# BP Oil Pipeline Company — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-94-032
- **title:** BP Oil Pipeline Company — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1994-10-17
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-94-032 response to BP Oil Pipeline Company concerning 195.402.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-94-032.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-94-032.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-94-032
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1994/PI94032.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

October 17, 1994
Mr. L. S. Abraham
Health & Compliance Officer
BP Oil Pipeline Company
812 E. National Road
Vandalia, OH 45377-3016
Dear Mr. Abraham:
I have reconsidered my initial response to your letter of December 16, 1993, concerning
procedures required by 49 CFR 195.402(c)(4). Under this regulation, operators must have
procedures for “ determining which pipeline facilities are located in areas that would require an
immediate response by the operator to prevent hazards to the public if the facilities failed or
malfunctioned.”
Initially I supported the view that BP’ s policy of responding immediately to every failure or
malfunction, regardless of location, would not meet § 195.402(c)(4). According to your letter,
some of our inspectors had asked BP to identify environmentally sensitive, highly populated,
industrial, and agricultural areas along its pipelines; to state how it would respond to each area;
and to establish response priorities.
Based on the regulatory history cited in my earlier letter, it’ s apparent that operators only have to
identify their high risk facilities to comply with § 195.402(c)(4). So, by identifying all its facilities,
as BP apparently has done, an operator would not only meet but exceed the requirements of
§ 195.402(c)(4).
In addition, § 195.402(c)(4) does not require operators to have plans and priorities to respond to
failures or malfunctions at facilities under that section. However, response plans are a [sic]
essential part of the emergency procedures required by § 195.402(e) and of the abnormal
operation procedures required by § 195.402(d). Also, under § 195.402(c)(6), operators must
take steps to minimize the potential for hazards to occur at the facilities identified under
§ 195.402(c)(4).
I hope you were not too inconvenienced by my initial response. But please don’ t hesitate to write
if you need any additional information regarding our regulations.
Sincerely,
Cesar De Leon
Director for Pipeline Safety
Regulatory Programs
dal/195.402
94-10-17
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 2030