# Bose McKinney & Evans LLP — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-11-0014
- **title:** Bose McKinney & Evans LLP — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2012-08-27
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-11-0014 response to Bose McKinney & Evans LLP concerning 191.3.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-11-0014.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-11-0014.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-11-0014
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/Pipeline/2012/Indiana%20PRC-PI-11-0014-03-27-2012-Parts%20191%2C%20192%2C%20199.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20590
MAR 17 201£
Mr. Robert V eneck
Executive Director
Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
101 West Washington Street
Suite 1500 East
Indianapolis, IN 46204-3407
Dear Mr. Veneck:
In a letter to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) dated
August 30, 2011, you asked for an interpretation of a master meter under 49 CFR Part 191.
Based on the definition of a "master meter" as defined in 49 CFR § 191 .3, you believe that the
pipeline downstream from the local distribution company (LDC) should be regulated by the
Federal pipeline safety regulations because the apartment complex owners are operating natural
gas distribution systems.
You stated that the property in question includes approximately twenty buildings. each having
five to seven residential units that are served by natural gas from the local distribution company
(LDC). There is a meter, owned by the LDC. at the end of each of these buildings: the apartment
owner's piping downstream from the meter goes back underground and around the back of the
building to each unit. The piping for each tenant's individual unit proceeds to a riser where it
enters the building for each individual ultimate customer, the tenant. There is a minimum of
12,293 feet of underground natural gas piping owned by the apartment complex owners that is
located adjacent to and around the length of the twenty serviced buildings.
Also, you stated that the apartment complex owners, and the Indiana Apartment Association,
dispute your determination because there are not multiple buildings being served by a single
meter. By the fact that there is a single meter per building. they insist that they are not, by
definition, master meter operators. Therefore, you request a detem1ination by PHMSA regarding
the status of the owners of this apartment complex whether they are considered natural gas
operators and are subject to Federal and state pipeline safety regulations.
Under 49 CFR § 191.3, a master meter system is defined as follows:
Master Meter System means a pipeline system for distributing gas within, but not limited
to, a definable area, such as a mobile home park, housing project, or apartment complex,
where the operator purchases metered gas from an outside source for resale through a gas
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Office of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations ( 49 CFR
Parts 190-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application of the regulations to the specific facts
presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and are provided to
help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

2
distribution pipeline system. The gas distribution pipeline system supplies the ultimate
consumer who either purchases the gas directly through a meter or by other means, such
as by rents;
Also, under 49 CFR § 192.3, an operator is defined as follows:
Operator means a person who engages in the transportation of gas.
In this case, the apartment complex owners are operating the pipeline which provides gas to their
tenants and, therefore, are engaged in the transportation of gas. The pipelines downstream of the
master meter used to distribute the gas to the tenants are considered mains and service lines
subject to the Federal pipeline safety regulations. We consider the mains and service lines
downstream from the LDC master meter (whether or not there are multiple buildings being
served by a single meter) to be a distribution system that is subject to the Federal pipeline safety
regulations in 49 CFR Parts 191 and 192.
I hope that this information is helpful to you. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me
at 202-366-4046.
0
Director, Office of Standards
and Rulemaking
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Otlice of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations
(49 CFR Parts !90-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application of the regulations to the
specific facts presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and
are provided to help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

SEP ·o 6 2011
STATE INDIANA
INDIANA UTJLLTY REGULATORY COMMISSION
I 01 WEST WASHlNGTON STREET, SUITE 1500 EAST
lNDIANAPOLTS, INDIANA 46204-3407
http://www.in.gov/iurc
Office: (317) 232-2701
Facsimile: (3 17) 232-6758
August 30, 2011
Mr. Jeffrey D. Wiese, Associate Administrator
Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
US Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE
East Building, 2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Mr. Wiese:
The Pipeline Safety Division of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission requests an
interpretation of 49 CFR 191.3 regarding master meter natural gas systems.
You can also expect to receive a similar request on behalf of the Indiana Apartment Association.
There is an apartment complex in our state whose owners dispute our determination that they are
operating natural gas distribution systems and therefore should fall under our jurisdiction and the
requirements found in 49 CFR 191 and 192, and 40 and 199, and 170 lAC 5-3.
The property in question includes approximately twenty buildings, each having five to seven
residential units that are served by natural gas from the local distribution company (LDC). There is
a meter, owned by the LDC, at the end of each of these buildings; the apartment owner's piping
downstream from the meter goes back underground and around the back of the building to each unit.
The piping for each tenant's individual unit proceeds to a riser where it enters the building for each
individual ultimate customer, the tenant. There is a minimum of 12,293 feet of underground natural
gas piping owned by the landlord which is located adjacent to and around the length of the twenty
gas serviced buildings.
The property owners, and the Indiana Apartment Association, dispute our determination because
there are not multiple buildings being served by a single meter. By the fact that there is a single
meter per building, they insist that they are not, by definition, master meter operators.
The Pipeline Safety Division maintains that the apartment complex owners fall under the definition
of 49 CFR 191.3, and, because they are providing natural gas to their residents and recovering their
cost through rents, they are operating natural gas distribution systems. Further, there is the fact that
the property owner's piping is all underground, which, in our opinion, increases risk for the
residents.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

As I requested in the beginning of this letter, we request a determination from PHMSA regarding the
status of the owners of this apartment complex as natural gas operators and subject to federal and
state pipeline safety laws. You should know that there are other apartment complexes in Indiana and
likely nation-wide, with similar piping configurations. It would no doubt be helpful for all if you
could clarify this situation for all similar apartment complexes.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Robert Veneck, Executive Director
Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
RV/bh
Enclosures
2

<<<PAGE 5>>>

05/19/2011 15:42

<<<PAGE 6>>>

05/19/2011 15:40

<<<PAGE 7>>>

4917
4915
4907
4905
05/19/2011 15:43
4901

<<<PAGE 8>>>

05/19/2011
15:39
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 7715
