2023 Gas Transmission IA Question Set

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 1AR.RCOM.NONCOVERED.POfficial PDFDoes the integrity assessment and maintenance processes include adequate criteria for determining the need for, and timeliness of, pipeline defect repairs in non-covered segments? References: 192.485(a), 192.485(b), 192.485(c), 192.703(b), 192.710, 192.711, 192.713#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 1AR.RCOM.NONCOVERED.RRepair Criteria in Non-Covered Segments From the review of the results of integrity assessments, did the operator repair conditions that posed a threat to pipeline integrity on Non-Covered segments? References: 192.485(a), 192.485(b), 192.485(c), 191.23(a)(1), 192.703(b), 192.710, 192.711, 192.713#

AR.RCOMobservationPage 1AR.RCOM.REMEDIATIONOM.OIs anomaly remediation and documentation of remediation adequate for all segments? References: 192.485(a), 192.485(b), 192.485(c), 192.710, 192.711, 192.713#

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 1AR.RCOM.RCAMAOP.PIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), do the processes meet the requirements of the permit or 192.620? References: 192.620(d)#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 1AR.RCOM.RCAMAOP.RIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of selected records, were required repairs performed? References: 192.620(d)#

AR.CDAprocedurePage 1AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate CDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate CDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.CDArecordPage 1AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate CDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(h), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.CDAobservationPage 2AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate CDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.CDAprocedurePage 2AR.CDA.CDAPLAN.PIs an adequate Confirmatory Direct Assessment Plan in place? References: 192.931(a), 192.931(b), 192.931(c), 192.931(d)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDAEXTCORR.RDo records indicate that the external corrosion plan was properly implemented? References: 192.947(h), 192.931(b)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDAINTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that the internal corrosion plan was properly implemented? References: 192.947(h), 192.931(c)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDAINDICATION.RDo records demonstrate that the next assessment should have been accelerated? References: 192.947(h), 192.931(d)#

AR.CDAprocedurePage 2AR.CDA.CDACORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats identified using confirmatory direct assessment? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDACORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats identified by CDA as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 2AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate ECDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ECDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDAPREASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the ECDA pre-assessment process complied with NACE SP0502- 2010 Section 3 and 192.925(b)(1)? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(1)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate ECDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct ECDA assessments or review and analyze assessment results are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ECobservationPage 3AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate ECDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 3AR.EC.ECDAPLAN.PIs an adequate ECDA plan and process in place for conducting ECDA? References: 192.925(a), 192.925(b)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 3AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.PIs the process for integrating ECDA results with other information adequate? References: 192.917(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.RDo records demonstrate that the operator integrated other data/information when evaluating data/results? References: 192.947(g), 192.917(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDAREGION.RDo records demonstrate that the operator identified ECDA Regions? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(1)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDAINDIRECT.RDo records demonstrate that ECDA indirect inspection process complied with NACE SP 0502-2010 Section 4 and ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 6.4? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(2)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.RDo records demonstrate that excavations, direct examinations, and data collection were performed in accordance with NACE SP 0502-2010, Sections 5 and 6.4.2 and ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 6.4? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(3)#

AR.ECobservationPage 4AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.OECDA Direct Examination Were ECDA direct examinations adequately conducted? References: 192.925(b)(3)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAANALYSIS.RDo records demonstrate that an analysis of the ECDA data and other information was adequate to identify areas where external corrosion activity is most likely? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(4), 192.933(b)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 4AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.PHave criteria and internal notification processes been established and implemented for any changes in the ECDA plan? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(3)(iii), 192.911(k)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.RDo records demonstrate that changes in the ECDA plan have been implemented and documented? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(3)(iii)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAPOSTASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements for post-assessment were met? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(4)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAMAOP.RIf ECDA was performed on segments (as allowed by §192.620(d)(9)(iii)), were all ECDA assessment requirements completed? References: 192.947(g), 192.620(d)(9)(iii), 192.620(d)(10)(i), 192.620(d)(10)(iii)#

AR.ECobservationPage 4AR.EC.ECDAMAOP.OIf ECDA was performed on segments (as allowed by §192.620(d)(9)(iii)), were all ECDA assessment requirements completed? References: 192.620(d)(9)(iii), 192.620(d)(10)(i), 192.620(d)(10)(iii)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 4AR.EC.ECCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant external corrosion threats? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant external corrosion threats as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 5AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate ICDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ICDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ICrecordPage 5AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate ICDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct ICDA assessments or review and analyze assessment results, are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ICobservationPage 5AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate ICDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 5AR.IC.ICDAPLAN.PIs an ICDA plan and process in place for conducting ICDA? References: 192.927(c), 192.927(a), 192.927(b)#

AR.ICrecordPage 5AR.IC.ICDAPREASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements for an ICDA pre-assessment were met? References: 192.927(c)(1), 192.947(g)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 5AR.IC.ICDAINTEGRATION.PIs the process for integrating ICDA results with other information adequate? References: 192.917(b)#

AR.ICrecordPage 5AR.IC.ICDAINTEGRATION.RDo records demonstrate that other data/information was integrated when evaluating data/results? References: 192.917(b), 192.947(g)#

AR.ICrecordPage 5AR.IC.ICDAREGION.RDo records demonstrate that ICDA Regions were adequately identified? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c)(2), 192.927(c)(5)#

AR.ICrecordPage 5AR.IC.ICDADIRECT.RDo records demonstrate that sites were identified where internal corrosion may be present? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c)(3), 192.927(c)(5)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDAPOSTASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the operator assessed the effectiveness of the ICDA process? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c)(4)(i), 192.927(c)(4)(ii), 192.477#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDAANALYSIS.RDo records demonstrate that sufficient data was used to complete the ICDA analysis to identify the internal corrosion threats to the pipeline? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c), 192.933(b)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDAMAOP.RIf the pipeline is operated using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule) were required ICDA assessments performed? References: 192.947(g), 192.620(d)(9), 192.620(d)(10), 192.927#

AR.ICprocedurePage 6AR.IC.ICCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant internal corrosion threats related to internal corrosion? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant internal corrosion threats as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 6AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate SCCDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate SCCDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 6AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate SCCDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(e), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.SCCobservationPage 6AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate SCCDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAPLAN.PIs an adequate plan developed for performing SCCDA, if the conditions for SCC were present? References: 192.929(b)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 7AR.SCC.SCCDADATA.RDo records demonstrate that data was collected and evaluated? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)(1)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAMETHOD.RDo records demonstrate that an assessment was performed using one of the methods specified in ASME B31.8S-2004 Appendix A3? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)(2)#

AR.SCCobservationPage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAMETHOD.OAssessment Method (High pH SCC) From field observations, was SCCDA performed in accordance with 192.929 and the SCCDA plan? References: 192.929#

AR.SCCrecordPage 7AR.SCC.SCCDANEARNEUTRAL.RAssessing for Near Neutral SCC From the review of the results of selected integrity assessments, was the pipeline evaluated for near neutral SCC? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)(2)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAREASSESSINTRVL.RReassessment Interval From the review of the results of selected integrity assessments, did the operator determine a reassessment interval based on SCCDA results? References: 192.947(d), 192.939(a)(3)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAAMAOP.RIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of selected records, were required SCCDA assessments performed? References: 192.620(d), 192.620(d)(9), 192.620(d)(10)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 7AR.SCC.SCCCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats found following SCCDA? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 7AR.SCC.SCCCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required following SCCDA? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 8AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.PWho Evaluate ILI Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ILI assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 8AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.RWho Evaluate ILI Results Do records demonstrate that personnel who conduct assessments or review assessment results are qualified per the process requirements? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.493#

AR.ILobservationPage 8AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.OWho Evaluate ILI Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 8AR.IL.ILISPECS.PDoes the process assure complete and adequate vendor ILI specifications? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.933(b), 192.493, 192.18#

AR.ILrecordPage 8AR.IL.ILISPECS.RDo records demonstrate that the ILI specifications were complete and adequate? References: 192.947(g), 192.933(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 8AR.IL.ASSESSMETHOD.PDoes the process specify the assessment methods that are appropriate for the pipeline specific integrity threats? References: 192.919(b), 192.921(a), 192.937(c), 192.917, 192.493, 192.506#

AR.ILrecordPage 8AR.IL.ASSESSMETHOD.RDo records demonstrate that the assessment methods shown in the baseline and/or continual assessment plan were appropriate for the pipeline specific integrity threats? References: 192.947, 192.919(b), 192.921(a), 192.937(c)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 8AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.PDoes the process for validating ILI results ensure that accurate integrity assessment results are obtained? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.937(c), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 9AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.RDo records demonstrate that the operator has validated ILI assessment results per their process? References: 192.947, 192.921(a)(1), 192.493#

AR.ILobservationPage 9AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.OValidation of ILI Results From observation of field activities, do the employees and vendors validate ILI assessment results per their process? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 9AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.PIs the process for integrating ILI results with other information adequate? References: 192.917(b), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 9AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.RDo records demonstrate that the operator integrated other data/information when evaluating tool data/results? References: 192.947, 192.917(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 9AR.IL.ILIACCEPCRITERIA.PIs the process for ILI survey acceptance criteria adequate to assure an effective assessment? References: 192.921(a), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 9AR.IL.ILIACCEPCRITERIA.RDo records indicate adequate implementation of the process for ILI survey acceptance? References: 192.947, 192.921(a), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 9AR.IL.ILIDELAY.RDo records indicate that the performance of integrity assessments has been delayed and integrity assessment delays have been justified? References: 192.947(d), 192.909(a), 192.909(b), 192.943(a), 192.943(b), 190.341, 192.18#

AR.ILprocedurePage 9AR.IL.ILIAMAOP.PAlternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? For pipelines operating under AMAOP, do processes implement the ILI requirements of 192.620(d)(9) and (10) for the entire segment? References: 192.620(d), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 9AR.IL.ILIAMAOP.RAlternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? For pipelines operating under AMAOP, do records indicate the ILI requirements of 192.620(d)(9) and (10) have been implemented for the entire segment? References: 192.620(d), 192.493#

AR.ILobservationPage 10AR.IL.ILIIMPLEMENT.OAre O&M and IMP procedural requirements for the performance of ILI assessments followed? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.620(d), 192.605(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 10AR.IL.ILCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats identified during in-line inspections? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ILrecordPage 10AR.IL.ILCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats identified during in-line inspections? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.LSRprocedurePage 10AR.LSR.LSRPLAN.PIs the process for performing low stress reassessment adequate? References: 192.941(a), 192.941(b), 192.941(c)#

AR.LSRrecordPage 10AR.LSR.LSRBA.RDo records demonstrate that a baseline assessment meeting the requirements of 192.919 and 192.921 was performed prior to performing a low stress reassessment? References: 192.947(d), 192.919(c), 192.921(d), 192.941(a), 192.506#

AR.LSRrecordPage 10AR.LSR.LSREXTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements of §192.941(b) were implemented when performing low stress reassessment for external corrosion? References: 192.947(d), 192.941(b)#

AR.LSRrecordPage 10AR.LSR.LSRINTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements of §192.941(c) were implemented when performing low stress reassessment for internal corrosion? References: 192.947(d), 192.941(c)#

AR.LSRprocedurePage 10AR.LSR.LSRCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats following a LSR? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.LSRrecordPage 10AR.LSR.LSRCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required following a LSR? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 11AR.PTI.PRESSTESTREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate Pressure Test Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate pressure test assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.921(a)(4)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 11AR.PTI.PRESSTESTREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate Pressure Test Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct or review pressure test assessment results are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 11AR.PTI.PRESSTESTACCEP.PTest Acceptance Criteria and Procedures Were test acceptance criteria and processes sufficient to assure the basis for an References: 192.503(a), 192.503(b), 192.503(c), 192.503(d), 192.505(a), 192.505(b), 192.505(c), 192.505(d), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.507(c), 192.513(a), 192.51#

AR.PTIrecordPage 11AR.PTI.PRESSTESTRESULT.RDo the test records validate the pressure test? References: 192.517(a), 192.505(a), 192.505(b), 192.505(c), 192.505(d), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.507(c), 192.513(a), 192.513(b), 192.513(c), 192.513(d), 192.51#

AR.PTIrecordPage 11AR.PTI.PRESSTESTAMAOP.RIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of selected records, were required pressure test assessments performed? References: 192.517(a), 192.505(a), 192.517(b), 192.620(c)(4), 192.620(d)(9), 192.620(d)(10)#

AR.PTIobservationPage 11AR.PTI.PRESSTESTCOMPLETE.OPressure Test Completion From field operations was the pressure test performed in accordance with Subpart J requirements and References: 192.503(a), 192.503(b), 192.503(c), 192.503(d), 192.505(a), 192.505(b), 192.505(c), 192.505(d), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.507(c), 192.513(a), 192.51#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 11AR.PTI.PTICORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 11AR.PTI.PTICORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 12AR.PTI.SPIKEHYDRO.PDo the procedures for selecting pipeline assessment methods specifically include spike hydrotests as the assessment method for detecting time-dependent threats? References: 192.506(a), 192.505, 192.710(c)(3), 192.921(a)(3)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 12AR.PTI.SPIKEHYDRO.RWhere time-dependent threats were an identified risk, do the records indicate that a spike hydrotest was performed to “clear” any cracks that might otherwise grow during pressure reductions after the hydrostatic test? References: 192.506(a), 192.505, 192.710(c)(3), 192.921(a)(3)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 12AR.OT.OTPLAN.PHas a process been developed for "other technologies" that provide an equivalent understanding of the condition of the pipe? References: 192.921(a)(4), 192.18#

AR.OTrecordPage 12AR.OT.OTPLAN.RDo records demonstrate that the assessments were performed in accordance with the process and vendor recommendations and that defects were identified and categorized within 180 days, if applicable? References: 192.947(d), 192.921(a)(4), 192.933(b)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 12AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate Other Technology Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate assessment results meet acceptable qualification standards? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.921(a)(7), 192.493#

AR.OTrecordPage 12AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate Other Technology Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(d), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.OTobservationPage 12AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate Other Technology Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.OTobservationPage 12AR.OT.OTPLAN.OOther Technology Were assessments conducted using "other technology" adequately performed in accordance with the OT process? References: 192.921(a)(4)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 13AR.OT.OTCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats identified using Other Technology? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.OTrecordPage 13AR.OT.OTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required following the use of Other Technology? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 13AR.PFP.ANOMALYMETALLOSS.PDo the procedures for evaluating corrosion metal loss anomalies or defects, ensure that a determination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established at the location of each anomaly or defect, in accordance with §192.712? References: 192.712(b), 192.607, 192.712(a), 192.917(b), 192.933(d), 192.485#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 13AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKMODEL.PDo the procedures for evaluating cracks and crack like defects ensure that a determination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established at the location of each anomaly or defect, in accordance with §192.712(d)(1)? References: 192.712(d)(1), 192.607, 192.712(a)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 13AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKGROWTH.PDo the procedures detail the performance of fatigue analysis and remaining life calculations for pipeline segments susceptible to cyclic fatigue or other loading conditions that could lead to fatigue crack growth? References: 192.712(d)(2), 192.607#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 13AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKSURVIVEPT.PDo procedures call for the calculation of the largest potential crack defect sizes when analyzing potential cracks that could have survived a pressure test, specifically in the absence of any in- line inspection data in accordance with §192.712(d)(3)? References: 192.712(d)(3), 192.607, 192.712(a), 192.712(d)(1)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 13AR.PFP.ANOMALYDATAUSE.PDo the procedures detail the use of data when performing analyses of predicted or assumed anomalies or defects, in accordance with §192.712(e)? References: 192.712(e), 192.607#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 13AR.PFP.ANOMALYRECORDS.PDo procedures detail the collection, creation and retention of records including all investigations, analyses, and other actions taken in performing analyses of predicted or assumed anomalies or defects, in accordance with §192.712(g)? References: 192.712(g), 192.607#

AR.PFPrecordPage 14AR.PFP.ANOMALYRECORDS.RDo the records capture all investigations, analyses and other actions taken to support the analysis of predicted failure pressure in accordance with §192.712(g)? References: 192.712(g), 192.712(e)#

AR.RCrecordPage 14AR.RC.DEFECTCAT.RDo records demonstrate that all defects were properly categorized? References: 192.947(f), 192.933(b), 192.933(d)#

AR.RCprocedurePage 14AR.RC.DISCOVERY.PDoes the integrity assessment process properly define discovery and the required time frame? References: 192.933(b)#

AR.RCrecordPage 14AR.RC.DISCOVERY.RDo records demonstrate that discovery was declared in the required time frame or justification was documented? References: 192.947(f), 192.933(b)#

AR.RCprocedurePage 14AR.RC.IMPRC.PDoes the Integrity Management Plan and/or maintenance processes include all of the actions that must be taken to address integrity issues in accordance with 192.933? References: 192.933(a), 192.933(c), 192.933(d), 192.18#

AR.RCrecordPage 14AR.RC.PRESSREDUCE.RDo records demonstrate that an acceptable pressure reduction was promptly taken for each immediate repair condition or when a repair schedule could not be met? References: 192.947(f), 192.933(a)(1), 192.18#

AR.RCrecordPage 14AR.RC.SCHEDULE.RDo records demonstrate that a prioritized schedule was developed? References: 192.947(f), 192.933(c)#

AR.RCrecordPage 14AR.RC.METHOD.RDo records demonstrate that the remediation specified in the prioritized schedule was adequate to ensure the integrity of the pipeline until the next scheduled reassessment? References: 192.947(f), 192.933(a)#

AR.RCprocedurePage 15AR.RC.CRITERIA.PDoes the repair process cover all of the elements for making repairs in covered segments? References: 192.711(b), 192.703(a), 192.703(b), 192.703(c), 192.713(a), 192.713(b)#

AR.RCrecordPage 15AR.RC.SCHEDULEIMPL.RDo records demonstrate that defects in covered segments were remediated (i.e., repair, pressure reduction, or notification to PHMSA) within the applicable mandatory time limits of 192.933(d)? References: 192.947(f), 192.933(d)#

AR.RCobservationPage 15AR.RC.REMEDIATION.OIs anomaly remediation adequate for the covered segments being observed? References: 192.933(c), 192.933(a), 192.933(d)#

AR.RCprocedurePage 15AR.RC.LOOKBEYOND.PDoes the process require an evaluation of all pipeline segments with similar environmental and material coating conditions as segments where corrosion that could adversely affect the integrity of the pipeline was found? References: 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.RCrecordPage 15AR.RC.LOOKBEYOND.R"Look Beyond" Evaluation of Significant Corrosion From the review of the results of integrity assessments, were all pipeline segments evaluated with similar environmental and material coating conditions as segments where corrosion that could adversely affect the integrity of the pipeline was found? References: 192.947(b), 192.917(e)(5), 192.459#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 15AR.RMP.SAFETY.PDoes the process ensure that repairs are made in a safe manner and are made so as to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 192.605(b)(9), 192.713(b)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 15AR.RMP.SAFETY.OAre repairs made in a safe manner and to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 192.605(b)(9), 192.713(b)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 15AR.RMP.IGNITION.PIs there a process for preventing accidental ignition where gas presents a hazard of fire or explosion? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 16AR.RMP.IGNITION.RDo records indicate adequate steps were taken by the operator to prevent accidental ignition prior to performing work? References: 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 16AR.RMP.IGNITION.OPrevention of Accidental Ignition Perform observations of selected locations to verify that adequate steps have been taken by the operator to minimize the potential for accidental ignition. References: 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 16AR.RMP.HOTTAP.PIs the process adequate for tapping pipelines under pressure? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.627#

AR.RMPrecordPage 16AR.RMP.HOTTAP.RTapping Pipelines Under Pressure From a review of selected records, were the personnel who performed pressure taps on pipelines under pressure qualified? References: 192.627#

AR.RMPobservationPage 16AR.RMP.HOTTAP.OTapping Pipelines Under Pressure Were pressure taps on pipelines under pressure performed in accordance with processes by qualified personnel? References: 192.627#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 16AR.RMP.REPAIRREQT.PDoes the repair process capture the requirements of 192.711 for transmission lines? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.711(a), 192.711(b), 192.711(c), 192.717(b)(3)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 16AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRDEFECT.PIs the process adequate for the permanent field repair of defects in transmission lines? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.713(a), 192.713(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 16AR.RMP.METHOD.RPermissible Repair Methods From the review of records, were all repairs performed in accordance with processes, applicable sections of Part 192, the guidance of ASME B31.8S-2004, Section 7, and the Pipeline Repair Manual, Revision 5? References: 192.709(a), 192.713(a), 192.713(b), 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 16AR.RMP.REPAIRQUAL.RQualification of Personnel Performing Pipeline Repair From the review of selected records, were personnel performing repairs, other than welding, and post repair tests qualified for the task they performed? References: 192.807(b), 192.805(h)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 17AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRWELDS.PIs the process adequate for the permanent field repair of welds? References: 192.605(b), 192.715(a), 192.715(b), 192.715(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 17AR.RMP.WELDERQUAL.RWelder Qualification From the review of selected records, were repairs requiring welding performed by qualified welders using qualified welding processes? References: 192.225(a), 192.225(b), 192.227(a), 192.227(b), 192.229(a), 192.229(b), 192.229(c), 192.229(d)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 17AR.RMP.WELDQUAL.RRepair of Weld Defects From the review of records, were weld defects repaired in accordance with 192.245 and 192.715? References: 192.245(a), 192.245(b), 192.245(c), 192.715(a), 192.715(b), 192.715(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 17AR.RMP.WELDINSPECT.RInspection of Welds From the review of records, were welds inspected and examined in accordance with 192.241 and 192.243? References: 192.241(a), 192.241(b), 192.241(c), 192.243(a), 192.243(b), 192.243(c), 192.243(d), 192.243(e), 192.243(f)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 17AR.RMP.WELDINSPECT.OInspection of Welds Were welds inspected and examined in accordance with 192.241 and 192.243? References: 192.241(a), 192.241(b), 192.241(c), 192.243(a), 192.243(b), 192.243(c), 192.243(d), 192.243(e), 192.243(f)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 17AR.RMP.PIPECONDITION.RDo repair records document all information needed to understand the conditions of the pipe and its environment and provide the information needed to support the Integrity Management Risk Model? References: 192.709(a), 192.709(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 17AR.RMP.REPLACESTD.RReplacement Components From the review of records, were any components that were replaced constructed to the same or higher standards as the original component? References: 192.713(a)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 17AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRLEAK.PIs there an adequate process for the permanent field repair of leaks on transmission lines? References: 192.605(b), 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 17AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRLEAK.RTransmission Lines Permanent Field Repair of Leaks From the review of records, did the operator properly repair leaks on transmission lines? References: 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 18AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRLEAK.ODoes the operator properly repair leaks on transmission lines? References: 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 18AR.RMP.WELDTEST.PIs the process adequate for the testing of replacement pipe and repairs made by welding on transmission lines? References: 192.605(b), 192.719(a), 192.719(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 18AR.RMP.WELDTEST.RTransmission Lines Testing of Repairs From the review of records, did the operator properly test replacement pipe and repairs made by welding on transmission lines? References: 192.719(a), 192.719(b)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 18AR.RMP.WELDTEST.ODoes the operator properly test replacement pipe and repairs made by welding on transmission lines? References: 192.719(a), 192.719(b)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 18AR.RMP.CRACKNDT.PWhen Exposed for Repair Does the process require that when a pipeline segment that meets the conditions for cracking and/or possible SCC is exposed (i.e., the coating is removed), an NDE method (e.g., MPI, UT) is employed to evaluate for cracking? References: 192.929(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 18AR.RMP.CRACKNDT.RWhen Exposed for Repair From the review of records, when a pipeline segment that meets the conditions of possible cracking and/or SCC is exposed (i.e., the coating is removed), was an NDE method (e.g., MPI, UT) employed to evaluate for cracking and/or SCC? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 18AR.PA.ASSESSSCHED.PWhat is the process/plan (including the selection criteria, timeline, and use of prior assessments) for performing the initial assessments as required by §192.710(b)(1) and (b)(3)? References: 192.710(b)(1), 192.710(b)(3)#

AR.PArecordPage 18AR.PA.ASSESSSCHED.RDo records demonstrate pipeline segments were initially assessed (and when) per §192.710(b)(1)? References: 192.710(b)(1), 192.710(b)(3)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 19AR.PA.ASSESSMETHODS.PDo the procedures include a methodology for conducting the initial assessment of pipeline segments outside of an HCA per §192.710(c)? References: 192.710(c)#

AR.PArecordPage 19AR.PA.ASSESSMETHODS.RDo the records confirm the methodology used for conducting the initial assessment of pipeline segments outside of an HCA per §192.710(c) was selected based on the results of a risk-based prioritization? References: 192.710(c)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 19AR.PA.REASSESSMENTS.PDo the procedures require reassessments to be conducted at least once every 10 years, not to exceed 126 months, or a shorter interval based upon the nature and extent of anomalies discovered in the previous assessment as required by §192.710(b)(2)? References: 192.710(b)(2), 192.710(b)(3), 192.939(a)#

AR.PArecordPage 19AR.PA.REASSESSMENTS.RDo the records indicate adequate documentation of and rationale for the reassessment intervals? References: 192.710(b)(2), 192.710(b)(3), 192.939(a)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 19AR.PA.OTHERTECH.PWhere the operator has elected to use “Other Technology” (or other technical evaluation process) for assessing pipeline segments, does the process demonstrate an equivalent understanding of the condition of the line pipe for each of the threats to which the pipeline is susceptible? References: 192.710(c)(7), 192.18, 192.506(b)#

AR.PArecordPage 19AR.PA.OTHERTECH.RWhere the operator has elected to use “Other Technology” (or other technical evaluation process) for assessing pipeline segments, do the records demonstrate an equivalent understanding of the condition of the line pipe for each of the threats to which the pipeline is susceptible? References: 192.710(c)(7), 192.18, 192.506(b)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 19AR.PA.REMEDIATIONCRITERIA.PDid the operator’s procedures for anomaly investigation and remediation criteria for non-HCA pipeline segments meet the requirements of §§192.485, 192.711, and 192.713? References: 192.710(f)#

AR.PArecordPage 19AR.PA.REMEDIATIONCRITERIA.RDo the remediation records indicate that conducted remediation activities were conducted in accordance with the procedures? References: 192.710(f), 192.933, 192.709#

AR.PAprocedurePage 19AR.PA.THREATID.PDoes the process include requirements to identify and evaluate all potential threats to each covered pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.PArecordPage 20AR.PA.THREATID.RDo records demonstrate that all potential threats to each covered pipeline segment have been identified and evaluated? References: 192.710#

AR.PAprocedurePage 20AR.PA.RAMETHOD.PDoes the process include requirements for a risk assessment and/or risk prioritization, that considers all of the identified threats for each assessable non-HCA pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.PArecordPage 20AR.PA.RAMETHOD.RDo records demonstrate that the operator has performed a risk assessment on the non-HCA pipeline segments? References: 192.710#

AR.PAprocedurePage 20AR.PA.RAFACTORS.PDoes the process include requirements for risk factors that could affect the likelihood of a release, and for factors that could affect the consequences of potential releases, be accounted for and combined in an appropriate manner to produce a risk value for each pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.PArecordPage 20AR.PA.RAFACTORS.RDo records demonstrate that risk analysis data is combined in an appropriate manner to produce a risk value for each pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.SPprocedurePage 20AR.SP.ILISP.PIf the pipeline operates under a special permit have the processes been modified to incorporate the requirements of the permit for required ILI assessments performed? References: 190.341(d)#

AR.SPrecordPage 20AR.SP.ILISP.RIf the pipeline operates under a special permit, from a review of selected records, were required ILI assessments performed? References: 190.341(d)#

AR.SPprocedurePage 20AR.SP.REPAIRSP.PIf the pipeline operates under a special permit have the processes been modified to incorporate the requirements of the permit for required repairs? References: 190.341(d)#

AR.SPrecordPage 20AR.SP.REPAIRSP.RIf the pipeline operates under a special permit, from a review of selected records, were required repairs performed? References: 190.341(d)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 21CR.CRMGEN.CRMCRITERIA.PDo procedures adequately address the process and criteria to determine which facilities are control rooms? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 21CR.CRMGEN.CRMMGMT.PAre CRM procedures formalized and controlled? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENrecordPage 21CR.CRMGEN.CRMIMPLEMENT.RAre procedures approved, in place, and implemented? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENobservationPage 21CR.CRMGEN.CRMPROCLOCATION.OAre procedures readily available to controllers in the control room? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 21CR.CRMRR.RESPONSIBLE.PAre there clear processes to describe each controller's physical domain of responsibility for pipelines and other facility assets? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 21CR.CRMRR.QUALCONTROL.PAre there provisions in place to assure that only qualified individuals may assume control at any console/desk? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 21CR.CRMRR.DOMAINCHANGE.PIf the physical domain of responsibility periodically changes, has a clear process been established to describe the conditions for when such a change occurs? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 21CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYABNORMAL.PHave processes been established to define the controllers' authority and responsibilities when an abnormal operating condition is detected? References: 192.631(b)(2)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 22CR.CRMRR.RESPCHANGE.PDo processes address a controller's role during temporary impromptu (unplanned) changes in controller responsibilities? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 22CR.CRMRR.COMMANDVERIFY.PDo the defined roles and responsibilities require controllers to stay at the console to verify all SCADA commands that have been initiated are fulfilled, and that commands given via verbal communications are acknowledged before leaving the console for any reason? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 22CR.CRMRR.PRESSLIMITS.OAre controllers aware of the current MAOPs of all pipeline segments for which they are responsible, and have they been assigned the responsibility to maintain those pipelines at or below the MAOP? References: 192.631(b)(2), 192.619(a), 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 22CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYEMERGENCY.PDo processes define the controllers' authority and responsibility to make decisions, take actions, and communicate with others upon being notified of, or upon detection of, and during, an emergency or if a leak or rupture is suspected? References: 192.631(b)(3), 192.615(a)(8)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 22CR.CRMRR.EVACUATION.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event the control room must be evacuated? References: 192.631(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 22CR.CRMRR.COMMSYSFAIL.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event of a SCADA system or data communications system failure impacting large sections of the controller's domain of responsibility? References: 192.631(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 22CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.PHave processes been established for the hand-over of responsibility that specify the type of information to be communicated to the oncoming shift? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 22CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.ODo observations indicate adequate hand-over of responsibility to the oncoming shift? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 22CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.PDo processes require that records document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 23CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.RAre there records that document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 23CR.CRMRR.HANDOVEROVERLAP.PDo processes require the controllers to discuss recent and impending important activities ensuring adequate overlap? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 23CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERALTERNATIVE.PWhen a controller is unable to continue or assume responsibility for any reason, do the shift hand-over processes include alternative shift hand-over actions that specifically address this situation? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 23CR.CRMRR.UNATTENDCONSOLE.PHas the operator established an adequate process for occasions when the console is left temporarily unattended for any reason? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 23CR.CRMRR.CONSOLECOVERAGE.PDo processes maintain adequate console coverage during shift hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 23CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.PDo processes disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 23CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.RDo records indicate that the policy disallowing others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller has been communicated to controllers and others? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 23CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.OAre controllers aware of, and can reference, processes that disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 23CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.PDoes the process result in identification of required qualification elements for those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller that are sufficient for those individuals to understand the implications of the scope of potential actions? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 24CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.RDo records indicate that others given authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller were qualified? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 24CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.PIs the process defined with respect to the details of how those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller are to implement their authority? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 24CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYLIST.RIs a list of individuals with authority to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller readily available to controllers? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 24CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.RDo records adequately document occurrences of when others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller have done so? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 24CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.ODo others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller demonstrate an understanding of the process to implement this authority? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 24CR.SCADA.SYSTEMMOC.PDo processes clearly define the types of changes to the SCADA system(s) that constitute additions, expansions, or replacements under the meaning of the CRM rule? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 24CR.SCADA.DISPLAYCONFIG.PAre there written processes to implement the API RP 1165 display standards to the SCADA systems that have been added, expanded, or replaced since August 1, 2012? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 24CR.SCADA.1165HUMANFACTORS.OHas section 4 of API RP 1165 regarding human factors engineering been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 25CR.SCADA.DISPLAYOBJECTS.OHas section 8 of API RP 1165 regarding display object characteristics been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 25CR.SCADA.DISPLAYDYNAMICS.RHas section 9 of API RP 1165 regarding display object dynamics been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 25CR.SCADA.ADMINISTRATION.RHave applicable paragraphs of section 11 of API RP 1165 administration been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 25CR.SCADA.1165IMPRACTICAL.RIf any/all applicable paragraph(s) of API RP 1165 have not been implemented, has it been demonstrated and documented that the unimplemented provisions are impractical for the SCADA system used? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 25CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.PDoes the process adequately define safety-related points? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 25CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.RDo records indicate safety-related points have been adequately implemented? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 25CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.PAre there adequate processes to define and identify the circumstances which require a point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 25CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.RHave required point-to-point verifications been performed? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 25CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.PAre there adequate processes for the thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 25CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.RDo records demonstrate adequate thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 26CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.PIs there an adequate process for defining when the point-to-point verification must be completed? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 26CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.RDo records indicate the point-to-point verification has been completed at the required intervals? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 26CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.OAre point-to-point verifications performed adequately when required? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 26CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.PHas an internal communication plan been established and implemented that is adequate to manually operate the pipeline during a SCADA failure/outage? References: 192.631(c)(3)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 26CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.RHas the internal communication plan been tested and verified for manual operation of the pipeline safely at least once each calendar year but at intervals not exceeding 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(3)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 26CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADA.OIs there a backup SCADA system? References: 192.631(c)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 26CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADADEV.PHas the use of the backup SCADA system for development work been defined? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 26CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.PIs the backup SCADA system required to be tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 26CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.RIs the backup SCADA system tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 26CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.PIs testing required to verify adequate processes are in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 27CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.RDoes the testing verify that there are adequate processes in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 27CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAADEQUACY.RIf the back-up SCADA system is not designed to handle all the functionality of the main SCADA system, does the testing determine whether there are adequate procedures in place to account for displaced and/or different available functions during back-up operations? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 27CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATRANSFER.PDo processes adequately address and test the logistics of transferring control to a backup control room? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 27CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADARETURN.PDo procedures adequately address and test the logistics of returning operations back to the primary control room? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 27CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAFUNCTIONS.RIs a representative sampling of critical functions in the back-up SCADA system being tested to ensure proper operation in the event the backup system is needed? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 27CR.SCADA.CMPPRESSRELIEFTEST.PAre processes adequate for inspection and test of each pressure relieving device in a compressor station, including periodic operation to determine opening at the correct set pressure? References: 192.731(a), 192.731(b), 192.731(c), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 27CR.SCADA.CMPPRESSRELIEFTEST.RDo inspection and test records for each pressure relieving device in a compressor station indicate it was operated periodically to determine that it opens at the correct set pressure? References: 192.731(a)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 27CR.SCADA.PRESSRELIEFTEST.PAre there procedures for inspection and test of each pressure relieving device at pressure limiting stations? References: 192.739(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 27CR.SCADA.PRESSRELIEFTEST.RDo records indicate adequate inspection and testing for each pressure relieving device in a pressure limiting station? References: 192.739(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 28CR.SCADA.VALVETEST.PIf the valve is monitored by SCADA, does the process account for how valve testing is coordinated with the controller? References: 192.745(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 28CR.SCADA.VALVETEST.RIf SCADA is used to operate valves, do records indicate the SCADA system was adequately involved in the testing to ensure valve operation? References: 192.709(c), 192.745(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 28CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMITIGATION.PDoes the fatigue mitigation process or procedures (plan) identify operator-specific fatigue risks? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 28CR.CRMFM.FATIGUERISKS.PDoes the fatigue mitigation plan adequately address how the program reduces the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 28CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEQUANTIFY.PDo processes require that the potential contribution of controller fatigue to incidents and accidents be quantified during investigations? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 28CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMANAGER.PIs there a designated fatigue risk manager who is responsible and accountable for managing fatigue risk and fatigue countermeasures, and someone (perhaps the same person) that is authorized to review and approve HOS emergency deviations? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 28CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTH.RIs the scheduled shift length less than or equal to 12 hours (not including shift hand-over) or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off- duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 28CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTHTIME.RDoes the operator factor in all time the individual is working for the company when establishing shift lengths and schedule rotations or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 29CR.CRMFM.SCHEDULEDTIMEOFF.RAre all scheduled periods of time off at least one hour longer than 8 hours plus commute time or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 29CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.POn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, do processes minimize interrupting the required 8 hours of continuous sleep or require a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 29CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.ROn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, does the operator minimize interrupting the required 8 hours of continuous sleep or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 29CR.CRMFM.MAXHOS.PDo processes limit the maximum HOS limit in any sliding 7-day period to no more than 65 hours or is there a documented technical basis to show a reduction of the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 29CR.CRMFM.MINTIMEOFF.PMinimum Time Off After HOS Limit Reached After reaching the HOS limit in any sliding 7-day period, is the minimum time off at least 35 hours or is there a documented technical basis to show a reduction of the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 29CR.CRMFM.DOCSCHEDULE.PIs there a formal system to document all scheduled and unscheduled HOS worked, including overtime and time spent performing duties other than control room duties? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 29CR.CRMFM.DAYSOFF.PTime Off Following Successive Days Worked For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), are no more than five days worked in succession before at least two days off? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 29CR.CRMFM.WORKHOURS.RDay Only Work Hours For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), do records indicate shift start times no earlier than 6:00 a.m. and shift end times no later than 7:00 p.m.? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 29CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECOUNTERMEASURES.PFatigue Countermeasures For shifts longer than 8 hours, have specific fatigue countermeasures been implemented for the ninth and beyond hours? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 30CR.CRMFM.DAILYHOSLIMIT.PDo processes limit the daily maximum HOS limit no more than 14 hours in any sliding 24-hour period? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMobservationPage 30CR.CRMFM.CONTROLLERNUMBERS.ODo operations include a sufficient number of qualified controllers? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 30CR.CRMFM.OFFDUTYHOURS.PWhen Limits Reached Do processes ensure that controllers are provided with at least thirty-five (35) continuous off-duty hours when limits are reached following the most recent 35-hour (minimum) off-duty rest period or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 30CR.CRMFM.SHIFTHOLDOVER.PDoes the shift holdover process conform to shift holdover guidelines or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 30CR.CRMFM.SPECIFICCOUNTERMEASURES.PDo processes require specific fatigue countermeasures during applicable time periods, or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 30CR.CRMFM.HOSDEVIATIONS.PIs there a formal process for approving deviations from the maximum HOS limits? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 30CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.PDoes the program require that fatigue education/training is required for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 30CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.RIs periodic fatigue education/training documented for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 30CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEREVIEW.PDo processes require that the effectiveness of the fatigue education/training program be reviewed at least once each calendar year, not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3), 192.605(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMFM.FATIGUESTRATEGY.PDoes fatigue education address fatigue mitigation strategies (countermeasures)? References: 192.631(d)(2)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMFM.OFFDUTY.PDoes fatigue education address how off-duty activities contribute to fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(2)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECONTENT.PIs the content of fatigue training adequate for training controllers and supervisors to recognize the effects of fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 31CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECONTENT.RHas controller and supervisor training to recognize the effects of fatigue been documented? References: 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMAM.ALARM.PIs the alarm management plan a formal process that specifically identifies critical topical areas included in the program? References: 192.631(e)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMAM.ALARMMALFUNCTION.PIs there a process to identify and correct inaccurate or malfunctioning alarms? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMAM.ALARMREVIEW.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for different alarm designs and all alarm types/priorities? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERPERFORMANCE.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for console differences that could affect individual-specific controller qualification and performance? References: 192.631(h), 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 31CR.CRMAM.STALEDATA.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms include specific procedures and practices for managing stale or unreliable data? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 32CR.CRMAM.MONTHLYANALYSIS.PDo processes require the monthly identification, recording, review, and analysis of points that have been taken off scan, have had alarms inhibited, generated false alarms, or that have had forced or manual values for periods of time exceeding that required for associated maintenance or operating activities? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 32CR.CRMAM.PROBLEMCORRECTION.PDoes the alarm management plan include a process for promptly correcting identified problems and for returning these points to service? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 32CR.CRMAM.ALARMVERIFY.RDo records verify that monthly reviews and analysis of alarm points have been performed? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 32CR.CRMAM.ALARMSETPOINTS.PIs there a formal process to determine the correct alarm setpoint values and alarm descriptions? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 32CR.CRMAM.SETTINGCONTROL.PHave procedures been established to clearly address how and to what degree controllers can change alarm limits or setpoints, or inhibit alarms, or take points off-scan? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 32CR.CRMAM.ALARMVALUEVERIFY.RDo records demonstrate verification of correct safety-related alarm set-point values and alarm descriptors when associated field instruments are calibrated or changed and at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 32CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.PAre there processes to review the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 192.631(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 32CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.RDo records indicate review of the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 192.631(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 32CR.CRMAM.WORKLOAD.PDoes the CRM program have a means of identifying and measuring the work load (content and volume of general activity) being directed to an individual controller? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 33CR.CRMAM.WORKLOADMONITORING.PIs the process of monitoring and analyzing general activity comprehensive? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 33CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERREACTION.PDoes the process have a means of determining that the controller has sufficient time to analyze and react to incoming alarms? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 33CR.CRMAM.PERFORMANCEANALYSIS.RHas an analysis been performed to determine if controller(s) performance is currently adequate? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 33CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.PIs there a process to address how deficiencies found in implementing 192.631(e)(1) through 192.631(e)(5) will be resolved? References: 192.631(e)(6)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 33CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.RDo records indicate deficiencies found in implementing 192.631(e)(1) through 192.631(e)(5) have been resolved? References: 192.631(e)(6)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 33CR.CRMCMGT.EQUIPMENTCHANGES.PIs there a process to assure changes in field equipment that could affect control room operations are coordinated with the control room personnel? References: 192.631(f)(1)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 33CR.CRMCMGT.CONTROLLERPARTICIPATE.PAre control room representative(s) required to participate in meetings where changes that could directly or indirectly affect the hydraulic performance or configuration of the pipeline (including routine maintenance and repairs) are being considered, designed and implemented? References: 192.631(f)(1), 192.631(f)(3)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 33CR.CRMCMGT.CONTROLLERPARTICIPATE.RDo records indicate that control room representative(s) participate in meetings where changes that could directly or indirectly affect the hydraulic performance or configuration of the pipeline (including routine maintenance and repairs) are being considered, designed and implemented? References: 192.631(f)(1), 192.631(f)(3)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 34CR.CRMCMGT.EMERGENCYCONTACT.PIs there a process requiring field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when emergency conditions exist? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 34CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCONTACT.PDoes the process require field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when making field changes (e.g., operating a valve, O&M inspections/calibrations, RTU/PLC modifications) that affect control room operations? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 34CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCHANGES.RDo records indicate field personnel and SCADA support personnel contacted the control room when making field changes (e.g., operating a valve, O&M inspections/calibrations, RTU/PLC modifications) that affect control room operations? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 34CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEINCIDENTREVIEW.PIs there a formal, structured approach for reviewing and critiquing reportable events to identify lessons learned? References: 192.631(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 34CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEINCIDENTREVIEW.RDo records indicate reviews of reportable events specifically analyzed all contributing factors to determine if control room actions contributed to the event, and corrected any deficiencies? References: 192.631(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 34CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.PDoes the program require training on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.), even though the control room may not have been at fault? References: 192.631(g)(2), 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 34CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.RHas operating experience review training been conducted on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.)? References: 192.631(g)(2), 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.PHas a controller training program been established to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.RHas a controller training program been implemented to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.PHave processes been established to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.RHave processes been implemented to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGCONTENT.RDoes training content address all required material, including training each controller to carry out the roles and responsibilities that were defined by the operator? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.AOCLIST.RHas a list of the abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence been established? References: 192.631(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGABNORMAL.PDoes the training program provide controller training on recognizing and responding to abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence? References: 192.631(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.RDo records indicate the training program used a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 35CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.ODoes the training program use a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.COMMUNICATIONTRAINING.PDoes the CRM program train controllers on their responsibilities for communication under the operator's emergency response procedures? References: 192.631(h)(3)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.SYSKNOWLEDGE.PDoes the training program provide controllers a working knowledge of the pipeline system, especially during the development of abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(4)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSLIST.RHas a list of pipeline operating setups that are periodically (but infrequently) used been established? References: 192.631(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSREVIEW.PDo processes specify that, for pipeline operating set-ups that are periodically (but infrequently) used, the controllers must be provided an opportunity to review relevant procedures in advance of their use? References: 192.631(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINPERSONNEL.PDo processes establish who, regardless of location, operationally collaborates with control room personnel? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINFREQ.PDo processes define the frequency of new and recurring team training? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINCOMPLETE.PDo processes address all operational modes and operational collaboration/control? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXPERIENCE.PDo processes include incorporation of lessons learned from actual historical events and other oil-gas industry events? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.RDo records indicate that training exercises were adequate and involved at least one qualified controller? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 36CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.ODoes implementation of a control room team exercise demonstrate performance in accordance with regulatory and process requirements? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 37CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINIDENTINDIVIDUAL.RDo records demonstrate that individuals identified as of January 23, 2018 received team training by January 23, 2019? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 37CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.PAre there adequate processes to assure that the operator is responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 37CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.RHas the operator been responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 37CR.CRMCOMP.CRMCOORDINATOR.RIs there an individual that is responsible and accountable for compliance with requests from PHMSA or other applicable agencies? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 37CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.PAre records management processes adequate to assure records are sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 37CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.RAre records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 37CR.CRMCOMP.ELECTRONICRECORDS.RAre electronic records properly stored, safeguarded, and readily retrievable? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 37CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.PAre there processes to demonstrate and provide a documented record that every deviation from any CRM rule requirement was necessary for safe operation? References: 192.631(j)(2)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 38CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.RDeviation Records Were all deviations documented in a way that demonstrates they were necessary for safe operation? References: 192.631(j)(2)#

CR.LDrecordPage 38CR.LD.LDSYS.RDo records demonstrate the operator has identified, considered, or implemented leak detection measures to mitigate the consequences of a pipeline failure? References: 192.631(g)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 38CR.LD.FACILITY.PDoes the process require continuing surveillance of facilities to determine and take appropriate action concerning failures/leakage history? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.613(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.LDrecordPage 38CR.LD.FACILITY.RDo records indicate continuing surveillance of facilities to determine and take appropriate action concerning failures/leakage history? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.613(a), 192.631(b)#

DC.COCMPprocedurePage 38DC.COCMP.CMPCOMBUSTIBLE.PDoes the process require that flammable/combustible materials are stored as required, and aboveground oil or gasoline storage tanks, are installed at compressor stations according to 192.735(b)? References: 192.303, 192.735(a), 192.735(b)#

DC.COCMPrecordPage 38DC.COCMP.CMPCOMBUSTIBLE.RDo records demonstrate that flammable/combustible materials are stored as required, and aboveground oil or gasoline storage tanks are installed at compressor stations according to 192.735(b)? References: 192.303, 192.735(a), 192.735(b)#

DC.COCMPobservationPage 39DC.COCMP.CMPCOMBUSTIBLE.ODo field observations demonstrate that flammable/combustible materials are safely stored as required, and aboveground oil or gasoline storage tanks are installed at compressor stations according to 192.735(b)? References: 192.735(a), 192.735(b)#

DC.COCMPprocedurePage 39DC.COCMP.CMPGASDETECT.PDoes the process require compressor buildings to have a fixed gas detection and alarm system installed according to §192.736? References: 192.303, 192.736(a)#

DC.COCMPrecordPage 39DC.COCMP.CMPGASDETECT.RDo records demonstrate that compressor buildings have a fixed gas detection and alarm system installed according to §192.736? References: 192.303, 192.736(a)#

DC.COCMPobservationPage 39DC.COCMP.CMPGASDETECT.ODo field observations confirm that compressor buildings have a fixed gas detection and alarm system installed according to 192.736? References: 192.303, 192.736(a), 192.736(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 39DC.CO.INSPECTGEN.PDoes the process require the pipeline to be inspected to ensure that it is constructed in accordance with Part 192? References: 192.303, 192.305#

DC.COrecordPage 39DC.CO.INSPECTGEN.RDo records indicate the pipeline is being inspected to ensure it is constructed in accordance with Part 192? References: 192.303, 192.305#

DC.COobservationPage 39DC.CO.INSPECTGEN.ODo field observation verify the pipeline being inspected to ensure it is constructed in accordance with Part 192? References: 192.303, 192.305#

DC.COprocedurePage 39DC.CO.CASING.PDoes the process require railroad or highway casings to be in accordance with the requirements of 192.323? References: 192.303, 192.323(a), 192.323(b), 192.323(c), 192.323(d), 192.467(a), 192.467(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 40DC.CO.CASING.ODo field observations confirm railroad or highway casings are being installed as designed and specified, and in accordance with 192.323? References: 192.323, 192.467(a), 192.467(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 40DC.CO.NONWELDJOINT.PDoes the process require that pipeline joints (to be made other than by welding) be designed and installed in accordance with 192.273? References: 192.303, 192.273(a), 192.273(b), 192.273(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 40DC.CO.PLASTICJOINT.PDoes the process require plastic pipe joints to be designed and installed in accordance with 192.281? References: 192.303, 192.281(a), 192.281(b), 192.281(c), 192.281(d), 192.281(e)#

DC.COrecordPage 40DC.CO.PLASTICJOINT.RPlastic Pipe Joints As applicable to the project, do records indicate that plastic pipe joints are installed in accordance with the requirements 192.281? References: 192.281(a), 192.281(b), 192.281(c), 192.281(d), 192.281(e)#

DC.COobservationPage 40DC.CO.PLASTICJOINT.OPlastic Pipe Joints As applicable to the project, are plastic pipe joints installed in accordance with the requirements 192.281? References: 192.281(a), 192.281(b), 192.281(c), 192.281(d), 192.281(e)#

DC.COprocedurePage 40DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTPROCEDURE.PDoes the process require plastic pipe joining procedures to be qualified in accordance with 192.283, prior to making plastic pipe joints? References: 192.283(a), 192.283(b), 192.283(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 40DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTQUAL.PIs a process in place to ensure that personnel making joints in plastic pipelines are qualified? References: 192.285(d), 192.285(a), 192.285(b), 192.285(c), 192.285(e), 192.805#

DC.COrecordPage 40DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTQUAL.RDo records indicate persons making joints in plastic pipelines are qualified in accordance with §192.285? References: 192.285(e), 192.285(a), 192.285(b), 192.285(c), 192.285(d), 192.807(a), 192.807(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 40DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTQUAL.ODo observations verify persons making joints in plastic pipelines are qualified? References: 192.285(d), 192.285(a), 192.285(b), 192.285(c), 192.285(e), 192.807(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTINSP.PIs a process in place to assure that persons who inspect joints in plastic pipes are qualified? References: 192.287, 192.805(h)#

DC.COrecordPage 41DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTINSP.RDo records indicate persons inspecting the making of plastic pipe joints have been qualified? References: 192.287, 192.807(a), 192.807(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 41DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTINSP.ODo person(s) inspecting joints in plastic pipelines demonstrate they are qualified to evaluate the acceptability of plastic pipe joints? References: 192.287, 192.807(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.SPECS.PDoes the operator have written construction specifications or standards as required of 192.303? References: 192.303#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.INSPECTVISUAL.PDoes the process require pipe and other components to be visually inspected prior to installation? References: 192.303, 192.307#

DC.COrecordPage 41DC.CO.INSPECTVISUAL.RDo records demonstrate each length of pipe and each other component was visually inspected prior to installation in accordance with 192.307? References: 192.303, 192.205, 192.307#

DC.COobservationPage 41DC.CO.INSPECTVISUAL.ODo field observations confirm each length of pipe and each component is being visually inspected for damage according to 192.307? References: 192.303, 192.307#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.REPAIR.PDoes the process require repairs to steel pipe in accordance with §192.309? References: 192.303, 192.309, 192.493#

DC.COrecordPage 41DC.CO.REPAIR.RDo records demonstrate that repairs to steel pipe are being made in accordance with §192.309? References: 192.303, 192.309, 192.493#

DC.COobservationPage 41DC.CO.REPAIR.ODo field observations confirm repairs to steel pipe being made in accordance with §192.309? References: 192.303, 192.309#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.REPAIRPLASTIC.PDoes the process require imperfections or damage of plastic pipe to be repaired or removed? References: 192.303, 192.311#

DC.COrecordPage 42DC.CO.REPAIRPLASTIC.RDo records indicate that imperfections or damage of plastic pipe are repaired or removed? References: 192.311#

DC.COobservationPage 42DC.CO.REPAIRPLASTIC.OAre imperfections or damage of plastic pipe repaired or removed? References: 192.311#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.FIELDBEND.PDoes the process require field bends to be made in accordance with 192.313? References: 192.303, 192.313(a), 192.313(b), 192.313(c), 192.315(a)#

DC.COrecordPage 42DC.CO.FIELDBEND.RDo records indicate that field bends are made in accordance with 192.313? References: 192.313(a), 192.313(b), 192.313(c), 192.315(a)#

DC.COobservationPage 42DC.CO.FIELDBEND.ODo field observations confirm field bends are being made in accordance with 192.313(a)? References: 192.313(a), 192.313(b), 192.313(c), 192.315(a)#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.WRINKLEBEND.PDoes the process require that wrinkle bends are made in accordance with 192.315? References: 192.303, 192.315(a), 192.315(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 42DC.CO.WRINKLEBEND.RDo records indicate that wrinkle bends were made in accordance with 192.315? References: 192.315(a), 192.315(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 42DC.CO.WRINKLEBEND.ODo field observations confirm wrinkle bends are made in accordance with 192.315? References: 192.315(a), 192.315(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.HAZARD.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring transmission line or main be protected from hazards in accordance with 192.317? References: 192.303, 192.317(a), 192.317(b), 192.317(c), 192.103#

DC.COrecordPage 43DC.CO.HAZARD.RDo records demonstrate the installed transmission line or main is protected from hazards? References: 192.317(a), 192.317(b), 192.317(c), 192.603, 192.614, 192.709#

DC.COobservationPage 43DC.CO.HAZARD.ODo field observations demonstrate or confirm installed transmission line or main is protected from hazards? References: 192.317, 192.303, 192.614#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 43DC.DPC.CCPROTCOATLOWER.PDo written specifications stipulate that each external protective coating must be inspected just prior to lowering the pipe into the ditch and backfilling, and any damage detrimental to effective corrosion control must be repaired? References: 192.143(b), 192.461(c)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 43DC.DPC.CCPROTCOATLOWER.RDo records indicate that each pipe segment with external protective coating was inspected just prior to lowering into the ditch and backfilling, and any damage detrimental to effective corrosion control was repaired? References: 192.143(b), 192.461(c)#

DC.DPCobservationPage 43DC.DPC.CCPROTCOATLOWER.ODo the field observations confirm that each pipe segment with external protective coating was inspected just prior to lowering into the ditch and backfilling, and any damage detrimental to effective corrosion control was repaired? References: 192.143(b), 192.461(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 43DC.CO.INSTALL.PDoes the process require that piping be installed such that stresses are minimized and the coating is protected? References: 192.303, 192.319(a), 192.319(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 43DC.CO.INSTALL.RDo records demonstrate that piping was installed such that stresses are minimized and the coating is protected? References: 192.303, 192.319(a), 192.319(b), 192.493#

DC.COobservationPage 43DC.CO.INSTALL.OWhen pipe is placed in the ditch, do field observations confirm pipe is installed so as to fit the ditch, minimize stresses, and protect the pipe coating from damage? References: 192.319(a), 192.319(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.PDoes the process require that certain offshore pipe be installed in accordance with 192.319(c)? References: 192.303, 192.319(c)#

DC.COrecordPage 44DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.RDo records indicate certain offshore pipe was installed in accordance with 192.319(c)? References: 192.319(c)#

DC.COobservationPage 44DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.ODo field observations confirm certain offshore pipe is installed in accordance with 192.319(c)? References: 192.319(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.INSTALLGOM.PDoes the process require that certain pipe in the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets be installed to the burial depths required by 192.319(c)? References: 192.303, 192.319(c)#

DC.COrecordPage 44DC.CO.INSTALLGOM.RDo records indicate that certain pipe in the Gulf of Mexico and its inlets was installed to the burial depths required by 192.319(c)? References: 192.303, 192.319(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.INSTALLPLASTIC.PDoes process require that plastic pipe be installed as required by 192.321? References: 192.303, 192.321(a), 192.321(b), 192.321(c), 192.321(d), 192.321(e), 192.321(f), 192.321(g)#

DC.COrecordPage 44DC.CO.INSTALLPLASTIC.RDo records indicate plastic pipe was installed as required by 192.321? References: 192.321(a), 192.321(b), 192.321(c), 192.321(d), 192.321(e), 192.321(f), 192.321(g)#

DC.COobservationPage 44DC.CO.INSTALLPLASTIC.ODo field observations confirm the plastic pipe is installed as required by 192.321? References: 192.321(a), 192.321(b), 192.321(c), 192.321(d), 192.321(e), 192.321(f), 192.321(g)#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.CLEAR.PDoes the process require pipe to be installed with clearances specified in 192.325 and (if plastic) installed as to prevent heat damage to the pipe? References: 192.303, 192.325(a), 192.325(b), 192.325(c), 192.325(d)#

DC.COrecordPage 44DC.CO.CLEAR.RDo records indicate that transmission lines or mains are installed with clearances specified in 192.325, and (if plastic) installed as to prevent heat damage to the pipe? References: 192.325(a), 192.325(b), 192.325(c), 192.325(d)#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.CLEAR.ODo field observations indicate the transmission lines or mains (and bottles/bottle-type holders) are installed with the clearances specified in 192.325 and (if plastic) installed as to prevent heat damage to the pipe? References: 192.325(a), 192.325(b), 192.325(c), 192.325(d), 192.175(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 45DC.CO.COVERONSHORE.PDoes the process specify that onshore piping is to be installed with a depth of cover as specified in 192.327? References: 192.303, 192.327(a), 192.327(b), 192.327(c), 192.327(d), 192.327(e)#

DC.COrecordPage 45DC.CO.COVERONSHORE.RIs onshore piping minimum cover provided as specified in 192.327? References: 192.327(a), 192.327(b), 192.327(c), 192.327(d), 192.327(e)#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.COVERONSHORE.ODo field observations confirm onshore piping was installed with the minimum cover specified in 192.327? References: 192.327(a), 192.327(b), 192.327(c), 192.327(d), 192.327(e)#

DC.COprocedurePage 45DC.CO.COVEROFFSHORE.PDoes the process require that offshore piping is to be installed with a depth of cover as specified in 192.327? References: 192.303, 192.327(f), 192.327(g), 192.612(c)(3)#

DC.COrecordPage 45DC.CO.COVEROFFSHORE.RDo records indicate offshore piping meets the minimum cover requirements specified in 192.327? References: 192.327(a), 192.327(f), 192.327(g), 192.612(c)(3)#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.COVEROFFSHORE.ODepth of Cover - Offshore To the extent possible, do field observations confirm offshore piping minimum cover as specified in 192.327? References: 192.327(a), 192.327(f), 192.327(g), 192.612(c)(3)#

DC.COprocedurePage 45DC.CO.AMAOPCONST.PAlternative MAOP: Construction For the AMAOP pipeline, does the process include conditions on the application of alternative MAOP? References: 192.303, 192.328, 192.620(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 45DC.CO.AMAOPCONST.RAlternative MAOP: Construction For the AMAOP pipeline, do records indicate the new or existing pipeline segments meet the additional construction requirements of 192.328? References: 192.328, 192.328(a), 192.328(b), 192.328(c), 192.328(d), 192.328(e), 192.620(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 46DC.CO.AMAOPCONST.OAlternative MAOP: Construction For the AMAOP pipeline, do field observations confirm the new or existing pipeline segments meet the additional construction requirements of 192.328? References: 192.328, 192.328(a), 192.328(b), 192.328(c), 192.328(d), 192.328(e), 192.620(b)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 46DC.WELDINSP.WELDVISUALQUAL.PDoes the operator have comprehensive written specifications or procedures for the inspection and testing of welds that meet the requirements of 192.241? References: 192.241, 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 46DC.WELDINSP.WELDVISUALQUAL.RDoes the operator have records showing that the welding was visually and/or non- destructively tested according to the requirements of 192.241 and the operator’s specifications or procedures? References: 192.241, 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 46DC.WELDINSP.WELDVISUALQUAL.ODo field observations confirm that inspection and testing of welds was being done in accordance with the requirements of 192.241 and the operator's written specifications or procedures? References: 192.241(a), 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 46DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.PIs there a process for nondestructive testing and interpretation in accordance with 192.243? References: 192.243#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 46DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.RDo records indicate that NDT and interpretation are in accordance with 192.243? References: 192.243#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 46DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.ODo field observations indicate that welding NDT procedures are being properly followed? References: 192.243#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 46DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.PDoes the process require welds that are unacceptable to be removed and/or repaired as specified by 192.245? References: 192.245, 192.303#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.RDo records indicate that unacceptable welds are removed and/or repaired in accordance with 192.245? References: 192.245, 192.303#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.ODo field observations confirm that unacceptable welds removed and/or repaired in accordance with 192.245? References: 192.245, 192.303#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 47DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring qualified welding procedures in accordance with 192.225? References: 192.225#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 47DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.RDoes the operator have detailed records showing proper qualification of the welding procedures in accordance with 192.225? References: 192.225#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 47DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.ODo field observations indicate proper qualification of the welding procedures in accordance with 192.225? References: 192.225#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 47DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDERQUAL.PDo the written specifications require welders to be qualified in accordance with applicable sections of API Standard 1104 or ASME BPVC, Section IX and cover the limitations in §192.229? References: 192.227, 192.225, 192.229#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 47DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDERQUAL.RDo the records demonstrate that the welders are qualified in accordance with applicable sections of API Standard 1104 or ASME BPVC, Section IX, and cover the limitations in §192.229? References: 192.227, 192.225, 192.229#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 47DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDERQUAL.ODo field observations confirm that the welders are qualified in accordance with applicable sections of API Standard 1104 or ASME BPVC, Section IX, and cover the limitations in §192.229? References: 192.227, 192.225, 192.229#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.PDoes the operator have written specifications that require the welding operation to be protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality of the completed weld? References: 192.231, 192.225, 192.227#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.RDoes the operator have records that document weather conditions, suspension, protective measures, and resumption of the welding processes to prevent impairment of the quality of the completed weld? References: 192.231, 192.225, 192.227#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.ODo field observations indicate that welding operations are protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality of welds? References: 192.231, 192.225, 192.227#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.PDoes the operator have written specifications or procedures that prohibit the use of certain miter joints as required by 192.233? References: 192.233#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.RMiter Joints In the event that improper miter joints are installed, does the operator have records to indicate that the miter joints were removed as required by 192.233? References: 192.233#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.OMiter Joints In the event that miter joints were being used, do field observations show that the miter joints were properly constructed as required by 192.233? References: 192.233#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPREP.PDoes the operator have comprehensive written specifications or procedures that require preparations for welding in accordance with 192.235? References: 192.235#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPREP.RDo welding inspection records show that welding preparation was not performed according to 192.235 and the operator’s specifications or procedures, or that identified issues were not corrected? References: 192.235#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 48DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPREP.ODo field observations confirm that welding preparations are being made in accordance with 192.235 and the operator's welding specifications and procedures? References: 192.235, 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.241, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.DPprocedurePage 49DC.DP.PIPEDESGEN.PDoes the operator have specifications in place for pipe design so that the wall thickness is sufficient or installed with adequate protection to withstand external pressures and loads that will be imposed on the pipe after installation? References: 192.103, 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.112, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPprocedurePage 49DC.DP.PIPEDESMAOP.PDoes the operator have written procedures in place for steel pipe design so that the wall thickness is sufficient for the intended maximum operating pressure as required by 192.105? References: 192.105, 192.103, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.113, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPrecordPage 49DC.DP.PIPEDESMAOP.RDo design records and drawings indicate the design pressure of steel pipe is established in accordance with 192.105(a)? References: 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.113, 192.115#

DC.DPprocedurePage 49DC.DP.CLASSLOCATION.PDoes the operator have written procedures for determining the class location for the new (or converted) pipeline immediately prior to design? References: 192.111, 192.5, 192.105, 192.609#

DC.DPrecordPage 49DC.DP.CLASSLOCATION.RDoes the operator have complete records showing the determination of class location(s) for the new (or converted) pipeline? References: 192.111, 192.5, 192.105, 192.609#

DC.DPobservationPage 49DC.DP.CLASSLOCATION.ODo field verifications confirm the operator’s class location determinations for the new pipeline? References: 192.111, 192.5, 192.105, 192.609#

DC.DPprocedurePage 49DC.DP.PIPEDESFACTOR.PDoes the operator have written procedures for determining the Design Factor to be used for steel pipe as required by 192.111? References: 192.111, 192.103, 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.112, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPprocedurePage 49DC.DP.PIPEDESAMAOP.PDoes the operator have written procedures for the additional design requirements needed to be eligible for the alternative maximum allowable operating pressure (AMAOP) covered by 192.112 and calculated using 192.620? References: 192.112, 192.103, 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPrecordPage 50DC.DP.PIPEDESAMAOP.RDo design records indicate alternative MAOP replacement pipe and components meet the additional design requirements of 192.112? References: 192.112, 192.303#

DC.DPprocedurePage 50DC.DP.DESIGNPRESSPLASTIC.PDoes the process require the design pressure for plastic pipe to be determined in accordance with the formulas in 192.121? References: 192.103, 192.121#

DC.DPrecordPage 50DC.DP.DESIGNPRESSPLASTIC.RDo design records and drawings indicate the design pressure for plastic pipe is determined in accordance with the formulas in 192.121? References: 192.121#

DC.DPprocedurePage 50DC.DP.DESIGNLIMITPLASTIC.PDoes the process require the design limitations of 192.123 be incorporated into the design of plastic pipe? References: 192.103, 192.123(a), 192.123(b), 192.123(c), 192.123(d), 192.123(e), 192.123(f)#

DC.DPrecordPage 50DC.DP.DESIGNLIMITPLASTIC.RDo design records and drawings indicate that the design limitations of 192.123 are incorporated into the design of plastic pipe? References: 192.123(a), 192.123(b), 192.123(c), 192.123(d), 192.123(e), 192.123(f)#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 50DC.DPCCMP.CMPBLDGLOCATE.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring compressor stations be designed and constructed in accordance with 192.163? References: 192.163, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 50DC.DPCCMP.CMPBLDGLOCATE.RDo the operator’s records indicate that the compressor station has been designed and constructed to comply with 192.163? References: 192.163, 192.143, 192.163(e)#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 50DC.DPCCMP.CMPBLDGLOCATE.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of compressor station buildings meet the requirements of 192.163? References: 192.163, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPLIQPROT.PDoes the operator have written specifications that require compressors be protected from liquids? References: 192.165, 192.143, 192.153(e), 192.505(b)#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPLIQPROT.RDoes the operator have records to indicate that compressors are protected from liquids in accordance with 192.165? References: 192.165(a), 192.615(b), 192.153(e), 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPLIQPROT.ODo field observations confirm that compressors are protected from liquids and, as applicable, liquid separators for compressors installed in accordance with 192.165? References: 192.165, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPESD.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring that compressor station emergency shutdown systems meet the requirements of 192.167? References: 192.167, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPESD.RDo the operator’s records indicate that compressor station emergency shutdown systems meet the requirements of 192.167? References: 192.167, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPESD.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of compressor station emergency shutdown systems meet the requirements of 192.167? References: 192.167, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPPRESSLIMIT.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring that compressor stations have pressure relief or other suitable protective devices that meet the requirements of 192.169? References: 192.169, 192.141, 192.143, 192.199#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPPRESSLIMIT.RDoes the operator have records to indicate that compressor stations have pressure relief or other suitable protective devices in accordance with 192.169? References: 192.169, 192.141, 192.143, 192.199#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 51DC.DPCCMP.CMPPRESSLIMIT.ODo field observations confirm design and construction of compressor station pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.169? References: 192.169, 192.141, 192.143, 192.199#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPSAFETYEQUIP.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring additional compressor station safety equipment be designed and constructed in accordance with 192.171? References: 192.171, 192.143, 192.167(a)(3)#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPSAFETYEQUIP.RDo the operator’s records indicate that additional compressor station safety equipment is designed and constructed in accordance with 192.171? References: 192.171, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPSAFETYEQUIP.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of additional compressor station safety equipment meet the requirements of 192.171? References: 192.171, 192.141, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPVENTILATE.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring ventilation of compressor buildings in accordance with 192.173? References: 192.173, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPVENTILATE.RDo operator records indicate that the design and construction of compressor buildings meet the ventilation requirements of 192.173? References: 192.173, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPVENTILATE.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of compressor buildings meet the ventilation requirements of 192.173? References: 192.173, 192.143#

DC.DPCOPPprocedurePage 52DC.DPCOPP.OVERPRESSURE.PDoes the process require the pipeline have pressure relieving or pressure required of 192.195(a), and that they meet the requirements of 192.199 and 192.201? References: 192.303, 192.143(b), 192.195(a), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.201(a), 192.20#

DC.DPCOPPrecordPage 52DC.DPCOPP.OVERPRESSURE.RDo records indicate that the pipeline has pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices that are required by 192.195(a), and that they meet the requirements of 192.199 and 192.201? References: 192.195(a), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

DC.DPCOPPobservationPage 53DC.DPCOPP.OVERPRESSURE.OAre required pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices being installed, and do they meet the requirements of 192.199 and 192.201? References: 192.195(a), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

DC.DPCOPPprocedurePage 53DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMIT.PDoes the process require that pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.199? References: 192.303, 192.143(b), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.143(a)#

DC.DPCOPPrecordPage 53DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMIT.RDo records indicate that pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.199? References: 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h)#

DC.DPCOPPobservationPage 53DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMIT.ODo field observations confirm pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.199? References: 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h)#

DC.DPCOPPprocedurePage 53DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMITCAP.PDoes the process require that pressure relief or pressure limiting stations being installed comply with 192.201? References: 192.201(a), 192.143(a), 192.143(b), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

DC.DPCOPPrecordPage 53DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMITCAP.RDo records indicate that pressure relief or pressure limiting stations being installed comply with 192.201? References: 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

DC.DPCOPPobservationPage 53DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMITCAP.ODo field observations verify pressure relief or pressure limiting stations comply with the requirements of 192.201? References: 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 53MO.GM.TRAPSAFETY.PDo the procedures require all launchers and receivers to have adequate safety devices in accordance with 192.750 and to ensure the safety devices are working properly just prior to each use? References: 192.750, 192.605(b), 192.801, 192.805#

MO.GMrecordPage 54MO.GM.TRAPSAFETY.RDoes the operator have records to demonstrate whether all launchers and receivers have safety devices that were utilized prior to each use? References: 192.750, 192.605(b), 192.801, 192.805#

MO.GMobservationPage 54MO.GM.TRAPSAFETY.ODo field observations confirm selected launchers and receivers have safety devices installed and whether the safety devices were inspected prior to each use? References: 192.750, 192.605(b), 192.801, 192.805#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 54DC.DPC.METALCOMPONENT.PDo the procedures require certain metallic components to be qualified for use in accordance with 192.144? References: 192.144, 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 54DC.DPC.METALCOMPONENT.RDo records indicate that certain metallic components are qualified for use in accordance with §192.144 and §192.205? References: 192.144(a), 192.144(b), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 54DC.DPC.VALVE.PDo the procedures require that valves comply with the requirements of §192.145? References: 192.145, 192.145(a), 192.145(b), 192.145(c), 192.145(d), 192.145(e), 192.145(f), 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 54DC.DPC.VALVE.RDo records indicate valves comply with the requirements of §192.145 and §192.205? References: 192.145, 192.145(a), 192.145(b), 192.145(c), 192.145(d), 192.145(e), 192.145(f), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCobservationPage 54DC.DPC.VALVE.ODo valves comply with the requirements of 192.145? References: 192.141, 192.145(a), 192.145(b), 192.145(c), 192.145(d), 192.145(e), 192.145(f), 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 54DC.DPC.FLANGE.PDo the procedures require that flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of §192.147? References: 192.147, 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c), 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 55DC.DPC.FLANGE.RDo records indicate flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of §192.147 and §192.205? References: 192.147, 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCobservationPage 55DC.DPC.FLANGE.ODo flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of 192.147? References: 192.147, 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c), 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 55DC.DPC.STANDARDFITTING.PDo procedures require that standard fittings are in compliance with §192.149? References: 192.149, 192.149(a), 192.149(b), 192.149(c), 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 55DC.DPC.STANDARDFITTING.RDo records indicate standard fittings are in compliance with §192.149 and §192.205? References: 192.149, 192.149(a), 192.149(b), 192.149(c), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCobservationPage 55DC.DPC.STANDARDFITTING.ODo field observations confirm standard fittings are in compliance with §192.149? References: 192.149, 192.149(a), 192.149(b), 192.149(c), 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 55DC.DPC.ILIPASS.PDoes the process require that certain transmission pipeline components are designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 192.103, 192.150(a), 192.150(c)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 55DC.DPC.ILIPASS.RDo records indicate that certain transmission pipeline components are designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 192.150, 192.150(a), 192.150(c), 192.493#

DC.DPCobservationPage 55DC.DPC.ILIPASS.OAre certain transmission pipeline components designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 192.150, 192.150(a), 192.150(c)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 55DC.DPC.TAP.PDoes the process require pipeline hot taps (or taps) and tapping fittings to comply with the requirements of 192.151? References: 192.143, 192.151(a), 192.151(b), 192.151(c)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 56DC.DPC.TAP.RDo records indicate that tapping fittings and taps comply with the requirements of §192.151 and §192.205? References: 192.151, 192.151(a), 192.151(b), 192.151(c), 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 56DC.DPC.TAP.ODo field observations confirm each length of pipe and each tapping component are being visually inspected for sufficient installation of taps in accordance with 192 192.151? References: 192.141, 192.151(a), 192.151(b), 192.151(c)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 56DC.DPC.WELDFABRICATE.PDoes the process require components fabricated by welding, such as branch connections, assemblies of standard pipe, or prefabricated units utilized in the construction of a pipeline, are to be in accordance with 192.153? References: 192.143(a), 192.153(a), 192.153(b), 192.153(c), 192.153(d)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 56DC.DPC.WELDFABRICATE.RDo records indicate that components fabricated by welding, such as branch connections, assemblies of standard pipe, or prefabricated units utilized in the construction of a pipeline, are in accordance with §192.153 and §192.205? References: 192.153(a), 192.153(b), 192.153(c), 192.153(d), 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 56DC.DPC.WELDFABRICATE.ODo field observations confirm that components fabricated by welding, such as branch connections, assemblies of standard pipe, or prefabricated units, are in accordance with §192.153? References: 192.141, 192.153(a), 192.153(b), 192.153(c), 192.153(d)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 56DC.DPC.WELDEDBRANCH.RDo records demonstrate that each welded branch connection in the form of a single connection, or in a header or manifold as a series of connections, were designed in accordance to §192.155 and §192.205? References: 192.155, 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 56DC.DPC.WELDEDBRANCH.OWelded Branch Connections As applicable to the project, do field observations verify that each welded branch connection in the form of a single connection, or in a header or manifold as a series of connections, was installed as designed in accordance to §192.155? References: 192.155#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 56DC.DPC.EXTRUDEOUTLET.PDoes the process require each extruded outlet to be suitable for anticipated service conditions and designed in accordance to §192.157? References: 192.149(b), 192.157#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 56DC.DPC.FLEXIBLE.PDoes the process require pipeline and pipe components to be designed for flexibility in accordance with §192.159? References: 192.143(a), 192.159#

DC.DPCrecordPage 57DC.DPC.FLEXIBLE.RDo records indicate pipeline and pipe components are designed for flexibility in accordance with §192.159? References: 192.143(a), 192.159#

DC.DPCobservationPage 57DC.DPC.FLEXIBLE.ODo field observations verify that observed pipe and pipe components meet the flexibility design for thermal expansion/contraction and unusual loading or forces? References: 192.143(a), 192.159#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 57DC.DPC.SUPPORT.PDoes the process require piping and associated equipment to have sufficient anchors or supports to prevent undue strain on connected equipment, resist longitudinal forces, and prevent or dampen excessive vibration in accordance with §192.161? References: 192.161#

DC.DPCrecordPage 57DC.DPC.SUPPORT.RDo records indicate piping and associated equipment have sufficient anchors or supports to prevent undue strain on connected equipment, to resist longitudinal forces, and to prevent or dampen excessive vibration in accordance with §192.161? References: 192.161(a), 192.161(b), 192.161(c), 192.161(d), 192.161(e), 192.161(f), 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 57DC.DPC.SUPPORT.ODo field observations confirm each length of pipe and each component is being visually inspected for sufficient installation of anchors or supports to prevent undue strain on connected equipment, to resist longitudinal forces, to prevent or dampen excessive vibration, and is in accordance with §192.161? References: 192.141, 192.161(a), 192.161(b), 192.161(c), 192.161(d), 192.161(e), 192.161(f)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 57DC.DPC.VALVESPACE.PDoes the process require transmission line valve spacing to be accordance with §192.179( References: 192.143, 192.179(a), 192.179(a)(1), 192.179(a)(2), 192.179(a)(3), 192.179(a)(4), 192.179(b), 192.179(c), 192.179(d), 192.179(e), 192.179(f), 192.17#

DC.DPCrecordPage 57DC.DPC.VALVESPACE.RDo records indicate that transmission line valve spacing is in accordance with 192.179(a)? References: 192.179(a), 192.179(a)(1), 192.179(a)(2), 192.179(a)(3), 192.179(a)(4), 192.179(b), 192.179(c), 192.179(d)#

DC.DPCobservationPage 57DC.DPC.VALVESPACE.OAre transmission line valves being installed as required by 192.179? References: 192.141, 192.179(a), 192.179(b), 192.179(c), 192.179(d)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 57DC.DPC.PLASTICFITTING.PDoes the process require plastic fittings conform to the standards referenced in 192.191? References: 192.191(a), 192.191(b)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 58DC.DPC.PLASTICFITTING.RDo records indicate that plastic fittings conform to the standards referenced in 192.191? References: 192.191(a), 192.191(b)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 58DC.DPC.HOLDERS.PPipe and Bottle Type Holders As applicable to the project, does the process require that pipe and bottle type holders are designed to meet requirements? References: 192.143(a), 192.143(b), 192.175(a), 192.175(b), 192.177(a), 192.177(b)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 58DC.DPC.HOLDERS.RPipe and Bottle Type Holders As applicable to the project, do records indicate that pipe and bottle type holders are designed to meet requirements? References: 192.175(a), 192.175(b), 192.177(a), 192.177(b)#

DC.DPCobservationPage 58DC.DPC.HOLDERS.OPipe and Bottle Type Holders As applicable to the project, are pipe-type and bottle-type holders installed as designed and in accordance with 192.175? References: 192.141, 192.175(a), 192.175(b), 192.177(a), 192.177(b)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 58DC.DPC.VAULT.PVaults Structural Design Requirements As applicable to the project, does the process require that vaults and valve pits are designed in accordance with 192.183? References: 192.143(a), 192.143(b), 192.183(a), 192.183(b), 192.183(c)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 58DC.DPC.VAULT.RVaults Structural Design Requirements As applicable to the project, do records indicate that vaults and valve pits are designed in accordance with 192.183? References: 192.183(a), 192.183(b), 192.183(c)#