P-80-046 through P-80-047
P-80-046 through P-80-047
Page 1Official PDFISSUED: June 4 , 1980 ------------_--________________I________- Forwarded to: \ Honorable Howard Dugoff Administrator Research and Special Programs Administration Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 SAFETY RECOMMENDAT I ON (S) P-80-46 and -47 __,.____________ _ _ ~ A t 1 1 : l O a.m., e.s.t., on February 21, 1980, an explosion and fire destroyed four stores in a shopping complex and severely damaged an adjoining restaurant in Cordele, Georgia. Of the eight persons who were injured, three died later as a result of their injuries. Property damage was extensive. The gas department construction crew responded promptly to the accident and s h u t off the gas t o the affected section of t h e shopping complex by digging up and closing the tap tee on the gas main. Gas shutoff was completed 45 minutes after the accident. The National Transportation Safety Board's continuing investigation of the accident has revealed that natural gas leaked from a 1-inch steel service line, which had been pulled from a I-inch compression coupling, and migrated under a concrete slab floor and into a jewelry store where it was ignited by an unknown source. On February 18, 1980, a crew from the City of Cordele Gas Department discontinued gas service to a gasoline service station. Since no maps, records, or measurements were available, the crew used a pipe locator to locate the service line and a backhoe to dig for it. While digging for the service line, t h e backhoe struck and broke i t directly behind a row of stores. The crew promptly installed a 1-inch valve and closed it. The crew took no additional action to determine t h e possibility of further damage. During the investigation, a survey revealed heavy concentrations of gas in the south end of the shopping complex and parking areas and around a 6-inch gas main adjacent t o the jewelry store. Further investigation revealed that the service Line had been pulled from a compression coupling located approximately 14 feet upstream of the closed valve when the backhoe struck it. Natural gas at 22 psig leaked from the broken coupling. 2944#
Page 2-2- On February 6, 1980, t h e Safety Board made the following response to the Materials Transportation Bureau's Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM), Docket No. PS-61, Notice No. 1, "Transportation of Material and Other Gas by Pipeline; illaps and Records:" "All gas system operators should be required to have and maintain current system maps and records sufficient t o identify and locate their facilities. Requirements for transmission and distribution facilities should be established independently, but these requirements must be included in Subpart L of 49 CFR 192 to make the requirements applicable to existing systems. Other than to provide a sufficient grace period t o bring existing systems into compliance, there should be no differentiation in the requirements between existing and new systems." The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is scheduled for publication in April 1981. The city of Cordele did not report this accident telephonically lo t h e lhtional Response Center until 4:30 p.m., on February 21, 1980, over 5 hours after the accident. The Safety Board received its first notification of the accident a t 4:35 p.m., on February 21, 1980, and arrived a t the accident site a t 4:30 p.m., February 22, 1980, 29 hours after the accident. On January 29, 1971, a letter was written by Mr. Joseph C. Caldwell, Acting Director Office of Pipeline Safety, U. S. Department of Transportation, t o each owner or operator of gas pipeline facilities, which stated, in part: "49 CFR 191.5 requires each operator t o give direct telephone notice to t h e Office of Pipeline Safety a t the earliest practicable moment following discovery of certain types of leaks described therein, and identifies the information to be furnished. In most cases this telephonic report can and should be made within one t o two hours after discovery." OPSO Advisory Bulletin No. 77-6, June 1977 addressed the fact that some operators had been delinquent in making telephonic notices of reportable leaks to OPSO. The late notification and the consequent late arrival of the Safety Board investigator hampered the timely onsite witness interrogation and the visual inspection of the pipe as it was uneart tied. No gas leak complaints had been received by the gas department before the accident. The gas department's records showed that only 195 gallons of odorant had been put into the gas distribution system between March and November 1979. Records did not exist to show the odorant level as required by 49 CFR 192.625. However, the use of only 195 gallons of odorant in this system over a 9-month period would not verify an adequate level of odorization as prescribed by regulation. Well odorized gas, leaking at 22 p i g pressure from the open end of a 1-inch service line for 3 days before the explosion, should have been easily detected. In addition, if t h e crew had used a spotting bar and a combustible gas indicator (CGI) upstream of the break t o determine if additional gas w a s leaking, t h e accident may have been prevented because the compression coupling and leakage could have been revealed and repaired.#
Page 3-3- The Safety Board is concerned with the unsafe operational practices of the City of Cordele Gas Department, and it is also concerned with the possibility of similar unsafe practices in other small municipally and privately owned natural gas distribution systems throughout the country. Therefore, the National Transportation Safety Board recommends that the Research and Special Programs Administration of the Department of Transportation: Inspect the city of Cordele gas system for compliance w i t h applicable Federal regulations and take necessary action. (Class 11, Priority Action) (P-80-46) Expedite rulemaking action on location, size, and operating pressure of pipelines. (Class II, Priority Action) (P-80-47) KING, Chairman, DRIVER, Vice Chairman, McADAMS, GOLDMAN, and BURSLEY, Members, concurred in these recommendations.#
This is an NTSB safety recommendation letter. NTSB recommendations are advisory and do not themselves create binding regulatory requirements.