# Bracewell & Giuliani LLP — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-09-0001
- **title:** Bracewell & Giuliani LLP — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2009-07-14
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-09-0001 response to Bracewell & Giuliani LLP concerning 193.2007, 193.2057.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-09-0001.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-09-0001.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-09-0001
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/2009/PI-09-0001.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
JUL I 4 '2009
George H. Williams, Jr.
Attorney for Calais LNG Project Company LLC
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
2000 K Street NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20006-1872
Dear Mr. Williams:
In a letter to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) dated
December 12,2008, you requested an interpretation of the Federal pipeline safety regulations in
49 CFR Part 193 as those requirements relate to the activities of Calais LNG Project Company
LLC (Calais LNG). Specifically, you requested a written interpretation of §§ 193.2007 and
193.2057 as set forth below:
Calais LNG proposes to construct, own and operate an LNG facility, including an LNG storage
and vaporization facility, as well as associated pipeline. The terminal site will be located about
six miles southeast of Calais in eastern Maine. Under the current construction plan, the terminal
facilities will include two 160,000 m3 insulated tanks with thermal exclusion zones within
property owned by Calais LNG. In addition, Calais plans to build a third 160,000 m
3 tank at a
later unspecified date to accommodate future market conditions. This third tank, however,
would have a thermal exclusion zone that overlaps onto property adjacent to the Calais LNG
property known as Devil' sHead.
The Devil's Head property is owned by the City of Calais and is subject to.a conservation
easement governing use of the land. The conservation easement provides that the property will
be managed by the City of Calais for natural resource conservation, open space preservation, low
impact, dispersed public recreation, scenic viewing, shore access, outdoor education, and forestry
demonstration. The easement further provides that public access to the land may be limited or
controlled for public safety and that the land shall be forever used, operated and maintained in
conformity with the easement.
In your letter, you request an interpretation as to whether:
A. The City of Calais is a government agency under the definition of "exclusion zone"
within § 193.2007; and

<<<PAGE 2>>>

2
B. The City of Calais legally controls all activities on the Devil's Head property, as long as
the LNG facility is in operation, in accordance with the thermal exclusion zone
requirements of § 193.2057.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq., PHMSA prescribes and enforces standards and regulations
that apply to the LNG facilities used in the transportation of gas by pipeline. The regulations in
49 CFR Part 193 govern siting, design, installation, and construction of new and some
significantly altered LNG facilities. Section 193.2057 of those regulations states that "[e]ach
LNG container and LNG transfer system must have a thermal exclusion zone in accordance with
section 2.2.3.2 ofNFPA 59A (incorporated by reference, see § 193.2013)" with certain
exceptions not relevant to this discussion. An "exclusion zone" is defined in § 193.2007 to mean
"an area surrounding an LNG facility in which an operator or government agency legally
controls all activities in accordance with § 193.2057 [for thermal exclusion zones] and
§ 193.2059 [for dispersion exclusion zones] for as long as the facility is in operation."
In accordance with 49 CFR § 190.11, PHMSA provides the following written interpretation and
guidance concerning these regulations:
Answer to A: Yes, PHMSA considers the City of Calais to be a government agency under the
definition of "exclusion zone" within § 193.2007.
Answer to B: Yes, PHMSA finds the City of Calais may control activities on the Devil' sHead
property in accordance with § 193.2057, but we recognize that the City's authority to legally
control all activities on the land is ultimately a matter of State law. Calais LNG is responsible
for ensuring compliance with the thermal exclusion zone requirements for its LNG facility and
the company is not alleviated from those obligations by virtue of the fact that the City of Calais,
and not the operator, controls the activities of Devil's Head. Were certain facts to change in the
future, such as a change in ownership of Devil's Head or to usage of the land, Calais LNG would
still be responsible for ensuring its facility remains in compliance with 49 CFR Part 193.
I hope that this information is helpful to you. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me
at (202) 366-4046.
Sincerely,
114 (;0
1/,/ L_/ i . ;t/fs)
y/ JOlnf/A~Tiale .
! Director, Office of Regulations
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations (49 CFR
Parts 190-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application ofthe regulations to the specific facts
presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and are provided to
help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

BRACEWELL
&GIULIANI
Texas
New York
Washington, DC
Connecticut
Dubai
Kazakhstan
London
George H. (Greg) Williams, Jr.
Partner
202.828.5815 Office
202.857.2122 Fax
greg.williams@bgllp.com
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
2000 K Street NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC
20006-1872
December 12,2008
John A. Gale
Director, Office of Pipeline Safety Regulations
U.S. Department of Transportation
Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP-30)
East Building, Room E24-312
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Re: Calais LNG Project Company LLC
FERC Docket No. PF08-24-000
Re: Letter of Interpretation
Dear Mr. Gale:
Attached for your consideration is a request for a letter of interpretation from Calais LNG
Project Company LLC concerning the Department of Transportation's regulations at 49 C.F.R.
Parts 193.2007 and 193.2057.
Should you have any questions about the instant filing, please feel free to contact me at
(202) 828-5815.
Respectfully submitted,
~~L\~~r
Georg . reg) Williams, Jr.
M. An McLain, Jr.
Attorneys for Calais LNG Project Company LLC
Enclosures
cc: Frank Licari
Carl Myers
Alex Dankanich
DC\247440.1

<<<PAGE 4>>>

CALAIS. --------
-------- -- -----
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
REQUEST OF CALAIS LNG PROJECT COMPANY LLC
FOR LETTER OF INTERPRETATION
I. INTRODUCTION
Calais LNG Project Company LLC ("Calais LNG") hereby requests a formal
written letter of interpretation pursuant to 49 C.F.R. Part 190.11(b)(l) concerning the
applicability of the Department of Transportation's ("DOT") regulations at 49 C.F.R.
Parts 193.2007 and 193.2057 to Calais LNG's proposed liquefied natural gas ("LNG")
storage terminal to be located in Calais, Maine. We request expedited treatment of this
request in order to accommodate the permitting processes currently underway before
FERC and soon to be initiated before various State of Maine agencies, as well as the
anticipated financing horizons for the proposed project.
As discussed below, Calais LNG respectfully requests clarification that the City of
Calais is a government agency that legally controls all activities in accordance with
thermal exclusion zone requirements for as long as the LNG facility is in operation.
While Calais LNG believes this issue to be straight-forward, DOT guidance is sought, in
an abundance of caution, to resolve any potential ambiguity with respect to Calais LNG's
conformity with DOT safety rules.
II. BACKGROUND
A. The proposed facilities and related exclusion zones at issue
Calais LNG is proposing to construct, own and operate an LNG project that will
include an LNG receiving, storage, and vaporization facility as well as associated
pipeline facilities. 1 The terminal site will be located in eastern Maine, approximately six
miles southeast of Calais, Maine. Id. Under current construction plans, the terminal
facilities will include two 160,000 m
3 insulated tanks and planned space for a third tank
("Tank Three") of equal dimension which may be built at a later, unspecified date to
! Calais LNG initiated pre-filing procedures at the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission ("FERC") on June 2, 2008 in FERC Docket No. PF08-24-000. A copy of
Preliminary Resource Report 1 is available http://elibrary.{erc.govlidmwsldocket search. asp.
DC\247440.! 2

<<<PAGE 5>>>

CALAIS.
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
accommodate future market conditions. Id. The exclusion zones applicable to Tank
Three give rise to this letter.
B. The property that is the subject of the exclusion zones
Devil's Head is a remote coastal headland of approximately 31S acres that borders
the Calais LNG site immediately to the north and is owned by the City of Calais under
three deeds, each of which subjects the land in question to a conservation easement
(entitled "Land For Maine's Future Fund Project Agreement") ("Conservation
Easement,,).2 The Deed and related Conservation Easement for the portion of Devil' s
Head that would be affected by the thermal exclusion zone for Tank Three are attached
hereto as Exhibit A.3 The attached Devil's Head Conservation Easement is a land
preservation agreement between the City of Calais and the Land for Maine's Future
Fund. The Land for Maine's Future Fund is a conservation fund fmanced by the State of
Maine and the federal government to preserve natural resource lands in Maine for
individual recreational purposes, such as hunting, fishing, snowmobiling, and boating.4
C. The Conservation Easement governing use of the subject property
In keeping with the general purpose of conservation easements to encumber land
from future development, the Devil's Head Conservation Easement restricts the future use
of Devil's Head as follows:
the site will be managed by the City of Calais for natural resource conservation;
open space preservation; low impact, dispersed public recreation; scenic viewing;
shore access; outdoor education; and forestry demonstration.
Exhibit A-4 (emphasis added). This Conservation Easement also recognizes that "public
access [to Devil's Head] may be limited or controlled ... for public safety" and that
Devil's Head "shall be forever used, operated and maintained" in conformity with the
restrictions and covenants contained in the Conservation Easement. Exhibit A-4, A-7, A-
S.
2 See Exhibit C which shows the entirety of Devil's Head (lots 21-3, 21-4, 21-5, 21-6 and
21-8). This land mass was acquired by the City of Calais by virtue of three separate deeds
identified in the Legend on Exhibit C.
3 The deeds and conservation easements for the remaining portions of Devil's Head
contain identical restrictions to those set forth in Exhibit A.
4 See http://maine.gov/spo/lmf/docs/finallmfbrochure2007.pdf.
DC\247440.1 3

<<<PAGE 6>>>

CALAIS.
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
III. DISCUSSION
A. Statement of the Issue
Part 193.2057 of DOT's regulations provides:
Each LNG container must have a thermal exclusion zone ill
accordance with Section 2.2.3.2 ofNFPA 59A.5
An exclusion zone is defined as "an area surrounding an LNG facility in which an
operator or government agency legally controls all activities in accordance with [thermal
exclusion zone requirements] for as long as the facility is in operation." 49 C.F.R. §
193.2007 (2007).
Essentially, the Thermal Zone Table specifies radial distances from the LNG
facility, creating concentric circular exclusion zones, inside of which certain property-use
restrictions apply for public safety purposes. The thermal exclusion zones for Calais
LNG's tanks 1 and 2 are contained within property controlled by Calais LNG. However,
the thermal exclusion zones applicable to Tank Three overlap, slightly, onto the Devil's
Head property controlled by the City of Calais.6 The two property-use restricted zones,
as set forth in the Thermal Zone Table,7 are as follows:
1. The nearest point located outside the owner's property line
that, at the time of plant siting, is used for outdoor assembly by
groups of 50 or more persons ....
2. The nearest point of the building or structure outside the
owner's property line that is in existence at the time of plant
. . 8 Sltillg ....
Based on the foregoing, the relevant inquiries here are whether:
5 Section 2.2.3.2 ofNFPA 59A, as codified in the 2001 Edition, has been superseded by
NFPA 59A, 2006 Edition, section 5.2.3.2, which references table 5.2.3.2. ("Thennal Zone
Table").
6 As seen on the attached map (Exhibit C), the thennal exclusion zones overlap onto
Devil's Head at Map 21, Lot 8.
7 NFPA 59A Section 5.2.3.2, Table 5.2.3.2
8 There are not any structures on Devil's Head property, and no buildings are
contemplated under the Conservation Easement. Accordingly, this property-use restriction is not
in question and not discussed herein.
DC\247440.1 4

<<<PAGE 7>>>

CALAIS.
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
(1) the City of Calais is a "government agency" that may control
exclusion zones;
(2) the City of Calais legally controls all activities on Devil's Head;
(3) such activities at Devil's Head are consistent with the property-use
restrictions of the Thermal Zone Table noted above; and
(4) the City of Calais will exercise such control for as long as the LNG
facility is in operation.
B. The City of Calais is a government agency that may control exclusion zones
The first question is whether the City of Calais is a "government agency" for
purposes of 49 C.P.R. Part 193.2007. The DOT's regulations do not expressly define
"government agency." 9 However, the commonly understood meaning of "government
agency" is a "governmental body with the authority to implement and administer
particular legislation." 1
0
The City of Calais is clearly a "government agency" within that plain meaning of
the term. The city charter makes clear that the City of Calais "shall have all powers
possible for a municipality to have under the Constitution and laws of Maine." II Calais
City Charter at 1. The City Charter further authorizes the City of Calais to conduct other
governmental functions such as the performance of intergovernmental relations, the
composition of a governing body, and the establishment of a mayor. Id. at 1-2.
9 The tenn "government agency" is not defined in the definition section or in any other
chapter of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The phrase is used (but not defmed) in
49 C.F.R. Part 15 (which deals with protection of security sensitive infonnation). At 49 C.F.R.
15.l9(b)(2), the DOT's regulations provide an exception to the requirement that secret security
infonnation be destroyed, when it states: "Exception: Paragraph (b )(1) of this section does not
require a State or local government agency to destroy infonnation that agency is required to
preserve under State or local law. " The implication of this language is that a governmental
agency can include both state agencies and local agencies (i.e., municipalities or departments
thereot).
10 BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY (Sth ed. 2004) (defining "government agency").
11The Calais City Charter is available at http://www.calaismaine.govoffice.comlverticallS
itesl {76D4701A-BEEE-43C9-BA4E-AEDSEE3D2757}!uploadsl {3SD7C87F-FBCI-4074-9631-
5CE5931 095AB} .PDF ("City Charter").
DC\247440.! 5

<<<PAGE 8>>>

CALAIS.
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
DOT has made it clear beyond any question that a "government agency," as well
as the project operator, can control exclusion zone property. As noted above, an
"exclusion zone is defined in DOT's regulations to be "an area ... in which an operator
or government agency legally controls all activities .... " 49 C.F.R. § 193.2007 (2007).
Moreover, in the preamble of its rule in which "government agency" was added to Part
193, DOT states: "'exclusion zone' is revised to permit government control as well as
control by an operator of activities within the zone. . .. This change [will] allow means
[other] than ownership by an operator to provide the required restrictions on land
development around an LNG facility." 44 Fed. Reg. 8142, 8148 (February 8, 1979)
(emphasis added). Thus, DOT's regulations contemplate that a government agency (like
the City of Calais )-not just the project operator-may oversee restricted-use exclusion
zones, if that government agency possesses the ability to restrict the property's use
consistent with the Thermal Exclusion Zone Table.
C. The City of Calais has the authority to control all activities at Devil's Head
The Deed (attached at Exhibit A) evidences that all ownership interests in Devil's
Head vest in the City of Calais. See Exhibit A-3. As the Deed makes clear, the
Conservation Easement restricts the use of the property, and it is within the legal
authority of the City of Calais to control the property within those restricted uses. The
Conservation Easement states that Devil's Head "will be owned and managed by the City
of Calais" and further that "public access may be limited or controlled ... for public
safety." Exhibit A-4. Accordingly, the City of Calais has authority to control all
activities at Devil's Head, and to do so with an overarching purpose of ensuring public
safety.
D. The City of Calais-controlled activities at Devil's Head are consistent with
NFPA59A
DOT's prior letters of interpretation provide some context for addressing this issue.
In one instance, DOT determined that the restriction on public assembly by groups of 50
or more persons was measured by the "routine or usual use of the areaL]" rather than
occasional uses which may conflict with NFPA 59A. See Letter of Interpretation from
Cesar De Leon, Director Regulatory Programs, Office of Pipeline Safety to James S.
Stites (July 13, 1992). DOT offered the following as examples of "routine" uses which
would implicate assembly by groups of 50 or more persons: "beaches, playgrounds,
outdoor theaters, other recreation areas or other places of public assembly." Id. at 1.
The Conservation Easement restricts the use of Devil's Head by requiring the
property to be:
DC1247440.1 6

<<<PAGE 9>>>

CALAIS.
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
Managed to preserve [the property's] natural values, to enhance public
accessibility to the shore and to provide opportunities for dispersed, low intensity
public recreation and natural history and outdoor skills educations.
Exhibit A-4 (emphasis added). The expressed limitations of the Conservation Easement
contemplate "dispersed" activity, not large assemblages of people, such as "assembly by
groups of 50 or more people."
And even if such assemblages would occur, it is in all events evident that such
assemblages would not be routine. The routine activities at Devil's Head are not the
kinds of activities that, in DOT's view as noted above, are contemplated by NPP A 59A.
As indicated by the letter from the City of Calais, the routine uses of Devils' Head consist
of dispersed outdoor activities such as individual and small group hiking and wildlife
viewing during the warmer months (May through September) and virtually no public use
during the colder months (October through April).12 There are no beaches, no
playgrounds, no outdoor theatres, or the like.
The generally sparse
l3 and dispersed nature of use at Devil's Head is much less
intense and concentrated than uses that have previously been considered permissible
activities within an exclusion zone. In a prior letter of interpretation, DOT indicated that
travel by fishing boats or cruise ships were permissible in exclusion zones. See
Comments of George W. Tenley, Jr., Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety on
Yukon Gold DEIS, Docket No. CP88-105-000 (August 9, 1993). The Commission
subsequently adopted this reasoning in its analysis of Weaver's Cove LNG Project
(Docket No. CP04-36-000) to conclude that a portion of a state highway over which
Weaver Cove's 5 kW exclusion zone extended, "[did] not fall within the restricted usage
for this zone, which is for outdoor assembly by groups of 50 or more persons.,,14
Compared to cruise ships and public highways, the sparse and dispersed recreational use
at Devil's Head is even more consistent with DOT's safety goals under 193 C.P.R. Part
193.2057 and NFPA 59A.
12 Enclosed as Exhibit B is a draft letter which, for purposes of this request for letter of
interpretation, DOT may assume will be executed by the City of Calais.
13 The City of Calais has a population ofless than 4,000 and is the largest city in
Washington County. See http://www.calaismaine.govoffice.com/index.asp?Type=B LOC&SEC
=% 7BBFC3477D-48B8-45BO-BBED-73252020243F% 7D.
14 Weaver's Cove Final Environmental Impact Statement, FERC Docket No. CP04-36-
000 at p 4-248.
OC\24 7440.1 7

<<<PAGE 10>>>

CALAIS.
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
Furthermore, the Conservation Easement expressly provides that "public access
maybe be limited or controlled ... for public safety." Exhibit A-4. Accordingly, as
noted in the attached letter, the City of Calais is well acquainted with the exclusion zone
responsibilities, and is positioned to limit access to Devil's Head as necessary to ensure
public safety. See Exhibit B.
E. The City of Calais will control aU activities in accordance with the
applicable thermal zone requirements for as long as the LNG facility is in
operation
The Conservation Easement states that Devil's Head "shall be forever used,
operated and maintained" in conformity with the restrictions and covenants contained in
the Conservation Easement. Exhibit A at 2, 5-6, emphasis added. Because there is no
temporal limit to the restrictions of the Conservation Easement, the City of Calais will be
governed by those restrictions "for as long as the LNG facility is in operation."
Further, as noted above, the City of Calais appreciates the existence of the
exclusion zone at Devil's Head and has committed to managing the property in
conformity with DOT safety standards in perpetuity. See Exhibit B. Calais LNG submits
that this letter from the City of Calais, in conjunction with the Conservation Easement
restrictions, satisfies the requirement that the exclusion zone activities be controlled for
as long as the facility is in operation under 193 C.F.R. Part 2007. 15
IV. SUMMARY AND REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION
Calais LN G proposes to construct, own and operate an LN G storage and
regasification terminal in Calais, Maine. The terminal design contemplates a possible
future third storage tank for which the exclusion zone under DOT's regulations would
extend onto the Devil's Head property that adjoins the terminal site owned by Calais
LNG. The Devil's Head property is owned and controlled by the City of Calais, and it is
subject to a conservation easement that both requires and empowers the City of Calais to
manage the property in perpetuity for "dispersed, low intensity public recreation and
natural history and outdoor skills education." These limited uses, and the City of Calais's
legal authority to enforce these limitations as owner and manager of the property, ensure
15 Even in the event that Devil's Head property is sold, the Conservation Easement makes
clear that its encumbrances on the property will run with the land and remain in effect in
perpetuity. Exhibit A-8 (stating that the City of Calais "shall incorporate the terms of the
Agreement by reference in any deed or other instrument by which the Cooperating Entity sells or
transfers any interest. ").
DC\247440.1 8

<<<PAGE 11>>>

CALAIS.
A Clean, Secure Energy Future for Maine & the Maritimes
that the third tank's exclusion zone falls entirely within an area legally controlled by the
tenninal operator (Calais LNG) or a government agency (City of Calais) for as long as
the LNG facility is in operation.
In light of the foregoing, Calais LNG respectfully requests a fonnal written letter
of interpretation pursuant to 49 C.F.R. Part 190.l1(b)(1) confirming that the City of
Calais is a government agency that legally controls all activities on the Devil's Head
property in accordance with thennal exclusion zone requirements for as long as Calais
LNG's facility will be in operation, within the meaning of the DOT regulations at 49
C.F.R. Parts 193.2007 and 193.2057.
DC\247440.1 9

<<<PAGE 12>>>

EXHIBIT A
DC 247440.1

<<<PAGE 13>>>

Exhibit A-I
• I~----~.~ .. ~.~.~ .. ~. ____ ~~.~I __ ~'~'==============::======:_=-==_=._=_~_.~."=="=~=.~~
y'" <o- ... !
BK2107PG2 I 0
WARRANlYDeeD
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PReSENTS:
ll1at, we, RlCHARO SCOTT OBEARi ELIZABeTH C. OBEAR; KATHRYN
H. 08EAR and JEAN O. DEN'ENBAUGH. whou mallng IIIIdnIIss Is c/o
RICHARD SCOTT OBEAR Of Ctotoh. ~ ... for canslderatloJt palcl, GRANT
will WAARANTY eoveNANTS, to tn. CIty ofe.lalc, a tnUl1k:iPIlllt¥WIIh 8
mallfng address of p.o. b 41&. C8IaIs, ME 0461$, the IIHId In C8JaIs,
WaGhinglon COUnty. MaIne. bounded and deacrtbed as fcnaws:
A certain rot or parcel ofland at Devil's Head, In carel .. Coun1y or
W8$h1lglon end Stale of MeIne. bounded norfl by Round lot HIt by Sl. Cn*
AIYer: 80UIh by RoUIKi kit and weal by County Road. BeInO TalC M8p 21. Lot 5,
on the CI~ of Calels lax maps. ,... prGp8Jty 1& Rew men patlcularly described
lIS boIndedon hi: north by laRd oflheCltyufCaluIs, being Tu: Nap 21. 1.1Jt4
g 8J'Id on the south by tend of Che Clv or ealels, being T8lC Map 21, Lot e on the
!C Oily of CaklIs btx maps.
g;.
!S ALSO. • certllfn rot or paICel ofland at DavII'a Head,. beng the Lorenzo
P GaI'dIIriIr lot, so-oallad. aid dellCl1bed _ Tax Mep 21, Lot 3 on the CIty of Calais
CalaIs NatIoMI Bank now orWeroh; eest by Ihe Sf. CroIx RI\IeI'; sCUlt bV lila
I lax rwaps, bouncBd .nd dncrlbed as follcM: norfI by lind bmerly owned by
BanI! Md RClands IaI:s. later of GlI\Jna arid now ofll'le OIly or CSSls. end west by
the County Road now known iIS Route No. 1, IeiilAlg from a.. to Robblnslon.
ALSO, • c:ertah 101 or pran:el of land at De'fII'5 He .. described as befng
100 acta. of land. Il10re or leu, en Ill. Countr Road bound~ noJ1h by the
and welt by". County Road. BI'tM'n lor, east by Sf. CroIx RfwIr; soUlh byWhaIen Broth&nt and MIc1teIIIots
Befng TalC Map 21, Lot $. on IfJe, CUr of Calais
turnips.
Th& property Ie currently more acett/8tett deeaibed aa being bounded on
the norh by land of the Cky of Calas. belf1g Tmr Map 2·f. Lot 6 OR 1he City
of CaIaI5 talc tnap&, and on lie soutr by Iud d Cam/Hera and Roberts.
ThallC1llth line fa the nCNth line of lot 7 clUte RlY8r lot. n set fortl on Ibe
B.R. Jon". Aan of the City of calais.
Excepting, hoMvar. that pOl'tion now CIt formerly ownei:l by Robart
Adamonls by vir6Je of a d88CI Of record tI the washington CO .... ty Registry
of Dead5. Book 1128. Pase 6S and Lot %1.7,,1, bmeif, af Flank Ob .. r.
The pntmlsea herem conveyad Js being .cqu1red by Granlee wflh funds. in
part. ffOm the land for Maine's Future Fund In 8000rdtmce with the L.and far
Maine'. Future Aat, at TIUa 5, thllnlt Revised statutes Annoblled. Chapter 363.
OC\247440.1

<<<PAGE 14>>>

Exhibit A-2
, I
" .'
, .. ..
11K 2 7 0 1 PG 2 J I
88 ..,eAded, Md P.L 1999. c ~14, sec; A-8, and pursuant to 8 Project
Agreement beIItJean the Land for Mlllne'. Futwe Burd. 1M Stale of Mane.
aCtIna by Incf Ihtough Ita Department of conservation. end the Grantee, said
Pf$Ot AgNemem 10 b, NCOIded. Tho prernltva Ie blfng acq/llrad &y the
G .... a ccopelll1fng entity dt8lgnated by tile Land for MaIne', Future Board,
m .HUle permanent preurvdon '1f the .-mllIS .nd It • .vaIIabI!IIr fot pttbllc
outcfoor 1'8018." In aCDOrdllllce with the fot~ ltIIlUay pUl'JICHS and ..
t)(pI'UI condJlona and IfmItafona 881 fQrth In IIIIfd Project Agreement. ~,
Forllla referenoe. eM deed of John Gaftlnerto tete grantors daled ApJII
7 t 1995 of f8«lrd In .... WIlhlngIOn County Rtgldy d Deedl h Book 199&.
Page 76. See 8180 absttal:t of tfie WIJI of Gaorve Obear of recosd In !he ReaTatry
In Book 1332. Page U. June Obear 18 deceaS&d and the grantor& are al her
cIIIIdren and fl .. only befm.
Wllm •• our hands Ind $eal51h1s I!I day of F::. L ( I( t ~ 7 .
2003.
______ ....1, SI.
--.ll .... G_-::ts..h ....... =-,'---, . 2~¢.;,·,::;. :: "EAL
' ............... ,
Personalyappeared the no~ named . " .; . , .
ELIZABETH C. OSEAA
DC\247440,1

<<<PAGE 15>>>

Exhibit A-3
· .....
'. ~.
a::2101PG212
LAND FOR MAlNE'S J'I1rJ'URE FUO
PltOIECr AG~
(Punuut to P.L. 1999 e. 514. SK.. A-6)
~itl.""I.dfJ: cq,qI'CaIaI.f
Prefect Nate lOll Locatloni IJuIt's 1'-4 CirIdS, MIIIM
Detfpattd smteApalJ; Dqe ••• , II/~""'''''' tJ/Pru/lstlfld 1AtdI
PmDIw CoYend ~ tWt A ...... t: BeiIW lUI estate noworfOnnezirOWlled"
JttcbaN Sooft Obcar. B1babcll C. OlIou.lC11t O. DeaI'e!llaab IIIllICall1f1ll R. 0*
ad identified by tItc CityofCd.rs as Tax Map 21, Lou). 5,. end I ("PtctaJsc:s'?sald
'-illS _~ f1tcertalD cIHcIs as 1bIbws:
I.) deed hmJahn 0IIdner1O lUcIuI Scott 0beIr. eI. II dUt Aprl?
1995 wi NCOnIed in tile Wullington Cca1ty Rtgislry of'neeGs III
Book 19". ,.", ad
1.) two peKCIs dcKribed in ,he Ahmact ofProbite t'OIIO!miD& tho EsWe
ofGeotJP Obeor ,eeor4ed lit said JtesisIr7 ." 0.11 at 900k 1332,
P8p 24; 010 alrrcDt OWIUS IdA;thl oilly beirnt lrrIofJ\llc 0_.
SaW PmEsa CdCOIIIpILtS IIfIDOIdlMlciy 230 lelft lind oouet..t. .... otWIeIIJ JIOl1Ielf
to be oWDlNl by'" Ci1y ofCa1ais ami collljlrisina the lbn1'a Head Pmja:t.
PnJject Cosh
I.MF COPIribatiDl11o eoopa.Jiac ~:
~ 8ndty Mtleb., of 12II2I2Ot2:
•• 1«1
DC\247440.!

<<<PAGE 16>>>

Exhibit A-4
" ". t:=:.
. I ~ .. ,
,"-
k2707PG213
The 101 ....... ~ I1etcIl1 i1lCOlJlOf8lCd 11110 tIIfI Aaftcmcm:
I •. Gcn«al Ptcwisro.
2. Project Applica&ion 6IId MIDc:hlllI:nfS
3. PIojNt Doundary Mop
4. 00et: __________ _
'11111 t.dd fOr Meincl'a Future Board, NpeSIIIlIc:d by its Cbait. (herei\DRar l..MfB). and
die SllaeolMlllttc. Dopzhnent oreu_mtion. rcpcuclDled by its CommiSlllDncr. as die
l>eIIp.IIed s..te APfI/41 (.., .. ina" DSA). and lhe Ccoptradng Snci1y. ruutuaJly agm
10 ped)ma1lU .AJcecmcn1 in IICCOIdlllCO wit. TItle 5, Maine RcWscd SIIIl\IIc:II AoaotaJC4,
SettlDn QOO Itaeq.. u _eo4ed. .. hl1lB_lIfed by P.L 1999 e. 514, Sec. A-6. pld w1lh.
~ kntlS, ~1IIlses. COIIItitIml. plDIIlIo spedBcatfOlla, ~ procoduIu. proJocl
PftIIOIIIII, ..... DaUdlIICU, ancl ocrCirlCationt iIcorponIIed hel'llill b7 n:tcn.ac:e I.Dd
,..., I1IIdD I JIIrl Jacot
SuIject Ie tbctlJllll! keHoI amt to till a\ltlllWlty 01 funds Jbrthl. purpose, L'MPB IImtb}'
proriIeI. D COtIIicbotion of the promises ... byl!le CooJlCfat&!g Brdlly 1It:n[D,. to
obIIJ* 10 1M CooperDIfng EntIly lhe amoUllt or mo.-y ~femd 10 Ihove. MIl I. tcIIdcr
to 6c Cuopaalin: EmIly tbal partioa of I&c obIiptioa which II ""Wed 10 "' the
LMPB'.1hIro oi'lmcosCs or •• hovo pejcd stetc. base4 upon tbe aboYe PCl'CCluse or
....... The CeopcgtlDs lad" Jlm4Iy PfOIIIfM, ill conaIcIeIadcm of 1bc promlsa
l'IIIIk lit Ihc LJ.fFB herein. tit PfOvido tlIc matcbins fUnds dnd ftap1cmcat the 9ftIJec1
~ UoV9 itt 8OCO.IdI&too with dlo .... o(dIfs Agreemen1.
The IbllowiIIoIPOCiII pJOjtct tamJ and OOJtdllioll8 were added to ~bit ~ hefoR
a 'lll'Qllipxl by the pIl1ltl heftUI:
'In. DnI/', IItD.i P,1I}u11'UJl nI$ {tJ/1Phk1t 1110 Prvm/sItI " Q ptI1I} ..ul" o"llmtlllJltd
-,."m I1y me CIry qftAlafg, rs.t m~ ItJ J1I'Ufi"W! h$lttlhIrttJ Yt1IW#, to mtllfCl!
pIIiJ# tHflfWlWIlty" 1M ,Ittw GMt ItI prolJhh t1pj1fllUlllUIcI for ~d, law /1tIMsIl1
pIlbIk: I'UNIIrItItm allfl IIIlIumJ Idst""" and tluldoor tfIIII edIat~n. 'lite foYut JltJltds "'SJI
b.1fIrIItIIIl*I tlwttghllr:lhrllhll'D /MpI'tIv. JIIIdIIfo hfJlttII (II' p1f1IIItie ruoruw ~tm
~ts.. ff .. h lICIiWl1e wtU ''''' haw an .... __ m the NCfMllltmtJl
iII'tJI'IIy tljtM/onst ""Ii _ ~ by the llSa Pmldng anJlnIlIs wIfJ II, JWVItId
1II1l1.,/IJftItnd.ftw publle #ft.
1ft 01."".,. Entity",aII mItW drrJt ,. pf'fI/Hf tINIllI opu til "" "Rft'd PMft/k,
pNWIt1tJ I/u;d p/Jrw A1:aR ",. h llmHM fir cwrJruIIrd IIJ Off "l1li.,,'" /IJIIIIIfI!!r for
pfI&rc a:qt;(Jr. rfBHlm JIf't/IIfCtIon Of' otMr pod QIfI/ muodl, crms4't ~ bat MI
llmJltJ ID tIf:Cf1IfIIIIiiJotIorr f{ sper:lal nrna, ~ 0IIl.". or- sdenJljie remwIt.
11rf ~ EtllIIy lbdI ~ tD itt tN~ III /hi 111111 pmII411t!Il1 J1iafIW .". .fIIH,.
IllUffJIdh ItJ ,,,, NMltJIIQl 0MmIc .",14(..".,.,1, ,umlfllltMfltm'l 0.8k0 of CkIOlt
IIItd CIHB1rrl AaoIll'Ce ~mm (" NOAAIOCRM") 'M ""fPD I," prqJceI #nQ
4NI'~ IMt, IJt «RI}UltClIQII wIlIt thtJ ItIIIfM lAasiD/ PrD8fYl1#t NOMIOCRM pIIrl/y
DC\247440.1

<<<PAGE 17>>>

Exhibit A-5
· I ', .. " (. .....
8K2101P821 r.
/IUId«l flt:flbNlmr .IM pruJn:I cunJ tImkr ./~' Coa.tlltr 2".om:: M~ Ad
("CZW").
hi 1M ..,.", thai NOAA or lIfIfIIlIrr ptNtJIlJmtI/hs rItle ~, or ~M.
..,. ,halt dtoH '_/foil ", lit OmI/ttHlft oJ f'IIIe fiJr 1AI , 011 Cofc:Ifr Ta Mllp JI
tImtJ 8qNfaber 2J. ZlJlJ2. ITtm NOM detmS kJ I~re Mdt l1fe ptitpOIf P """
/4*tlfjimbW(# pNWldll pnutIIfI u.1I«I/t»t J04 .... Qj'iIIl! czv..tfor qIisIlttnl G/W
".,. ...... tw ffNOM hllI'tIdIw .IM IIHN·"..,Itmf4"...,,,,,, IIQ IofIgtr IINII
/Or tt. origJmJ ~ IrluIH./IfiJ Iff ,hI •
.... _. 1m CocIpnothl& brlly ..
NlMNrft NOAJ./tW ,IH/MIInII/rmI& pNV/tIfd pIW.,.",r 108'fcthRI ~ 4/* czw.
m. ~ BntIty "",11 pro"'" lilt Mollie StIR I'tfll'lltlq ~ M_ CotUtlll
PrtJ:,rta. • CIIIW qf tMJIlWpI/mI '(KG#. SUr,., tR' ftdmzI p"'" obttllnctlfor pIlJ'pHU fI/
dewJapllfltll oJ_ JIf'O!«I GM:'L
~ a" 0/ CfIicJIs. Mtzhte fIBRU I(J assume tUIJ' ctJSb whkIr tmr,)' be _lfIIIItI tIIOh
~ ~ """ er ,UO/WnJ ~ «nwltuy ~ rMn",. 10 1M 1'roJ«I
IIIhtdt In.I 111'_ t;kr lis ~1IiM ., 1M h{tlrrl_: 6WIr lIWII hIl mil btl JIfItrl al
"1IIIllC'h'" for fIII11DI8 of'LMF/fItuIhI&
Ie wituss wILIn:of. 1111 putinbaeto hm'" t1IiB ApIcmIt&t 1/1 ortbt~...,
or a-y. 2063. .
THE LAND FOR MAINE'S FUTURE BOARD
,.JOI'T
OC\247440.!

<<<PAGE 18>>>

Exhibit A-6
·~, .
g.:.
== .,H
• f
'------------
-
..
.
8l2707PG215
STA.T&OFMAIHE
Cototy orWASHINGTOJI(
.;~~~
MJ ComralniouEllpbs: Seal:
OC\247440.!

<<<PAGE 19>>>

~
~
--••. A-..
I
1
'I . ~
I :.
~ liP t! ~ ~JJ{11ff~ ~it~. ~i~ It~ I~ ~~ f~ ~
"1 rit hil.I. -if · 1!i' 'i' ~i' ii :~ ,
JI i[ ~Ji~!i;J !ll rUH~ il Ii !~ i "
, t ! .f:~>. i ii iIi at ~ f~ !
ii d .. t.rflslt ~~Il U II; ~r.l. t~ ai
n f r f -·6'r 211'1 a c ~t:I
:i Ii dJ ~ilt i~d iEi:. {; tn i! il ft Ii ~
I I Ii i! i··ilin~! };'It .l 41 ;:;. ~i i !i ~
... I, ~IJ liirlilli 11li if '!i I! It i ~i ~ ~
r a... I-I > .,; " __ !I!r ! =. · -I I ~ m
{ tl I 1 1111"1'1=1 . ~f.. i-. It :- It _ ~ ..,t:
tl lil ~illir:fl ~IJ Ii fi I!! ~ ~i
f
• t tt l
... I ~ rl f$ .. .... > 1 .. ..
..
r ill Hi fi h • Ii I ~
t ti !tl ~ ]i=l! L·i if iJ ~ [ f ..
i t-,.. III ... ill' 2. eo ~
~I ~!r .u ... ~ I ht U li I: It a
f It Ito! ttll, .. 1:. 1.1 ti II I ~ I II:;"
..
. ' .
. '
11
..... , .... ~-!
t'f'j
~
e:
'a'
....
-
> I
-.....l

<<<PAGE 20>>>

~
t
o
i
...
" ...
~ ~ FlliF it.~ (!! 11 a ti.1 ;Ii It
W i ·r II J-i .~ & ~fi tSll
Il~1 . tli ~ Jf~ ~j" I~lf ill~rl{~ itffs.!
.. "CIt!f ~'.f Ji .. I' !J r 1"1 i!!I.a.~".
IJlli'E!1 ! If.l i :f ~I !l it it 1!:i ,t[ i'~ ~~J4!r
fili~~a I JI i!'~ s tr~ ~ Ii l!ttlf §i~?~lf
[L'·~ ~e~ * ~. 8 ol ~~ili 15i ~
tJirf~!tf I !Iiil lif~ = II! Ii iii 4 1
It[I'1 1~!~tt5
-( 'lrw~ I_~ ~-1'8 ~ fE ~& II 'lSa ~~~rlO
I f:.'~ ~~. f < !IJ!r ttl ~~ ! flff~ii~
.. .Ii 11 ~if ~ of iIJ-~ ! iir iii' ~i[ ~IJlf! ~!ti.l ~f e!
'ic'!"sr[fl glf)·· It i . i&; l!~ a.il ~-j!J"'!";' I'l;~ii:::;
Ii.tiftll i~!f iii Ilf i~! li~ isl!i9 flil;!
i 'J. if .po &.!f .t" il f ! ~'I I'll i I 1.111 It f I'ilf II"!!
j;l .. i:j I~t~ i! 't! Iff ·H~I flt l iil~~'
ri1irti 11 it itl !i ~l" 1': tift!'- !liW:
i~fBi[~ ~:f Iii il Jifi Ji~ ~lil~ !i.IJIJ'
~lrCittn ,w-i i ~ ~~« q~ ~L~l~~ * i a
I i.ll- ii:1 "Iii i~ i:J l: .1"12JJ illrl-
8i~f ,g IIIJ!a. :'IItJ 5i Fir if l:rl~~i' l-i'~f.l
r t~~\~;
-.
Ib
tr1
=- .....
0'"
.....
......
~
00
~

<<<PAGE 21>>>

~
r:;
+-
t
::>
l
..
~
II f·~ II!
.. f ;11
I .!tf
III
t~ iJ-li~ JlilniI1iiilillll!il~
I 1 I.. l fS! ~'I I 41 t.l .. 1 € 'G'
II t~ii ;t!llil:!J!~liiii!i ~Il~.f 1~lj .
o;~ I~~r -:.uHI'1li r.t.!lln;i~ ;~illil ll~! II:
f .. 5fs · i·"~a I f(lll: Bfl; Is.: a. 'ra.:'
'I I~~ lil'5' II .t' 14"'.5" It JilS- If
ti ~II ill t,~,si!~ ftalluiI'tJI fi;~1 hfl~ 1···
J~ ~ L- lif'J ;~I.fa~tllftAI tf~l!f I~~ ~
oCI " I't.;i i... J ~t.. Er ." a, f;,,~ 0
I ~il~ ; rJ n:5"rtttftf"ifl;r I{'IS} f ili-'
~ a·ltil t ij~ ti"l fltl r flP tit' f ttl r,li ~
1 !Iilt iJ~~~Jil;ftr..fl.jl' i ~~~,~ f~·~~
[f;lt} !lli~ltl~li~lf.;g.r~ t!~fl~J i~il
• iii" It-at.rllttflafti,ll I'~ (a tl['
;"ff~i lR;tt~~ It;;t1t'ltt· ~iiij.t[ ,il
1 ~~lM 11gU~~~tl 111-~1 ~. ~ ~cl~
R as-I" ,S: . ttf r s~..;.; I' iir.l'! a:.I"'f
4 "" fllll C.$' .... fO~ ~ 'If ri}"" ".50
~ lJ!f. i~lltiijJtf~lllifJlt IJEr, ilE~
It . i r l f to! i It t . f. f I fJ j ~. tift I "i:J' I .. f ~ I ."
I ,.
I .
I '.
I I
;'
t,'!'j
=r
....
a'
....
"""" > I
\0
~

<<<PAGE 22>>>

EXHIBIT B
DC 247440.1

<<<PAGE 23>>>

Exhibit B
Proposed Letter from City of Calais, Maine
The City of Calais understands that property it owns and operates, known as the Devil's
Head Project or Devil's Head, borders on the northern edge of a parcel of land that Calais LNG
Project Company LLC intends to use for an LNG tenninal. By Warranty Deed, dated February
1, 2003 (Washington County Registry of Deeds, Book 2707, page 210), property known as
Devil's Head was conveyed to the City of Calais, Maine, subject to a Conservation Easement.
That Conservation Easement "forever" obligates the City of Calais "to assure pennanent
preservation of the premises." The Conservation Easement further provides that:
The Devils Head Project real estate will be owned and managed by the
City of Calais, and managed to preserve its natural values, to enhance
public accessibility to the shore and to provide opportunities for
dispersed, low intensity public recreation and natural history and
outdoor skills education .... [The City of Calais] shall ensure that the
project area is open to the general public, provided that public access
maybe limited or controlled for public safety, resource protection or
other good and reasonable cause ....
The City of Calais has managed, and will continue to manage, Devil's Head, not in
contemplation of large public assemblages, buildings or structures on the property, but rather in
contemplation of recreational activities, nonnally seasonal, such as hiking and wildlife
observation. Furthennore, the City of Calais is mindful of the Conservation Easement's proviso
that "public access may be limited or controlled for public safety" in representing that it intends
to manage Devil's Head Project in keeping with the thennal exclusion zone provisions of 49
C.F.R. Part 193.
Yours Very Truly,
City of Calais
DC\247440.1

<<<PAGE 24>>>

EXHIBIT C
DC(247440.1

<<<PAGE 25>>>

_ ••• :.u:kJsiGn 2Dne 6ou"C0IIY
-~6c.wf~"
~::e Pb" I
EI PrtIptfty 8!:1.nd ~ 'Y
Duffs Hnd Propfriy
Mop 21lc:s :U h
~~ 9coll 2707. ? 2 0
Mop 211..014
_ 0tH 9oIIiI2~ . ;>I~ 1
~ Deal 8001; 271l!i. ~ape 2a3
Mop 21lo16
ORo 8c!lk 2 e :p . "..,. :>2£
OC\247440.1
Exhibit C
-.- ....
",~,
,
,
,
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
•
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 38815
