# Browning Chemical Corp. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 98-0150
- **title:** Browning Chemical Corp. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1998-08-10
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 98-0150 response to Browning Chemical Corp. concerning 172.401.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0150.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0150.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0150
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1998/980150.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
Washington, D.C. 20590
400 Seventh Street, S.W
Research and
Special Programs
Administration
AUG 1 0 1998
Mr. Bruce M. Pershan
Browning Chemical Corp.
Ref. No. 98-0150
707 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, New York 10604-3104
Dear Mr. Pershan:
This is in response to your letter dated June 27, 1998, requesting clarification concerning
sodium percarbonate which you state is required to be labeled under European requirements
as an oxidizer but is not subject to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts
171-180) for transportation in the United States. You asked whether this material may be
accepted and distributed in the United States if the European hazard warning label appears on
1
the package.
Section 172.401 permits labeling in accordance with the ICAO Technical Instructions, IMDG
Code, or Canadian TDG Regulations if a material is a hazardous material or dangerous good
under any of these regulations. The HMR do not authorize labeling in accordance with the
ADR/RID regulations. Therefore, a package may not display a hazard warning label for
=
transportation in the United States if it contains a material regulated only under the European
:
road or rail regulations. However, a shipment imported into the United States in accordance
with the IMDG Code under § 171.12 of the HMR may be offered for transportation and
transported in the United States to its final destination.
For your information, sodium percarbonate was removed from the HMR and international
transportation regulations as a proper shipping name. However, available test data now
indicates this material meets the hazard class defining criteria for a Division 5.1, Packing
Group III. Therefore, it is our opinion that sodium percarbonate is subject to the HIMR and
must be shipped as an oxidizing material.
I hope this satisfies your request.
Sincerely,
Delmer F. Billings
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

2, 41-29-1998 05:44
P.01/02
BROWNING CHEMICAL CORP._
707 WESTCHESTER AVENUE • WHITE PLAINS, NY 10604 - 3104
SUBSIDIARY OF JLM MARKETING INC.
TELEPHONE: 914 GB6-0300
FAX: 914 686-0310
Boothe
EACSIMILE MESSAGE
File: 172,401
DATE: 06/27/98
FROM: Bruce M. Pershan
TO: Edward Mazzulo
COMPANY: Office Of Hazardous
Materials Standards,
Washington, DC
OUR FAX: [914] 761-3792
NUMBER OF PAGES
FAX NUMBER: [202] 366-3012
(INCLUDING COVER SHEET)
2
IF THIS TRANSMISSION IS NOT RECEIVED CORRECTLY OR PAGES ARE MISSING,
PLEASE CALL BROWNING CHEMICAL CORPORATION AT [800] 771-0008.
Re: Sodium Carbonate Peroxyhydrate
Browning Chemical is a domestic distributor of mostly imported chemicals. We are in
the process of qualifying a European supplier who has advised he must use the enclosed
label to satisfy EU requirements. Another supplier in Asia also uses a warning label but it
does not have a symbol to reflect the oxidizing properties of the product. IMO and DOI
regulations except the chemical [see Sodium Percarbonate] from transport regulations.
Our concern is that if we have the enclosed label on product we ship it will cause
confusion with customers and possibly state authorities performing inspections. We
therefore would like a written interpretation of the regulations by the DOT. It should
explain that the product has oxidizing properties, however, it is not considered a
hazardous material for DOT purposes.
We understand it may take a little while for your department to research and write about
this matter. I would greatly appreciate it if you would simply have this note faxed back
with an approximate reply date. Thank you.
•
Regards,
Bruce M. Pershurs
•.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

" "•
MFR on Letter Ref. No. 98-0150
7-15-98
Per conversation with Fritz Wybenga, International Standards Coordinator and Charlie Ke,
Chemist on July 15, 1998:
Sodium percarbonate was taken off the list of hazardous materials for both domestic and
international transportation. However, test data has been made available to DOT that indicates
this material meets DOT hazard class defining criteria for a Division 5.1, Packing Group III
Oxidizer.
Therefore, unless Mir. Pershan's material test data is different (e.g., material is at a concentration
so low that it does not meet the hazard class criteria for Division 5.1, PG III material), his
material is regulated under the HMR, and must be shipped IAW the HMR.
Deboral Dostho
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4405
