P-85-003
P-85-003
NTSB safety recommendation P-85-003.
THE NTSB RECOMMENDS THAT THE MOBIL PIPE LINE COMPANY: DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM TO: SYSTEMATICALLY IDENTIFY ALL LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO ITS PIPELINE RIGHTS-OF-WAY AT WHICH PERSONS WORK OR RESIDE; TO INFORM ALL PERSONS AT THESE LOCATIONS OF THE PIPELINE, THE NATURE OF THE MATERIALS TRANSPORTED IN THE PIPELINE AND THE ASSOCIATED HAZARDS, AND THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN THE EVENT OF A PIPELINE FAILURE OR OTHER EMERGENCY; AND VERIFY PERIODICALLY THE ACCURACY OF THE SURVEY AND FOLLOWUP.
Priority: CLASS II
Overall Status: Closed - Unacceptable Action
Issued Date: 1985-02-22
Adopted Date: 1985-02-22
Overall Date Closed: 1989-05-19
Synopsis: ON FEBRUARY 28, 1984, AT 10:30 A.M., C.S.T., A FRONT END LOADER, OPERATED BY AN EMPLOYEE OF PIONEER CONCRETE OF TEXAS, INC. (PIONEER), STRUCK AND PUNCTURED AN 8-INCH-DIAMETER NATURAL GAS LIQUID (NGL) PIPELINE IN HURST, TEXAS, OPERATED BY MOBIL PIPE LINE COMPANY (MOBIL). NGL AT 460 PSIG PRESSURE ESCAPED FROM THE PUNCTURE AND WAS IGNITED WHILE THE OPERATOR OF THE FRONTEND LOADER WAS BACKING THE LOADER AWAY FROM THE PUNCTURED PIPELINE. THE OPERATOR RECEIVED FIRST-AND SECOND-DEGREE BURNS OVER 30 PERCENT OF HIS BODY. SOON AFTER THE RELEASE OF NGL, AUTOMATIC VALVES IN THE PIPELINE CLOSED TO ISOLATE THE PUNCTURE WITHIN A 3-MILE SEGMENT OF THE PIPELINE. THE FIRE EXTINGUISHED ITSELF AT 8:30 P.M. WHEN THE NGL WITHIN THE ISOLATED SEGMENT HAD BEEN CONSUMED. BY MIDMORNING OF FEBRUARY 29, 1984, THE DAMAGED PIPE HAD BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED, AND THE PIPELINE WAS RETURNED TO SERVICE.
Probable Cause: None
Ntsbnumber: DCA84FP018
Report Number: None
Addressee Name: ExxonMobil Pipeline Company
Addressee Status: Closed - Unacceptable Action
Addressee Date Closed: 1989-05-19
Addressee Organization Type: P-Private Industry
Communication Date: 1989-05-19
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
Addressee Organization Type: P-Private Industry
Communication Date: 1988-10-21
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.