P-00-025
P-00-025
Page 1Official PDFNational Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C. 20594 Safety Recommendation Date: December 15, 2000 In reply refer to: P-00-25 Mr. Jim Hughes Utilities Board Manager Utilities Board of the City of Bridgeport 513 Alabama Avenue Bridgeport, Alabama 35740 The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency charged by Congress with investigating transportation accidents, determining their probable cause, and making recommendations to prevent similar accidents from occurring. We are providing the following information to urge your organization to take action on the safety recommendation in this letter. The Safety Board is vitally interested in this recommendation because it is designed to prevent accidents and save lives. This recommendation addresses procedures for responding to natural gas leaks. The recommendation is derived from the Safety Boardís investigation of the natural gas pipeline rupture, explosion, and fire in Bridgeport, Alabama, on January 22, 1999,1 and is consistent with the evidence we found and the analysis we performed. As a result of this investigation, the Safety Board has issued seven safety recommendations, one of which is addressed to the Utilities Board of the City of Bridgeport (Utilities Board). Information supporting the recommendation is discussed below. The Safety Board would appreciate a response from you within 90 days addressing the actions you have taken or intend to take to implement our recommendation. On January 22, 1999, while digging a trench behind a building at 406 Alabama Avenue, a backhoe operator damaged a 3/4-inch steel natural gas service line and a 1-inch water service line, both of which were underground. This resulted in two leaks in the natural gas service line, which was operated at 35 psig. One leak occurred where the backhoe bucket had contacted and pulled the natural gas service line. The other was a physical separation of the gas service line at an underground joint near the meter, which was close to the building. Gas migrated into the building at 406 Alabama Avenue, where it ignited about 10:02 a.m. An explosion followed, destroying three buildings: 404, 406, and 408 Alabama Avenue. Other buildings within a two- 1 For additional information, read Pipeline Accident BriefóNatural Gas Pipeline Rupture, Explosion, and Fire, Bridgeport, Alabama, January 22, 1999 (NTSB/PAB-00/01). 7307#
Page 22 block area of the explosion were significantly damaged. Three fatalities, five serious injuries,2 and one minor injury resulted from this accident. The National Transportation Safety Board determined that the probable cause of the accident was the failure of R&B Construction (R&B) to establish and follow safe procedures for excavation activities, resulting in damage to a 3/4-inch gas service line, and the failure of the Utilities Board to provide appropriate emergency response to the subsequent natural gas leak. The Utilities Board paged its field personnel shortly after the leak was reported, between 9:18 and 9:22 a.m. Shortly afterward, five Utilities Board employees responded to the excavation site from three locations to locate and repair the leaks. One of the Utilities Board employees told Safety Board investigators that upon his arrival at the accident scene, the R&B backhoe operator showed him where he had wrapped black tape over the leak in the gas service line. In addition, he and other Utilities Board employees noticed that water was running on the ground. They could hear the hissing of leaking gas and smell a strong natural gas odor in the general area. The Utilities Board employee who was the acting supervisor turned the water off so that field personnel could excavate and locate the leak. The acting supervisor could see a portion of the pulled gas service line above ground and said that he suspected that the gas service line was severed at some point. Though the acting supervisor could hear the gas blowing and see the gas bubbling from the water in the excavated ditch, he did not know the direction in which the gas was blowing. He told investigators that he ìwas hopingî that the line was pulled off at the main and that the gas was blowing up into the air. He added that he believed the leak was routine and the situation was safe. The Utilities Board employees did not check for gas migrating underground or accumulating in buildings and did not stop flow of the gas. After the acting supervisor turned off the water, a Utilities Board employee started digging to remove water and soil from the trench with a backhoe. Shortly after the Utilities Board backhoe operator started digging, the building at 406 Alabama Avenue exploded. The Alabama State Fire Marshals Office determined that the likely source of ignition for the accumulated natural gas was a gas-fired heater at 406 Alabama Avenue, which had an active pilot light at the time of the explosion.3 The Superintendent of the Utilities Board estimated that within 5 to 10 minutes after the explosion he had closed two valves on the 4-inch natural gas main feeding the natural gas to the broken service line. The Utilities Boardís written emergency procedures in effect at the time of the January 22, 1999, accident instruct service personnel to ìÖevaluate the extent of the emergency, request assistance as needed, and inform the manager if necessary.î The procedures further direct service personnel to: 2 According to the Jackson County Coroner, on March 23, 2000, 14 months and 1 day after the accident, one of the seriously injured persons died as a result of injuries sustained in the explosion. In accordance with 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 830.2, his injuries continue to be classified as ìseriousî for reporting purposes. 49 CFR 830.2 defines fatal injury as ìany injury which results in death within 30 days of the accident.î 3 Although the gas line had separated underground, the compacted earth surrounding the line would have provided a path that allowed continued gas flow sufficient to have fueled the pilot light.#
Page 33 Evacuate and secure the area if necessary. Actions should be directed towards protecting people first and then property. ÖIf, in the opinion of the person in charge, the emergency is so severe that immediate shutdown is imperative, he may do so without clearance from the Manager. However, the procedures do not instruct employees responding to a reported leak to consider the possibility of multiple leaks, check for gas accumulation in nearby buildings, and, if necessary, to take steps to promptly stop the flow of gas. Upon arriving at the accident scene, Utilities Board employees could have taken a number of actions that might have either prevented the accident or loss of life. For instance, they could have closed the valves in the 4-inch main, squeezed the exposed service line, and checked for gas migration underground. The Utilities Boardís procedures did not include such safeguards. Since the accident, the emergency procedures have been changed only to update the names, addresses, and phone numbers of contact persons and employees. The Safety Board concludes that the Utilities Boardís procedures for responding to pipeline emergencies are deficient. Therefore, the Safety Board recommends that the Utilities Board of the City of Bridgeport: Revise your emergency plan and procedures for responding to reported gas leaks, paying particular attention to the possibility of multiple leaks and to the underground migration of gas into nearby buildings from damaged pipelines. In addition, train appropriate personnel in the new procedures, and ensure that they understand existing procedures to secure the area and protect people. (P-00-25) The Safety Board also issued safety recommendations to the Research and Special Programs Administration, the Alabama Public Service Commission, Alabama One Call, and R&B Construction. In your response to the recommendation in this letter, please refer to P-00-25. If you need additional information, you may call (202) 314-6170. Acting Chairman HALL and Members HAMMERSCHMIDT, GOGLIA, BLACK, and CARMODY concurred in these recommendations. Original Signed By: Jim Hall Acting Chairman#
This is an NTSB safety recommendation letter. NTSB recommendations are advisory and do not themselves create binding regulatory requirements.