# Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC — Pipeline Special Permit

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PHMSA-2017-0161
- **title:** Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC — Pipeline Special Permit
- **source type:** permit
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** current
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2022-08-11
- **effective on:** 2022-08-11
- **summary:** PHMSA-2017-0161, issued 2022-08-11 for Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC's gas transmission system.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-special-permit-phmsa-2017-0161.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-special-permit-phmsa-2017-0161.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-special-permit-phmsa-2017-0161
- **source url:** https://www.regulations.gov/docket/PHMSA-2017-0161
**body:**

PHMSA pipeline special permit PHMSA-2017-0161. Operator: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC. System: Gas Transmission. Issue date: 2022-08-11.

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Class 1 to 3 Location
Special Permit Information:
Docket Number: PHMSA-2017-0161
Requested By: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC
Operator ID#: 19160
Original Date Requested: December 7, 2017
Original Issuance Date: August 11, 2022
Code Section(s): 49 CFR 192.611(a) and (d) and 192.619(a)
Purpose:
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety
(OPS),
1 provides this information to describe the facts of the subject special permit application
submitted by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC (TGP)2 to discuss any relevant public comments
received with respect to the application, to present the engineering and safety analysis of the special
permit application, and to make findings regarding whether the requested special permit should be
granted and, if so, under what conditions. TGP requested that PHMSA waive compliance from the 49
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 192.611(a) and (d) and 192.619(a) for a natural gas transmission
pipeline segment, where the class location has changed from Class 1 to a Class 3 location.
Pipeline System Affected:
This special permit application by TGP requests a waiver from the class location change requirements in
49 CFR 192.611(a) and (d) and 192.619(a) for approximately 1.050 miles of the 20-inch diameter gas
1 Throughout this special permit the usage of “PHMSA” or “PHMSA OPS” means the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Office of Pipeline Safety.
2 TGP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc.
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 1 of 10

<<<PAGE 2>>>

transmission pipeline located in Kanawha County, West Virginia.
Pipe specifications including outside diameter, year installed, seam type, coating type, pipe grade, wall
thickness, maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP), minimum pressure test pressure, and
pressure test factor based on the minimum test pressure are detailed in Table 1 – Pipe Specifications by
Line Name.
Table 1 – Pipe Specifications by Line Name
Outside
Wall
Min. Test
Pressure
Year
Line Name
Diameter
Installed
Seam
Type MAOP
Coating Type Grade
Thickness
Pressure
Test
(psig)
(inches)
(inches)
(psig)
Factor
100-1 20 1984 DSAW Fusion bonded epoxy X52 0.25 936 1,198 1.28
Note: DSAW is double submerged arc welded pipe weld seam type.
Psig means pounds per square inch gauge.
Without this special permit, 49 CFR 192.611(a) would require TGP to replace the special permit
segments with stronger pipe or reduce the pipeline MAOP for a Class 1 to Class 3 location change.
Special Permit Request:
On December 29, 2020, TGP applied to PHMSA for a special permit seeking relief from 49 CFR
192.611(a) and (d) and 192.619(a) for the below-listed special permit segments, where a class location
change occurred from the original Class 1 to a Class 3 on the 20-inch diameter Line 100-1 Pipeline
(Pipeline) located in Kanawha County, West Virginia.
TGP’s special permit applies to the special permit segments and special permit inspection area
described and defined as follows, using the TGP survey station references:
Special Permit Segments:
This special permit applies to the special permit segments identified using the TGP valve and station
references as detailed in Table 2 – Special Permit Segments.
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 2 of 10

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Table 2 – Special Permit Segments
Special
Permit
Outside
Line
Diameter
Name
Length
(feet)
Segment
Number3
(inches)
Start Survey Station
(Valve/MP–
Station)
End Survey
Station
County/Parish,
State
No.
Year
Installed Seam Type MAOP
(psig)
451 20 100-1 4,249.18 120-1 – 14819 (Valve/MP –
Station)
120-1 – 15995 Dwellings
Kanawha,
WV 13 1984 DSAW 936
452 20 100-1 1,816.56 120-1 – 19928 120-1 – 21744 Kanawha,
WV 2 1984 DSAW 936
453 20 100-1 845.38 120-1 - 23426 120-1 – 24271 Kanawha,
WV 1 1984 DSAW 936
Special Permit Inspection Area:
The special permit inspection area is defined as the area that extend 220 yards on each side of the
centerline as shown in Table 3 – Special Permit Inspection Area.
Table 3 – Special Permit Inspection Area
Special Permit
Inspection Area
Number
Special
Permit
Outside
Line
Diameter
Segment
Name
Start Survey Station
(Valve/MP – Station)
End Survey Station
(Valve/MP – Station)
Length4
(miles/feet)
(inches)
Number
1 451.452,
453 20 100-1 118-1 – 18.79 121-1 – 27219.53 46.02/
242,989.49
Public Notice:
On April 5, 2022, PHMSA posted a notice of this special permit request in the Federal Register (87 FR
19735) with a closing date of May 5, 2022. PHMSA did not receive any comments concerning this
special permit request.
The TGP special permit application letter, Federal Register notice, Final Environmental Assessment,
Finding of No Significant Impact, and all other pertinent documents are available for review in Docket
No. PHMSA-2017-0161 in the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) located at
www.Regulations.gov.
Analysis:
Background: On June 29, 2004, PHMSA published in the Federal Register (69 FR 38948) the criteria it
uses for the consideration of applications for class location change waivers, now being granted or denied
3 On February 3, 2022, TGP rescinded requested special permit segments 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 462, and 463.
4 If the special permit inspection area footage does not extent from launcher to receiver then the special permit inspection
area would need to be extended.
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 3 of 10

<<<PAGE 4>>>

through a special permit. First, certain threshold requirements should be met on a pipeline special
permit segments for a class location change special permit to be granted. Second, the age and
manufacturing process of the pipe; system design, and construction; environmental, operating and
maintenance histories; and integrity management (IM) program elements are evaluated as significant
criteria. These significant criteria are presented in matrix form and can be reviewed in the FDMS,
Docket No. PHMSA–RSPA-2004-17401. Third, special permits will only be granted when pipe
conditions and active IM provide a level of safety greater than or equal to a pipe replacement or pressure
reduction. The operator’s Federal pipeline safety regulation compliance history is also evaluated as part
of the criteria matrix for acceptability prior to issuance of a special permit.
Threshold Requirements: Each of the threshold requirements published by PHMSA in the June 29,
2004, Federal Register notice is discussed below regarding the TGP special permit request.
• No pipeline segment in a class location changing to Class 4 location will be considered.
• This special permit request is for three (3) special permit segments where a change has
occurred from a Class 1 location to a Class 3 location.
• TGP meets this requirement.
• No bare pipe will be considered.
• The special permit segments are externally coated with fusion bonded epoxy.
• TGP meets this requirement.
• No pipe containing wrinkle bends will be considered.
• There are no reported wrinkle bends in the special permit segments.
• TGP meets this requirement.
• No pipe segment operating above 72% of the specified minimum yield strength (SMYS) will be
considered for a Class 3 special permit.
• The special permit segments operate at or below 72% SMYS.
• TGP meets this requirement.
• Records must be produced that show a hydrostatic test to at least 1.25 times the MAOP. The records
should include test pressure, year of the test, test duration, and pressure test percent of MAOP for the
pipeline:
• TGP has provided records to PHMSA that the special permit segments have been tested to at
least 1.25 times the MAOP.
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 4 of 10

<<<PAGE 5>>>

• TGP meets this requirement
• Inline Inspection (ILI) must have been performed with no significant anomalies identified that
indicate systemic problems such as stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
• TGP ran an ILI for corrosion and deformation and an ILI for denting in all special permit
segments.
• Criteria for consideration of a class location change waiver, being considered through the special
permit, published by PHMSA in the Federal Register (69 FR 38948), define a waiver inspection
area (special permit inspection area) as up to 25 miles of pipe on either side of the waiver segment
(special permit segment).
• TGP has identified a longer segment surrounding the special permit segments as the special
permit inspection area. The special permit inspection area is the entire segment length
between the upstream launcher and downstream receiver on the ILI segment that contains the
special permit segments.
• A special permit would be contingent upon TGP’s incorporation of the special permit
segments into its written IM program as a covered segment in a high consequence area in
accordance with 49 CFR 192.903.
Criteria Matrix: The data submitted by TGP for the special permit segment has been compared to the
class location change special permit criteria matrix.
• The special permit segments fall in the probable acceptance column of the criteria matrix for:
• Pipe material and toughness, coating type, design stress, depth of cover, test pressure, test
failures, local geology, type of service, pressure fluctuations, safety related conditions, ILI type,
ILI timeframe, and damage prevention program.
• The special permit segments fall in the requires substantial justification column of the criteria
matrix for:
• Kinder Morgan, Inc. overall enforcement findings fall in the requires substantial justification
category. TGP’s 11-year enforcement findings do not fall within this category.
• This special permit requires TGP to implement the special permit conditions that include safety
requirements on the operations, maintenance, and IM of the special permit segments (1.050
miles) and the special permit inspection area (46.02 miles). Therefore, the safety benefits are
obtained well beyond the portion of the pipeline that experienced a class location change.
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 5 of 10

<<<PAGE 6>>>

• TGP will be required to submit an annual report for this special permit on integrity threats to the
pipeline in the special permit segments and the special permit inspection area.
Operational Integrity Compliance:
To inform PHMSA’s decision about whether a special permit could provide a level of safety greater than
or equal to a pipe replacement or pressure reduction and is consistent with pipeline safety, PHMSA
reviewed this special permit request to understand the known type of integrity threats that are in the
special permit segments and special permit inspection area. This integrity information was used to
consider special permit conditions to provide a systematic program to review and remediate the pipeline
for safety concerns. Additional operational integrity review and remediation requirements are required
by this special permit to ensure that the operator has an ongoing program to locate and remediate safety
threats. These threats to integrity and safety include any issues with the pipe coating quality, cathodic
protection effectiveness, operations damage prevention program, pipe depth of soil cover, weld seam
and girth weld integrity, anomalies in the pipe steel and welds, and material and structures either along
or near the pipeline that could cause the cathodic protection system to be ineffective. PHMSA would
have to carefully design a comprehensive set of conditions that TGP must implement to comply with
this special permit.
Past Enforcement History – January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2022:
During January 1, 2011, through January 31, 2022, TGP was cited in 27 enforcement actions with a total of
$257,600 in assessed civil penalties. PHMSA issued four (4) Corrective Action Orders, six (6) Notices of
Amendment, ten (10) Notices of Probable Violation, one (1) Safety Order, and six (6) Warning Letters to
TGP. Tables 4 and 5 below show PHMSA’s enforcement actions and civil penalties for TGP:
Table 4: TGP Enforcement Matters from
January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2022
Notice of
Status Corrective
Action Order
Notice of
Safety
Probable
Amendment
Order
Warning
Letter Total
Violation
CLOSED 3 5 9 1 6 24
OPEN 1 1 1 0 0 3
Total 4 6 10 1 6 27
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 6 of 10

<<<PAGE 7>>>

Table 5: TGP Enforcement Civil Penalty Status
January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2022
Proposed Awaiting Order Assessed Withdrawn/Reduced Collected
$384,200 $0 $257,600 $126,000 $257,000
Summary of Enforcement Findings for TGP includes: Reporting, welding, compliance with
specifications or procedures, corrosion control, operations and maintenance procedures, continuing
surveillance, public awareness, MAOP, control room management, relief devices, maintenance of
valves, qualification of operating personnel, and IM:
• 49 CFR 191.22, 191.27, 192.225, 192.229, 192.303, 192.469, 192.479, 192.481, 192.603,
192.605, 192.613, 192.615, 192.616, 192.619, 192.631, 192.705, 192.706, 192.709, 192.713,
192.735, 192.736, 192.739, 192.743, 192.745, 192,805, 192.905, 192.921, and 192.937.
Table 6 below shows PHMSA’s enforcement actions and civil penalties for TGP and the specific 49 CFR Part
191 and 192 violations:
Table 6: Summary of Enforcement Findings from TGP
January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2022
Notice of Amendment
Construction 1 Control Room
Management 3 OME Procedural
Manual 2
Operation and/or
Maintenance 2 Reporting 2 Welding of Steel in
Pipelines 1
Notice of Amendment Total: 11
Notice of Probable Violation
Control Room
Management 1 OME Procedural
Manual 7 Public Awareness 1
Corrosion Control 3 Operation and/or
Maintenance 8 Reporting 1
Integrity Management 3 Operator
Qualification 3 Welding of Steel in
Pipelines 1
Notice of Probable Violation Total: 28
Warning Letter
OME Procedural
Manual 2 Operation and/or
Maintenance 4 Reporting 1
Notice of Amendment Total: 7
Grand Total: 46
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 7 of 10

<<<PAGE 8>>>

Summary of Enforcement Findings for the Kinder Morgan Gas Pipelines Companies - CIG, EPNG,
NGPL, SNG, TEJAS, and TGP:
From January 1, 2011, through January 31, 2022, Kinder Morgan, the operator of TGP, was cited in 69
enforcement actions with a total of $1,077,800 in assessed civil penalties on its Colorado Interstate Gas
Company (CIG), El Paso Natural Gas Company (EPNG), Natural Gas Pipeline of America (NGPL), Southern
Natural Gas Company (SNG), Tejas Pipeline (TEJAS), and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (TGP) pipeline
systems. PHMSA issued seventeen (17) Notice of Amendments, twenty-two (22) Notices of Probable
Violation, twenty (21) Warning Letters, one (1) Safety Order, and eight (8) Corrective Action Orders to
Kinder Morgan.
Tables 7 and 8 below show PHMSA’s enforcement actions and civil penalties for Kinder Morgan on
these pipeline systems – CIG, EPNG, NGPL, SNG, TEJAS, and TGP with operator identification
numbers (OPID#) 2564, 4280, 13120, 18516, 4900, and 19160.
Table 7: Kinder Morgan Enforcement Matters from
January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2022
Notice of
Status Corrective
Action Order
Notice of
Safety
Probable
Amendment
Order
Warning
Letter Total
Violation
CLOSED 5 16 21 1 21 64
OPEN 3 1 1 0 0 5
Total 8 17 22 1 21 69
Table 8: Kinder Morgan Enforcement Civil Penalty Status
January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2022
Proposed Awaiting Order Assessed Withdrawn/Reduced Collected
$1,461,500 $0 $1,077,800 $383,700 $1,077,800
The type of 49 CFR Part 192 enforcement violations against Kinder Morgan on these six (6) pipeline
systems from January 1, 2011 through January 31, 2022, were as follows:
Summary of Enforcement Findings for CIG, EPNG, NGPL, SNG, TEJAS, and TGP includes:
The type of 49 CFR Part 192 enforcement violations against Kinder Morgan on these six (6) pipeline
systems from January 1, 2011, through January 31, 2022, included reporting, design, welding,
compliance with specifications or procedures, corrosion control, operations and maintenance
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 8 of 10

<<<PAGE 9>>>

procedures, continuing surveillance, public awareness, emergency plans, MAOP, control room
management, relief devices, maintenance of valves, qualification of operating personnel, and IM:
• 49 CFR 191.5, 191.14, 191.15, 191.22, 191.25, 191.27, 192.12, 192.14, 192.161, 192.199, 192.225,
192.227, 192.229, 192.303, 192.459, 192.463, 192.465, 192.469, 192.475, 192.479, 192.481,
192.603, 192.605, 192.613, 192.615, 192.616, 192.619, 192.625, 192.631, 192.705, 192.706,
192.707, 192.709, 192.713, 192.735, 192.736, 192.739, 192.743, 192.745, 192,805, 192.807,
192.905, 192.911, 192.917, 192.921, 192.933, 192.935, and 192.937.
Table 9 below gives a complete summary of the findings and the specific 49 CFR Part 191 and 192 violation:
Table 9: Summary of Enforcement Findings for
CIG, EPNG, NGPL, SNG, TEJAS, and TGP
January 1, 2011, through January 31, 2022
Notice of Amendment
OME Procedural
Manual 11 Operation and/or
Maintenance 2 Operator Qualification 3
Public Awareness 8 Reporting 3 Transportation of Gas 5
Integrity Management 10 Control Room
Management 4 Construction 1
Welding of Steel in
Pipelines 3
Notice of Amendment Total: 50
Notice of Probable Violation
Corrosion Control 13 OME Procedural
Manual 14 Operation and/or
Maintenance 26
Operator Qualification 7 Public Awareness 2 Reporting 5
Integrity Management 10 Control Room
Management 1 Welding of Steel in
Pipelines 1
Design 2
Notice of Probable Violation Total: 81
Warning Letter
Corrosion Control 10 OME Procedural
Manual 9 Operation and/or
Maintenance 31
Operator Qualification 2 Public Awareness 4 Reporting 1
Transportation of Gas 1 Integrity
Management 1 Design 1
Notice of Amendment Total: 60
Grand Total: 191
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 9 of 10

<<<PAGE 10>>>

Findings:
Based on the information submitted by TGP and PHMSA’s analysis of the technical, operational, and
safety issues, PHMSA finds that granting this special permit with conditions for TGP to operate the
special permit segments defined in Table 1 at its current MAOP for a Class 1 to 3 location change
would not be inconsistent with pipeline safety.
PHMSA has designed the special permit conditions to effectively assess and remediate threats to the
special permit segments and special permit inspection area, including pressure testing, obtaining pipe
material records, and conducting assessments to evaluate pipe girth welds that have not been non-
destructively tested, any pipe with missing material records, and SCC. To ensure TGP properly
implements the special permit conditions, TGP will be required to give PHMSA an annual review of
their compliance with the special permit.
PHMSA finds the issuance and full implementation of this special permit that waives the requirements
of 49 CFR 192.611 for a class location change to a Class 3 location is not inconsistent with pipeline
safety. This special permit requires TGP to implement the special permit conditions that include safety
requirements on the operations, maintenance, and IM of the special permit segments and the special
permit inspection area. TGP will be required to implement the special permit conditions in the special
permit segments and special permit inspection area, which include areas along the pipeline where
periodic assessment is not required by 49 CFR Part 192.
Completed in Washington DC on: August 11, 2022
Prepared by: PHMSA - Engineering and Research Division
Final Page of the Special Permit Analysis and Findings
PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings – WV
Page 10 of 10

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
August 11, 2022
Mr. Kenneth W. Grubb
Chief Operating Officer
Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Division
1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000
Houston, Texas 77002
Re: Docket No. PHMSA-2017-0161
Special Permit from August 11, 2022 to August 11, 2032
Dear Mr. Grubb:
On December 7, 2017, pursuant to 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 190.341, Tennessee
Gas Pipeline Company, LLC (TGP)1 applied to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) for a special permit. TGP requested a special permit to waive
compliance with 49 CFR §§ 192.611(a) and (d), and 192.619(a) for Class 1 to Class 3 location
changes on three (3) pipeline segments for approximately 1.050 miles of 20-inch diameter gas
transmission pipelines (Pipelines) located in Kanawha County, West Virginia. A gas
transmission pipeline operator is required by 49 CFR § 192.611 to confirm or revise the
maximum allowable operating pressure of a pipeline segment where the class location has
changed as defined in 49 CFR § 192.5.
On April 5, 2022, PHMSA published a Federal Register notice (87 FR 19735) announcing the
Special Permit Request. The Special Permit Request letter, Final Environmental Assessment
(FEA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), Special Permit Analysis and Findings
(SPAF), and all other pertinent documents for this special permit are available in Docket No.
PHMSA-2017-0161 in the Federal Docket Management System located at
www.regulations.gov.2
Subject to the stated terms and conditions, PHMSA grants this special permit (enclosed) based
on the information provided by TGP and the findings set forth in the SPAF, FEA, and FONSI.
This special permit provides relief from certain provisions of the Federal pipeline safety
1 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC is owned by Kinder Morgan, Inc.
2 https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=PHMSA-2017-0161.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

regulations for the Pipelines and requires TGP to comply with conditions and limitations
designed to maintain pipeline safety as defined in the special permit. Note that in accordance
with 49 CFR § 190.341(j), PHMSA reserves the right to revoke, suspend, or modify this special
permit if circumstances occur in which its continuance would be inconsistent with safety. If
TGP elects not to implement the special permit conditions, TGP must notify PHMSA within 60
days and comply with 49 CFR § 192.611 within 18 months of the date of this letter.
My staff would be pleased to discuss this special permit or any other regulatory matter with you.
Sentho White, Director of PHMSA Engineering and Research Division, may be contacted at
202-366-2415, on technical matters; and James Urisko, Director, Office of Pipeline Safety,
Southern Region, may be contacted at 404-832-1150, for operational matters specific to this
special permit.
Sincerely,
Alan K. Mayberry
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure: Special Permit – PHMSA-2017-0161
Special Permit: PHMSA-2017-0161 – Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC Letter of Decision – Class 1 to 3 Location – West Virginia
Page 2 of 2
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 23616
