# The Duriron Company, Inc. — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-83-008
- **title:** The Duriron Company, Inc. — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1983-05-19
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-83-008 response to The Duriron Company, Inc. concerning 192.363.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-83-008.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-83-008.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-83-008
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1983/PI83008.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

May 19, 1983
Mr. Allan W. McKee
Petroleum Market Manager
The Duriron Company, Inc. - Valve Division
P.O. Box 2609
Cookeville, TN 38502-2609
Dear Mr. McKee:
Enclosed is an interpretation of 49 CFR §192.363(b) as requested by your letter to this Office of
April 26, 1983.
We hope this answers your question adequately.
Sincerely,
Richard L. Beam
Associate Director for
Pipeline Safety Regulation
Materials Transportation Bureau
Enclosure
dal\192\363\83-05-19
1

<<<PAGE 2>>>

No. 83-6
Date: May 19, 1983
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION
MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION BUREAU
_
PIPELINE SAFETY REGULATORY INTERPRETATION
_
Note: This pipeline safety regulatory interpretation
applies to all operators that are
subject to the rule under Federal or
State law.
SECTION: 192.363(b), Service lines: Valve requirements.
FACTS: SUBJECT: Use of soft-seated valves.
§192.363(b) says, "A soft seat service line valve may not be used if its ability to
control the flow of gas could be adversely affected by exposure to anticipated
heat."
QUESTION: Does "anticipated heat" refer to a possible fire, or simply hot gas flowing under
normal operating conditions?
INTERPRETATION: "Anticipated heat" refers to any possible source of heat to which a valve
may be exposed, including fire, that would make the valve inoperable. The primary industry
standard that has been used to demonstrate the fire resistance of valves is "Fire Test for Soft-
Seated Ball Valves," API 607.
Richard L. Beam
Associate Director for
Pipeline Safety Regulation
Materials Transportation Bureau
dal\192\363\83-05-19
2

<<<PAGE 3>>>

April 26, 1983
Mr. Richard Beam
Assoc. Director, Pipeline Safety Regulations
Materials Transportation Bureau
Dept. of Transportation
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Mr. Beam:
Our company is a manufacturer of non-lubricated plug valves. We have, in the past two years,
begun marketing these valves in the gas distribution industry on a wide variety of applications.
Recently, one of our sales engineers was visiting with a prospective gas utility client who called
our attention to Title 49, Federal Code, Para. 192.363, subparagraph (b), which indicates that
soft-seated valves should not be in a service line if the valve's performance would be affected by
anticipated heat.
Our prospective client claims he cannot use our product because the soft seat "may be destroyed
in a fire." My question is to clarify the phrase, "anticipated heat." Is this spec referring to a fire,
or simply hot gas flowing under normal operating conditions? Please send a written clarification
of this spec to:
Allan W. McKee - Petroleum Market Mgr.
The Duriron Co., Inc. - Valve Division
P.O. Box 2609
Cookeville, TN 38502-2609
dal\192\363\83-05-19
3

<<<PAGE 4>>>

49 CFR Part 192
[Interpretation 83-6]
Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by
Pipeline; Service Line Valve Requirements
AGENCY: Materials Transportation Bureau (MTB),
Research and Special Programs Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Interpretation.
SUMMARY: The Research and Special Programs
Administration (RSPA) is issuing this interpretation, of
the term "Anticipated heat" as it appears in paragraph
(b) of §192.363, Service line valve requirements. The
interpretation was requested by a pipeline valve
manufacturer. This interpretation clarifies the intent of
the term "anticipated heat" and the appropriateness of
certain tests used to determine that a valve does or does
not comply with §192.363(b).
Richard L. Beam,
Associate Director for Pipeline Safety
Regulation, Materials Transportation Bureau.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 22, 1983.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul J. Cory, (202) 426-2082.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Interpretation 83-6.
Section: §192.363(b).
Subject: Use of soft-seated valves.
Facts: Section 192.363(b) says, "A soft seat service
line valve may not be used if its ability to control the
flow of gas could be adversely affected by exposure to
anticipated heat."
Question: Does "anticipated heat" refer to a possible
fire, or simply hot gas flowing under normal operating
conditions?
Interpretation: "Anticipated heat" refers to any
possible source of heat to which a valve may be exposed,
including fire, that would make the valve inoperable.
The primary industry standard that has been used to
demonstrate the fire resistance of valves is "Fire Test for
Soft-Seated Ball Valves." API 607.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 192
Pipeline Safety.
(49 U.S.C. 1672 and 1804; 49 CFR 1.53, Appendix A
to Part 1, and Appendix A to Part 106)
Issued in Washington,D.C. on May 19, 1983.
dal\192\363\83-05-19
4
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 4602
