# U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline Safety Regulatory Programs, DPS-1 — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-92-0105
- **title:** U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline Safety Regulatory Programs, DPS-1 — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1992-07-02
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-92-0105 response to U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline Safety Regulatory Programs, DPS-1 concerning 192.187.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-92-0105.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-92-0105.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-92-0105
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1992/g92_07_02_Sanders_192.187_Xs.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

PI-92-0105
July 2, 1992
INFORMATION: Section 192.187
Cesar De Leon, Director
Pipeline Safety Regulatory Programs, DPS-1
Richard Sanders, Manager
Pipeline Safety Division, DTI-60
By memo of June 17, 1992, you asked me to explain the difference between the sizes of areas for ventilation under
paragraphs (a) and (c) of § 192.187. The difference is explained as follows: Ventilation under paragraph (a) is by means
of two ducts that extend aboveground. Differential pressure forces vault gases through the ducts; so only small openings
are needed for proper ventilation. Under paragraph (c), ventilation is by means of surface openings in the vault. This
method requires a large open area, because ventilation is accomplished by dispersion, or mixing of vault gases with the
air above the vault.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Memorandum
U.S. Department of Transportation
Research and
Special Programs Administration
Subject: ACTION: Part 192.187, Vented Vaults
From: Richard Sanders
Manager, Pipeline Safety Division, DTI-60
To: Cesar DeLeon
Director, DPS-10
On April 20, 1992, Mr. Alex Dankanich of the Maryland Public Service Commission contacted Mr. Jack Edwards of our
office to discuss a concern about the sizing requirements for vents on vaults per Part 192.187. The sections of concern
are:
Part 192.187 Vaults: Sealing, venting and ventilation.
Each underground vault or closed top pit containing either a pressure regulating or reducing station, or a pressure
limiting or relieving station, must be sealed, vented or ventilated, as follows:
(a) When the internal volume exceeds 200 cubic feet:
(1) The vault or pit must be ventilated with two ducts, each having at least the ventilating effect of a pipe 4 inches in
diameter.
(b) When the internal volume is more than 75 cubic feet but less than 200 cubic feet:
(3) If the vault or pit is ventilated, paragraph (a) or (c) of this section applies.
(c) If a vault or pit covered by paragraph (b) of this section is ventilated by openings in the covers or grating and the
ratio of the internal volume, in cubic feet, to the effective ventilating area of the cover or grating, in square feet, is less
than 20 to 1, no additional ventilation is required.
The mathematics works out to require 25 square inches of effective ventilating area for a vault greater than 200 cubic
feet per Part 192.187(a)(1).
Ventilated vaults under Part 192.187(b)(3), for vaults greater than 75 cubic feet, but less than 200 cubic feet, require a
minimum effective ventilating area as illustrated below:
VAULT SIZE MINIMUM VENT AREA
76 cubic feet 3.8 square feet or 547 square inches
100 cubic feet 5.0 square feet or 720 square inches
199 cubic feet 9.9 square feet or 1,433 square inches

<<<PAGE 3>>>

It is difficult to justify that a smaller vault requires considerably more effective ventilating area.
I would appreciate an opinion on the reason for this seeming discrepancy in the code. Thank you for the assistance.
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 2953
