# Missouri Public Service Commission — Pipeline Safety Interpretation - **operation:** document - **citation:** PI-82-012 - **title:** Missouri Public Service Commission — Pipeline Safety Interpretation - **source type:** guidance - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** guidance - **official:** true - **published on:** 1982-06-30 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** PI-82-012 response to Missouri Public Service Commission concerning 192.457. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-82-012.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-82-012.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-82-012 - **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1982/PI82012.pdf **body:** <<>> June 30, 1982 Mr. Dale W. Johansen Assistant Director, Gas Department Engineering Section Missouri Public Service Commission P.O. Box 360 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Dear Mr. Johansen: We regret the delay in answering your letter about a compliance issue involving the Laclede Gas Company. As we understand your inquiry, it is whether Section 3(a)(1) of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended (49 USC 1672(a)(1)), permits retroactive application of the cathodic protection standards in Subpart I of Part 192 to pipeline facilities in existence when the standards were adopted. Section 3(a)(1) provides that standards applying to emergency plans and procedures, extension, operation, replacement, maintenance, subsequent inspection, or subsequent testing may be applied to pipeline facilities in existence when the standards are adopted. With respect to existing facilities (installed before August 1, 1971), Subpart I requires the determination of areas of active corrosion and the application of cathodic protection to these areas and to any repaired or replaced areas, with subsequent inspection and testing to ascertain whether the cathodic protection is working properly. These requirements are examples of standards specifically permitted by Section 3(a)(1) for replacement, maintenance, inspection, and testing of existing pipeline facilities. They are not standards which would require modification of a pipeline's design to achieve compliance; and we agree that such standards would be forbidden by Section 3(a)(1). Sincerely, Melvin A. Judah Acting Associate Director for Pipeline Safety Regulation Materials Transportation Bureau dal/192.457 82-06-30 - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 1694