# Bell Container Corporation — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** 98-0341
- **title:** Bell Container Corporation — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1999-01-11
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** 98-0341 response to Bell Container Corporation concerning 178.601.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0341.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0341.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0341
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1998/980341.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Washington, D.C
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
• 20590
Research and
Special Programs
Administration
JAN | / 1999
Ms. Elaine Walicky
Ref. No. 98-0341
Sales and Administrative Services
Bell Container Corporation
615 Ferry Street
Newark, NJ 07105
Dear Ms. Walicky:
This is in response to your letter of November 13, 1998, requesting clarification of the requirements for
manufacturing UN standard packagings under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
parts 171-180). Specifically you ask whether you may reproduce a packaging that was originally
manufactured by a different company as long as you reproduce the exact specifications listed on the
certification.
Generally, no; if any component of a packaging differs in any way from the packaging that was
originally design certified, the packaging is a "different packaging" as defined in § 178.601(c)(4) and
must be retested. An exception would be where the manufacturer can establish that the packaging is
virtually identical (for example fiberboard must have the same burst strength, edge crush resistance,
water absorption rate, board weight, manner of construction etc.). In addition, as provided by
§ 178.601(1) the test report for each packaging must be maintained at each location where the
packaging is manufactured and each location where the periodic retests are conducted until such tests
are successfully performed again and a new test report is produced.
I hope this information is helpful.
Sincerely,
Shun Dillio
Delmer F. Billings
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

1998
4:15PM
BELL. CONTAINER CORP
NO.812
P.212
*(973) 344-4400
NEW JERSEY PHONE
NEW YORK PHONE
FAX (973) 344-0817
(212) 964-0900
98-0341
Bell Container Corp.
Manufacturers of CORRUGATED SHIPPING CONTAINERS
615 FERRY STREET, NEWARK, N.J. 07105
Lavalle
5178.601
November 13, 1998
Atta: Edward Mazzullo
U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT)
Washington, D.C.
VIA FACSIMILE
(202) 366-3012
Dear Mr. Mazzullo:
Re:
Our telephone conversation with Diane Leville on this date regarding the
manufacturing of U.N. Certification corrugated cartons.
It is our understanding from the referenced telephone conversation with Ms. Leville, that we are
not required to retest a U.N. Certified carton manufactured by a different manufacturer, as long
as we can reproduce the exact specs listed on the Certification.
We need this information in writing, at your earliest convenience, and would appreciate your
faxing it to us at (973) 344-0817.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours,
BELL CONTAINER CORP.
Slaine Walicky
Elaine Walicky,
General Manager,
Sales and Administrative Services
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 2725
