# House of Representatives — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-72-0109
- **title:** House of Representatives — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1972-08-04
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-72-0109 response to House of Representatives concerning 192.703.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-72-0109.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-72-0109.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-72-0109
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1972/g72-08-04_Hathaway_192.703-msfx.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

PI-72-0109
August 4. 1972
Honorable William D. Hathaway
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Hathaway:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of July 21, 1972, to the Office of Congressional Relations, enclosing
a copy of a letter from Mr. Edward J. Beauchamp, concerning repairs to gas pipelines.
Mr. Beauchamp’s letter inquires if there is some “criteria as expressed by the Federal Commission as to the
time that a leak must be repaired in a gas pipe line or distribution system. Is there a fine for not complying
with the time requirement?”
Section 192.703 of the Federal gas pipeline safety standards provides in paragraph (b) that each segment of
pipeline that becomes unsafe must be replaced, repaired, or removed from service, and further provides in
paragraph (c) that hazardous leaks must be repaired promptly. Which leaks are “hazardous,” which leaks
make a pipeline “unsafe,” and whether a repair has been done “promptly,” depends upon the nature of the
operation and local conditions. The nature and size of the leak, its location, and the danger to the public are
among the factors that must be considered by the operator. These same factors would be considered in
determining whether a penalty should be imposed for failure to comply with the requirements of Section
192.703.
We trust that this information will assist you in responding to Mr. Beauchamp’s inquiry in this matter. If we
can be of any further service, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Original signed by:
Joseph C. Caldwell
Director
Office of Pipeline Safety

<<<PAGE 2>>>

July 21, 1972
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Office of Congressional Relations
Department of Transportation
Washington, D.C.
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is a copy of a letter I received from a constituent regarding repairs on gas pipelines.
I shall appreciate having your comments on this matter.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
William Haththaway
U.S. Congressman

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Edward J. Beauchamp
163 Lisbon Street
Lewiston, Maine 04240
July 19, 1972
Hon. William D. Hathaway Re: Estate of Amanda Castonguay
House of Representatives and Rita Castonguay
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Al:
Would you find out what is considered a reasonable time under the Federal Safety Standard
Regulations for the transportation of gas by pipe line.
Would there be some criteria as expressed by the Federal Commission as to the time that a leak must
be repaired in a gas pipe line or distribution system. Is there a fine for not comply with the time requirement.
My problem briefly is that under the Maine Public Utilities Commission there is a requirement to make
surveys to determine any leakage in the gas services. But there is no time specified as to when these leaks
should be repaired. Obviously the Lewiston Gas Light with a crew of 10 people could take 4 months to repair
under our Public Utilities Law as they now exist. Would there be something under the transportation act or
whatever body regulates the transmission of gas by pipeline whereby upon failure to remedy the situation
within a certain number of days that it be prima-facie evidence of neglect on the part of the gas company and
that after the discovery of gas if not repaired within a specified time that they be subject to a Federal fine.
In discussing the matter with the Gas Transportation People in Washington; would you send me
anything that might be helpful.
Yours truly,
EDWARD J. BEAUCHAMP
Attorney at Law
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 3493
