{"operation":"document","citation":"PI-70-008","title":"Union Carbide Corporation — Pipeline Safety Interpretation","source_type":"guidance","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"1970-11-30","effective_on":null,"summary":"PI-70-008 response to Union Carbide Corporation concerning 192.13, 195.1.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-70-008.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-70-008.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-70-008","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1970/PI70008.pdf","body":"<<<PAGE 1>>>\n\nNovember 30, 1970\nMr. J. J. Kocian\nManager of Pipelines\nUnion Carbide Corporation\n1200 Travis, Suite 912\nHouston, Texas 77002\nDear Mr. Kocian:\nThis is in reply to your letter of November 5, 1970, regarding applicability of 49 CFR, Part 192 to\npipelines carrying ethylene.\nIt is our interpretation based on the information provided in your letter that the pipelines\nconcerned are governed by the liquid line regulation, 49 CFR, Part 195, a copy of which is\nenclosed for your information. There are no requirements for odorization in this regulation.\nIf, after you consider the applicable provisions of 49 CFR, Part 195, you have further questions\ndo not hesitate to ask.\nSincerely,\nJoseph C. Caldwell\nDirector, Acting\nOffice of Pipeline Safety\nEnclosure\ndal\\192.1-a\\13\\70-11-30\n1","truncated":false,"body_characters":792}