# BP Oil Company — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PI-97-0102
- **title:** BP Oil Company — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
- **source type:** guidance
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** guidance
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 1997-10-01
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** PI-97-0102 response to BP Oil Company concerning 195.404.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-97-0102.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-97-0102.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-interpretation-pi-97-0102
- **source url:** https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1997/g97_10_01_Abraham_195.404.pdf
**body:**

<<<PAGE 1>>>

PI-97-0102
U.S. Department of Transportation
Research and Special Programs Administration
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20590
October 1, 1997
Mr. Larry Abraham
Compliance Coordinator
BP Oil Company
200 Public Square
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2375
Dear Mr. Abraham:
This is in response to your letter dated May 7, 1997, asking if the Research and Special
Programs Administration’s Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) will accept BP's use of the
SCADA Master system to record pump discharge pressures at each pump/booster station
to meet the requirements of 49 CFR 195.404(b)(l). In your letter, you state that the scan
time for the SCADA system is 40 to 50 seconds in the South East Region and every 20
seconds in the Mid-West Region. The discharge pressure recorded in both regions is
based on an average of one minute of data. These discharge pressures would be stored on
tape and held for 36 months. The data would also be retrievable via computer in
graphical form with two weeks of data viewable at one time. The data would not be
collected during times of occasional communications failure.
OPS considers an appropriate minimum time interval for electronically recorded pressure
data as that time interval which is frequent enough to collect the pressures attained during
normal and abnormal conditions, such that the recorded data could be assembled to create
a facsimile of the pressures that actually occurred, including the magnitude and time
interval of all elevated pressures.
This approach requires the operator to review the dynamics of their individual pipeline to
determine what interval would be necessary and to ensure that all elevated pressures are
captured. An inspector could then review the operating dynamics of the pipeline to
determine if the chosen interval is small enough and that the recorded data reasonably
agrees with actual field data.
The use of the SCADA system in lieu of pressure chart recorders would be acceptable as
an option available to BP, if the SCADA system could be configured to collect and
archive sufficiently detailed pressure records. The recording of average pressure every
minute instead of the peak pressure each minute may not preserve the short-term,

<<<PAGE 2>>>

abnormal pressures that occur on BP's pipelines. BP should perform an operations
analysis to determine what SCADA configuration parameters would be necessary to
preserve the pressure history. Such an analysis could also be reviewed during an
inspection audit to verify the adequacy of the configuration parameters.
If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact me or L.E. Herrick of my
staff at (202) 366-5523.
Sincerely,
Richard D. Huriaux, P.E.
Director for Technology and Regulations
Office of Pipeline Safety
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 2770
