# Colorado Interstate Gas — Pipeline Special Permit

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** PHMSA-2023-0002
- **title:** Colorado Interstate Gas — Pipeline Special Permit
- **source type:** permit
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** current
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2023-07-31
- **effective on:** 2023-07-31
- **summary:** PHMSA-2023-0002, issued 2023-07-31 for Colorado Interstate Gas's gas transmission system.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-special-permit-phmsa-2023-0002.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-special-permit-phmsa-2023-0002.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-special-permit-phmsa-2023-0002
- **source url:** https://www.regulations.gov/docket/PHMSA-2023-0002
**body:**

PHMSA pipeline special permit PHMSA-2023-0002. Operator: Colorado Interstate Gas. System: Gas Transmission. Issue date: 2023-07-31.

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
July 31, 2023
Kenneth W. Grubb
Chief Operating Officer
Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Division
1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000
Houston, Texas 77002
Re: Docket No. PHMSA-2023-0002
Special Permit from July 31, 2023 to July 31, 2033
Dear Mr. Grubb:
On December 29, 2022, pursuant to 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 190.341, Colorado
Interstate Gas Company, LLC (CIG)1 applied to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) for a special permit. CIG requested a special permit to waive
compliance with 49 CFR §§ 192.611(a) and (d), and 192.619(a) for Class 1 to Class 3 location
changes on one (1) pipeline segment for approximately 0.194 miles of 20-inch diameter gas
transmission pipeline (Pipeline) located in Douglas County, Colorado. A gas transmission
pipeline operator is required by 49 CFR § 192.611 to confirm or revise the maximum allowable
operating pressure of a pipeline segment where the class location has changed as defined in 49
CFR § 192.5.
On January 18, 2023, PHMSA published a Federal Register notice (88 FR 2996) requesting
public comment on the special permit request. The special permit request letter, Final
Environmental Assessment (FEA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), Special
Permit Analysis and Findings (SPAF), and all other pertinent documents for this special permit
are available in Docket No. PHMSA-2023-0002 in the Federal Docket Management System
located at www.regulations.gov.
2
Subject to the stated terms and conditions, PHMSA grants this special permit (enclosed) based
on the information provided by CIG and the findings set forth in the SPAF, FEA, and FONSI.
This special permit provides relief from certain provisions of the Federal pipeline safety
1 Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC is owned by Kinder Morgan, Inc.
2 https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=PHMSA-2023-0002.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

regulations for the Pipelines and requires CIG to comply with conditions and limitations
designed to maintain pipeline safety as defined in the special permit. In accordance with 49 CFR
§ 190.341(j), PHMSA reserves the right to revoke, suspend, or modify this special permit if
circumstances occur in which its continuance would be inconsistent with pipeline safety. If CIG
elects not to implement the special permit conditions, CIG must notify PHMSA within 60 days
and comply with 49 CFR § 192.611 within 18 months of the date of this letter.
My staff would be pleased to discuss this special permit or any other regulatory matter with you.
Mary L. McDaniel, Acting Director of PHMSA Engineering and Research Division, may be
contacted at (713) 272-2847, on technical matters; and James Urisko, Director, Office of Pipeline
Safety, Southern Region, may be contacted at (404) 832-1150, for operational matters specific to
this special permit.
Sincerely,
ALAN
KRAMER
MAYBERRY
Digitally signed by
ALAN KRAMER
MAYBERRY
Date: 2023.07.31
10:17:26 -04'00'
Alan K. Mayberry
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure: Special Permit – PHMSA-2023-0002
Special Permit: PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Page 2 of 2
Letter of Decision – Class 1 to 3 Location

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Class 1 to 3 Location
Special Permit Information:
Docket Number: PHMSA-2023-0002
Requested By: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC
Operator ID#: 2564
Date Requested: December 29, 2022
Issuance Date: July 31, 2023
Code Sections: 49 CFR 192.611(a) and (d), and 192.619(a)
Purpose:
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline
Safety (OPS),1 provides this information to describe the facts of the subject special permit
application submitted by Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC (CIG)2 to discuss any relevant
public comments received with respect to the application, to present the engineering and safety
analysis of the special permit application, and to make findings regarding whether the requested
special permit should be granted and, if so, under what conditions. CIG requested that PHMSA
waive compliance from the 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 192.611(a) and (d) and
192.619(a) for natural gas transmission pipeline segments, where the class location has changed
from Class 1 to a Class 3 location.
Pipeline System Affected:
This special permit application by CIG requests a waiver from the class location change
requirements in 49 CFR 192.611(a) and (d) and 192.619(a) for approximately 0.194 miles of the
1 Throughout this special permit the usage of “PHMSA” or “PHMSA OPS” means the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Office of Pipeline Safety.
2 CIG is owned by Kinder Morgan, Inc.
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 1 of 10

<<<PAGE 2>>>

20-inch diameter Line 0009-A Pipeline located in Douglas County, Colorado.
Pipe specifications including outside diameter, year installed, seam type, coating type, pipe
grade, wall thickness, maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP), minimum pressure test
pressure, and pressure test factor based on the minimum test pressure are detailed in Table 1 –
Pipe Specifications by Line Name.
Table 1 – Pipe Specifications by Line Name
Outside
Min Test
Line
Year
Diameter
Name
Installed
Seam
Type Coating Type Grade Wall Thickness
(inches)
MAOP
Pressure
Pressure
(psig)
Test Factor
(inches)
(psig)
0009-A 20 1966 DSAW Coal Tar Enamel X52 0.219 820 1,191 1.45
Note: DSAW is a double submerged arc welded pipe longitudinal seam.
Without this special permit, 49 CFR 192.611(a) would require CIG to replace the special permit
segment with stronger pipe or reduce the pipeline MAOP for a Class 1 to Class 3 location
change.
Special Permit Request:
On December 29, 2022, CIG applied to PHMSA for a special permit seeking relief from 49 CFR
192.611(a) and (d) and 192.619(a) for the below-listed special permit segment, where a class
location change occurred from the original Class 1 to a Class 3 on the 20-inch diameter Line
0009-A Pipeline located in Douglas County, Colorado.
CIG’s special permit applies to the special permit segment and special permit inspection area
described and defined as follows, using the CIG mile post (MP) and survey station (SS)
references:
Special Permit Segment:
This special permit applies to the special permit segment in Table 2 – Special Permit
Segment.
Table 2 – Special Permit Segment
Special
Outside
Permit
Line
Diameter
Name
Length
(feet)
Start Survey
Station
End Survey
Station
County, State No.
Dwellings
Year
Seam
MAOP
Segment
Number
Installed
Type
(psig)
(inches)
(MP - SS)
(MP - SS)
1
(KM 725) 20 0009-A 1,022.62 87 – 1491.38 87 – 2514 Douglas, CO 7 1966 DSAW 820
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 2 of 10

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Note: DSAW is a double submerged arc welded pipe longitudinal seam.
Special Permit Inspection Area:
The special permit inspection area is defined as the area that extends 220 yards on each side of
the centerline as listed in Table 3 – Special Permit Inspection Area.
Table 3 – Special Permit Inspection Area
Special
Special
Outside
Start Survey
End Survey
Permit
Permit
Diameter
Inspection
Segment(s)
Line
Name Length
Master Segment
Station
Station
(miles)
(inches)
(MP - SS)
(MP - SS)
Area Number
Included
1 1 (KM 725) 20 0009-A Colorado Springs to Watkins 49-3487.53 108-5196.7 59.5
Public Notice:
On January 18, 2023, PHMSA posted a notice of this special permit request in the Federal
Register (88 FR 2996) with a public comment closing date of February 17, 2023. PHMSA has
reviewed all public comments received for Docket Number PHMSA-2023-0002. PHMSA
received public comments concerning this special permit request that have been addressed in the
Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FEA and FONSI).
The CIG special permit application letter, Federal Register notice, Final Environmental
Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, and all other pertinent documents are available
for review in Docket No. PHMSA-2023-0002 in the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) located at www.Regulations.gov.
Analysis:
Background: On June 29, 2004, PHMSA published in the Federal Register (69 FR 38948) the
criteria it uses for the consideration of applications for class location change waivers, now being
granted or denied through a special permit. First, certain threshold requirements should be met
on a pipeline special permit segment for a class location change special permit to be granted.
Second, the age and manufacturing process of the pipe; system design, and construction;
environmental, operating and maintenance histories; and integrity management (IM) program
elements are evaluated as significant criteria. These significant criteria are presented in matrix
form and can be reviewed in the FDMS, Docket No. PHMSA–RSPA-2004-17401. Third,
special permits will only be granted when pipe conditions and active IM provide a level of safety
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 3 of 10

<<<PAGE 4>>>

greater than or equal to a pipe replacement or pressure reduction. The operator’s Federal
pipeline safety regulation compliance history is also evaluated as part of the criteria matrix for
acceptability prior to issuance of a special permit.
Threshold Requirements: Each of the threshold requirements published by PHMSA in the June
29, 2004, Federal Register notice is discussed below regarding the CIG special permit request.
1) No pipeline segments in a class location changing to Class 4 location will be considered.
• This special permit request is for one (1) special permit segment where a change has
occurred from a Class 1 location to a Class 3 location.
• CIG meets this requirement.
2) No bare pipe will be considered.
• The special permit segment is externally coated with fusion bonded epoxy.
• CIG meets this requirement.
3) No pipe containing wrinkle bends will be considered.
• There are no reported wrinkle bends in the special permit segment.
• CIG meets this requirement.
4) No pipe segments operating above 72% of the specified minimum yield strength (SMYS)
will be considered for a Class 3 special permit.
• The special permit segment operates at or below 72% SMYS.
• CIG meets this requirement.
5) Records must be produced that show a hydrostatic test to at least 1.25 time the MAOP. The
records should include test pressure, year of the test, test duration, and pressure test percent
of MAOP for each pipeline:
• CIG has provided records that demonstrate the special permits segment has been tested
to at least 1.25 times the MAOP.
• CIG meets this requirement.
6) In-line inspection (ILI) must have been performed with no significant anomalies identified
that indicate systemic problems such as stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
• An ILI tool was run in 2021 with no significant anomalies.
• CIG meets this requirement.
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 4 of 10

<<<PAGE 5>>>

7) Criteria for consideration of a class location change waiver, being considered through the
special permit, published by PHMSA in the Federal Register (69 FR 38948), define a waiver
inspection area (special permit inspection area) as up to 25 miles of pipe on either side of
the waiver segment (special permit segment).
• CIG has identified longer segments surrounding the special permit segment as the
special permit inspection area. The special permit inspection area has been extended
to the entire segment length between the upstream launcher and downstream receiver
on each ILI segment that contains the special permit segment.
Criteria Matrix: The data submitted by PNGTS for the special permit segments have been
compared to the class location change special permit criteria matrix.
• The following falls in the probable acceptance column of the criteria matrix for:
o Class location change, pipe material, design stress, pipe girth welds, test pressure,
test failures, local geology, type of service, pressure fluctuations, safety related
conditions, IM program, ILI time frame, ILI type, direct assessment, coating
assessment, damage prevention program.
• The following falls in the possible acceptance column of the criteria matrix for:
o Pipe manufactured in 1966, leaks and failures, coal tar enamel coating, and
cathodic protection.
• The special permit segment falls in the required substantial justification column of the
criteria matrix for the enforcement history for the operating company, Kinder Morgan,
Inc.
Operational Integrity Compliance:
To inform PHMSA’s decision about whether a special permit could provide a level of safety
greater than or equal to a pipe replacement or pressure reduction and is consistent with pipeline
safety, PHMSA reviewed this special permit request to understand the known type of integrity
threats that are in the special permit segment and special permit inspection area. This integrity
information was used to consider special permit conditions to provide a systematic program to
review and remediate the pipeline for safety concerns. Additional operational integrity review
and remediation requirements are required by this special permit to ensure that the operator has
an ongoing program to locate and remediate safety threats. These threats to integrity and safety
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 5 of 10

<<<PAGE 6>>>

include any issues with the pipe coating quality, cathodic protection effectiveness, operations
damage prevention program, pipe depth of soil cover, weld seam and girth weld integrity,
anomalies in the pipe steel and welds, and material and structures either along or near the
pipeline that could cause the cathodic protection system to be ineffective. PHMSA has carefully
designed a comprehensive set of conditions that CIG must implement to comply with this special
permit.
Past Enforcement History – January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023:
During January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023, CIG was cited in five (5) enforcement actions with
a total of $154,800 in assessed civil penalties. PHMSA issued one (1) Notice of Amendment, one (1)
Notice of Probable Violation, and three (3) Warning Letters to CIG. Tables 4 and 5 below shows
PHMSA’s enforcement actions and civil penalties for CIG:
Table 4 - CIG Enforcement Matters from
January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023
Notice of
Status Corrective
Action Order
Notice of
Safety
Probable
Amendment
Order
Warning
Letter Total
Violation
CLOSED 0 1 1 0 3 5
OPEN 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1 1 0 3 5
Table 5 - CIG Enforcement Civil Penalty Status
January 1, 2011 through July 31, 2022
Proposed Awaiting Order Assessed Withdrawn/Reduced Collected
$198,000 $43,200 $154,800
$154,800 Summary of Enforcement Findings for CIG includes:
• Corrosion Control: Records; Integrity Management: High Consequence Area – Integrity
Actions and Preventative and Mitigative Measures; OME Procedural Manual: General and
Maintenance and Normal Operations; Operations and Maintenance: Overpressure safety
devices and overfill protection systems, Valve Maintenance, and General; Reporting:
Immediate Reporting Incident; Transportation of Gas: Conversion to Service.
• 49 CFR 191.5, 191.14, 192.461, 192.475, 192.491, 192.603, 192.605, 192.745, and 192.935.
Table 6 below shows PHMSA’s enforcement actions and civil penalties for CIG and the specific 49
CFR Parts 191 and 192 violations:
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 6 of 10

<<<PAGE 7>>>

Table 6 - Summary of Enforcement Findings from CIG
January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023
Notice of Amendment
OME Procedural Manual 1 Reporting 1 Transportation of Gas 1
Notice of Amendment Total: 3
Notice of Probable Violation
Integrity Management 3 Operation and/or Maintenance 2
Notice of Probable Violation Total: 5
Warning Letter
Corrosion Control 1 Integrity Management 1 OME Procedural Manual 1
Operation and/or Maintenance 1
Warning Letter Total: 4
Grand Total: 12
Summary of Enforcement Findings for the Kinder Morgan Gas Pipelines Companies - CIG,
EPNG, NGPL, SNG, Tejas, and CIG:
From January 1, 2011, through January 22, 2023, Kinder Morgan, the operator of CIG, was cited in 64
enforcement actions with a total of $979,900 in assessed civil penalties on its Colorado Interstate Gas
Company (CIG), El Paso Natural Gas Company (EPNG), Natural Gas Pipeline of America (NGPL),
Southern Natural Gas Company (SNG), Tejas Pipeline (Tejas), and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
(CIG) pipeline systems. PHMSA issued seven (7) Corrective Action Orders, 15 Notice of
Amendments, 20 Notices of Probable Violations, and 22 Warning Letters to Kinder Morgan.
Tables 7 and 8 below show PHMSA’s enforcement actions and civil penalties for Kinder
Morgan on these pipeline systems – CIG, EPNG, NGPL, SNG, Tejas, and CIG - with operator
identification numbers (OPID#) 2564, 4280, 13120, 18516, 4900, and 19160.
Table 7 - Kinder Morgan Enforcement Matters from
January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023
Notice of
Status Corrective
Action Order
Notice of
Safety
Probable
Amendment
Order
Warning
Letter Total
Violation
CLOSED 3 15 20 0 22 60
OPEN 4 0 0 0 0 4
Total 7 15 20 0 22 64
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 7 of 10

<<<PAGE 8>>>

Table 8 - Kinder Morgan Enforcement Civil Penalty Status
January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023
Proposed Awaiting Order Assessed Withdrawn/Reduced Collected
$1,363,600 $0 $979,900 $383,700 $979,900
The type of 49 CFR Part 192 enforcement violations against Kinder Morgan on these six (6)
pipeline systems from January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023 were as follows:
Summary of Enforcement Findings for CIG, EPNG, NGPL, SNG, Tejas, and CIG
includes:
• Atmospheric Corrosion Control: General and Monitoring; Construction: Compliance with
Standards; Control Room Management: Alarm Management and Fatigue Mitigation;
Design: Supports and Anchors; External Corrosion Control: Cathodic Protection,
Examination of Buried Pipe, Monitoring, and Test Stations; Gas Transportation:
Conversion of Service and Underground Natural Gas Storage; Internal Corrosion Control:
Inspection Internal Surface; Integrity Management: Addressing Integrity Issues, Continual
IM Baseline Assessment, Continual Process of Evaluation and Assessment, High
Consequence Area (HCA) Identification, HCAs – Integrity Actions, Preventative and
Mitigative Measures, and Threat Identification; Maintenance: Compressor Stations-Gas
Detection, Compressor Stations-Inspection and Testing of Relief Devices, Compressor
Stations-Storage of Combustible Materials, Line Markers, Leak Surveys, Pressure Limiting
and Regulating Stations Inspection and Testing, Relief Devices, Patrolling, Record Keeping,
and Valve Maintenance; OME Procedural Manual: General and Maintenance and Normal
Operations; Operations and Maintenance: Overpressure safety devices and overfill
protection systems and Valve Maintenance; Operations: Change in Class Location,
Continual Surveillance, Emergency Plans, General, MAOP, and Odorization of Gas;
Operator Qualification: Qualification Program and Recordkeeping; Public Awareness:
Develop and Implement Public Awareness, Documentation available for Review, Follow
API RP 1162, Justification for not following API RP 1162, Language Used, and Specifics
addressing the Public; Reporting: Filing SRCR, Incident Reports, Immediate Reporting
Incident, National Registry of Pipeline and LNG Operators, Offshore Pipeline Condition
Report; Welding: Limitations on Welders and Procedures.
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 8 of 10

<<<PAGE 9>>>

• 49 CFR 191.3, 191.5, 191.15, 191.22, 191.23, 191.25, 191.27, 192.3, 192.12, 192.14,
192.161, 192.201, 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.303, 192.459, 192.461, 192.463,
192.465, 192.469, 192.475, 192.479, 192.481, 192.603, 192.605, 192.611, 192.613,
192.615, 192.616, 192.619, 192.625, 192.631, 192.705, 192.706, 192.707, 192.709,
192.713, 192.731, 192.735, 192.736, 192.739, 192.743, 192.745, 192.805, 192.807,
192.905, 192.917, 192.921, 192.933, 192.935, and 192.937.
Table 6 below gives a complete summary of the findings and the specific 49 CFR Parts 191 and 192
violations:
Table 9 - Summary of Enforcement Findings for
CIG, EPNG, NGPL, SNG, Tejas, and CIG
January 1, 2012 through January 22, 2023
Notice of Amendment
Construction 1 Control Room Management 4 Integrity Management 2
OME Procedural Manual 6 Operation and/or Maintenance 2 Operator Qualification 3
Public Awareness 8 Reporting 3 Transportation of Gas 5
Welding of Steel in Pipelines 1
Notice of Amendment Total: 35
Notice of Probable Violation
Corrosion Control 6 Integrity Management 9 OME Procedural Manual 11
Operation and/or Maintenance 14 Operator Qualification 8 Public Awareness 2
Reporting 4 Welding of Steel in Pipelines 2
Notice of Probable Violation Total: 56
Warning Letter
Corrosion Control 13 Design 1 Integrity Management 1
OME Procedural Manual 13 Operation and/or Maintenance 43 Operator Qualification 4
Public Awareness 4 Reporting 4 Transportation of Gas 1
Warning Letter Total: 84
Grand Total: 167
Findings:
Based on the information submitted by CIG and PHMSA’s analysis of the technical, operational,
and safety issues, PHMSA finds that granting this special permit with conditions that requires
CIG to operate the special permit segment on the 20-inch diameter 0009-A Pipeline located in
Douglas County, Colorado at the current MAOP for a Class 1 to Class 3 location change
segment is not inconsistent with pipeline safety.
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 9 of 10

<<<PAGE 10>>>

PHMSA has designed the special permit conditions to effectively assess and remediate threats to
the special permit segment and special permit inspection area, including pressure testing
standards, obtaining pipe material records, and conducting assessments to evaluate pipe girth
welds that have not been non-destructively tested, any pipe with missing material records, and
SCC. To ensure CIG properly implements the special permit conditions, CIG will be required to
give PHMSA an annual review of their compliance with the special permit.
PHMSA finds the issuance and full implementation of this special permit that waives the
requirements of 49 CFR 192.611(a) and (d) and 192.619(a) for a class location change to a Class
3 location is not inconsistent with pipeline safety. This special permit requires CIG to implement
the special permit conditions that include safety requirements on the operations, maintenance,
and integrity management of the special permit segment and the special permit inspection area.
CIG will be required to implement the special permit conditions along the special permit
segment and special permit inspection area in pipeline segments that are not high consequence
areas and would not normally be required by 49 CFR Part 192 to be assessed on a periodic
interval for threats.
Completed in Washington DC on: July 31, 2023
Prepared By: PHMSA – Engineering and Research Division
PHMSA-2023-0002 – Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC Special Permit Analysis and Findings
Page 10 of 10
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 23781
