{"operation":"document","citation":"23-0019","title":"AET Environmental, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation","source_type":"guidance","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"2023-05-16","effective_on":null,"summary":"23-0019 response to AET Environmental, Inc. concerning 173.50, 173.56, 173.58.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-23-0019.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-23-0019.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-23-0019","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77591/230019.pdf","body":"<<>>\n\nU.S. Department\nof Transportation\nPipeline and Hazardous\nMaterials Safety\nAdministration\nMay 16, 2023\n1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE\nWashington, DC 20590\nFrank Virginia\nAET Environmental, Inc.\n14 Lakeside Lane\nDenver, CO 80212\nReference No. 23-0019\nDear Mr. Virginia:\nThis letter is in response to your March 6, 2023, email requesting clarification of the Hazardous\nMaterials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to waste streams containing\ntrace amounts of explosive hazardous material. You state that your firm manages hazardous and\nnon-hazardous waste for waste generators, and you are currently working with a DoD installation\nin Colorado named Pueblo Chemical Depot (“the depot”). You state that the depot has\ncontamination of various constituents of concern1 throughout the facility where a specific area\nwas identified as being in contact with explosive nitro-aromatic compounds (e.g., TNT,\nDinitrotoluene, RDX, etc.). You state that these compounds have contaminated the groundwater\nand you state that analysis of the post treatment groundwater samples display traces of certain\nexplosive compounds at approximately 0.053 µg/l. You ask questions regarding the applicability\nof the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) explosive approval\nprocess for waste generated with trace amounts of these constituents of concern. We have\nparaphrased and answered your questions as follows:\nQ1. You ask whether any debris (e.g., personal protective equipment (PPE)) that may have\nbeen exposed to waste streams containing trace amounts of explosive compounds must\nhave an explosives examination report submitted to PHMSA for review under the\nexplosive approval process.\nA1. The answer is yes. Waste material that is exposed to and contaminated with explosive\ncompounds is considered a “new explosive.” A new explosive is an explosive produced\nby a person who has not previously produced that explosive or has previously produced\nthat explosive but has made a change in the formulation, design, or process to alter any of\nthe properties of the explosive (see § 173.56). The term “formulation”\n—as used in the\ndefinition of a new explosive—applies to the entire mixture and not just the explosive\ncomponents. Any changes must be examined to determine whether the properties have\nbeen altered and this may not be self-determined but must be determined in accordance\n1 Any substance defined as a hazardous substance, hazardous waste, hazardous material, toxic substance, solid\nwaste, pollutant, or contaminant by an Environmental Law (https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/constituent-of-\nconcern).\n\n<<>>\n\nwith § 173.56(b). If the explosive compounds are mixed with filters, rags, dirt, or other\nmaterial (e.g., diluted with contaminated water or other solvents), it is considered a “new\nexplosive” and must be approved in accordance with § 173.56(b).\nHowever, it is the shipper’s responsibility to determine whether a specific piece of waste\nmaterial generated from the site is contaminated with explosive residue. Please note, if\nfurther process to decontaminate or neutralize contaminated PPE before declaring it as\nwaste or if further sampling indicates there is no longer detectable explosive content, it\nwould be possible to determine the PPE is no longer an explosive hazardous material.\nQ2. You believe that the contaminated water would be considered non-hazardous waste based\non the trace amount of explosive compound identified in the groundwater and you ask\nwhether the HMR has allowances for a de minimis quantity exception for explosive\nmaterial. You also seek confirmation that assigning a non-regulated hazardous material\ndescription for the material is appropriate and would not warrant submission and review\nin accordance with the requirements found in § 173.56(b).\nA2. The answer is no. All compositions containing any amount of explosive material—\nincluding compositions of diluted (desensitized) explosives or explosives combined or\ncontaminated with other materials—meet the definition of a new explosive and must be\nclassified and approved by PHMSA. However, this process may result in a determination\nthat the material is not an explosive and thus not regulated.\nPlease note that in accordance with § 173.56(i), if experience or other data indicate that\nthe hazard of a material or a device containing an explosive composition is greater or less\nthan indicated according to the definitions and criteria specified in §§ 173.50, 173.56, and\n173.58, the Associate Administrator may specify a classification or except the material or\ndevice from the requirements of the HMR.\nI hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.\nSincerely,\nDirk Der Kinderen\nChief, Standards Development Branch\nStandards and Rulemaking Division\n\n<<>>\n\nBaker\n23-0019\nFrom: Raynor, T\"Mia (PHMSA)\nTo: Hazmat Interps\nSubject: FW: Interpretation of New Explosives (173.56)\nDate: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 10:18:04 AM\nAttachments: image001.png\nSWMU 17 PPE _ Debris (002).pdf\nimage003.png\nHello,\nPlease see below.\nThanks,\nT’Mia Raynor\nWebmaster, Office of the PHMSA CIO\nUS Department of Transportation\nPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration\n1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, D.C., 20590\nOffice: 202.366.9818 ◊ Mobile: 202.580.9447\nPHMSA Home | LinkedIn | Twitter | HAZMAT | OPS\nFrom: Virginia, Frank \nSent: Monday, March 6, 2023 5:36 PM\nTo: PHMSA Website Manager \nCc: Rosinski, Pamela A CIV USARMY USAMC (USA) ; Monical, Lee B\n\nSubject: Interpretation of New Explosives (173.56)\nCAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do\nnot click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content\nis safe.\nTo whom it may concern:\nMy firm manages hazardous and non-hazardous waste for a variety of Generators across a wide\nvariety of industry sectors and government agencies.\nIn this particular instance, I am working with a DOD instillation, Pueblo Chemical Depot, in Pueblo,\nCO. The site is slated for closure in the coming years but was very instrumental in our success during\nthe cold war and had broad mission. Fast forward to today (70 years later) and there is wide spread\ncontamination of various constituents of concern (COC) throughout the facility. The Army worked\nwith the State of Colorado (CDPHE) to identify and establish corrective action measures for various\nareas of concern throughout the site, which brings us to my question.\n\n<<>>\n\nSolid Waste Management Unit (SWMU 17) is an area that came in contact with explosive materials\nyears ago that eventually contaminated the ground water. Nitro-aromatic compounds (TNT, Dinitro-\ntoluene, etc), RDX, etc.) have been identified in the ground water. A Corrective Action measure,\napproved by the State, calls for the ground water to be extracted, treated and reinjected back to\nground, and to take quarterly samples from monitoring wells.\nMost recent analysis of the water shows traces of certain explosive compounds at 0.053 ug/l.\nExcerpts from the analysis and a more detailed discussion of the history of the site and the\ncorrective action measures are outlined in the attached file.\nThe generator is trying to profile non-hazardous PPE and debris from this process. The debris may or\nmay not have come in direct contact with ground water containing trace levels (0.53ug/l) of\nexplosive compounds.\nThe disposal firm (Clean Harbors) is asking for an EX number demonstrating that the generator has\nmade a submission of this “material” (non-hazardous waste), as a “newly manufactured” explosive\nfor review and concurrence by PHMSA. The generator maintains that this is not necessary, as this\nnot a new explosive and nothing is being manufactured. This is simple a non-hazardous waste, that\nhas been generated during implementation of corrective action measures, that may or may not have\ncome in contact with water, that may have de minimus traces of explosive compounds. The\ngenerator believes that assigning a non-regulated DOT description is appropriate and does not\nbelieve that it requires submission and review under 173.56(b).\nCould you please give us your interpretation in this matter\nI would appreciate a prompt response.\nKind Regards,\nFrank Virginia\nAET Environmental, Inc\n14 Lakeside Ln\nDenver, CO 80212\n(O) 303.333.8521\nThe information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation is\nintended only for the exclusive use of the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this e-\nmail and any attached documentation is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent of the\nintended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby\nnotified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attached\ndocumentation is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately\n\n<<>>\n\nnotify the sender by return e-mail and promptly delete the e-mail and any attached documentation.\nThis e-mail and any attached documentation may contain information that is privileged, confidential,\nproprietary or otherwise protected by law. This notice serves as a confidentiality marking for the\npurpose of any confidentiality or nondisclosure agreement. Receipt of this e-mail and the attached\ndocumentation by anyone other than the intended recipient shall not be deemed a waiver of any\nrights of confidentiality.\n\n<<>>\n\nxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\nC08213820725\nPUEBLO, CO 81006\n6. TECHNICAL CONTACT:\n7. TITLE:\n8. PHONE:\nAnn Mead\n719-549-4484\n1. NAME OF WASTE:\nB. WASTE INFORMATION\nFILTERS, PPE & DEBRIS SWMU 17\n2A: USEAPA WASTE CODE:\n2B. DEMIL CODE:\nB\nE\nF\nG\nP\n2C. STATE/LOCAL/HOST-NATION WASTE CODES:\n3. PROCESS GENERATING WASTE: Corrective action at a solid waste management unit under RCRA\n4. PROJECTED ANNUAL VOL: 100000\n5. MODE OF COLLECTION DRUM\n6. IS THIS WASTE A DIOXIN LISTED WASTE AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 261.317\n] YES XINO\n7. IS THIS WASTE RESTRICTED FROM LAND DISPOSAL?\n(40 CFR 268)\nYES\nNO\nHAS AN EXEMPTION BEEN GRANTED?\nYES\nNO\nDOES THE WASTE MEET APPLICABLE TREATMENT STANDARDS ALREADY?\nYES\n(If yes, Enter Reference Standards in Part II, Block 6)\nNO\nPART II\n1. MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION\n(Optional - Unless otherwise indicated)\nCOLOR: Varied\nDENSITY:\nBTU/LB:\nTOTAL SOLIDS: 99 %\nASH CONTENT: 0%\nLAYERING\nX MULTILAYERED BILAYERED\nSINGLE PHASE\n(Mandatory)\nPHYSICAL STATE\nSOLID\nLIQUID\nSEMI-SOLID\nGAS\nOTHER\n2. RCRA CHARACTERISTICS (Check all that apply)\n• IGNITABLE (D001)\n• CORROSIVE (D002)\nREACTIVE(D003)\nWATER REACTIVE\nCYANIDE REACTIVE\nSULFIDE REACTIVE\nPH:\nHIGH TOC (≥ 10%)\nLOW TOC (<10%)\nTREATMENT GROUP:\nWASTEWATER\nNON-WASTEWATER\nTOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC (D004-D043)\nCORRODES STEEL\nDLA FORM 2511, NOV\n(Formerty DRMS Form 1930)\nPage 1 of 3\nPDF (DLA)\n\n<<>>\n\nRANGE TOTAL MUST EQUAL AT LEAST 100%\n3. MATERIAL COMPOSITION/UNDERLYING HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS\nCOMPONENT\nCAS#\nBe as descriptive as possible. Chemical names or generic descriptions, e.g. 'sludge\"\nCONCENTRATION\npaint solids, water\", etc, ara acceptable\nRANGE\nRANGE TOTAL MUST EQUAL AT LEAST 100%\nDLA FORM 2511, NOV\n(Formerly DRMS Form 1930)\nPage 2 of 3\nPDF (OLA)\n\n<<>>\n\nMETHOD OF SHIPMENT\n• BULK\nDRUM\nOTHER\nDOT REPORTABLE QTY (RO)\n(REF: 49 CFR 72.101, Appendix A)\nEMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDE EDITION:\nEMERGENCY RESPONSE NO:\n5. SPECIAL HANDLING INFORMATION\n6. GENERATOR CERTIFICATION:\nCHEMICAL ANALYSIS\nSER KNOWLEDGE (Attach Supporting Documents\n(Attach Test Results)\nExplain how and why these documents comply wi\nRCRA requirements)\nCERTIFICATION:\n1, PAMELA ROSINSKI\nHEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THIS AND ALL\nATTACHED DOCUMENTS IS TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE\nWASTE TURNED IN TO THE DLA. ALL KNOWN OR SUSPECTED HAZARDS HAVE BEEN DISCLOSED.\nPamela Rounck\n03/03/2022\nSignature of Generator's Representative\nDate\nDLA FORM 2511, NOV\n(Formerly DRMS Form 1930)\nPage 3 of 3\nPDF (DLA)\n\n<<>>\n\n\n\n<<>>\n\nSubject: Disposition of Investigation-Derived Waste\nPueblo Chemical Depot, Pueblo Colorado\nContract #: W9128F-18-D-0029\nGenerating Process\nDuring the period of 14 July to 30 November 2021, TLI Solutions - Bay West Joint Venture (TLI-Bay\nWest JV) performed ground water sample collection activities at Solid Waste Management Unit\n(SWMU) 17. Environmental sampling equipment (inoperable submersible pump, bailer filters, and\nfilter cartridges) and related waste (decontamination paper towels, personal protective equipment\n[PPE], and sampling debris) was generated during groundwater sampling and operation and\nmaintenance (O&M) event. The waste was generated from Corrective Action activities conducted in\naccordance with the Pueblo Chemical Depot (PCD) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act\n(RCRA) Hazardous Waste Permit No. CO-13-12-23-01 (the Permit). As detailed herein, the wastes\nhave been characterized pursuant to 6 Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR) 1007-3, §262.11.\nSite Description and RCRA Status\nThe Trinitrotoluene (TNT) Washout Facility and Discharge System is located in the southwestern\nportion of PCD within the Western Wildlife Management Reuse Area. From the late 1940s to 1974,\nTNT from various munitions was reclaimed at the TNT Washout Facility. A pump and treat system for\ncontaminated groundwater at SWU 17, called the Southwest Terrace (SWT) Groundwater\nExtraction, Treatment, and Injection (GETI) System, was installed and operational since June 2001 to\nstop offsite migration of contaminated groundwater from the SWU 17 Southwest Terrace (SWT)\narea. The SWT area covers approximately five square miles extending from northwest of the TNT\nWashout Facility to the western and southern boundaries of PCD. This area includes a portion of\nChico Creek. The GETI system has three distinct and separate areas of groundwater extraction,\ntreatment, and reinjection: Ciruli Spring, South Point, and Southwest.\nExpected Waste Contaminants\nSWU 17 (TNT Washout Facility and Discharge System) is the source of explosives-related\nconstituents in soil and groundwater in the SWT area. Explosives such as hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-\n1,3,5-triazine (RDX), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT), 2,6-dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT), and\n1,3-dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) are detected above the Colorado Groundwater Quality Standards\n(CGWQSs) in the groundwater within the facility boundary.\nThe Permit identifies octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX), RDX,\n1,3,5-trinitrobenzene, 1,3-DNB, tetryl, nitrobenzene, 2,4,6-TNT, 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene, 2-amino-\n4,6-dinitrotoluene, 2,4-DNT, 2,6-DNT, 2-nitrotoluene, 3-nitrotoluene, 4-nitrotoluene, pentaerythritol\ntetranitrate (PETN), and nitrate as contaminants of concern (COCs) in groundwater. The selected\nPage 1\n\n<<>>\n\nAccumulation Area (SAA) drum addressed in this letter.\nPurged Groundwater Characterization\nTable 1 presents the waste drum ID along with the associated laboratory analytical file IDs of the\ngroundwater sampled during the period solid waste was accumulated in drum 21PCD0232.\nGroundwater samples associated with solid waste contained in this drum were analyzed for\nexplosives using USEPA Method SW8321B and nitrate by method USEPA SW9056A.\nThere were no listed waste compounds detected. However, toxicity characteristic (TC) waste\nconstituent 2,4-DNT, as well as a number of other site-related hazardous and non-hazardous\nconstituents, were detected in the purged groundwater collected during the period SAA drum\n21PC0232 accumulated PPE and O&M solid waste.\nNone of the detected TC waste constituents exceeded the USEPA Toxicity Characteristic Regulatory\nLimits (TCRLs) in the purged groundwater associated with the solid waste in the drum addressed in\nthis letter. Accordingly, \"D\" codes are not applicable to any of this waste.\nTC waste constituent 2,4-DNT, as well as RDX, were detected above the CGWQS. However these\nare not listed waste constituents, and therefore this waste is considered non-hazardous.\nOther site-related hazardous constituents detected in the purged groundwater associated with the\nsolid waste in the drum addressed in this letter were below the associated CGWQSs, and therefore\nhave no bearing on the waste classification.\nTable 1 also shows the proposed waste codes, proposed waste code justification, and the proposed\nwaste disposition. Table 2 provides a tabulation of the groundwater sample detections, and\ncompares the concentrations to the TCRLs and CGWQS.\nPPE and Sampling Debris Characterization and Disposition\nThe PPE and sampling debris generated during this groundwater sampling event was contained\nwithin SAA drum 21PCD0232 at the time of the sampling that was stored in the Ciruli Spring\ntreatment building CS 6A at SWU 17 in the GETI Area. PPE and sampling debris from sampling\nevents conducted between 14 July to 30 November 2021 has not been in contact with a listed waste\nas characterized above, and is therefore will be disposed as non-hazardous solid waste contents will\ntemporarily be stored in the Building 114 covered dumpster until it is transported off-site for disposal.\nThis drum had an original accumulation start date (ASD) of 14 July 2021, and was filled and replaced\nPage 2\n\n<<>>\n\nIf you require additional information regarding this waste, please contact me at (571) 992-5225.\nSincerely,\nPalchy\nPaul Chang\nTLI-Bay West JV Waste Coordinator\nI concur with the waste determination as described above.\nSignature\nDate\nPamela Rosinski\nPueblo Chemical Depot\nEnclosure\nCC:\nJamal Albaiz, PCD, 45825 Highway 96 East, Building 49, Pueblo, CO 81006-9330\nPCD Document Tracking/PCD Environmental Library, 45825 Highway 96 East, Building 49,\nPueblo, CO 81006-9330\nT. Allen, TLI Solutions, 45825 Highway 96 East, Building 114, Pueblo, CO 81006-9330\nPage 3\n\n<<>>\n\nShe-rela\nSite-rela\nSite-reia\nWant\nDue Unrestricted Une\nNo\ncome into tontact with\ngroundwater with\nwhatle dealter\n(see lab reports associated with\ngroundwater analysb).\nDetections are listed below\n2. 4-Dinitrotoluene\n1,3.5-Trinitrobenzene\n2-Amino-4,5-Dinitrotoluene\n4-Amiso-2,6-Dinitrototuene\n2.4,6-Trinitrotoluene\nNitrate (as N)\n[from Documented Sold waste not tested but has\nIco to a Subtitle C or O facility, as appropriate.\nTable 1: Investigation Dertred Waste Proposed Dispositie\nAnnust Sempling- Boundary Compliance Wolls\nPuablo Chernical Depot\nCharacteristic\nOther Constituents\nTas Are Flat/Peratit\n1144361, 1144648.\n1144962\nPPE, baller filters.\nsubmersible pump.\nContainer\nShe/Type\n55 GL DF\n2/27/2022\nASD\n11/30/2021\nsouthwest, Cirull Spring, and\nthe South Point Boundary\nComplance Well\nColorado Department of Public Heath and Environmen\nInterim Corebe Atten Groundate Remedition Sten\nColorado Groundwater Quelty Standard\nAccumulation Start Date\nConstituent of Concern\nDrum - Are endored Plente\nMote theme Depen\nsensonal protective equipment\nlesource Conservation and Recovery Act\nTreatmem, Storage, and Disposal Facity\nSoild Waste Management Unit\nMexalondro-23,5-Trintero-1,3, 5-Telazine\nOctatedro- 1.3.5,7 Tetranitro- 1,2,5.7-Tetrazocine\nSWMU 17 SAA Drum Weste Despostion\ndentification\nTotkity Characteristk\nTrichloroethylene\nrolable organk compound\n1P(00732\n(PHE\ncoWas\nICAGRS\n\n<<>>\n\nISLA\nVIVI\nNitrate as N\n0,80 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE01B\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-3\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D\nMethod\nPrep Type\nRDX\n0.024 JM\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.75 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE01BFD\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-4\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL UnIt\nDil Fac D\nMethod\nPrep Type\nRDX\n0.023\n0.095\n0.020 ug/l.\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.75\nM\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE01C\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-5\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac\nD\nMethod\nPrep Type\nRDX\n0.024 J M\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.56\nM\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\n-lient Sample ID: SPE02\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-6\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac\nMethod\nPrep Type\nRDX\n0.045 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.64 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE02A\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-7\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac\nD\nMethod\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.058\nJ\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.049 J M\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.056 J M\n0.095\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.20\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.82 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE02B\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-8\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.029 J\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.026 JM\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.027 J M\n0.095\n0.018 ug/L\n----\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.15\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.79 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE03\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-9\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unis\nDIl Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.024 JM\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 6 of 558\n\n<<>>\n\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac\nD\nMethod\nPrep Type\n2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene\n0.039 J M\n0.096\n0.021 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.021 J M\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.022 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nHMX\n0.018 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.31\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.82 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE05\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-11\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac\nD\nMethod\nPrep Type\nRDX\n0.022 JM\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.84 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE06\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-12\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDIl Fac\nD\nMethod\nPrep Type\nRDX\n0.12\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.75 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE06FD\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-13\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D\nMethod\nPrep Type\nRDX\n0.069 J\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.75 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE07\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-14\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2.4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.049 J M\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L.\n8321B\nTola/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.041 J M\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.045 M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nHMX\n0.019 J\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.64\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n1.2 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SPE08\nLab Sample ID: 280-144361-15\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\nNitrate as N\n1.3 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 7 of 558\n\n<<>>\n\nClient Sample ID: CSE11\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-2\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n1,3,5- Trinitrobenzene\n0.92\n0.096\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.080 M\n0.077\n0.018\nug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.023 J M\n0.096\n0.020\nug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.048 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTota/NA\nRDX\n0.057 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0,44 J\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE11FD\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-3\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nOL Unit\nDil Fac D\nMethod\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.085 M\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.037 JM\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.064 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.059 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene - DL\n1.3 D\n0.19\n0.033 ug/L\n2\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.44 JM\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE12\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-4\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D\nMethod\n1\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.066 J\n0.096\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.034\nJM\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.65 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE13\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-5\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac\nD\nMethod\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.13\n0.096\n0.016 ug/L\nRDX\n0.065 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.61 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE14\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-6\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLoQ\nDL Unit\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.13\n0.095\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.038 J\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0,48 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE15\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-7\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\n8321B\nPrep Type\n1,3,5- Trinitrobenzene\n0.58\n0.095\n0.016 ug/L\nTotal/NA\n2.4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.053 J\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n--\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.023 JM\n0.095\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 7 of 786\n\n<<>>\n\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.072 J\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.047 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTota/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.44 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE17\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-9\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac\nD\n| Method\nPrep Type\n2.4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.11\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.028 JM\n0.095\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321฿\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.088 J\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene - DL\n2.0\nD\n0.19\n0.032 ug/L\n2\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.42 JM\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE18\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-10\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.11\n0.078\n0.019 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.023\nJ M J1\n0.098\n0.021 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.037 JM J1\n0.09B\n0.019 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.13\n0.098\n0.021 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene - DL\n2.6 D\n0.39\n0.067 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.48 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE19\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-11\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.065 J\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.027 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.070 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene - DL\n2.8 D\n0.19\n0.033 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.50 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE20\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-12\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOa\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.34\n0.096\n0.016 ug/L\n- 8321B\nTotal/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.037 J\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.020 JM\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTota/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.028 JM\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTota/NA\nRDX\n0.058 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.70 M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE22\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-13\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.24\n0.077\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.062 J M\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 8 of 786\n\n<<>>\n\nulent sample lo. cockerb\nLab sample IN. c00-144040-14\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDIl Fac D\nMethod\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.21\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.053 JM\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.071 JM\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nHMX\n0.031 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.33\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene - DL\n1.6 D\n0.19\n0.033 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.49 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE23\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-15\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\n-DL Unit\nDil Fac D\nMethod\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.30\n0.096\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n00054 J\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.022 J M\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2.6-dinitrotoluene\n0.029 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.074 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.31 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE24\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-16\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D\nMethod\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.40\n0.096\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTota/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.091 M\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.039 J M\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.049 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nHMX\n0.018 J M\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.16\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.40 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE30\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-17\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDIl Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n1,3.5-Trinitrobenzene\n1.0\n0.095\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.076\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTota/NA\n2-Amino-4.6-dinitrotoluene\n0.026 JM\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.059 J M\n0.095\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.065 J\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.46 JM\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE31\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-18\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDIl Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n1.3,5- Trinitrobenzene\n1.2\n0.095\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0,088\n0.076\n0,018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 9 of 786\n\n<<>>\n\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.054\nJ\n0.095\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.43 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE45\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-20\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDIl Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.57\n0.096\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.023 J\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.027 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.49 J M\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTota/NA\nClient Sample ID: CSE46\nLab Sample ID: 280-144648-21\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene\n0.048\nJ\n0.094\n0.016 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.025 J\n0.094\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n0.47 J\n0,50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 10 of 786\n\n<<>>\n\nClient Sample ID: SWE02\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-4\nNo Detections.\nClient Sample ID: SWE03\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-5\nNo Detections.\nClient Sample ID: SWE04\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-6\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL UnIt\nDil Fac\nD\nMethod\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.030\nJ\n0.076\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.020\nJM\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.038\nJM\n0.095\n0.018\nug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.11\n0,095\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SWE05\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-7\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.027\nJ\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.020\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.054\nJ\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.18\n0.096\n0,020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SWE06\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-8\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLoa\nDL Unit\nDIl Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.17\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.060 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.11\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.65\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SWE30\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-9\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLoQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2, 4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.13\n0.077\n0.018wg/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4, 6-dinitrotoluene\n0.032 J\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2, 6-dinitrotoluene\n0.11\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n0.89\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n5.8\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SWE31\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-10\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nNitrate as N\n4.9\n0.50\nPrep Type\n0.090 mg/L\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 6 of 537\n\n<<>>\n\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.070 J\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX\n1.2\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n3.3\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTota/NA\nClient Sample ID: SWE33\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-13\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifler\nLOQ\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.46\n0.095\n0.020 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n- 0.73\n0.095\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nHMX\n0.080 J\n0.095\n0.018 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene - DL\n1.5 D\n0.38\n0.091 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX - DL\n2.5 J1D\n0.48\n0.10 ug/L\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n5.7\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nClient Sample ID: SWE34\nLab Sample ID: 280-144962-14\nAnalyte\nResult Qualifier\nLOO\nDL Unit\nDil Fac D Method\nPrep Type\n2,4-Dinitrotoluene\n0.66\n0.077\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\n2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.20\n0.096\n0.020 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTota/NA\n4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene\n0.41\n0.096\n0.018 ug/L\n1\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nRDX - DL\n3.3 D\n1.9\n0.40 ug/L\n20\n8321B\nTotal/NA\nNitrate as N\n4.0\n0.50\n0.090 mg/L\n1\n9056A\nTotal/NA\nThis Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.\nEurofins TestAmerica, Denver\nPage 7 of 537\n\n<<>>\n\nOrganization:\nBuilding:\nHazardous Waste Manger and Alternate Manager\nSWMU17-(GETI) TNT WO\nAnn Mead\nDATE\nAMOUNT\nTYPE OF WASTE\nNAME (Print Clearly)\n7-14-21\n12 Co. FT.\nPAPER TUWEIS\nTONY AlIEN\n7-20-21\n• 25 cufT\nTONY AllE\n1/2621\n1.25 cuff\nsloves, fiters, filter wrappers\nVeil Nelsor\n/ Bag PIE\n7-29•21\nAs Bell tals sut sampling\nBill/LEMP\n8-23.21\n11\" land\nDead submersible\nNeil Nelson\n10-20-21\n1.29 cuft\ny'aues. Filtrs,\nTony AllEN\n11-17•21\n\" \" each\nsubmersible pumps, gloves\nNeil Nelson\nTURN-IN VERIFICATION\nGENERATOR CERTIFICATION\n1.\n, hereby certify that all the information submitted in this document is to the best of my knowledge an\naccurate representation of the waste turned in or burned. All known or suspected hazards have been disclosed. If a waste profile exists\non this waste, I certify that no changes have occurred in the process that generated this waste.\nSIGNATURE\nDate:\nDISPOSAL METHOD: (Circle One: BLEND FOR ENERGY RECOVERY, RECYCLED, SENT TO HWC)\nThis section to be filled in by Hazardous Waste Center Personnel\nProfile Number:\nDocument Number:\nTum-in date\n\n<<>>","truncated":false,"body_characters":34968}