# AllTranstek, L.L.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 22-0138
- **title:** AllTranstek, L.L.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2023-01-19
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 22-0138 response to AllTranstek, L.L.C. concerning 173.31.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-22-0138.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-22-0138.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-22-0138
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77196/220138.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
January 19, 2023
Mike Tait
Director
AllTranstek, L.L.C.
1101 W. 31st Street, Suite 200
Downers Grove, IL 60515
Reference No. 22-0138
Dear Mr. Tait:
This letter is in response to your December 14, 2022, email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the protection
against shifting or coupling of tank cars placed for loading or unloading by blocking and setting
of the hand brake(s). Specifically, you ask whether the use of the SCAMP® rail car indexer—
mechanized equipment placed along rails to move trains one or more cars at a time—may be
used instead of blocking at least one wheel on a tank car and setting the hand brake in
accordance with the requirements in § 173.31(g)(3).
The answer is no. The requirements of § 173.31(g)(3) specifically require a person to block at
least one wheel on the tank car against motion in both directions and the hand brake must
(emphasis added) be set. There is no prohibition in the HMR on using additional means to
prevent motion of the tank car—such as the use of the SCAMP® railcar indexer—but the use of
this device alone does not satisfy the requirements of § 173.31(g)(3).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Baker
22-0138
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Subject: Date: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA); Hazmat Interps
FW: Request for Interpretation, 49 CRF 173.31(g)(3)
Friday, December 16, 2022 1:36:01 PM
Hi Alice and team,
Please see the LOI request below. Thank you!
Best,
Madison (HMIC)
From: Mike Tait <tait@alltranstek.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 8:02 AM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Cc: Dave Ronzani <ronzani@alltranstek.com>
Subject: Request for Interpretation, 49 CRF 173.31(g)(3)
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Mr. Shane Kelley
Director, Standards and Rulemaking Division
U.S. DOT/PHMSA (PHH-10)
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building, 2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20590
Mr. Kelley,
We have a client that would like to request an interpretation as to the suitability of using a “railcar
indexer” in leu of setting the handbrake and blocking at least one wheel per the requirements of 49
CFR 173.31(g)(3). Please note, the requirements of 49 CFR 173.31(g) (1) and (2) will be met.
“(g)(3) At least one wheel on the tank car must be blocked against movement in both
directions, and the hand brakes must be set. If multiple tank cars are coupled together,
sufficient hand brakes must be set, and wheels blocked to prevent movement in both
directions.”
Per the manufacturer: SCAMP® railcar indexer, pusher dogs capture axle and maintains positive
control in both forward & reverse directions.
As the equipment “maintains positive control in both directions” does this meet the intent of 49 CRF
173.31(g)(3)?

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Thank you for your time and consideration.
Mike Tait
AllTranstek L.L.C.
Director, NDT and Special Processes
1101 W. 31st Street, Suite 200
Downers grove, IL 60515
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 3485
