# Matson Navigation Co. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 25-0096
- **title:** Matson Navigation Co. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2025-09-24
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 25-0096 response to Matson Navigation Co. concerning 173.185, 176.905.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-25-0096.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-25-0096.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-25-0096
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2025-09/250096.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
September 24, 2025
James Owen
Manager Dangerous Goods
Matson Navigation Co.
3426 E Libby St.
Phoenix AZ 85032
Reference No. 25-0096
Dear Mr. Owen:
This letter is in response to your July 15, 2025 email requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to lithium battery-powered
vehicles. It is your understanding that according to PHMSA’s lithium battery guide1
, vehicles
shipped as “UN3171, Battery-powered vehicle or Battery-powered equipment, 9” are excepted
from all HMR requirements under § 176.905 with certain conditions. Moreover, you believe that
when the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code introduced “UN3556, Vehicle,
lithium ion battery powered, 9” it created a conflict with the aforementioned exception and the
stricter requirements for shipment of lithium batteries under § 173.185(c)(1) in the HMR. These
stricter requirements only allow shipment under exceptions for lithium ion batteries up to 100
Watt-hours (Wh). You question how vehicles powered by large batteries, such as a particular
vehicle with a 123,000 Wh battery, can be excepted from specific requirements while a
standalone battery slightly over 100 Wh cannot. Therefore, you seek clarification regarding the
differing treatment of lithium ion batteries as a standalone versus vehicle-installed applications
under the HMR and IMDG Code regulations.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. How is it possible that a lithium ion battery with a capacity greater than 100 Wh is more
regulated than a much larger battery, as in the example given in the letter, which is a
component part of a vehicle?
A1. The HMR allows exceptions for certain materials, such as vehicles, based on comparative
hazards in transportation. Motor vehicles are subject to vehicle safety standards (e.g., the
1 Lithium Battery Guide for Shippers, Revised October 2024,
https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2024-11/Lithium-Battery-Guide-2024.pdf

<<<PAGE 2>>>

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards). Additionally, the body of a vehicle itself offers protection against damage
during normal transportation conditions. Thus, based on certain additional conditions,
such as a lithium ion battery that is a component of a motor vehicle being subject to UN
38.3 testing, a vehicle is afforded exceptions from further regulation.
Q2. Given the IMDG Code adoption of the “UN3556” description for a lithium ion battery-
powered vehicle, can vehicles consigned under “UN3556” qualify for the exception
outlined in Part 3, Chapter 3.3, Special Provision 961.5?
A2. No. Special Provision 961.5 applies to a wet or dry electric storage battery or a sodium
battery. A lithium ion battery is neither a wet nor a dry electric storage battery. A lithium
ion battery has a distinct battery chemistry due to its chemical composition and
associated risks. However, a lithium ion battery-powered vehicle may still be excepted
from further regulation in accordance with IMDG Code provision found in 961.1.
Q3. Given that the IMDG Code Special Provision 961 and § 176.905(i) of the HMR have the
same language but now that there are differing hazardous material descriptions for
lithium ion battery-powered vehicles, how is the exception applied under the HMR?
A3. Domestically, the hazardous material identification number “UN3556” has not yet been
formally adopted into the HMR. In general, electric vehicles (i.e., battery-powered
vehicles) may be shipped under the existing description as “UN3171,” which covers a
battery-powered vehicle powered by lithium ion batteries. Furthermore, the HMR allows
for the use of international standards, such as the IMDG Code, for domestic
transportation under certain conditions outlined in 49 CFR Part 171, Subpart C, and in
combination with an enforcement policy notice issued by PHMSA which authorizes use
of the current edition of the IMDG Code (Amendment 42-24) that includes the
“UN3556” identification number.2 However, it should be noted that there is no difference
in the application of exceptions between the use of “UN3171” and “UN3556” for electric
vehicles powered by lithium ion batteries. The new identification number merely
provides a more distinct hazardous material description.
Q4. Does PHMSA consider a lithium ion battery to be a dry electric storage battery, and if
not, how does a lithium ion battery meet the exception within § 176.905(i)?
2 Notice of Enforcement Policy Regarding International Standards 2024, https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulatory-
compliance/phmsa-guidance/notice-enforcement-policy-regarding-international-standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

A4. No. As stated in answer A2, a lithium ion battery is not considered a dry electric storage
battery for purposes of the HMR or the IMDG Code. Furthermore, a lithium ion battery-
powered vehicle may still be eligible for exception from regulation in accordance with
Special Provision 961.1 or its counterpart in § 176.905(i)(1).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk DerKinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Baker, Y.
25-0096
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Baker, Yul (PHMSA)
Cc: Hazmat Interps
Subject: FW: Lithium Battery Interpretation Request
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 10:44:13
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
image007.png
Good morning,
Mr. Owen submitted a second request for a letter of interpretation.
Please let me know if anything else is needed.
Best,
Aminah
From: James Owen <JOwen@matson.com>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 5:06 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Lithium Battery Interpretation Request
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do not
click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To whom it may concern,
I am requesting an interpretation of 176.905(1)(5) in relation to lithium battery powered vehicles. The
Lithium Battery Guide published on the PHMSA website states under section 09 that vehicles
shipping under UN3171 are exempt from all requirements of the HMR if the requirements of 176.905
are met.
For lithium-ion battery powered vehicles this is in direct contrast to the exemption for lithium
batteries. The exemption under 173.185(c)(i) only allows for lithium-ion batteries up to 100wh’s. How
is it possible that a lithium-ion battery at 101wh’s is not exempt but a Tesla Cybertruck which has a
watt hour rating of 123,000 watt hours can be exempted from all requirements?
Furthermore, IMDG Code 42-24 created UN3556 and defined it separately from UN3171. The
exemption noted above for vehicles does not by definition appear to include lithium batteries.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

IMDG Code SP 388
IMDG Code SP 961.5
Is it your department’s position that vehicles consigned under the new UN3556 entry would quality
for the exemption? Both IMDG and 49CFR have the same verbiage in the exemption but now they
have different definitions for a vehicle powered by a lithium-ion battery.
Does DOT/PHMSA classify a lithium-ion battery as a dry electric storage battery? If not, how does a
lithium-battery meet this exemption?
A LOI can be mailed to:
James Owen
Matson Navigation Co.
3426 E Libby St
Phoenix AZ 85032
NOTE: Approval of Shipping Papers is always subject to the Port/Vessel’s ability to accommodate the
dangerous goods with other commodities, stowage restrictions and permit requirements.
For assistance from the DG Team after 8PM PST please call a member of the team directly.
James Owen| Manager Dangerous Goods | SQES l MBA
jowen@matson.com | Tel: 480-653-1114
Matson.com
NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is intended for the use of the party to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you
are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately by
reply e-mail, and delete the original and any copies of this message. It is the sole responsibility of the

<<<PAGE 6>>>

recipient to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free.
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 8583
