# Kansas Highway Patrol — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 23-0012
- **title:** Kansas Highway Patrol — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2023-09-29
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 23-0012 response to Kansas Highway Patrol concerning 172.101, 172.201.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-23-0012.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-23-0012.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-23-0012
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77961/230012.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
September 29, 2023
Technical Trooper Nick Wright, K-100
Kansas Highway Patrol
Troop I, Commercial Vehicle Enforcement
1220 S. Enterprise
Olathe, KS 66061
Reference No. 23-0012
Dear Mr. Wright:
This letter is in response to your February 15, 2023, email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to shipping papers
that describe hazardous materials and materials not subject to the requirements of the HMR. You
ask about a scenario in which a shipping paper describes both fully regulated hazardous materials
and a hazardous material that is not subject to regulation—including not subject to shipping
paper requirements—when transported by motor vehicle. Specifically, you provide a scenario of
a shipping paper for motor vehicle transportation that lists and describes the following materials
in this order: “UN1090, Acetone, 3, PG II”; “UN1845, Carbon dioxide, solid, 9”; and “UN1263,
Paint, 3, PG II” and includes an “HM” column to distinguish hazardous material from non-
hazardous material.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. You ask, as provided in § 172.201(a)(1) for preparation of shipping papers, whether the
“UN1845, Carbon dioxide, solid, 9” should be distinguished from the regulated
hazardous materials (e.g., by placing an “X” in the “HM” column for the other two
materials) given that it is only regulated as a hazardous material by air or vessel
transportation, and not for shipment by motor vehicle.
A1. PHMSA is unable to provide a definitive response in the absence of additional necessary
information about the way the material is transported. That said, in the § 172.101
Hazardous Materials Table, “UN1845, Carbon dioxide, solid or Dry ice” is assigned an
“A” and a “W” in Column 1 indicating the material is only regulated when transported by
aircraft or vessel. Moreover, in accordance with § 172.101(b)(2) and (6), a shipping
description entry preceded by a “A” or “W”, respectively, may be used to describe a

<<<PAGE 2>>>

material for other modes of transportation provided all applicable requirements for the
entry are met (emphasis added). Thus, for motor vehicle only transportation one may not
use the description “UN1845, Carbon dioxide, solid” unless meeting all requirements of
the HMR. Note that for multi-modal transportation, § 172.201(a)(1) would not apply to
shipping papers for the motor vehicle portion of transportation in association with aircraft
or vessel transportation.
Q2. You ask whether the answer would change if the shipping paper simply listed “dry ice”
instead.
A2. The answer is yes. For motor vehicle-only transportation, simply listing “dry ice”
between the descriptions of the hazardous materials would result in § 172.201(a)(1)
applying and necessitating either: the use of a contrasting color for any description on the
shipping paper pertaining to a material that is not subject to the requirements of the HMR
or adding an “X” in the “HM” column for the two hazardous materials in the example
you provide.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Casey
23-0012
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
Cc: Hazmat Interps
Subject: FW: Request for official letter of interpretation
Date: Friday, February 17, 2023 11:42:26 AM
Attachments: image002.png
Hi Alice,
Please see the below interpretation request.
Let me know if you need anything from us.
Regards,
-Breanna
From: Nicholas Wright [KHP] <Nicholas.Wright@KS.GOV>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 8:48 AM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Request for official letter of interpretation
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
Greetings,
I am seeking an official PHMSA interpretation on a scenario regarding shipping papers used for both
hazardous materials and non-hazardous materials.
49 CFR 172.201(a)(1) states:
(1) When a hazardous material and a material not subject to the requirements of this subchapter
are described on the same shipping paper, the hazardous material description entries required by
§ 172.202 and those additional entries that may be required by § 172.203:
(i) Must be entered first, or
(ii) Must be entered in a color that clearly contrasts with any description on the shipping paper
of a material not subject to the requirements of this subchapter, except that a description on a
reproduction of a shipping paper may be highlighted, rather than printed, in a contrasting color
(the provisions of this paragraph apply only to the basic description required by § 172.202(a)(1),
(2), (3), and (4)), or
(iii) Must be identified by the entry of an “X” placed before the basic shipping description
required by § 172.202 in a column captioned “HM.” (The “X” may be replaced by “RQ,” if
appropriate.)

<<<PAGE 4>>>

The question is when a shipping paper contains hazardous materials that ARE subject to the
requirements of the subchapter, and other hazardous materials that are NOT subject to the
subchapter due to an exception or exemption. For example, if a shipping paper contains fully
regulated hazardous materials and another material that is a haz-mat by definition, but excepted from
the shipping paper requirement such as “UN1843, Carbon dioxide, solid, 9” when transported by
highway.
In the example above, if the shipper (i.e, “person who offers”) opts to declare the carbon dioxide solid
on the shipping paper for ground transportation, and assuming it is not a hazardous substance,
hazardous waste, or marine pollutant, may the entry for the carbon dioxide solid appear between
other hazardous materials, and be considered “not subject to this subchapter,” thereby requiring the
other fully regulated hazardous materials on the shipping paper to be subject to the requirements of
172.201(a)(1)?
For example:
Using the example above, is the UN1263, Paint subject to the requirements in 172.201(a)(1)? In other
words, is the paint required to have an “X” in the HM column or appear in a contrasting color? If the
answer is no, since the carbon dioxide contains all proper hazardous materials shipping description
information, does the answer change if it was simply listed as “dry ice” in between the acetone and
paint?
Thank you for attention to this request.
Technical Trooper Nick Wright, K-100
Kansas Highway Patrol
MCSAP Training / Public Information
Troop I, Commercial Vehicle Enforcement
1220 S. Enterprise
Olathe, KS 66061
Office: (913) 782-8100
Nicholas.Wright@ks.gov
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6909
