{"operation":"document","citation":"PI-90-033","title":"One-Call Systems — Pipeline Safety Interpretation","source_type":"guidance","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"1990-11-01","effective_on":null,"summary":"PI-90-033 response to One-Call Systems concerning 199.3.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-90-033.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-90-033.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-90-033","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1990/PI90033.pdf","body":"<<<PAGE 1>>>\n\nNovember 1, 1990\nMs. Kim Lilly\nOne-Call Systems\nInternational Committee\nSuite 440\n4747 N. Seventh Street\nPhoenix, AZ 85014\nDear Ms. Lilly:\nThis responds to your letter of July 25, 1990, in which you asked if RSPA's anti-drug rules in 49 CFR\nPart 199 apply to employees of One-Call Centers.\nOne-Call services which notify membership of planned excavation are not subject to 49 CFR Part 199\nunless the service is performed for the pipeline operator under contract; and pursuant to Part 192, is\nalso receiving, identifying, or classifying notices of events or making emergency decisions which need\nimmediate response by the operator or notice to fire, police, or other officials.\nSincerely,\nGeorge W. Tenley, Jr.\nAssociate Administrator for\nPipeline Safety\ndal/199.3\n90-11-01.1","truncated":false,"body_characters":788}