{"operation":"document","citation":"PI-74-0113","title":"Minnesota Highway Department — Pipeline Safety Interpretation","source_type":"guidance","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"1974-05-03","effective_on":null,"summary":"PI-74-0113 response to Minnesota Highway Department concerning 192.105.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-74-0113.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-74-0113.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-74-0113","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1974/g74-05-03_osendorf_192.105-nlmx.pdf","body":"<<<PAGE 1>>>\n\nPI-74-0113\nMay 3, 1974\nMr. J. G. Osendorf, Utilities Engineer\nMinnesota Highway Department\nSt. Paul, MN 55155\nDear Mr. Osendorf:\nThis is with regard to the telephone conversation between Mr. Van Alstine of your office and Mr.\nCesar DeLeon of the Office of Pipeline Safety concerning §192.111, 49 CFR.\nMr. Van Alstine's interpretation of §192.111(b) is correct, that a steel pipe in a Class 1 location\nthat crosses a public road without a casing must use a design factor of 0.60 or less in the design\nformula in §192.105. He is also correct in interpreting that a steel pipe in a Class 1 location that\ncrosses a public road with a casing design in accordance with §192.105.\nI trust that this has answered Mr. Van Alstine's particular question. If we can be of further\nassistance, please let us know.\nSincerely,\nJoseph C. Caldwell\nDirector\nOffice of Pipeline Safety\n1","truncated":false,"body_characters":879}