# State Fire Marshal Headquarters — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-91-026
- **title:** State Fire Marshal Headquarters — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1991-09-04
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-91-026 response to State Fire Marshal Headquarters concerning 199.7.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-91-026.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-91-026.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-91-026
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1991/PI91026.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Research and
Special Programs
Administration
September 4, 1991
Mr. James Wait
Division Chief, Pipeline Safety
State Fire Marshal Headquarters
7171 Bowling Drive, Suite 600
Sacramento, CA 95823-2034
Dear Mr. Wait:
This is in response to your letter of June 19, 1991, to George W. Tenley, Jr., Associate
Administrator for Pipeline Safety, Research and Special Programs Administration, asking
for guidance on whether a small refinery which has hazardous liquid lines subject to your
office's jurisdiction must implement an anti-drug plan under Part 199.
Your letter indicates that the refinery instituted a stringent drug testing program in 1986. a result of a law suit, that challenged the implementation of the 1986 drug program, the
drug program was changed to a court ordered program. The court ordered drug testing
program is different in several respects from the requirements of Part 199.
As
The operator (intrastate) would be required to have an anti-drug testing program which
conforms to the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 199 and 40 as outlined in your appropriate
state regulations. An operator has to comply with the requirements of Parts 199 and 40 by
April 20, 1990, (50 or more employees), or August 21, 1990, (less than 50 employees).
The operator may have two separate drug testing programs; one which meets the court
ordered requirements and one that complies with our regulations. As you have indicated,
the operator may petition the courts to allow the DOT regulations to replace the court
ordered requirements.
dal/199.7
91-09-04
1

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Thank you for your inquiry. assistance.
Please let me know if you need any more information or
Sincerely,
Richard L. Rippert
Drug Compliance Coordinator
Office of Pipeline Safety
Enforcement
dal/199.7
91-09-04
2
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 1823
