P-86-011
P-86-011
NTSB safety recommendation P-86-011.
THE NTSB RECOMMENDS THAT THE CONTINENTAL PIPE LINE COMPANY: BASED UPON THE RESULTS OF THE JOB/TASK ANALYSIS, ESTABLISH INSPECTION AND WORK STANDARDS FOR PIPELINE RECOATING OPERATIONS AND CONDUCT PERIODIC QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEWS TO MEASURE THE ADEQUACY OF THE LEVEL OF INSPECTION PROVIDED ON-SITE AT PIPELINE RECOATING PROJECTS.
Priority: CLASS II
Overall Status: Closed - Acceptable Action
Issued Date: 1986-04-17
Adopted Date: 1986-03-18
Overall Date Closed: 1989-07-12
Synopsis: ABOUT 10:30 A.M. ON JULY 23, 1985, IN A RURAL AREA ABOUT 8 MILES SOUTH OF KAYCEE, WYOMING, A GIRTH WELD CRACKED DURING A PIPELINE RECOATING PROJECT ON A 23-YEAR-OLD, 8-INCH DIAMETER PIPELINE OWNED BY THE CONTINENTAL PIPE LINE COMPANY. THE CRACKED GIRTH WELD ALLOWED THE RELEASE, ATOMIZATION, AND IGNITION OF AIRCRAFT TURBINE FUEL UNDER 430 POUNDS PRESSURE, KILLING ONE PERSON, BURNING SIX PERSONS, DESTROYING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, AND SHUTTING DOWN THE PIPELINE. DAMAGE WAS ESTIMATED AT MORE THAN $128,000.
Probable Cause: None
Ntsbnumber: DCA85FP016
Report Number: PAR-86-01
Addressee Name: Continental Pipeline Company
Addressee Status: Closed - Acceptable Action
Addressee Date Closed: 1989-07-12
Addressee Organization Type: P-Private Industry
Communication Date: 1988-12-27
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
Communication Contents: BESIDES ASSIGNING AN INSPECTOR OR INSPECTORS TO PIPELINE MAINTENANCE AND/OR RECONDITIONING WORK, CHIEF INSPECTORS ARE ALSO ASSIGNED WHERE THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT IS SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO WARRANT ONE.
Addressee Organization Type: P-Private Industry
Communication Date: 1988-11-08
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
Addressee Organization Type: P-Private Industry
Communication Date: 1989-07-12
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
Addressee Organization Type: P-Private Industry
Communication Date: 1988-10-21
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.