# Linde Gas and Equipment — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 25-0136
- **title:** Linde Gas and Equipment — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2026-02-24
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 25-0136 response to Linde Gas and Equipment concerning 180.417.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-25-0136.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-25-0136.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-25-0136
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-02/25-0136.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
February 24, 2026
Mark Hammond
Linde Gas and Equipment
3625 S. Main Street
South Bend, IN 46614
Reference No. 25-0136
Dear Mr. Hammond:
This letter is in response to your October 8, 2025 email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to leakage
testing on cargo tanks. You perform annual visual and leakage inspections on cargo tanks
containing liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in which you apply a leak-detecting fluid to find
bubbles at fittings, valves, and welds. You ask about a test and inspection form that your
company uses to record requalification activity. The form includes a section to record
performance of a leakage test and two boxes to indicate a “hydrostatic” or “pneumatic” test.
The report contains an additional section to indicate performance of a leakage test which
includes fields to indicate the fluid used and pressure during a leakage test. Specifically, you
ask whether you should leave both the hydrostatic or pneumatic boxes blank and instead fill
out the second leakage test portion of the form with LPG listed as the test medium (i.e., the
fluid used).
The HMR neither requires use of a particular form nor specifies a format. Therefore, this
Office cannot provide specific instructions regarding how to fill out the proprietary form you
provided and described in your letter. You need only record and maintain a report of tests or
inspections in accordance with § 180.417(b).
However, it is the opinion of this Office that not selecting either “hydrostatic” or
“pneumatic” when recording a leakage test is appropriate. Pneumatic and hydrostatic tests are
“pressure tests” as specified in 49 CFR 180.407(g). The inspection method you described
conforms to the “leakage test” outlined in 49 CFR § 180.407(h), therefore you should only
record the completion of a leakage test. Furthermore, this Office suggests that the second
portion of the form should also remain blank unless you are providing information related to
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 27 Vapor Tightness Test (K-
EPA27).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Casey, C.
25-0136
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Baker, Yul (PHMSA)
Cc: Hazmat Interps
Subject: FW: Letter Of Interpretation Request
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 16:43:07
Attachments: JJ Keller Inspection Report.pdf
Good afternoon,
Please see the following request for a letter of interpretation. Please let us know if you need
anything.
Best,
Aminah
From: Mark A Hammond <Mark.A.Hammond@linde.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 5:58 AM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Letter Of Interpretation Request
You don't often get email from mark.a.hammond@linde.com. Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Good morning. I have a concern regarding the use of the JJ Keller Tanker Test and Inspection
Report (Please see attachment and highlighted areas). I conduct annual Visual and Leak tests
only. In the area of the form “Type of Tests – Leakage Test (K)” the form gives a choice of
Hydrostatic (water) and Pneumatic (air). While conducting an inspection on a Propane bobtail
neither one of these seems appropriate for a flammable gas. Would the best approach be to
leave the 2 choices, hydrostatic or pneumatic, blank and mark fluid used (which I always do) in
the “Leakage Test” box (also highlighted under the K-EPA27 and Upper Coupler Assembly
boxes)?
I have attached email communication with Jessica Stiles DOT Hazardous Materials Program
Manager on this same question from 9-9-25.
Thank you.
Mark Hammond
Linde Gas and Equipment
574-210-5992
3625 S Main Street South Bend, Indiana 46614

<<<PAGE 4>>>

From: Stiles, Jessica (FMCSA) <jessica.stiles@dot.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 9:35 AM
To: Mark A Hammond <Mark.A.Hammond@linde.com>
Cc: Rios, David (FMCSA) <david.rios@dot.gov>
Subject: RE: JJ Keller Tank Inspection Form
CYBERSECURITY ALERT: This is an email from an external organization. Use caution, especially with
links and attachments. More
Hi again Mark. After consultation with PHMSA, we all agree that for a leakage test/inspection
report there is no need to list whether it was pneumatic or hydrostatic, since those two terms
are not used in 49 CFR 180.407(h).
However, those two terms are used in the pressure testing section of the regulation (49 CFR
180.407(g)) so you’ll need to be sure to include hydrostatic or pneumatic when a pressure test
report is completed.
Section 49 CFR 180.417(b)(2)(iii) also requires that the leakage test report include:
identification of the fluid used for the test, test pressure, and holding time of test. So while you
don’t need to list pneumatic or hydrostatic, you do still have to include these three items along
with all the other information required by 180.417(b). You are correct that for the “fluid used”
you can list LPG as the medium if that’s what was used for the test.
Thank you,
Jessica Stiles
Hazardous Materials Program Manager
Midwestern Service Center
360-846-3869
From: Mark A Hammond <Mark.A.Hammond@linde.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 4:30 AM
To: Stiles, Jessica (FMCSA) <jessica.stiles@dot.gov>
Cc: Rios, David (FMCSA) <david.rios@dot.gov>
Subject: RE: JJ Keller Tank Inspection Form
You don't often get email from mark.a.hammond@linde.com. Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Thank you, Jessica.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

From: Stiles, Jessica (FMCSA) <jessica.stiles@dot.gov>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2025 11:12 AM
To: Mark A Hammond <Mark.A.Hammond@linde.com>
Cc: Rios, David (FMCSA) <david.rios@dot.gov>
Subject: RE: JJ Keller Tank Inspection Form
CYBERSECURITY ALERT: This is an email from an external organization. Use caution, especially with
links and attachments. More
Good morning Mark.
My apologies – I’m not ignoring this email, but your question made me reevaluate how I’ve read this
regulation for years. I’ve reached out to PHMSA to get their take on it and will let you know once I
hear back.
Thank you,
Jessica Stiles
Hazardous Materials Program Manager
Midwestern Service Center
360-846-3869
From: Mark A Hammond <Mark.A.Hammond@linde.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 6:15 AM
To: Stiles, Jessica (FMCSA) <jessica.stiles@dot.gov>; Rios, David (FMCSA) <david.rios@dot.gov>
Subject: JJ Keller Tank Inspection Form
Some people who received this message don't often get email from mark.a.hammond@linde.com. Learn why this
is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Good morning. I have a question regarding the Leakage Test (Under heading “Type of Tests”)
on the form. There is Hydrostatic (water test?) and Pneumatic (air or inert gas?). When
conducting an inspection on a propane bobtail neither description seems to be correct.
Should I leave the 2 choices (Hydrostatic or Pneumatic) blank and fill out the other Leakage
Test area circled about half way down the form on the right side with Liquid Propane noted as
the test medium?
Thank you.
The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is
provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail,

<<<PAGE 6>>>

its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorized and prohibited. If
you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-
mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that
might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked
by anti-virus software.
The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is
provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail,
its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorized and prohibited. If
you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-
mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that
might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked
by anti-virus software.
The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is
provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail,
its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorized and prohibited. If
you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-
mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that
might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked
by anti-virus software.

<<<PAGE 7>>>

_ AVERAGE
PRESSURE TEST
REPORT NUMBER
REPAIR DATE
8898 (Rev. 1/17)
TELEPHONE
END
ASME CODE SYMBOL
DATE
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WORKING PRESSURE
MEASUrE
MANUFACTURER'S TANK SERIAL NO.
K-EPA27
Gasoline Delivery Tank Pressure Test -
EPA Reference Method 27
START
VESSEL MATERIAL SPEC. NO.
UPPER COUPLER ASSEMBLY
WATER CAPACITY IN LBS.
• REMOVED FOR EXAMINATION
LEAKAGE TEST
ASME OR NATIONAL BOARD NO. OF REPAIR FACILITY
END
• EXAMINED IN PLACE
MARKINGS APPLIED: • YES • NO
• delivery hose/piping • appurtenances
• NO
PSIG
START |
STRESS RELIEVED AFTER FABRICATION
FLUID CAPACITY (GALS.)
TANK
• INSULATED
FLUID USED
PRESSURE
HOLDING TIME
PRES
RES
VENT
DESIGN CERTIFYING ENGINEER REGISTRATION NO.
• YES
• DEFECTS OR DAMAGE DISCOVERED
TANK IDENTIFICATION NO. INSPECTION TEST DATE
• MATERIAL CORROSIVE TO TANK
• DEDICATED SERVICE
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ADDRESS
SPECIAL SERVICE
• OTHER
MIN. TESTED
LINED
TYPE
(• Full • Local) • NO
CARRIER (if other than owner)
CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
CARRIER'S EQUIPMENT NO.
STRESS RELIEVED AFTER REPAIR
TANK MANUFACTURER
DOT SPECIFICATION NO.
ORIGINAL TEST DATE
DESIGN TEMPERATURE
• YES
REPAIRED BY
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE, ZIP
MFG,
ITEMS INSPECTED OR TESTED
DATE
ORIGINAL
Pressure - set to discharge
SHELL BOTTOM
IS REPAIR CERTIFICATION REQUIRED? • YES • NO
TELEPHONE
• PRESSURE RETEST (P)
Pressure - when open
Pressure - when reseated
THICKNESS (INCHES)
CARGO TANK: • MEETS • FAILS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOT SPECIFICATIONS IDENTIFIED ON THIS REPORT
• WITHDRAWN FROM SERVICE • RETURNED TO SERVICE
MFG. DATE
DESIGN TEMPERATURE
• HYDROSTATIC
• PNEUMATIC
PRESSURE
Device Number
Tested
Removed
Inspected
Replaced
Reinstalled
HEAD
SHELL TOP
SHELL SIDE
RELIEF
DEVICES
Repaired
TEST DATE
DOT REGISTRATION NUMBER
CARGO TANK MOTOR VEHICLE CERT. DATE
MAX. DESIGN DENSITY OF LADING
• NO DEFECT OR DAMAGE DISCOVERED
(LBS. PER GAL.)
• PNEUMATIC
ITEM
• suspension system
connecting structures
Pressure Bearing Portions
attachments
Lining Material
of Heating System
Flues for Heating System
Corroded or Abraded Areas
(• CERTIFIED AS 0.2% WATER BY WEIGHT)
MATERIAL
HEAD
Frangible (Rupture) Disk
Major Appurtenances
upper coupler assembly
TYPE OF TEST(S)
• ANHYDROUS AMMONIA
• LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
TANKER TEST AND INSPECTION REPORT
LINING MATERIALS
• DELIVERY HOSE/PIPING
Distortions
DESIGN PRESSURE
Dents
Welds
• LEAKAGE TEST (K)
• HYDROSTATIC
For compliance with 49 CFR 180.407(h)(4), 180.417(b) & (c), and 40 CFR 60.505(b)
(PSIG)
• K-EPA27
YES NO
DATE OF ORIG. HOSE
DELIVERY HOSE/PIPING
ASSEMBLY TEST.
LOCATION OF DEFECTS OR DAMAGE: • weld • heat-affected zone
DOT REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE TESTING FACILITY/PERSON
Neenah, WI • JJKeller.com • (800) 327-6868 • Printed in the USA
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ADDRESS
CARGO TANK MOTOR VEHICLE MFG.
EXPOSED SURFACE AREA IN SQ. FT.
ITEM
Head-to-Shell Seam
Tank Shell
Tank Heads
Manhole Covers
Manhole Gaskets
Devices for Tightening
Gaskets on Full Opening
Self-closing Stop-valves
Excess Flow Valves
Remote Closure Devices
CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
OWNER'S TANK SERIAL NO.
MAX. WEIGHT OF LADING
] EXTERNAL VISUAL (V)
• INTERNAL VISUAL (1)|
O LINING INSPECTION (L)
Reclosing Pressure
CONDITION OF HOSE ASSEMBLY
DISPOSITION OF CARGO TANK:
SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR / TESTER
Copyright 2017 J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
• THICKNESS TEST (T)
Valves
Gaskets
Manhole
Rear Head
Relief Valves
Nuts and Bolts
& PIPING SYSTEM
NATURE AND SEVERITY:
METHOD OF REPAIRS:
TESTED BY (Person's Name)
OWNER
HEATING
SYSTEM
THIS UNIT
HAS HAULED
SHELL
HOSE
I.D. NO. _
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE, ZIP
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 13265
