 See the HM-219C final rule titled “Hazardous Materials: Adoption of Miscellaneous Petitions To Reduce
Regulatory Burdens” published on November 25, 2020 [85 FR 75680] at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-
2020-11-25/pdf/2020-23712.pdf

<<<PAGE 2>>>

• UN2014, Hydrogen, peroxide, aqueous solutions with more than 40 percent but not more
than 60 percent hydrogen peroxide (stabilized as necessary)
• UN2014, Hydrogen, peroxide, aqueous solutions with not less than 20 percent but not
more than 40 percent hydrogen peroxide (stabilized as necessary)
Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention and please note that PHMSA will correct this
inadvertent editorial error in an upcoming rulemaking.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Shane C. Kelley
Director
Standards and Rulemaking Division
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Andrews
21-0105
From:
Co:
To:
Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
Subject:
Hazmat Interps
Date:
FW: Urgent Request for Letter of Interpretation on UN2014 PSN Correction
Importance:
High
Tuesday, November 16, 2021 5:04:00 PM
Hello Alice,
Please see the below request for interpretation.
Let me know if you need anything.
Regards,
-Breanna
From: Miller, Robert <robert.miller@ evonik.com>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 2:00 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Urgent Request for Letter of Interpretation on UN2014 PSN Correction
Importance: High
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not click on links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Greetings,
time frame for correcting the PSN of UN2014? The phrase "(stabilized as necessary)" was mistakenly
May I please request a Letter of Interpretation that addresses my below issue and provides a
left as Roman type and not italicized as it should have been, therefore it is not part of the Proper
requiring written response from PHMSA indicating it is not a violation to omit that phrase.
Shipping Name and not required to be printed on the BoL. This is causing unnecessary shipment delays
Thanks,
Rob
Please rate our service today!
Have feedback you'd like to share?
Robert Miller
P +1 610 573-5129 | C +1 973 202-3038 | robert.miller@evonik.com
Manager - Compliance and Audit Reporting | ESHQ Services | North America
Evonik Corporation
Evonik in North America
7201 Hamilton Blvd | Allentown, Pennsylvania 18195 | USA
LinkedIn | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook

<<<PAGE 4>>>

This message and any attachments are the property of Evonik Industries AG and its subsidiaries, are confidential, and may be
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you receive this e-
mail in error, please telephone or e-mail the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your system. If you are not
the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of this information.
From: Miller, Robert
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 11:28 AM
To: infocntr@dot.gov
Subject: Urgent UN2014 PSN Correction
Importance: High
Greetings,
This is in regards to an issue I discussed with your info center a week ago. May I ask for an
update as to when the PSN for UN2014 will be corrected or a statement that the phrase “(stabilized as
necessary)” was mistakenly left as Roman type and not italicized as it should have been. I understand
that in a few weeks PHMSA will correct this in the eCFR, which means, that phrase is not part of the
Proper Shipping Name and not required to be printed on the BoL, but I need a timeline.
In order to get our shipments out, carriers and freight forwarders are holding up our shipments
due to this oversight and misunderstanding. Therefore, I need a statement from PHMSA as to when this
will occur so they know it is not part of the PSN and will process our shipments as being in compliance.
Please advise as this is an urgent matter.
Thanks you,
Rob
Have feedback you’d like to share?
Please rate our service today!
Robert Miller
Manager – Compliance and Audit Reporting | ESHQ Services | North America
P +1 610 573-5129 | C +1 973 202-3038 | robert.miller@evonik.com
Evonik Corporation
7201 Hamilton Blvd | Allentown, Pennsylvania 18195 | USA
Evonik in North America
LinkedIn | Twitter | Instagram | Facebook
This message and any attachments are the property of Evonik Industries AG and its subsidiaries, are confidential, and may be
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you receive this e-
mail in error, please telephone or e-mail the sender and delete this message and any attachments from your system. If you are not
the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing or using any of this information.
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6703
