# State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-91-037
- **title:** State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1991-12-24
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-91-037 response to State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety concerning 192.375.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-91-037.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-91-037.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-91-037
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1991/PI91037.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

Mr. Walter T. Kelly
Director, Office of Pipeline Safety
State of Minnesota
Department of Public Safety
175 Aurora Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55013-2356
Dear Mr. Kelly:
This responds to your letter of August 25, requesting our opinion whether .049 square inches of
exposed polyethylene pipe are acceptable under 49 CFR §192.375(a). You said the ,049 square
inches of exposed polyethylene pipe are exposed to ultraviolet rays through a vent hole on a
service riser.
Section 192.375(a) requires that all plastic service lines transporting gas above ground, outside a
building, be protected against deterioration and external damage. Ultraviolet rays are known to
deteriorate polyethylene pipe; so no exposure of polyethylene pipe to ultraviolet rays is permitted
under §192.375(a).
We trust this adequately responds to your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Cesar DeLeon
Director for Pipeline Safety
Regulatory Programs
DB
C:\WP51]INTERPRT\192\375\91-12-24
1
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 948
