# Mobile Power Solutions — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 26-0015
- **title:** Mobile Power Solutions — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2026-05-22
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 26-0015 response to Mobile Power Solutions concerning 173.185.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-26-0015.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-26-0015.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-26-0015
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-05/26-0015.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
May 22, 2026
Rory Pynenburg, PhD
Mobile Power Solutions
9665 SW Allen Blvd
Suite 110
Beaverton, OR 97005
Reference No. 26-0015
Dear Dr. Pynenburg:
This letter is in response to your January 26, 2026 email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to testing
requirements for lithium-ion cells and batteries, in accordance with Section 38.3 of the United
Nations (UN) Manual of Tests and Criteria. Specifically, you request clarification of the UN
Manual of Tests and Criteria, Subsection 38.3.4.8, Test T.8: Forced discharge, as it relates to the
definition of “disassembly” and “fire” during testing. You describe a scenario in which, during
the rest period following T.8 testing, a pouch cell’s envelope burst at a corner, exposing a small,
singed protrusion of internal components. You note that no visible flame was observed, and the
mesh screen barrier placed 25 cm away was not penetrated. You ask whether this specific result
constitutes a test failure.
In accordance with Subsection 38.3.4.8.3, cells meet the T.8 testing requirement if there is no
disassembly and no fire during the test and within seven days after the test. Subsection 38.3.2.3
states “disassembly” means a rupture of the cell or battery case where solid components are
ejected. However, there is a note to the definition of “disassembly,
” which states that during cell
or component cell testing, ejection of internal components is acceptable provided the energy of
the ejected components does not penetrate a wire mesh screen (annealed aluminum wire with a
0.25 mm diameter and grid density of 6 to 7 wires per cm) placed 25 cm from the cell. Based on
your observation that the mesh screen remained intact, and the components were merely exposed
or protruding rather than forcefully ejected beyond the screen, it is the opinion of this Office that
the event described does not meet the criteria for “disassembly.” In addition, Subsection 38.3.2.3
states “fire” means that flames are emitted from the test cell or battery. You note that no visible
flame was observed. While you state the internal material was singed, in the absence of a visible
flame, it is the opinion of the Office this does not constitute a “fire” for the purposes of passing
or failing the T.8 test.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Based on your description that there was no disassembly (as defined by Subsection 38.3.2.3) and
no visible flame, it is the opinion of this Office that the condition of the cell would likely not
constitute a failure of the T.8 test.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Alexander Wolcott
Acting Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Larson, R.
26-0115
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Baker, Yul (PHMSA)
Cc: Hazmat Interps
Subject: FW: Request for interpretation of section 38.3.4.8.
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 2:33:17 PM
Good afternoon,
Please see the following request for a letter of interpretation. Let us know if you need anything
else.
Best,
Aminah
From: Rory Pynenburg <RPynenburg@mobilepowersolutions.com>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2026 6:20 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Cc: Jeremy Le Grand <JGrand@mobilepowersolutions.com>; Spencer Poff
<SPoff@mobilepowersolutions.com>; Chuck Weitzel <CWeitzel@mobilepowersolutions.com>
Subject: Request for interpretation of section 38.3.4.8.
You don't often get email from rpynenburg@mobilepowersolutions.com. Learn why this is important
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Good afternoon,
I’m reaching out to request an interpretation of section 38.3.4.8.
During the rest period following T.8 forced discharge testing a pouch cell had a corner of
its envelope burst, exposing a small, singed protrusion of internal components. The
burst did not break our mesh screen barrier. We did not witness visible flame during the
test, but the exposed internal material is singed. Picture attached for reference.
T.8 requirements: Primary or rechargeable cells meet this requirement if there is no
disassembly and no fire during the test and within seven days after the test.
Disassembly means a rupture of the cell or battery case where solid components are

<<<PAGE 4>>>

ejected.
Note: During cell or component testing, ejection of internal components is acceptable.
Energy of ejected components shall be limited and can be measured as follows:
-will not penetrate a wire mesh screen (annealed aluminum wire with a diameter
of .25mm and grid density of 6 to 7 wires per cm) placed 25 cm away from cell; or
-it can be measured by a method demonstrated to be equivalent to the one
described in sub-paragraph (a) above.
Rupture means the mechanical failure of a cell container or battery case induced by an
internal or external cause, resulting in exposure or spillage but not ejection of solid
materials.
Please advise if this constitutes a failure based on the standard.
Thank you,
Rory Pynenburg
Rory Pynenburg, PhD
CTO
9665 SW Allen Blvd, Suite 110,
Beaverton, OR 97005
503-645-6789
www.mobilepowersolutions.com
rpynenburg@mobilepowersolutions.com
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. It is
intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their
designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice
that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or
destroy any copy of this message. This message was encrypted with TLS.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

AK-
- 1982
AK-1982
01-28
0:-29
W...

<<<PAGE 6>>>



<<<PAGE 7>>>



<<<PAGE 8>>>

AK-1 782
01-29
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6082
