# SI Group — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-17-0015
- **title:** SI Group — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2018-03-12
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-17-0015 response to SI Group concerning 195.1.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-17-0015.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-17-0015.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-17-0015
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/pipeline/interpretations/57446/si-group-pi-17-0015-03-12-2018-part-195-1.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
ofTransportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington DC 20590
M AR 1 2 2018
Ms. Paulina Williams
Baker Botts LLP
98 San Jacinto Blvd.
Suite 1500
Austin, Texas 78701-4078
Dear Ms. Williams:
In an August 29, 2017, letter to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), you requested an interpretation of 49 CFR Part 195. Specifically, you requested for
interpretation regarding the exemption in§ 195.l(b)(3)(ii).
You provided the following information.
We are writing on behalf of our client, SI Group-Baytown ("SI Group"), to request a
written regulatory interpretation regarding application of an exception from Part 195
applicability. Specifically, SI Group seeks an interpretation from Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration ("PHMSA") of the PHMSA pipeline safety regulation at
49 CFR 195.l(b)(3)(ii) as it applies to a 4-inch liquid propane pipeline SI Group now
operates at a chemical manufacturing plant SI Group recently acquired in Baytown,
Texas. This pipeline is less than one-mile long, does not cross any waterways, and it will
be operated as a low stress pipeline. The pipeline transports propane from the plant a
distance of approximately 1800 feet outside the plant boundary to a customer operated
long-distance transportation line ...
SI Group is requesting PHMSA guidance on whether the pipeline in question "serves" a
manufacturing facility within the meaning of the[§ 195.l(b)(3)(ii)]. SI Group has
reviewed the rule language and relevant guidance and believes that the outbound propane
pipeline "serves" SI Group's manufacturing plant and, therefore, provided the other
conditions of 49 CFR § 195.l(b)(3)(ii) are properly satisfied, the propane pipeline would
not be subject to Part 195. Because the regulation does not contain a definition of what
constitutes "serving" a manufacturing facility, however, SI Group is requesting
confirmation from PHMSA of the appropriate interpretation in this fact situation.
You also attached PHMSA rulemaking history and a February 1, 2001, interpretation on this
exemption.
The section 195.l(b)(3)(ii) exemption reads as follows:
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations (49 CFR
Parts 190-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application of the regulations to the specific facts
presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and are provided to
help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

2
§ 195 .1 Which pipelines are covered by this Part?
(a) ...
(b) Excepted This Part does not apply to any of the following:
(3) Transportation of a hazardous liquid through any of the following low-stress
pipelines:
(ii) A pipeline that serves refining, manufacturing, or truck, rail, or vessel terminal
facilities, if the pipeline is less than one mile long (measured outside facility grounds)
anll does not cross- an offshore area or a waterway currently used fo1comrrr erctal
navigation ...
On September 2, 1998, PHMSA issued a final rule, "Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
Serving Plants and Terminals," 63 FR 46692, whose purpose was to "exclude from [PHMSA's]
safety standards for hazardous liquid ... low-stress pipelines less than 1 mile long that serve
certain plants and transportation terminals without crossing an offshore area or a waterway
currently used for commercial navigation." The rule stated that this definition included
"interfacility transfer lines" that "move hazardous liquids for short distances between truck, rail,
and vessel transportation terminals, manufacturing plants (including petrochemical plants), and
oil refineries, or between these facilities and associated storage or long distance pipeline
transportation." 63 FR 46692. The rule included the current regulatory language excluding a
low-stress pipeline that "serves refining, manufacturing, or truck, rail, or vessel terminal
facilities, ifthe pipeline is less than 1 mile long (measured outside facility grounds) and does not
cross an offshore area or a waterway currently used for commercial navigation." Therefore, the
word "serve" includes both receiving and delivering regulated products through pipeline
transportation.
In this case, the pipeline is 1800 feet (0.34 miles) long, does not cross any waterways, and it will
be operated as a low stress pipeline. The pipeline transports propane a short distance between
the plant and a customer operated long-distance transportation line. It therefore "serves"
manufacturing facility within the meaning of the§ 195.l(b)(3)(ii)]. Under§ 195.l(b)(3)(ii), the
line is therefore excluded from PHMSA's regulations.
lfwe can be of further assistance, please contact Tewabe Asebe at 202-366-5523.
Sincerely,
Director, Office of Standards
and Rulemaking
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations
(49 CFR Parts 190-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application of the regulations to the
specific facts presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and
are provided to help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

98 SAN JACINTO BLVD.
SUITE 1500
AUSTIN, TEXAS
78701-4078
TEL +1 512.322.2500
FAX +1 512.322.2501
BakerBotts.com
AUSTIN
BEIJING
BRUSSELS
DALLAS
DUBAI
HONG KONG
HOUSTON
LONDON
MOSCOW
NEW YORK
PALO ALTO
RIYADH
SAN FRANCISCO
WASHINGTON
August 29, 2017
Paulina Williams
TEL: 5123222543
FAX: 5123223643
paulina.williams@bakerbotts.com
DOT/PHMSA/OPS
Attn: Information Resource Manager
informationresourcesmanager@dot.gov
East Building, 2nd Floor
PHP-20, E22-321
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Re: SI Group—Baytown Part 195 Interpretation Request
Dear Sir/Madam:
We are writing on behalf of our client, SI Group–Baytown (“SI Group”), to request a written
regulatory interpretation regarding application of an exception from Part 195 applicability.
Specifically, SI Group seeks an interpretation from Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (“PHMSA”) of the PHMSA pipeline safety regulation at 49 C.F.R.
§ 195.1(b)(3)(ii) as it applies to a 4-inch liquid propane pipeline SI Group now operates at a
chemical manufacturing plant SI Group recently acquired in Baytown, Texas. This pipeline is
less than one-mile long, does not cross any waterways, and it will be operated as a low stress
pipeline. The pipeline transports propane from the plant a distance of approximately 1800 feet
outside the plant boundary to a customer operated long-distance transportation line.
The relevant exception to Part 195 applicability set forth in 49 C.F.R. § 195.1(b) states:
This Part does not apply to any of the following: …
(3) Transportation of a hazardous liquid through any of the following low-stress
pipelines:…
(ii) A pipeline that serves refining, manufacturing, or truck, rail, or vessel terminal
facilities, if the pipeline is less than one mile long (measured outside facility
grounds) and does not cross an offshore area or a waterway currently used for
commercial navigation
SI Group is requesting PHMSA guidance on whether the pipeline in question “serves” a
manufacturing facility within the meaning of the above provision. SI Group has reviewed the
rule language and relevant guidance and believes that the outbound propane pipeline “serves” SI
Group’s manufacturing plant and, therefore, provided the other conditions of 49 C.F.R.
§ 195.1(b)(3)(ii) are properly satisfied, the propane pipeline would not be subject to Part 195.
Active 36110637.1

<<<PAGE 4>>>

DOT/PHMSA/OPS - 2 - August 29, 2017
Because the regulation does not contain a definition of what constitutes “serving” a
manufacturing facility, however, SI Group is requesting confirmation from PHMSA of the
appropriate interpretation in this fact situation.
We have attached additional details and explanation in support of this request and relevant
preambles and guidance for ease of reference.
Please contact me at 512.322.2543 or paulina.williams@bakerbotts.com with any questions
regarding this request for written interpretation. We appreciate your time and consideration.
Very truly yours,
Paulina Williams
cc: Charles Gardner, SI Group
Gary Crabtree, SI Group
Active 36110637.1

<<<PAGE 5>>>

SI Group -
Baytown
W. Baker Rd.
4” Propane
Pipeline
Active 34784590.1
Connection to
Energy Transfers’
Pipeline

<<<PAGE 6>>>

Hazel St
Lcy Elastomers Lp O
Wade Ri
* Lillian St
Lorraine Dre
Decker Dr.
Louise St
Vae Da
Sunshine A
Decker Dr
Decker Dra
Ponderosa Dr
Baytown Self Storage
Craigmont Bird
McElroy Park
James House
~ Baker Ro
W Baker Rd
Dairy Queen Store
Fluor Craft Employment
W Baker Rd
W Baker Rd
W Baker Rd
Baker Rd
W Baker Rd
W Baker Rd
Shopping Center
Decy West Town C
ExxonMobil
Decker Dr
ID Badge Gate
Enterprise Products
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 9173
