# Pipeline Safety Interpretation PI-77-0109

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-77-0109
- **title:** Pipeline Safety Interpretation PI-77-0109
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1977-12-14
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-77-0109 concerning 192.707.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-77-0109.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-77-0109.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-77-0109
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1977/g77-12-14_Duncan_192.707-msfx.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

PI-77-0109
December 14, 1977
Honorable John J. Duncan
House of Representatives
Suite 318 Federal Building
Knoxville, Tennessee 37901
Dear Congressman Duncan:
We have reviewed the Federal regulation for marking gas pipelines contained in 49. CFR 192.707 (Copy enclosed) in light
of the problem expressed by your constituent, Joe P. Dickerson, in his letter to you dated November 9, 1977.
As shown by the photographs enclosed with Mr. Dickerson's letter, the line markers installed by the last Tennessee
Natural Gas Company appear to be in compliance with the applicable requirements of Section 192.707. However, the
markers that have been installed are not the only ones that might be used for compliance. The purpose of the marking
regulation is to assist interested persons in identifying the location of underground gas pipelines. To the extent that this
purpose is accomplished, markers may be installed in any manner that is consistent with the applicable requirements.
For example, in a residential neighborhood such as Mr. Dickerson's, for aesthetic reasons markers old be installed in the
curb or Street or in a horizontal position in the yard beside the curb.
Any one of these alternatives might alleviate Mr. Dickerson’s concern that the existing markers detract from the
appearance of his home. While the present regulation does not require that a particular alternative be adopted/ an
operator must use markers which are in keeping with the rights of property owners under any applicable common law
or local ordinance that is compatible with section 192.707.
I have requested that the Office of Pipeline Safety Operations discuss this matter with the East Tennessee Natural Gas
Company.
Sincerely,
Original Sign By
John J. Fearnsides Acting Director

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
November 10, 1977
Mr. Philip H. Bolger
Director
Office of Safety Affairs
Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, S. W.
Washington, D. C. , 20590
Dear Mr. Bolger:
I am attaching hereto a letter I have received from a member of my constituency, Mr. Joe P. Dickerson, which is
explanatory.
I am also attaching two photographs of the Dickerson property showing one of the signs complained of immediately in
front of the entrance to the home and the other at the garage entrance. Mr. Dickerson states that his lot is 200 feet
wide by 150 feet, and that these signs badly detract from the appearance of his home.
It would be appreciated if you would please investigate the allegation contained in his letter and furnish me with a reply
suitable for forwarding to Mr. Dickerson.
Very truly yours,
John J. Duncan
Member of Congress

<<<PAGE 3>>>

509 Nobscot Roda
Knoxville, Tennessee 37919
November 9, 1977
Honorable John J. Duncan, Congressman
Federal Building
Knoxville, Tennessee
Dear Congressman Duncan:
I am enclosing photographs of the warning signs East Tennessee Natural Gas Company has placed on my property and
the property of Mr. Guinn Lockett, my neighbor who lives directly across from me. We are told by the gas company that
the signs are required by the government. Could you please determine for us the requirements by the government, and
if it is absolutely necessary to post these signs at such conspicuous locations?
My address is 509 Nobscot Road. The Locketts have lived across the street, 512 Nobscot Road, for 14 years. We have
resided at our present residence for 13 years. Throughout this time the East Tennessee Natural Gas Company has held
easement rights across these properties for their pipelines (they now have two lines). The easement runs diagonally
across my property in an approximate northwest to southeast direction. Just recently, they placed these warning signs in
our yards, at the curb, and claim that they must do this at each street where their pipelines cross. We property owners
who have these signs placed in front of our homes are quite concerned over this for several reasons:
1. The signs create a safety hazard to not only the little children who may be playing in our yards but also
to guests who park at the curb and walk to our front door.
2. The signs detract from the appearance of our homes and will most definitely reduce the market value
substantially.
3. For the past 13 years the gas company has never needed signs and we wonder why such action must
now be taken.
It seems to me that even if the Government requires such markings at street crossings, the utility company should be
required to exercise reasonableness in protecting the property owners' equities. They have been kind enough to lower
the signs from a height of 2 or 3 feet to their present position and we appreciate the consideration, but it is still not
satisfactory. We certainly understand that they have a responsibility toward the safety of the community, etc., but why
can't they nut their signs on the curb, letter the curbs or street rather than deface our properties. We speak with
deference toward ETNGCo. for we recognize the problems they encounter dealing with the public.
We still maintain, however, that the markings need not be done in a way that deface our properties, devalue our
financial interests, and create a safety hazard, especially for children.
Thank you for your help in resolving our problem.
Sincerely,
Joe P. Dickerson
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5344
