{"operation":"document","citation":"PI-83-018","title":"Memo: Internal — Pipeline Safety Interpretation","source_type":"guidance","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"1983-10-03","effective_on":null,"summary":"PI-83-018 response to Memo: Internal concerning 192.625.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-83-018.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-83-018.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-83-018","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1983/PI83018.pdf","body":"<<<PAGE 1>>>\n\nOctober 3, 1983\nOdorization of Gas, Section 192.625\nJames C. Thomas, chief\nSouthern Region, Pipeline Safety, DMt-16\nRichard L. Beam, DMT-30\nRobert L. Paullin, DMT-10\nYour memorandum of September 14, 1983, indicates the need for further information to respond\nto my cases 1, 2 and 3.\nAssume that the source line is transmission or non-rural gathering and that it is \"legally\nunodorized\" because it meets the provisions of either 192.625(b)(1) or (3) but not (b)(2). I trust\nthis information will be sufficient to respond to cases 1, 2 and 3 which concern \"one customer\"\npipelines.\nIf the type of ultimate consumer does influence your responses to cases 1, 2 and 3 (as suggested\nin your final paragraph), I request guidance as to how to distinguish between \"large volume\ncustomer: and, for example, an industrial or farm tap customer.\nDB\nC:\\WP51\\INTERPRT\\192\\625\\83-10-03\n1","truncated":false,"body_characters":885}