# Counsel to North Dakota LNG, LLC — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-16-0011
- **title:** Counsel to North Dakota LNG, LLC — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2017-12-08
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-16-0011 response to Counsel to North Dakota LNG, LLC concerning 193.2001.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-16-0011.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-16-0011.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-16-0011
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/pipeline/interpretations/56596/north-dakota-lng-pi-16-0011-10-23-2017-part1932001.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
OCT 2 3 2017
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
Mr. Greg H. Williams
Counsel to North Dakota LNG, LLC
TemcoLegal, LLC
10440 Little Patuxent Parkway
Suite 300
Columbia, MD 21044
Dear Mr. Williams:
In a letter to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), dated
August 12, 2016, you requested an interpretation of 49 CFR Part 193. Specifically, you
requested an interpretation regarding the applicability of§ 193.2001 to the North Dakota LNG
LLC's (ND LNG) liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility located in Tioga, North Dakota.
In the letter; you stated:
The LNG facility in question is an LNG liquefaction plant, consisting of 3 production
trains - two smaller N2 expander plant trains, and one larger mixed-refrigerant
liquefaction train. The liquefaction trains share common LNG storage and truck loadout.
Across the street from the ND LNG Facility is a Hess gas processing plant, which is the
source of the natural gas feedstock for the ND LNG Facility. An underground pipeline
runs from the Hess gas processing plant to the ND LNG Facility. The pipeline is owned
by the Hess processing plant up to the meter located on the ND LNG property. LNG is
unloaded from two 60,000 gallon storage tanks on the ND LNG property into transport
trailers for truck transportation. The majority of the LNG is consumed on relatively
nearby drill sites (within 200 miles of the LNG Facility).
ND LNG, owner of the ND LNG Facility, purchased the two smaller N2 expander trains
from a prior owner/operator and moved them to the current location. ND LNG hired a
third party1 to: prepare the current site, assemble the two expander trains that were
relocated to the current site in addition to assembling the new mixed-refrigerant train.
Additionally, on September 30, 2016, you provided the' following additional information via
email:
(1) Hess receives the gas from wells in the Williston B~sin and refines the gas at its
processing plant. ·
1 The third party was the prior operator of the LNG facility until June 30, 2016. ND LNG assumed operations of
the plant on July 1, 2016.
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety provid<?-s written clarifications of the Regulations (49 CFR
Parts 190-199) in the fonn of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current apr;Jjcation of the regulations to the specific facts
presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and are provided to
help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

2
(2) The underground pipeline is about 2000 feet long in total length and Hess owns
nearly all of it.
(3) The portion of the underground pipeline Hess owns runs under a public roadway.
(4) Fifteen percent of the LNG produced is picked up at the plant and shipped out of
state (via truck), most of the time fuel for plant outages in other states or temporary
projects. During the summer the plant ships a few loads a week to asphalt plants in
Minnesota. Also, the facility has shipped LNG to coal mines in Colorado, pipeline
outage projects in Canada, and has shipped about 20 loads over the past year to a BNSF
rail yard for a pilot project to power trains with LNG
(5) A layout of the LNG facility and the processing plant map is provided.
To such an extent that ND LNG has been able to determine, the prior operator had not explored
whether DOT regulation apply to the LNG facility. Moreover, ND LNG has not been able to
determine whether PHMSA regulations apply to the Hess processing plant. Therefore, based on
the aforementioned information, ND LNG requests an interpretation of § 193.2001.
The LNG facility is regulated under 49 CFR Part 193 ifthe LNG facility either receives from or
delivers to a 49 CFR Part 192 pipeline except when it meets the requirements in 193.2001(b).
Typically, the processing and liquefaction plants are collocated and operated by one operator. In
the case of the ND LNG facility, the processing plant is located on property owned by Hess and
the liquefaction plant is owned by ND LNG.
The Hess processing plant is not regulated under Part 192 or Part 193, but the pipeline that
transports the treated gas from the processing plant to the LNG plant is regulated under Part 192.
The ND LNG facility is regulated under 49 CFR Part 193 because it receives natural gas from a
Part 192 regulated pipeline and converts that gas into LNG for sale and delivery to customers
outside of the LNG facility. Therefore, the LNG facility is used in the transportation of gas by
pipeline for purposes of§ 193.2001(a).
Ifwe can be of further assistance, please contact Tewabe Asebe at 202-366-5523.
Sincerely,
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations
(49 CFR Parts 190-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application of the regulations to the
specific facts presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and
are provided to help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

TEMCOLEGAL I f.'I ,1\'11 f ",\I' ·
( '·'I ( \ .. ' I' ;,·, ( II ,.\ ( I 1·:
Mr. John Gale
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
East Building, 2nd Floor
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE
Washington, DC 20590
AUG 17 2016
August 12, 2016
Dear Mr. Gale,
North Dakota LNG, LLC (ND LNG) requests a formal written letter of interpretation pursuant to
49 C.F.R. Part 190.ll(b) concerning the applicability of the Department of Transportation's
("DOT") regulations at 49 C.F.R. Part 193 to ND LNG's liquefied natural gas ("LNG")
manufacturing and storage terminal. We request expedited treatment of this request given that
this is an existing facility.
The LNG Facility-
ND LNG owns and operates an LNG facility located in Tioga, North Dakota. The LNG Facility in
question is an LNG liquefaction plant, consisting of 3 production trains-two smaller N2
expander plant trains, and one larger mixed-refrigerant liquefaction train. The liquefaction
trains share common LNG storage and truck loadout.
Across the street from the ND LNG Facility is a Hess gas processing plant, which is the source of
the natural gas feedstock for the ND LNG Facility. An underground pipeline runs from the Hess
gas processing plant to the ND LNG Facility. The pipeline is owned by the Hess processing plant
up to the meter located on the ND LNG property.
LNG is unloaded from two 60,000 gallon storage tanks on the ND LNG property into transport
trailers for truck transportation. The majority of the LNG is consumed on relatively nearby drill
sites (within 200 miles of the ND LNG Facility).
The DOT regulations-
Section 193 of DOT's regulations provides in relevant part:
§193.2001 Scope of part.
1

<<<PAGE 4>>>

r
TEMCOLEGAL \ olll ,',II
I I . . I " I l •
(a) This part prescribes safety standards for LNG facilities used in the transportation of gas
by pipeline that is subject to the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.) and Part 192 of
this chapter.
According to a DOT website document entitled "49 CFR Part 193 LNG Facility Jurisdiction
6/17/15" :
"Many LNG facilities are subject to the regulatory and enforcement authority of DOT through
PHMSA. A simple but not complete test to determine if an LNG facility is regulated under 49
CFR Part 193 is to identify both the source and the consumer of the LNG. The facility is
regulated under 49 CFR Part 193 if the LNG facility either receives from or delivers to a 49 CFR
Part 192 pipeline."
Definition of "pipeline" under 49 CFR 192:
Pipeline means all parts of those physical facilities through which gas moves in transportation,
including pipe, valves, and other appurtenance attached to pipe, compressor units, metering
stations, regulator stations, delivery stations, holders, and fabricated assemblies.
The request--
ND LNG, the owner of the ND LNG Facility, purchased the two smaller N2 expander trains from
a prior owner/operator and moved them to the current location. ND LNG hired a third party to
prepare the current site, assemble the two expander trains that were relocated to the current
site in addition to assembling the new mixed-refrigerant train. The third party was also the
operator of the plant until June 30, 2016. ND LNG assumed operations of the plant on July 1,
2016. Insofar as ND LNG has been able to determine, the prior operator had not explored
whether DOT jurisdiction applied to the LNG Facility. Neither has ND LNG been able to
determine whether PHMSA jurisdiction applies to the Hess processing plant. Based on the
foregoing, it is not clear whether PHMSA jurisdiction applies to the ND LNG Facility.
Accordingly, ND LNG respectfully makes the instant request for interpretation.
Respectfully submitted,
~ \»,l ~~ -
Greg ~ms
Counsel to North Dakota LNG, LLC
2
11 • 1• r 1 I I < ; I I 1i ~ I I I I I . \ I ~ I ' . I I 11• . . 1 t , I ~ ' , 11 1-.1 11 r .11 1 • ;. ; c J1 , .1 1 , • , , , • 1 11 1 , . • 1d·-. I,'> I

<<<PAGE 5>>>

COOLER 1
MR 2nd STAGE
DISCHARGE COOLER
10'-2.5"
16'-7.8"
COOLER 3
MR LUBE OIL COOLER
24'-0.0"
COOLER 2
MR 3rd STAGE
DISCHARGE COOLER
11'-2.4"
10'-0.0"
11'-2.4"
10'-0"
30'-6"
8'
6'-0"
10'
8'
20'
MAKE UP SKID
20'
MR COMPRESSOR
COLD BOX
12'
8'
7'-0"
10'
14'
6'
96'
15'
10'
INLET GAS T.I. POINT
15'
15'
10'-0"
30'
DEHYDRATION SKID
15'
MCC
20'
POWER T.I. POINT
LNG PRODUCT / VENT GAS T.I. POINT
TRUCK LOADING SKID
TRUCK SCALE
PROCESS BUILDING
8'
12'-6"
8'
20'
60'
8'
CONTROL BUILDING
ACCESS TO
68TH STREET NW
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 9815
