# National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** 98-0363 - **title:** National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 1999-01-19 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** 98-0363 response to National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. concerning 180.407. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0363.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0363.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-98-0363 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1998/980363.pdf **body:** <<>> U.S. Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Research and Special Programs Administration JAN 1 9 1999 Mr: Clifford J. Harvison, Jr. President Ref. No. 98-0363 National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. 2200 Mill Road Alexandria, VA 22314 Dear Mr. Harvison: This responds to your recent letter concerning certain cargo tank tests and inspections required under the Hazardous Materials Regulations • (49 CFR Parts 171-180; HMR) • Specifically, you ask about the elements of a pressure test and the procedures that should be followed if more than one facility performs the inspections and testing. Your interpretation is correct. The pressure test required by § 180.407 (g) of the HMR is not considered complete until both the external and internal inspections, as well as the pressure test, have been completed. An operator may use more than one facility to perform the required inspections and testing. In that event, as you have advised your members, the pressure test marking required by $ 180.415 is applied to the cargo tank only when all inspection and testing requirements are fulfilled. Further, the relevant documentation must indicate that different facilities performed the external and internal inspections and the pressure test. Until the inspection and testing requirements are completed, the specification plate or the cargo tank should be covered. We advise against removino the specification plate in this situation. I note the inform not neede to conta han Sincerely, Thoma. Allam Thomas G. Allan Senior Iransportation Regulations Specialist Office of Hazardous Materials Standards 180.407 <<>> NATIONAL TANK NTTC LUZMAI SAFET NATIONAL TANK TRIOCRS CARRIERS, INC. TRUCK CARRIERS THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION TANK TRUCK INDUSTRY CLIFFORD J. HARVISON PRESIDENT 2200 MILL ROAD • ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-4677 PHONE: 703/838-1960 - FAX: 703/684-5753 98-0363 November 24, 1998 Gorsky Mr. Alan I. Roberts Associate Administrator for § 180.407 Hazardous Materials Safety Research & Special Programs Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20591 (Via fax, hard copy to follow) Dear Mr. Roberts: Please consider this letter a request for interpretation regarding various tests and inspections of cargo tanks specified at 49 CFR 180.407 (g). The regulatory provision, dealing with the pressure test, specifies (in part) that, "(i) As part of the pressure test, the inspector must perform an internal and external visual inspection... " (the exception for MC 338 cargo tanks is not relevant, here). lacomplying with this provision, a question is raised by the fast that some registered "CI are equipped to perform external and internal inspections, but do not hold themselves out to perform the pressure test (nor do they perform the pressure test). Therefore, for a carrier to comply, it is forced to use more than one CT facility to perform all three elements of the pressure test. NITC reads the regulation in the following context: That the pressure test is not completed (and the cargo tank may not be represented as being in compliance with the HMR) until all elements of the test/inspection regime (i.e. external visual inspection, internal visual inspection and the pressure test) have been completed. In other words, a carrier may use more than one CT facility to achieve compliance. Fürthermore, and in such cases, we have counseled our members to take the following actions: - 1) Once the cargo tank has been removed from service for the purpose of inspection and testing, the specification plate should be removed or covered; • <<>> 2) No exterior markings (required by 49 CFR 180.415) should be affixed to the cargo tank until all three elements of the test/inspection regime have been completed; and, 3) All relevant documentation should reflect the fact that different CT facilities performed portions of the test/inspection regime. Mr. Roberts, please advise whether or not NTT's interpretation (and our advice to our membership in this matter) is correct. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, Chifforă J. Harviso President - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 4155