# Cities Service Company — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-80-018
- **title:** Cities Service Company — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1980-10-10
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-80-018 response to Cities Service Company concerning 195.402.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-80-018.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-80-018.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-80-018
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1980/PI80018.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

Oct 10 1980
Mr. R. S. Hutton
Manager-Production
Gulf of Mexico Region
Cities Service Company
Box 22082
Houston, TX 77027
Dear Mr. Hutton:
Your letter dated July 1, 1980, requested a waiver from
compliance with 49 CFR Part 195 concerning the requirements for a
procedural manual for operation, maintenance, and emergencies for
an offshore 8" crude oil pipeline connecting Eugene Island Block
258 "B" Platform to Eugene Island Block 259 "A" Platform, a
distance of 4 1/2 miles approximately. The basis of your request
is that a procedural manual is unwarranted considering the broad
scope of the regulations together with the absence of hazardous
conditions that could develop with this particular pipeline.
The regulations are necessarily broad to cover the various
situations in the industry. However, in the event that a
particular regulation addresses a situation which you do not have
(i.e., ?195.402(e)(6) which requires assisting with halting
traffic on roads and railroads), then clearly, you would not be
expected to include procedures for this situation in your manual.
Likewise, regulations need not be met that do not apply to your
pipeline, such as ?195.402(e)(8), which applies only to pipelines
transporting highly volatile liquids.
Concerning your statement that there is an absence of hazardous
conditions that could develop with your pipeline, we presume you
have based this conclusion on the nature of the conditions under
which the pipeline operates and the operating practices that are
followed. Even so, the purpose of Part 195 is to assure a
uniform level of safety throughout the industry. Waivers are
granted only for unusual circumstances that would make compliance
with a Part 195 requirement inappropriate. We do not find that
the conditions and practices you have described would justify a
waiver under these criteria.
In view of the foregoing, your request for a waiver is denied.
Sincerely,
\signed\
Melvin A. Judah
Acting Associate Director for
Pipeline Safety Regulation
dal\195\402\80-10-10
1

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Materials Transportation Bureau
dal\195\402\80-10-10
2
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 2108
