{"operation":"document","citation":"PI-81-0100","title":"Pipeline Safety Interpretation PI-81-0100","source_type":"guidance","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"1981-02-24","effective_on":null,"summary":"PI-81-0100 concerning 192.11.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-81-0100.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-81-0100.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-81-0100","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1981/g81-02-04_Stanton_192.11-lmx.pdf","body":"<<<PAGE 1>>>\n\nPI-81-0100\nFebruary 24, 1981\nJames L. Stanton, Esq.\n517 ½ North Main Street\nCarroll, Iowa 51401\nDear Mr. Stanton:\nThis is in response to your recent letter as well as to your telephone conversation with Mr. Langley of our staff.\nGas pipeline safety standards are in 49 CFR part 192. Section 192.11 governs petroleum gas systems. When a petroleum\ngas system, such as you describe, has fewer than 10 customers and no portion of the system is in public place, it is not\nsubject to the requirements of part 192 nor the industry standards (National Fire Protection Association standards No.\n58 and No.59) referenced in section 192.11. Also, we have previously interpreted section 192.11 as not applying to\nsingle tank single customer systems located on the customer’s property, even though the system may cross part of the\ncustomer’s property that is a public place.\nAlthough it appears that Federal regulations do not apply, there may be Iowa State regulations, as Mr. Langley pointed\nout in your telephone conversation that do apply.\nA copy of part 192, which you requested, is enclosed.\nSincerely,\nSIGNED\nMelvin A. Judah\nActing Associate Director\nPipeline Safety Regulation\nMaterials Transportation Bureau\n\n<<<PAGE 2>>>\n\nOPSO Advisory Bulletin No. 76-6 June 1976 page 4\nINTERPRETATION OF REGULATIONS\nRelates\nto 49 CFR,\n§192.3\nQuestion: Under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, at what point in a propane air peak-shaving facility does jurisdiction begin?\nOPSO Interpretation: \"In a propane air peak-shaving facility, liquid propane is vaporized and mixed with air to supplement natural gas supplies during peak shaving.\nAll 'pipeline facilities' are within the jurisdiction of the Act. 'Pipeline facilities' are defined in the Act to include 'without limitation . . . any\nequipment, facility, or building used in the transportation of gas or the treatment of gas during the course of transportation' (49 USC 1671 (4)).\nPeak-shaving facilities are an interrelated and often essential part of a gas distribution system and fall within the intended coverage of the term\n'pipeline facilities.' Consequently, a propane air peak-shaving facility is in its entirety subject to the jurisdiction of the Act.\"\n\n<<<PAGE 3>>>\n\nJames L. Stanton\nAttorney at Law\n517 ½ North Main Street\nCarroll, Iowa 51401\nDecember 29, 1980\nU. S. Department of Transportation\nResearch & Special Programs Admin.\nWashington, D. C. 20590\nRequest for Information-Natural Gas Pipeline Act of 1968\nGreetings:\nPresently I am involved in trying to resolve a dispute over the installation of a gas pipeline from an LP gas tank located\non the same property in which my client installed the gas line from the LP tank to a building located on the same\nproperty. While I doubt very much that any federal regulation applies to this project since we are not dealing with\n\"interstate commerce\", I am advised that there might be certain federal regulations which might be applicable. In\nparticular, I would like to have a copy of the regulations of the office of the Secretary of Transportation, (49 CFR, Part I)\nand the Delegation of Authority to Director, Office of Pipeline Safety, 133 F.R. 16468).\nI would appreciate your sending me copies of the above regulations and any other documents or regulations which, in\nyour opinion, might be applicable to the above situation. As I stated above, I do not see how the federal\nregulation5would cover a purely \"in house\" project in which the source of gas (LP tank) and the facility using the gas are\nconnected by a pipeline all of which is on the owner's property. Your comments in this regard would also be\nappreciated.\nVery truly yours,\nJames L. Stanton","truncated":false,"body_characters":3676}