2026 Gas Transmission IA Question Set

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 1AR.RCOM.NONCOVERED.POfficial PDFDoes the integrity assessment and maintenance processes include adequate criteria for determining the need for, and timeliness of, pipeline defect repairs in non-covered segments? References: 192.485(a), 192.485(b), 192.485(c), 192.703(b), 192.710, 192.711, 192.713, 192.714#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 1AR.RCOM.NONCOVERED.RRepair Criteria in Non-Covered Segments From the review of the results of integrity assessments, did the operator repair conditions that posed a threat to pipeline integrity on Non-Covered segments? References: 192.485(a), 192.485(b), 192.485(c), 191.23(a)(1), 192.703(b), 192.710, 192.711, 192.713#

AR.RCOMobservationPage 1AR.RCOM.REMEDIATIONOM.OIs anomaly remediation and documentation of remediation adequate for all segments? References: 192.485(a), 192.485(b), 192.485(c), 192.710, 192.711, 192.713#

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 1AR.RCOM.RCAMAOP.PIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), do the processes meet the requirements of the permit or 192.620? References: 192.620(d)#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 1AR.RCOM.RCAMAOP.RIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of selected records, were required repairs performed? References: 192.620(d)#

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 1AR.RCOM.GGREMEDIATION.PDo maintenance procedures include adequate criteria for determining the need for, and timeliness of, pipeline repairs in gas gathering pipelines? References: 192.485(a), 192.9(d)(2), 192.9(e)(1)(ii), 192.453, 192.485(b)#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 1AR.RCOM.GGREMEDIATION.RRepair Criteria in Type B and C Gas Gathering Pipelines From the review of records, did the operator repair or replace pipe to permanently restore the serviceability of the pipe? References: 192.485(a), 191.23(a)(1), 191.23(b)(1), 192.9(d)(2), 192.9(e)(1)(ii), 192.453, 192.485(b)#

AR.RCOMobservationPage 1AR.RCOM.GGREMEDIATION.OIs operator's remediation and documentation of remediation adequate? References: 192.485(a), 192.453, 192.459, 192.485(b)#

EP.ERGrecordPage 2EP.ERG.NOTICES.RDo records indicate receiving, identifying, classifying and communication of notices of events requiring immediate response in accordance with procedures? References: 192.615(a)(1), 192.9(e)#

AR.CDAprocedurePage 2AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate CDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate CDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate CDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(h), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.CDAobservationPage 2AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate CDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.CDAprocedurePage 2AR.CDA.CDAPLAN.PIs an adequate Confirmatory Direct Assessment Plan in place? References: 192.931(a), 192.931(b), 192.931(c), 192.931(d)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDAEXTCORR.RDo records indicate that the external corrosion plan was properly implemented? References: 192.947(h), 192.931(b)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDAINTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that the internal corrosion plan was properly implemented? References: 192.947(h), 192.931(c)#

AR.CDArecordPage 2AR.CDA.CDAINDICATION.RDo records demonstrate that the next assessment should have been accelerated? References: 192.947(h), 192.931(d)#

AR.CDAprocedurePage 3AR.CDA.CDACORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats identified using confirmatory direct assessment? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.CDArecordPage 3AR.CDA.CDACORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats identified by CDA as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 3AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate ECDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ECDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDAPREASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the ECDA pre-assessment process complied with NACE SP0502- 2010 Section 3 and 192.925(b)(1)? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(1)#

AR.ECrecordPage 3AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate ECDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct ECDA assessments or review and analyze assessment results are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ECobservationPage 3AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate ECDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 3AR.EC.ECDAPLAN.PIs an adequate ECDA plan and process in place for conducting ECDA? References: 192.925(a), 192.925(b)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 3AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.PIs the process for integrating ECDA results with other information adequate? References: 192.917(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.RDo records demonstrate that the operator integrated other data/information when evaluating data/results? References: 192.947(g), 192.917(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAREGION.RDo records demonstrate that the operator identified ECDA Regions? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(1)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAINDIRECT.RDo records demonstrate that ECDA indirect inspection process complied with NACE SP 0502-2010 Section 4 and ASME B31.8S-2018, Section 6.4? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(2)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.RDo records demonstrate that excavations, direct examinations, and data collection were performed in accordance with NACE SP 0502-2010, Sections 5 and 6.4.2 and ASME B31.8S-2018, Section 6.4? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(3)#

AR.ECobservationPage 4AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.OECDA Direct Examination Were ECDA direct examinations adequately conducted? References: 192.925(b)(3)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAANALYSIS.RDo records demonstrate that an analysis of the ECDA data and other information was adequate to identify areas where external corrosion activity is most likely? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(4), 192.933(b)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 4AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.PHave criteria and internal notification processes been established and implemented for any changes in the ECDA plan? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(3)(iii), 192.911(k)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.RDo records demonstrate that changes in the ECDA plan have been implemented and documented? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(3)(iii)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAPOSTASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements for post-assessment were met? References: 192.947(g), 192.925(b)(4)#

AR.ECrecordPage 4AR.EC.ECDAMAOP.RIf ECDA was performed on segments (as allowed by §192.620(d)(9)(iii)), were all ECDA assessment requirements completed? References: 192.947(g), 192.620(d)(9)(iii), 192.620(d)(10)(i), 192.620(d)(10)(iii)#

AR.ECobservationPage 5AR.EC.ECDAMAOP.OIf ECDA was performed on segments (as allowed by §192.620(d)(9)(iii)), were all ECDA assessment requirements completed? References: 192.620(d)(9)(iii), 192.620(d)(10)(i), 192.620(d)(10)(iii)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 5AR.EC.ECCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant external corrosion threats? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ECrecordPage 5AR.EC.ECCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant external corrosion threats as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 5AR.IC.ICDAPLANPRE.PIs an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the pre-assessment step of ICDA? References: 192.927(c), 192.927(a), 192.927(b)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 5AR.IC.ICDAPLANINDIRECT.PIs an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the indirect inspection step in the ICDA process? References: 192.927(c), 192.927(a), 192.927(b)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 5AR.IC.ICDAPLANEXAM.PIs an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the detailed examination step of the ICDA process? References: 192.927(c), 192.927(a), 192.927(b), 192.485, 192.712, 192.714, 192.933#

AR.ICprocedurePage 5AR.IC.ICDAPLANPOST.PIs an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the post assessment monitoring? References: 192.927(c), 192.927(a), 192.927(b), 192.485, 192.712, 192.714, 192.933#

AR.ICrecordPage 5AR.IC.ICDAPREASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements for an ICDA pre-assessment were met? References: 192.947(g)#

AR.ICrecordPage 5AR.IC.ICDAREGION.RDo records demonstrate that ICDA Regions were adequately identified? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c)(2), 192.927(c)(5)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDAINDIRECT.RDo records demonstrate that sites where internal corrosion may be present were properly identified? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c)(2), 192.927(c)(5)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDADIRECT.RDo records demonstrate the operator performed detailed examinations of locations identified during the Indirect Inspection? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c)(3), 192.927(c)(5)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDAPOSTASSESS.RDo records demonstrate that the operator assessed the effectiveness of the ICDA process? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c)(4)(i), 192.927(c)(4)(ii), 192.927(c)(4)(iii)(A), 192.477#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDAANALYSIS.RDo records demonstrate that sufficient data was used to complete the ICDA analysis to identify the internal corrosion threats to the pipeline? References: 192.947(g), 192.927(c), 192.933(b)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 6AR.IC.ICDAPLAN.PIs an ICDA plan and process in place for conducting ICDA? References: 192.927(c), 192.927(a), 192.927(b)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICDAMAOP.RIf the pipeline is operated using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule) were required ICDA assessments performed? References: 192.947(g), 192.620(d)(9), 192.620(d)(10), 192.927#

AR.ICprocedurePage 6AR.IC.ICCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant internal corrosion threats related to internal corrosion? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ICrecordPage 6AR.IC.ICCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant internal corrosion threats as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ICprocedurePage 6AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate ICDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ICDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ICrecordPage 7AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate ICDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct ICDA assessments or review and analyze assessment results, are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ICobservationPage 7AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate ICDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANPRE.PDoes the SCCDA plan include requirements for preassessment? References: 192.929(b)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANINDIRECT.PIs an adequate SCCDA plan developed prior to indirect inspections? References: 192.929(b), 192.929(b)(2)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANDIRECT.PIs an adequate plan developed prior to performing SCCDA? References: 192.929(b), 192.929(b)(3)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANPOST.PIs an adequate SCCDA plan developed prior to post assessment requirements? References: 192.929(b), 192.929(b)(5)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 7AR.SCC.SCCDAMITIG.PIs an adequate plan developed for remediating and mitigating SCC once discovered? References: 192.929(b)(4)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 7AR.SCC.SCCDADATA.RDo records demonstrate that data was collected and evaluated? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)(1)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 8AR.SCC.SCCDAINSPECTION.RDo records demonstrate that at least two Indirect Inspections were conducted using complementary measurement tools appropriate for the pipeline segment? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)(2)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 8AR.SCC.SCCDAEXAM.RDo records demonstrate that a minimum of three direct examinations for SCC were performed within the covered pipeline segment? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)(3)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 8AR.SCC.SCCDAMITIG.RDo records demonstrate that the operator mitigated the threat of SCC, if found? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)(4)#

AR.SCCobservationPage 8AR.SCC.SCCDAMETHOD.OAssessment Method (Near Neutral and High pH SCC) From field observations, was SCCDA performed in accordance with 192.929 and the SCCDA plan? References: 192.929#

AR.SCCrecordPage 8AR.SCC.SCCDANEARNEUTRAL.RAssessing for Near Neutral SCC From the review of the results of selected integrity assessments, was the pipeline evaluated for near neutral SCC? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 8AR.SCC.SCCDAREASSESSINTRVL.RReassessment Interval From the review of the results of selected integrity assessments, did the operator determine a reassessment interval based on SCCDA results? References: 192.947(d), 192.939(a)(3)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 8AR.SCC.SCCDAAMAOP.RIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of selected records, were required SCCDA assessments performed? References: 192.620(d), 192.620(d)(9), 192.620(d)(10)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 8AR.SCC.SCCCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats found following SCCDA? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 8AR.SCC.SCCCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required following SCCDA? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 9AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate SCCDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate SCCDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 9AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate SCCDA Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(e), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.SCCobservationPage 9AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate SCCDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 9AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.PWho Evaluate ILI Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ILI assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 9AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.RWho Evaluate ILI Results Do records demonstrate that personnel who conduct assessments or review assessment results are qualified per the process requirements? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.493#

AR.ILobservationPage 9AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.OWho Evaluate ILI Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 9AR.IL.ILISPECS.PDoes the process assure complete and adequate vendor ILI specifications? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.933(b), 192.493, 192.18#

AR.ILrecordPage 10AR.IL.ILISPECS.RDo records demonstrate that the ILI specifications were complete and adequate? References: 192.947(g), 192.933(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 10AR.IL.ASSESSMETHOD.PDoes the process specify the assessment methods that are appropriate for the pipeline specific integrity threats? References: 192.919(b), 192.921(a), 192.937(c), 192.917, 192.493, 192.506#

AR.ILrecordPage 10AR.IL.ASSESSMETHOD.RDo records demonstrate that the assessment methods shown in the baseline and/or continual assessment plan were appropriate for the pipeline specific integrity threats? References: 192.947, 192.919(b), 192.921(a), 192.937(c)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 10AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.PDoes the process for validating ILI results ensure that accurate integrity assessment results are obtained? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.937(c), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 10AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.RDo records demonstrate that the operator has validated ILI assessment results per their process? References: 192.947, 192.921(a)(1), 192.493#

AR.ILobservationPage 10AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.OValidation of ILI Results From observation of field activities, do the employees and vendors validate ILI assessment results per their process? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 10AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.PIs the process for integrating ILI results with other information adequate? References: 192.917(b), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 10AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.RDo records demonstrate that the operator integrated other data/information when evaluating tool data/results? References: 192.947, 192.917(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 11AR.IL.ILIACCEPCRITERIA.PIs the process for ILI survey acceptance criteria adequate to assure an effective assessment? References: 192.921(a), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 11AR.IL.ILIACCEPCRITERIA.RDo records indicate adequate implementation of the process for ILI survey acceptance? References: 192.947, 192.921(a), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 11AR.IL.ILIDELAY.RDo records indicate that the performance of integrity assessments has been delayed and integrity assessment delays have been justified? References: 192.947(d), 192.909(a), 192.909(b), 192.943(a), 192.943(b), 190.341, 192.18#

AR.ILprocedurePage 11AR.IL.ILIAMAOP.PAlternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? For pipelines operating under AMAOP, do processes implement the ILI requirements of 192.620(d)(9) and (10) for the entire segment? References: 192.620(d), 192.493#

AR.ILrecordPage 11AR.IL.ILIAMAOP.RAlternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? For pipelines operating under AMAOP, do records indicate the ILI requirements of 192.620(d)(9) and (10) have been implemented for the entire segment? References: 192.620(d), 192.493#

AR.ILobservationPage 11AR.IL.ILIIMPLEMENT.OAre O&M and IMP procedural requirements for the performance of ILI assessments followed? References: 192.921(a)(1), 192.620(d), 192.605(b), 192.493#

AR.ILprocedurePage 11AR.IL.ILCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats identified during in-line inspections? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.ILrecordPage 11AR.IL.ILCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats identified during in-line inspections? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.LSRprocedurePage 12AR.LSR.LSRPLAN.PIs the process for performing low stress reassessment adequate? References: 192.941, 192.919, 192.921, 192.941(b), 192.941(c)#

AR.LSRrecordPage 12AR.LSR.LSRBA.RDo records demonstrate that a baseline assessment meeting the requirements of 192.919 and 192.921 was performed prior to performing a low stress reassessment? References: 192.947(d), 192.919(c), 192.921(d), 192.941(a), 192.506#

AR.LSRrecordPage 12AR.LSR.LSREXTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements of §192.941(b) were implemented when performing low stress reassessment for external corrosion? References: 192.947(d), 192.941(b)#

AR.LSRrecordPage 12AR.LSR.LSRINTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that the requirements of §192.941(c) were implemented when performing low stress reassessment for internal corrosion? References: 192.947(d), 192.941(c)#

AR.LSRprocedurePage 12AR.LSR.LSRCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats following a LSR? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.LSRrecordPage 12AR.LSR.LSRCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required following a LSR? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 12AR.PTI.PRESSTESTREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate Pressure Test Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate pressure test assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.921(a)(4)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 12AR.PTI.PRESSTESTREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate Pressure Test Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct or review pressure test assessment results are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(g), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 13AR.PTI.PRESSTESTACCEP.PTest Acceptance Criteria and Procedures Were test acceptance criteria and processes sufficient to assure the basis for an acceptable pressure test? References: 192.503(a), 192.503(b), 192.503(c), 192.503(d), 192.505(a), 192.505(b), 192.505(c), 192.505(d), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.507(c), 192.513, 192.513(b), 192.513(c), 192.513(d), 192.921(a)(2)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 13AR.PTI.PRESSTESTRESULT.RDo the test records validate the pressure test? References: 192.517(a), 192.505(a), 192.505(b), 192.505(c), 192.505(d), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.507(c), 192.513(a), 192.513(b), 192.513(c), 192.513, 192.517(b), 192.617, 192.619(a), 192.919(e), 192.921(a)(2)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 13AR.PTI.PRESSTESTAMAOP.RIf the pipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of selected records, were required pressure test assessments performed? References: 192.517(a), 192.505(a), 192.517(b), 192.620(c)(4), 192.620(d)(9), 192.620(d)(10)#

AR.PTIobservationPage 13AR.PTI.PRESSTESTCOMPLETE.OPressure Test Completion From field operations was the pressure test performed in accordance with Subpart J requirements and the process requirements? References: 192.503(a), 192.503(b), 192.503(c), 192.503(d), 192.505(a), 192.505(b), 192.505(c), 192.505(d), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.507(c), 192.513, 192.513(b), 192.513(c), 192.513(d)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 13AR.PTI.PTICORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 13AR.PTI.PTICORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 13AR.PTI.SPIKEHYDRO.PDo the procedures for selecting pipeline assessment methods specifically include spike hydrotests as the assessment method for detecting time-dependent threats? References: 192.506(a), 192.505, 192.710(c)(3), 192.921(a)(3)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 13AR.PTI.SPIKEHYDRO.RWhere time-dependent threats were an identified risk, do the records indicate that a spike hydrotest was performed to “clear” any cracks that might otherwise grow during pressure reductions after the hydrostatic test? References: 192.506(a), 192.505, 192.710(c)(3), 192.921(a)(3)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 14AR.OT.OTPLAN.PHas a process been developed for "other technologies" that provide an equivalent understanding of the condition of the pipe? References: 192.921(a)(7), 192.18#

AR.OTrecordPage 14AR.OT.OTPLAN.RDo records demonstrate that the assessments were performed in accordance with the process and vendor recommendations and that defects were identified and categorized within 180 days, if applicable? References: 192.947(d), 192.921(a)(7), 192.933(b)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 14AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate Other Technology Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate assessment results meet acceptable qualification standards? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b), 192.921(a)(7), 192.493#

AR.OTrecordPage 14AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate Other Technology Results Do records demonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.947(d), 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.OTobservationPage 14AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.OWho Evaluate Other Technology Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 192.915(a), 192.915(b)#

AR.OTobservationPage 14AR.OT.OTPLAN.OOther Technology Were assessments conducted using "other technology" adequately performed in accordance with the OT process? References: 192.921(a)(7)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 14AR.OT.OTCORR.PDoes the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats identified using Other Technology? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.OTrecordPage 14AR.OT.OTCORR.RDo records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required following the use of Other Technology? References: 192.933, 192.917(e)(5)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 15AR.PFP.ANOMALYMETALLOSS.PDo the procedures for evaluating corrosion metal loss anomalies or defects, ensure that a determination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established at the location of each anomaly or defect? References: 192.605, 192.607, 192.712(a), 192.917(b), 192.933(d), 192.485, 192.712(b)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 15AR.PFP.ANOMALYDENTS.PDo the procedures for evaluating dents and other mechanical damage anomalies or defects, ensure that a determination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established at the location of each anomaly or defect? References: 192.605, 192.607, 192.712(a), 192.712(b), 192.933(d), 192.485, 192.712(c), 192.712(h)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 15AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKMODEL.PDo the procedures for evaluating cracks and crack like defects ensure that a determination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established at the location of each anomaly or defect, in accordance with §192.712(d)(1)? References: 192.605, 192.607, 192.712(a), 192.712(d)(1)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 15AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKGROWTH.PDo the procedures detail the performance of fatigue analysis and remaining life calculations for pipeline segments susceptible to cyclic fatigue or other loading conditions that could lead to fatigue crack growth? References: 192.605, 192.607, 192.712(d)(2)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 15AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKSURVIVEPT.PDo procedures call for the calculation of the largest potential crack defect sizes when analyzing potential cracks that could have survived a pressure test, specifically in the absence of any in- line inspection data in accordance with §192.712(d)(3)? References: 192.712(d)(3), 192.607, 192.712(a), 192.712(d)(1)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 15AR.PFP.ANOMALYDATAUSE.PDo the procedures detail the use of data when performing analyses of predicted or assumed anomalies or defects, in accordance with §192.712(e)? References: 192.605, 192.607, 192.712(e)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 15AR.PFP.ANOMALYRECORDS.PDo procedures detail the collection, creation and retention of records including all investigations, analyses, and other actions taken in performing analyses of predicted or assumed anomalies or defects, in accordance with 192.712(g)? References: 192.605, 192.607, 192.712(g)#

AR.PFPprocedurePage 16AR.PFP.ANOMALYREASSESS.PDo procedures detail the reassessment of anomalies when an operator used an Engineering Critical Assessment method? References: 192.605, 192.712(h)#

AR.PFPrecordPage 16AR.PFP.ANOMALYRECORDS.RDo the records capture all investigations, analyses and other actions taken to support the analysis of predicted failure pressure in accordance with §192.712(g)? References: 192.712(g), 192.712(e)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 16AR.RCHCA.GENERAL.PDo the repair procedures detail what actions must be taken to address integrity issues? References: 192.907(a), 192.607, 192.712, 192.933(a)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 16AR.RCHCA.GENERAL.RDo the repair records show what actions the operator took to address integrity issues? References: 192.947(a), 192.607, 192.712, 192.933(a)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 16AR.RCHCA.PRESSUREREDUC.PDo the repair procedures require a temporary pressure reduction for making repairs in covered segments? References: 192.907(a), 192.18, 192.712, 192.933(a)(1), 192.933(a)(2), 192.933(d)(1)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 16AR.RCHCA.PRESSUREREDUC.RDo records demonstrate that a temporary pressure reduction was taken immediately or when a repair schedule could not be met? References: 192.947, 192.18, 192.712, 192.933(a)(1), 192.933(a)(2), 192.933(d)(1)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 16AR.RCHCA.DISCOVERY.PDo the repair procedures require properly define discovery and the required time frame for response in covered segments? References: 192.907, 192.933(b)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 17AR.RCHCA.DISCOVERY.RDo the records show that discovery was declared in the required timeframe? References: 192.947, 192.933(b)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 17AR.RCHCA.SCHEDULE.PDo the repair procedures discuss remediating conditions according to a prioritization schedule in covered segments? References: 192.907(a), 192.933(c)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 17AR.RCHCA.SCHEDULE.RDo records demonstrate that defects in covered segments were remediated according to a prioritization schedule? References: 192.947, 192.933(c)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 17AR.RCHCA.IMMEDIATE.PDo the repair procedures cover all of the elements for making immediate repairs in covered segments? References: 192.907, 192.933(d)(1)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 17AR.RCHCA.IMMEDIATE.RDo records demonstrate that all conditions requiring immediate repair were repaired immediately upon discovery? References: 192.947, 192.933(d)(1)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 17AR.RCHCA.ONEYEAR.PDo the repair procedures cover all of the elements for making repairs in covered segments for One-year conditions? References: 192.907, 192.933(d)(2)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 17AR.RCHCA.ONEYEAR.RDo records demonstrate that all conditions meeting the one-year condition requirements were repaired within one year of discovery? References: 192.947, 192.712, 192.933(d)(2)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 17AR.RCHCA.MONITOR.PDo the repair procedures require the operator to record and monitor conditions that meet monitoring criteria in covered segments? References: 192.907, 192.933(d)(3)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 17AR.RCHCA.MONITOR.RDo records demonstrate that all defects were properly categorized? References: 192.947, 192.712, 192.933(d)(3)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 18AR.RCHCA.CRACK.PDo the repair procedures require the operator to perform direct examinations of known locations of cracks or crack-like defects? References: 192.907, 192.712, 192.933(e)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 18AR.RCHCA.CRACK.RDo the records show that the operator performed direct examinations of known locations of cracks or crack-like defects? References: 192.947, 192.712, 192.933(e)#

AR.RCHCAobservationPage 18AR.RCHCA.REMEDIATION.OIs anomaly remediation adequate for the covered segments being observed? References: 192.933#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 18AR.RCHCA.CRITERIATEMP.PDo the repair procedures require the operator to take immediate temporary measures to protect the public? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.711(a)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 18AR.RCHCA.CRITERIATEMP.RDo the records show that the operator took immediate temporary measures to protect the public? References: 192.709, 192.711(a)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 18AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAPERM.PDo the repair procedures require the operator to make permanent repairs? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.711(b)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 18AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAPERM.RDo the records show that the operator made permanent repairs on both non- integrity management and integrity management segments of the pipeline? References: 192.709, 192.711(b)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 18AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAWELD.PDo the repair procedures prohibit the operator from using welded patches? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.711(c)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 18AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAWELD.RDo the records show that the operator made repairs using welded patches? References: 192.709, 192.711(c)#

AR.RCHCAobservationPage 19AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAOBSERVE.OIs the anomaly remediation adequate for segment being observed? References: 192.711#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 19AR.RCNONHCA.GENERAL.PDo the repair procedures detail making repairs in a safe manner in non-covered segments? References: 192.605(a), 192.714(a), 192.714(b), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 19AR.RCNONHCA.GENERAL.RDo records demonstrate that repairs were made in a safe manner in non-covered segments? References: 192.714(b), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 19AR.RCNONHCA.SCHEDULE.PDo the repair procedures discuss remediating conditions according to a prioritization schedule in non-covered segments? References: 192.605, 192.714(c), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 19AR.RCNONHCA.SCHEDULE.RDo records demonstrate that defects in non- covered segments were remediated according to a prioritization schedule? References: 192.714(c), 192.105, 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 19AR.RCNONHCA.IMMEDIATE.PDo the repair procedures cover all of the elements for making immediate repairs in non-covered segments? References: 192.605, 192.714(d)(1), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 19AR.RCNONHCA.IMMEDIATE.RDo records demonstrate that all conditions requiring immediate repair were repaired immediately upon discovery? References: 192.714(d)(1), 192.712, 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 19AR.RCNONHCA.TWOYEAR.PDo the repair procedures cover all of the elements for making repairs in non-covered segments for two-year conditions? References: 192.605, 192.714(d)(2), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 19AR.RCNONHCA.TWOYEAR.RDo records demonstrate that all conditions meeting the two-year condition requirements were repaired within two years of discovery? References: 192.714(d)(2), 192.712, 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 20AR.RCNONHCA.MONITOR.PDo the repair procedures require the operator to record and monitor conditions that meet monitoring criteria in non covered segments? References: 192.605, 192.714(d)(3), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 20AR.RCNONHCA.MONITOR.RDo records demonstrate that all defects were properly categorized? References: 192.714(d)(3), 192.712, 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 20AR.RCNONHCA.PRESSUREREDUC.PDo the repair procedures require a temporary pressure reduction for making repairs in non-covered segments? References: 192.605, 192.714(e), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 20AR.RCNONHCA.PRESSUREREDUC.RDo records demonstrate that a temporary pressure reduction was taken immediately or when a repair schedule could not be met? References: 192.714(e), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 20AR.RCNONHCA.OTHER.PDo the repair procedures require the operator to take appropriate remedial action for other conditions that could affect safe operations in non-covered segments? References: 192.605, 192.712, 192.714(f), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 20AR.RCNONHCA.OTHER.RDo the records show that the operator took appropriate remedial action for other conditions that could affect safe operations in non-covered segments? References: 192.714(f), 192.712, 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAprocedurePage 20AR.RCNONHCA.CRACK.PDo the repair procedures require the operator to perform direct examinations of known locations of cracks or crack-like defects? References: 192.605, 192.712, 192.714(g), 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCArecordPage 20AR.RCNONHCA.CRACK.RDo the records show that the operator performed direct examinations of known locations of cracks or crack-like defects? References: 192.714(g), 192.712, 192.714(h)#

AR.RCNONHCAobservationPage 20AR.RCNONHCA.REMEDIATION.OIs anomaly remediation adequate for the non-covered segments being observed? References: 192.714, 192.712#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 21AR.RMP.SAFETY.PDoes the process ensure that repairs are made in a safe manner and are made so as to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 192.605(b)(9), 192.713(b)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 21AR.RMP.SAFETY.OAre repairs made in a safe manner and to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 192.605(b)(9), 192.713(b)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 21AR.RMP.IGNITION.PIs there a process for preventing accidental ignition where gas presents a hazard of fire or explosion? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 21AR.RMP.IGNITION.RDo records indicate adequate steps were taken by the operator to prevent accidental ignition prior to performing work? References: 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 21AR.RMP.IGNITION.OPrevention of Accidental Ignition Perform observations of selected locations to verify that adequate steps have been taken by the operator to minimize the potential for accidental ignition. References: 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 21AR.RMP.HOTTAP.PIs the process adequate for tapping pipelines under pressure? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.627#

AR.RMPrecordPage 21AR.RMP.HOTTAP.RTapping Pipelines Under Pressure From a review of selected records, were the personnel who performed pressure taps on pipelines under pressure qualified? References: 192.627#

AR.RMPobservationPage 21AR.RMP.HOTTAP.OTapping Pipelines Under Pressure Were pressure taps on pipelines under pressure performed in accordance with processes by qualified personnel? References: 192.627#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 21AR.RMP.REPAIRREQT.PDoes the repair process capture the requirements of 192.711 for transmission lines? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.711(a), 192.711(b), 192.711(c), 192.717(b)(3)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 22AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRDEFECT.PIs the process adequate for the permanent field repair of defects in transmission lines? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.713(a), 192.713(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 22AR.RMP.METHOD.RPermissible Repair Methods From the review of records, were all repairs performed in accordance with processes, applicable sections of Part 192? References: 192.709(a), 192.713(a), 192.713(b), 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 22AR.RMP.REPAIRQUAL.RQualification of Personnel Performing Pipeline Repair From the review of selected records, were personnel performing repairs, other than welding, and post repair tests qualified for the task they performed? References: 192.807(b), 192.805(h)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 22AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRWELDS.PIs the process adequate for the permanent field repair of welds? References: 192.605(b), 192.715(a), 192.715(b), 192.715(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 22AR.RMP.WELDERQUAL.RWelder Qualification From the review of selected records, were repairs requiring welding performed by qualified welders using qualified welding processes? References: 192.225(a), 192.225(b), 192.227(a), 192.227(b), 192.229(a), 192.229(b), 192.229(c), 192.229(d)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 22AR.RMP.WELDQUAL.RRepair of Weld Defects From the review of records, were weld defects repaired in accordance with 192.245 and 192.715? References: 192.245(a), 192.245(b), 192.245(c), 192.715(a), 192.715(b), 192.715(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 22AR.RMP.WELDINSPECT.RInspection of Welds From the review of records, were welds inspected and examined in accordance with 192.241 and 192.243? References: 192.241(a), 192.241(b), 192.241(c), 192.243(a), 192.243(b), 192.243(c), 192.243(d), 192.243(e), 192.243(f)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 22AR.RMP.WELDINSPECT.OInspection of Welds Were welds inspected and examined in accordance with 192.241 and 192.243? References: 192.241(a), 192.241(b), 192.241(c), 192.243(a), 192.243(b), 192.243(c), 192.243(d), 192.243(e), 192.243(f)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 22AR.RMP.PIPECONDITION.RDo repair records document all information needed to understand the conditions of the pipe and its environment and provide the information needed to support the Integrity Management Risk Model? References: 192.709(a), 192.709(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 23AR.RMP.REPLACESTD.RReplacement Components From the review of records, were any components that were replaced constructed to the same or higher standards as the original component? References: 192.713(a)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 23AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRLEAK.PIs there an adequate process for the permanent field repair of leaks on transmission lines? References: 192.605(b), 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 23AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRLEAK.RTransmission Lines Permanent Field Repair of Leaks From the review of records, did the operator properly repair leaks on transmission lines? References: 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 23AR.RMP.FIELDREPAIRLEAK.ODoes the operator properly repair leaks on transmission lines? References: 192.717(a), 192.717(b)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 23AR.RMP.WELDTEST.PIs the process adequate for the testing of replacement pipe and repairs made by welding on transmission lines? References: 192.605(b), 192.719(a), 192.719(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 23AR.RMP.WELDTEST.RTransmission Lines Testing of Repairs From the review of records, did the operator properly test replacement pipe and repairs made by welding on transmission lines? References: 192.719(a), 192.719(b)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 23AR.RMP.WELDTEST.ODoes the operator properly test replacement pipe and repairs made by welding on transmission lines? References: 192.719(a), 192.719(b)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 23AR.RMP.CRACKNDT.PWhen Exposed for Repair Does the process require that when a pipeline segment that meets the conditions for cracking and/or possible SCC is exposed (i.e., the coating is removed), an NDE method (e.g., MPI, UT) is employed to evaluate for cracking? References: 192.929(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 23AR.RMP.CRACKNDT.RWhen Exposed for Repair From the review of records, when a pipeline segment that meets the conditions of possible cracking and/or SCC is exposed (i.e., the coating is removed), was an NDE method (e.g., MPI, UT) employed to evaluate for cracking and/or SCC? References: 192.947(g), 192.929(b)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 24AR.PA.ASSESSSCHED.PWhat is the process/plan (including the selection criteria, timeline, and use of prior assessments) for performing the initial assessments as required by §192.710(b)(1) and (b)(3)? References: 192.710(b)(1), 192.710(b)(3)#

AR.PArecordPage 24AR.PA.ASSESSSCHED.RDo records demonstrate pipeline segments were initially assessed (and when) per §192.710(b)(1)? References: 192.710(b)(1), 192.710(b)(3)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 24AR.PA.ASSESSMETHODS.PDo the procedures include a methodology for conducting the initial assessment of pipeline segments outside of an HCA per §192.710(c)? References: 192.710(c)#

AR.PArecordPage 24AR.PA.ASSESSMETHODS.RDo the records confirm the methodology used for conducting the initial assessment of pipeline segments outside of an HCA per §192.710(c) was selected based on the results of a risk-based prioritization? References: 192.710(c)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 24AR.PA.REASSESSMENTS.PDo the procedures require reassessments to be conducted at least once every 10 years, not to exceed 126 months, or a shorter interval based upon the nature and extent of anomalies discovered in the previous assessment as required by §192.710(b)(2)? References: 192.710(b)(2), 192.710(b)(3), 192.939(a)#

AR.PArecordPage 24AR.PA.REASSESSMENTS.RDo the records indicate adequate documentation of and rationale for the reassessment intervals? References: 192.710(b)(2), 192.710(b)(3), 192.939(a)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 24AR.PA.OTHERTECH.PWhere the operator has elected to use “Other Technology” (or other technical evaluation process) for assessing pipeline segments, does the process demonstrate an equivalent understanding of the condition of the line pipe for each of the threats to which the pipeline is susceptible? References: 192.710(c)(7), 192.18, 192.506(b)#

AR.PArecordPage 24AR.PA.OTHERTECH.RWhere the operator has elected to use “Other Technology” (or other technical evaluation process) for assessing pipeline segments, do the records demonstrate an equivalent understanding of the condition of the line pipe for each of the threats to which the pipeline is susceptible? References: 192.710(c)(7), 192.18, 192.506(b)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 25AR.PA.REMEDIATIONCRITERIA.PDid the operator’s procedures for anomaly investigation and remediation criteria for non-HCA pipeline segments meet the requirements of §§192.485, 192.711, and 192.713? References: 192.710(f)#

AR.PArecordPage 25AR.PA.REMEDIATIONCRITERIA.RDo the remediation records indicate that conducted remediation activities were conducted in accordance with the procedures? References: 192.710(f), 192.933, 192.709#

AR.PAprocedurePage 25AR.PA.THREATID.PDoes the process include requirements to identify and evaluate all potential threats to each covered pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.PArecordPage 25AR.PA.THREATID.RDo records demonstrate that all potential threats to each covered pipeline segment have been identified and evaluated? References: 192.710#

AR.PAprocedurePage 25AR.PA.RAMETHOD.PDoes the process include requirements for a risk assessment and/or risk prioritization, that considers all of the identified threats for each assessable non-HCA pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.PArecordPage 25AR.PA.RAMETHOD.RDo records demonstrate that the operator has performed a risk assessment on the non-HCA pipeline segments? References: 192.710#

AR.PAprocedurePage 25AR.PA.RAFACTORS.PDoes the process include requirements for risk factors that could affect the likelihood of a release, and for factors that could affect the consequences of potential releases, be accounted for and combined in an appropriate manner to produce a risk value for each pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.PArecordPage 25AR.PA.RAFACTORS.RDo records demonstrate that risk analysis data is combined in an appropriate manner to produce a risk value for each pipeline segment? References: 192.710#

AR.SPprocedurePage 26AR.SP.ILISP.PIf the pipeline operates under a special permit have the processes been modified to incorporate the requirements of the permit for required ILI assessments performed? References: 190.341(d)#

AR.SPrecordPage 26AR.SP.ILISP.RIf the pipeline operates under a special permit, from a review of selected records, were required ILI assessments performed? References: 190.341(d)#

AR.SPprocedurePage 26AR.SP.REPAIRSP.PIf the pipeline operates under a special permit have the processes been modified to incorporate the requirements of the permit for required repairs? References: 190.341(d)#

AR.SPrecordPage 26AR.SP.REPAIRSP.RIf the pipeline operates under a special permit, from a review of selected records, were required repairs performed? References: 190.341(d)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 26CR.CRMGEN.CRMCRITERIA.PDo procedures adequately address the process and criteria to determine which facilities are control rooms? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 26CR.CRMGEN.CRMMGMT.PAre CRM procedures formalized and controlled? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENrecordPage 26CR.CRMGEN.CRMIMPLEMENT.RAre procedures approved, in place, and implemented? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENobservationPage 26CR.CRMGEN.CRMPROCLOCATION.OAre procedures readily available to controllers in the control room? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.RESPONSIBLE.PAre there clear processes to describe each controller's physical domain of responsibility for pipelines and other facility assets? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.QUALCONTROL.PAre there provisions in place to assure that only qualified individuals may assume control at any console/desk? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.DOMAINCHANGE.PIf the physical domain of responsibility periodically changes, has a clear process been established to describe the conditions for when such a change occurs? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYABNORMAL.PHave processes been established to define the controllers' authority and responsibilities when an abnormal operating condition is detected? References: 192.631(b)(2)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.RESPCHANGE.PDo processes address a controller's role during temporary impromptu (unplanned) changes in controller responsibilities? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.COMMANDVERIFY.PDo the defined roles and responsibilities require controllers to stay at the console to verify all SCADA commands that have been initiated are fulfilled, and that commands given via verbal communications are acknowledged before leaving the console for any reason? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 27CR.CRMRR.PRESSLIMITS.OAre controllers aware of the current MAOPs of all pipeline segments for which they are responsible, and have they been assigned the responsibility to maintain those pipelines at or below the MAOP? References: 192.631(b)(2), 192.619(a), 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYEMERGENCY.PDo processes define the controllers' authority and responsibility to make decisions, take actions, and communicate with others upon being notified of, or upon detection of, and during, an emergency or if a leak or rupture is suspected? References: 192.631(b)(3), 192.615(a)(8)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 27CR.CRMRR.EVACUATION.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event the control room must be evacuated? References: 192.631(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 28CR.CRMRR.COMMSYSFAIL.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event of a SCADA system or data communications system failure impacting large sections of the controller's domain of responsibility? References: 192.631(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 28CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.PHave processes been established for the hand-over of responsibility that specify the type of information to be communicated to the oncoming shift? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 28CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.ODo observations indicate adequate hand-over of responsibility to the oncoming shift? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 28CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.PDo processes require that records document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 28CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.RAre there records that document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 28CR.CRMRR.HANDOVEROVERLAP.PDo processes require the controllers to discuss recent and impending important activities ensuring adequate overlap? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 28CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERALTERNATIVE.PWhen a controller is unable to continue or assume responsibility for any reason, do the shift hand-over processes include alternative shift hand-over actions that specifically address this situation? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 28CR.CRMRR.UNATTENDCONSOLE.PHas the operator established an adequate process for occasions when the console is left temporarily unattended for any reason? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 28CR.CRMRR.CONSOLECOVERAGE.PDo processes maintain adequate console coverage during shift hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.PDo processes disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.RDo records indicate that the policy disallowing others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller has been communicated to controllers and others? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.OAre controllers aware of, and can reference, processes that disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.PDoes the process result in identification of required qualification elements for those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller that are sufficient for those individuals to understand the implications of the scope of potential actions? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.RDo records indicate that others given authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller were qualified? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.PIs the process defined with respect to the details of how those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller are to implement their authority? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYLIST.RIs a list of individuals with authority to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller readily available to controllers? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.RDo records adequately document occurrences of when others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller have done so? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 29CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.ODo others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller demonstrate an understanding of the process to implement this authority? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 30CR.SCADA.SYSTEMMOC.PDo processes clearly define the types of changes to the SCADA system(s) that constitute additions, expansions, or replacements under the meaning of the CRM rule? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 30CR.SCADA.DISPLAYCONFIG.PAre there written processes to implement the API RP 1165 (1st Edition) display standards to the SCADA systems that have been added, expanded, or replaced since August 1, 2012? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 30CR.SCADA.1165HUMANFACTORS.OHas section 4 of API RP 1165 (1st Edition) regarding human factors engineering been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 30CR.SCADA.DISPLAYOBJECTS.OHas section 8 of API RP 1165 (1st Edition) regarding display object characteristics been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 30CR.SCADA.DISPLAYDYNAMICS.RHas section 9 of API RP 1165 (1st Edition) regarding display object dynamics been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 30CR.SCADA.ADMINISTRATION.RHave applicable paragraphs of section 11 of API RP 1165 (1st Edition) administration been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 30CR.SCADA.1165IMPRACTICAL.RIf any/all applicable paragraph(s) of API RP 1165 (1st Edition) have not been implemented, has it been demonstrated and documented that the unimplemented provisions are impractical for the SCADA system used? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 30CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.PDoes the process adequately define safety-related points? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 30CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.RDo records indicate safety-related points have been adequately implemented? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 31CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.PAre there adequate processes to define and identify the circumstances which require a point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 31CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.RHave required point-to-point verifications been performed? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 31CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.PAre there adequate processes for the thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 31CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.RDo records demonstrate adequate thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 31CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.PIs there an adequate process for defining when the point-to-point verification must be completed? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 31CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.RDo records indicate the point-to-point verification has been completed at the required intervals? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 31CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.OAre point-to-point verifications performed adequately when required? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 31CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.PHas an internal communication plan been established and implemented that is adequate to manually operate the pipeline during a SCADA failure/outage? References: 192.631(c)(3)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 31CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.RHas the internal communication plan been tested and verified for manual operation of the pipeline safely at least once each calendar year but at intervals not exceeding 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(3)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 31CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADA.OIs there a backup SCADA system? References: 192.631(c)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADADEV.PHas the use of the backup SCADA system for development work been defined? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.PIs the backup SCADA system required to be tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.RIs the backup SCADA system tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.PIs testing required to verify adequate processes are in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.RDoes the testing verify that there are adequate processes in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAADEQUACY.RIf the back-up SCADA system is not designed to handle all the functionality of the main SCADA system, does the testing determine whether there are adequate procedures in place to account for displaced and/or different available functions during back-up operations? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATRANSFER.PDo processes adequately address and test the logistics of transferring control to a backup control room? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADARETURN.PDo procedures adequately address and test the logistics of returning operations back to the primary control room? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 32CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAFUNCTIONS.RIs a representative sampling of critical functions in the back-up SCADA system being tested to ensure proper operation in the event the backup system is needed? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 33CR.SCADA.CMPPRESSRELIEFTEST.PAre processes adequate for inspection and test of each pressure relieving device in a compressor station, including periodic operation to determine opening at the correct set pressure? References: 192.731(a), 192.731(b), 192.731(c), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 33CR.SCADA.CMPPRESSRELIEFTEST.RDo inspection and test records for each pressure relieving device in a compressor station indicate it was operated periodically to determine that it opens at the correct set pressure? References: 192.731(a)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 33CR.SCADA.PRESSRELIEFTEST.PAre there procedures for inspection and test of each pressure relieving device at pressure limiting stations? References: 192.739(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 33CR.SCADA.PRESSRELIEFTEST.RDo records indicate adequate inspection and testing for each pressure relieving device in a pressure limiting station? References: 192.739(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 33CR.SCADA.VALVETEST.PIf the valve is monitored by SCADA, does the process account for how valve testing is coordinated with the controller? References: 192.745(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 33CR.SCADA.VALVETEST.RIf SCADA is used to operate valves, do records indicate the SCADA system was adequately involved in the testing to ensure valve operation? References: 192.709(c), 192.745(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 33CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMITIGATION.PDoes the fatigue mitigation process or procedures (plan) identify operator-specific fatigue risks? References: 192.631(d), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 33CR.CRMFM.FATIGUERISKS.PDoes the fatigue mitigation plan adequately address how the program reduces the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 33CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEQUANTIFY.PDo processes require that the potential contribution of controller fatigue to incidents and accidents be quantified during investigations? References: 192.631(d), 192.631(a), 192.631(g)(1)(i)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 34CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMANAGER.PIs there a designated fatigue risk manager who is responsible and accountable for managing fatigue risk and fatigue countermeasures, and someone (perhaps the same person) that is authorized to review and approve HOS emergency deviations? References: 192.631(d), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 34CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTH.RIs the scheduled shift length less than or equal to 12 hours (not including shift hand-over) or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off- duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 34CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTHTIME.RDoes the operator factor in all time the individual is working for the company when establishing shift lengths and schedule rotations and that periods of time off that accommodates commute time or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 34CR.CRMFM.SCHEDULEDTIMEOFF.RAre all scheduled periods of time off at least one hour longer than 8 hours plus commute time or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 34CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.POn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, do processes minimize interrupting the required 8 hours of continuous sleep or require a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 34CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.ROn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, do records include shift schedules, when calls were made to the on call employee, and how long the individual worked? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 34CR.CRMFM.MAXHOS.PDo processes limit the maximum HOS limit in any sliding 7-day period to no more than 65 hours or is there a documented technical basis to show a reduction of the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 34CR.CRMFM.DOCSCHEDULE.PIs there a formal system to document all scheduled and unscheduled HOS worked, including overtime and time spent performing duties other than control room duties? References: 192.631(d)(4), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 35CR.CRMFM.DAYSOFF.PTime Off Following Successive Days Worked For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), are no more than five days worked in succession before at least two days off? References: 192.631(d)(4), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 35CR.CRMFM.WORKHOURS.RDay Only Work Hours For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), do records indicate shift start times no earlier than 6:00 a.m. and shift end times no later than 7:00 p.m.? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMobservationPage 35CR.CRMFM.CONTROLLERNUMBERS.ODo operations include a sufficient number of qualified controllers? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 35CR.CRMFM.OFFDUTYHOURS.PWhen Limits Reached Do processes ensure that controllers are provided with at least thirty-five (35) continuous off-duty hours when limits are reached following the most recent 35-hour (minimum) off-duty rest period or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 35CR.CRMFM.SHIFTHOLDOVER.PDoes the daily HOS limit and shift holdover process conform to shift holdover guidelines or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 35CR.CRMFM.SPECIFICCOUNTERMEASURES.PDo processes require specific fatigue countermeasures during applicable time periods, or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 35CR.CRMFM.HOSDEVIATIONS.PIs there a formal process for approving deviations from the maximum HOS limits? References: 192.631(d)(4), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 35CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.PDoes the program require that fatigue education/training is required for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 35CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEREVIEW.PDo processes require that the effectiveness of the fatigue education/training program be reviewed at least once each calendar year, not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3), 192.605(a), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 36CR.CRMFM.FATIGUESTRATEGY.PDoes fatigue education address fatigue mitigation strategies (countermeasures), how off-duty activities contribute to fatigue and recognizing the effects of fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 36CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.RIs periodic fatigue education/training documented for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 36CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECONTENT.PIs the content of fatigue training adequate for training controllers and supervisors to recognize the effects of fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(3), 192.631(a)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 36CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECONTENT.RHas controller and supervisor training to recognize the effects of fatigue been documented? References: 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 36CR.CRMAM.ALARM.PIs the alarm management plan a formal process that specifically identifies critical topical areas included in the program? References: 192.631(e)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 36CR.CRMAM.ALARMMALFUNCTION.PIs there a process to identify and correct inaccurate or malfunctioning alarms? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 36CR.CRMAM.ALARMREVIEW.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for different alarm designs and all alarm types/priorities? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 36CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERPERFORMANCE.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for console differences that could affect individual-specific controller qualification and performance? References: 192.631(h), 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 36CR.CRMAM.STALEDATA.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms include specific procedures and practices for managing stale or unreliable data? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 37CR.CRMAM.MONTHLYANALYSIS.PDo processes require the monthly identification, recording, review, and analysis of points that have been taken off scan, have had alarms inhibited, generated false alarms, or that have had forced or manual values for periods of time exceeding that required for associated maintenance or operating activities? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 37CR.CRMAM.PROBLEMCORRECTION.PDoes the alarm management plan include a process for promptly correcting identified problems and for returning these points to service? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 37CR.CRMAM.ALARMVERIFY.RDo records verify that monthly reviews and analysis of alarm points have been performed? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 37CR.CRMAM.ALARMSETPOINTS.PIs there a formal process to determine the correct alarm setpoint values and alarm descriptions? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 37CR.CRMAM.SETTINGCONTROL.PHave procedures been established to clearly address how and to what degree controllers can change alarm limits or setpoints, or inhibit alarms, or take points off-scan? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 37CR.CRMAM.ALARMVALUEVERIFY.RDo records demonstrate verification of correct safety-related alarm set-point values and alarm descriptors when associated field instruments are calibrated or changed and at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 37CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.PAre there processes to review the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 192.631(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 37CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.RDo records indicate review of the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 192.631(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 37CR.CRMAM.WORKLOAD.PDoes the CRM program have a means of identifying and measuring the work load (content and volume of general activity) being directed to an individual controller? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 38CR.CRMAM.WORKLOADMONITORING.PIs the process of monitoring and analyzing general activity comprehensive? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 38CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERREACTION.PDoes the process have a means of determining that the controller has sufficient time to analyze and react to incoming alarms? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 38CR.CRMAM.PERFORMANCEANALYSIS.RHas an analysis been performed to determine if controller(s) performance is currently adequate? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 38CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.PIs there a process to address how deficiencies found in implementing 192.631(e)(1) through 192.631(e)(5) will be resolved? References: 192.631(e)(6)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 38CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.RDo records indicate deficiencies found in implementing 192.631(e)(1) through 192.631(e)(5) have been resolved? References: 192.631(e)(6)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 38CR.CRMCMGT.EQUIPMENTCHANGES.PIs there a process to assure changes in field equipment that could affect control room operations are coordinated with the control room personnel? References: 192.631(f)(1)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 38CR.CRMCMGT.CONTROLLERPARTICIPATE.PAre control room representative(s) required to participate in meetings where changes that could directly or indirectly affect the hydraulic performance or configuration of the pipeline (including routine maintenance and repairs) are being considered, designed and implemented? References: 192.631(f)(1), 192.631(f)(3)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 38CR.CRMCMGT.CONTROLLERPARTICIPATE.RDo records indicate that control room representative(s) participate in meetings where changes that could directly or indirectly affect the hydraulic performance or configuration of the pipeline (including routine maintenance and repairs) are being considered, designed and implemented? References: 192.631(f)(1), 192.631(f)(3)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 39CR.CRMCMGT.EMERGENCYCONTACT.PIs there a process requiring field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when emergency conditions exist? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 39CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCONTACT.PDoes the process require field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when making field changes (e.g., operating a valve, O&M inspections/calibrations, RTU/PLC modifications) that affect control room operations? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 39CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCHANGES.RDo records indicate field personnel and SCADA support personnel contacted the control room when making field changes (e.g., operating a valve, O&M inspections/calibrations, RTU/PLC modifications) that affect control room operations? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 39CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEINCIDENTREVIEW.PIs there a formal, structured approach for reviewing and critiquing reportable events to identify lessons learned? References: 192.631(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 39CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEINCIDENTREVIEW.RDo records indicate reviews of reportable events specifically analyzed all contributing factors to determine if control room actions contributed to the event, and corrected any deficiencies? References: 192.631(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 39CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.PDoes the program require training on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.), even though the control room may not have been at fault? References: 192.631(g)(2), 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 39CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.RHas operating experience review training been conducted on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.)? References: 192.631(g)(2), 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.PHas a controller training program been established to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.RHas a controller training program been implemented to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.PHave processes been established to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.RHave processes been implemented to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGCONTENT.RDoes training content address all required material, including training each controller to carry out the roles and responsibilities that were defined by the operator? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.AOCLIST.RHas training been conducted on the abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence identified by the operator? References: 192.631(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGABNORMAL.PDoes the training program provide controller training on recognizing and responding to abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence? References: 192.631(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.RDo records indicate the training program used a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 40CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.ODoes the training program use a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.COMMUNICATIONTRAINING.PDoes the CRM program train controllers on their responsibilities for communication under the operator's emergency response procedures? References: 192.631(h)(3)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.SYSKNOWLEDGE.PDoes the training program provide controllers a working knowledge of the pipeline system, especially during the development of abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(4)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSLIST.RHas a list of pipeline operating setups that are periodically (but infrequently) used been established? References: 192.631(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSREVIEW.PDo processes specify that, for pipeline operating set-ups that are periodically (but infrequently) used, the controllers must be provided an opportunity to review relevant procedures in advance of their use? References: 192.631(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINPERSONNEL.PDo processes establish who, regardless of location, operationally collaborates with control room personnel? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINFREQ.PDo processes define the frequency of new and recurring team training? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINCOMPLETE.PDo processes address all operational modes and operational collaboration/control? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXPERIENCE.PDo processes include incorporation of lessons learned from actual historical events and other oil-gas industry events? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.RDo records indicate that training exercises were adequate and involved at least one qualified controller? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 41CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.ODoes implementation of a control room team exercise demonstrate performance in accordance with regulatory and process requirements? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 42CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINIDENTINDIVIDUAL.RDo records demonstrate that individuals identified as of January 23, 2018 received team training by January 23, 2019? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 42CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.PAre there adequate processes to assure that the operator is responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 42CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.RHas the operator been responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 42CR.CRMCOMP.CRMCOORDINATOR.PIs there an individual that is responsible and accountable for compliance with requests from PHMSA or other applicable agencies? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 42CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.PAre records management processes adequate to assure records are sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 42CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.RAre records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 42CR.CRMCOMP.ELECTRONICRECORDS.RAre electronic records properly stored, safeguarded, and readily retrievable? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 42CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.PAre there processes to demonstrate and provide a documented record that every deviation from any CRM rule requirement was necessary for safe operation? References: 192.631(j)(2)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 43CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.RDeviation Records Were all deviations documented in a way that demonstrates they were necessary for safe operation? References: 192.631(j)(2)#

CR.LDrecordPage 43CR.LD.LDSYS.RDo records demonstrate the operator has identified, considered, or implemented leak detection measures to mitigate the consequences of a pipeline failure? References: 192.631(g)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 43CR.LD.FACILITY.PDoes the process require continuing surveillance of facilities to determine and take appropriate action concerning failures/leakage history? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.613(a), 192.631(b)#

CR.LDrecordPage 43CR.LD.FACILITY.RDo records indicate continuing surveillance of facilities to determine and take appropriate action concerning failures/leakage history? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.613(a), 192.631(b)#

FS.CSprocedurePage 43FS.CS.CMPCOMBUSTIBLE.PDoes the process require that flammable/combustible materials are stored as required, and aboveground oil or gasoline storage tanks, are installed at compressor stations according to 192.735(b)? References: 192.303, 192.735(a), 192.735(b)#

FS.CSobservationPage 43FS.CS.CMPCOMBUSTIBLE.ODo field observations demonstrate that flammable/combustible materials are safely stored as required, and aboveground oil or gasoline storage tanks are installed at compressor stations according to §192.735(b)? References: 192.735(a), 192.735(b)#

FS.CSprocedurePage 43FS.CS.CMPGASDETECT.PDoes the process require compressor buildings to have a fixed gas detection and alarm system installed according to §192.736? References: 192.303, 192.736(a)#

FS.CSobservationPage 44FS.CS.CMPGASDETECT.ODo field observations confirm that compressor buildings have a fixed gas detection and alarm system installed according to 192.736? References: 192.303, 192.736(a), 192.736(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.INSPECTGEN.PDoes the process require the pipeline to be inspected to ensure that it is constructed in accordance with Part 192? References: 192.303, 192.305#

DC.COobservationPage 44DC.CO.INSPECTGEN.ODo field observation verify the pipeline being inspected to ensure it is constructed in accordance with Part 192? References: 192.303, 192.305#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.CASING.PDoes the process require railroad or highway casings to be in accordance with the requirements of 192.323? References: 192.303, 192.323(a), 192.323(b), 192.323(c), 192.323(d), 192.467(a), 192.467(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 44DC.CO.CASING.ODo field observations confirm railroad or highway casings are being installed as designed and specified, and in accordance with 192.323? References: 192.323, 192.467(a), 192.467(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.NONWELDJOINT.PDoes the process require that pipeline joints (to be made other than by welding) be designed and installed in accordance with 192.273? References: 192.303, 192.273(a), 192.273(b), 192.273(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.SPECS.PDoes the operator have written construction specifications or standards as required of 192.303? References: 192.303#

DC.COprocedurePage 44DC.CO.INSPECTVISUAL.PDoes the process require pipe and other components to be visually inspected prior to installation? References: 192.303, 192.307#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.INSPECTVISUAL.ODo field observations confirm each length of pipe and each component is being visually inspected for damage according to 192.307? References: 192.303, 192.307#

DC.COprocedurePage 45DC.CO.REPAIR.PDoes the process require repairs to steel pipe in accordance with §192.309? References: 192.303, 192.309, 192.493#

DC.COrecordPage 45DC.CO.REPAIR.RDo records demonstrate that repairs to steel pipe are being made in accordance with §192.309? References: 192.303, 192.309, 192.493#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.REPAIR.ODo field observations confirm repairs to steel pipe being made in accordance with §192.309? References: 192.303, 192.309#

DC.COprocedurePage 45DC.CO.FIELDBEND.PDoes the process require field bends to be made in accordance with 192.313? References: 192.303, 192.313(a), 192.313(b), 192.313(c), 192.315(a)#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.FIELDBEND.ODo field observations confirm field bends are being made in accordance with 192.313(a)? References: 192.313(a), 192.313(b), 192.313(c), 192.315(a)#

DC.COprocedurePage 45DC.CO.WRINKLEBEND.PDoes the process require that wrinkle bends are made in accordance with 192.315? References: 192.303, 192.315(a), 192.315(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.WRINKLEBEND.ODo field observations confirm wrinkle bends are made in accordance with 192.315? References: 192.315(a), 192.315(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 45DC.CO.HAZARD.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring transmission line or main be protected from hazards in accordance with 192.317? References: 192.303, 192.317(a), 192.317(b), 192.317(c), 192.103#

DC.COobservationPage 45DC.CO.HAZARD.ODo field observations demonstrate or confirm installed transmission line or main is protected from hazards? References: 192.317, 192.303, 192.614#

DC.CCPROTprocedurePage 46DC.CCPROT.COATLOWER.PDo written specifications stipulate that each external protective coating must be inspected just prior to lowering the pipe into the ditch and backfilling, and any damage detrimental to effective corrosion control must be repaired? References: 192.143(b), 192.461(c)#

DC.CCPROTrecordPage 46DC.CCPROT.COATLOWER.RDo records indicate that each pipe segment with external protective coating was inspected just prior to lowering into the ditch and backfilling, and any damage detrimental to effective corrosion control was repaired? References: 192.143(b), 192.461(c)#

DC.CCPROTobservationPage 46DC.CCPROT.COATLOWER.ODo the field observations confirm that each pipe segment with external protective coating was inspected just prior to lowering into the ditch and backfilling, and any damage detrimental to effective corrosion control was repaired? References: 192.143(b), 192.461(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 46DC.CO.INSTALL.PDoes the process require that piping be installed such that stresses are minimized and the coating is protected? References: 192.303, 192.319(a), 192.319(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 46DC.CO.INSTALL.RDo records demonstrate that piping was installed such that stresses are minimized and the coating is protected? References: 192.303, 192.319(a), 192.319(b), 192.493#

DC.COobservationPage 46DC.CO.INSTALL.OWhen pipe is placed in the ditch, do field observations confirm pipe is installed so as to fit the ditch, minimize stresses, and protect the pipe coating from damage? References: 192.319(a), 192.319(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 46DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.PDoes the process require that certain offshore pipe be installed in accordance with 192.319(c)? References: 192.303, 192.319(c)#

DC.COrecordPage 46DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.RDo records indicate certain offshore pipe was installed in accordance with 192.319(c)? References: 192.319(c)#

DC.COobservationPage 46DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.ODo field observations confirm certain offshore pipe is installed in accordance with 192.319(c)? References: 192.319(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 47DC.CO.INSTALLGOA.PDoes the process require that certain pipe in the Gulf of America and its inlets be installed to the burial depths required by 192.319(c)? References: 192.303, 192.319(c)#

DC.COrecordPage 47DC.CO.INSTALLGOA.RDo records indicate that certain pipe in the Gulf of America and its inlets was installed to the burial depths required by 192.319(c)? References: 192.303, 192.319(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 47DC.CO.CLEARANCE.PDoes the process require pipe to be installed with clearances specified in 192.325 and (if plastic) installed as to prevent heat damage to the pipe? References: 192.303, 192.325(a), 192.325(b), 192.325(c), 192.325(d)#

DC.COrecordPage 47DC.CO.CLEARANCE.RDo records indicate that transmission lines or mains are installed with clearances specified in 192.325, and (if plastic) installed as to prevent heat damage to the pipe? References: 192.325(a), 192.325(b), 192.325(c), 192.325(d)#

DC.COobservationPage 47DC.CO.CLEARANCE.ODo field observations indicate the transmission lines or mains (and bottles/bottle-type holders) are installed with the clearances specified in 192.325 and (if plastic) installed as to prevent heat damage to the pipe? References: 192.325(a), 192.325(b), 192.325(c), 192.325(d), 192.175(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 47DC.CO.COVERONSHORE.PDoes the process specify that onshore piping is to be installed with a depth of cover as specified in 192.327? References: 192.303, 192.327(a), 192.327(b), 192.327(c), 192.327(d), 192.327(e)#

DC.COrecordPage 47DC.CO.COVERONSHORE.RIs onshore piping minimum cover provided as specified in 192.327? References: 192.327(a), 192.327(b), 192.327(c), 192.327(d), 192.327(e)#

DC.COobservationPage 47DC.CO.COVERONSHORE.ODo field observations confirm onshore piping was installed with the minimum cover specified in 192.327? References: 192.327(a), 192.327(b), 192.327(c), 192.327(d), 192.327(e)#

DC.COprocedurePage 47DC.CO.COVEROFFSHORE.PDoes the process require that offshore piping is to be installed with a depth of cover as specified in 192.327? References: 192.303, 192.327(f), 192.327(g), 192.612(c)(3)#

DC.COobservationPage 48DC.CO.COVEROFFSHORE.ODepth of Cover - Offshore To the extent possible, do field observations confirm offshore piping minimum cover as specified in 192.327? References: 192.327(a), 192.327(f), 192.327(g), 192.612(c)(3)#

DC.COprocedurePage 48DC.CO.AMAOPCONST.PAlternative MAOP: Construction For the AMAOP pipeline, does the process include conditions on the application of alternative MAOP? References: 192.303, 192.328, 192.620(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 48DC.CO.AMAOPCONST.RAlternative MAOP: Construction For the AMAOP pipeline, do records indicate the new or existing pipeline segments meet the additional construction requirements of 192.328? References: 192.328, 192.328(a), 192.328(b), 192.328(c), 192.328(d), 192.328(e), 192.620(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 48DC.CO.AMAOPCONST.OAlternative MAOP: Construction For the AMAOP pipeline, do field observations confirm the new or existing pipeline segments meet the additional construction requirements of 192.328? References: 192.328, 192.328(a), 192.328(b), 192.328(c), 192.328(d), 192.328(e), 192.620(b)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 48DC.WELDINSP.WELDVISUALQUAL.PDoes the operator have comprehensive written specifications or procedures for the inspection and testing of welds that meet the requirements of 192.241? References: 192.241, 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 48DC.WELDINSP.WELDVISUALQUAL.RDoes the operator have records showing that the welding was visually and/or non- destructively tested according to the requirements of 192.241 and the operator’s specifications or procedures? References: 192.241, 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 48DC.WELDINSP.WELDVISUALQUAL.ODo field observations confirm that inspection and testing of welds was being done in accordance with the requirements of 192.241 and the operator's written specifications or procedures? References: 192.241(a), 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 48DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.PIs there a process for nondestructive testing and interpretation in accordance with 192.243? References: 192.243#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 49DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.RDo records indicate that NDT and interpretation are in accordance with 192.243? References: 192.243#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 49DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.ODo field observations indicate that welding NDT procedures are being properly followed? References: 192.243#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 49DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.PDoes the process require welds that are unacceptable to be removed and/or repaired as specified by 192.245? References: 192.245, 192.303#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 49DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.RDo records indicate that unacceptable welds are removed and/or repaired in accordance with 192.245? References: 192.245, 192.303#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 49DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.ODo field observations confirm that unacceptable welds removed and/or repaired in accordance with 192.245? References: 192.245, 192.303#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring qualified welding procedures in accordance with 192.225? References: 192.225#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.RDoes the operator have detailed records showing proper qualification of the welding procedures in accordance with 192.225? References: 192.225#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.ODo field observations indicate proper qualification of the welding procedures in accordance with 192.225? References: 192.225#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDERQUAL.PDo the written specifications require welders to be qualified in accordance with applicable sections of API Standard 1104 (21st Edition) or ASME BPVC, Section IX (2007) and cover the limitations in §192.229? References: 192.227, 192.225, 192.229#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDERQUAL.RDo the records demonstrate that the welders are qualified in accordance with applicable sections of API Standard 1104 (21st Edition) or ASME BPVC, Section IX (2007), and cover the limitations in §192.229? References: 192.227, 192.225, 192.229#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDERQUAL.ODo field observations confirm that the welders are qualified in accordance with applicable sections of API Standard 1104 (21st Edition) or ASME BPVC, Section IX (2007), and cover the limitations in §192.229? References: 192.227, 192.225, 192.229#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.PDoes the operator have written specifications that require the welding operation to be protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality of the completed weld? References: 192.231, 192.225, 192.227#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.RDoes the operator have records that document weather conditions, suspension, protective measures, and resumption of the welding processes to prevent impairment of the quality of the completed weld? References: 192.231, 192.225, 192.227#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.ODo field observations indicate that welding operations are protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality of welds? References: 192.231, 192.225, 192.227#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.PDoes the operator have written specifications or procedures that prohibit the use of certain miter joints as required by 192.233? References: 192.233#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.RMiter Joints In the event that improper miter joints are installed, does the operator have records to indicate that the miter joints were removed as required by 192.233? References: 192.233#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.OMiter Joints In the event that miter joints were being used, do field observations show that the miter joints were properly constructed as required by 192.233? References: 192.233#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPREP.PDoes the operator have comprehensive written specifications or procedures that require preparations for welding in accordance with 192.235? References: 192.235#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 51DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPREP.RDo welding inspection records show that welding preparation was not performed according to 192.235 and the operator’s specifications or procedures, or that identified issues were not corrected? References: 192.235#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 51DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPREP.ODo field observations confirm that welding preparations are being made in accordance with 192.235 and the operator's welding specifications and procedures? References: 192.235, 192.225, 192.227, 192.229, 192.231, 192.233, 192.241, 192.243, 192.245#

DC.DPprocedurePage 51DC.DP.PIPEDESGEN.PDoes the operator have specifications in place for pipe design so that the wall thickness is sufficient or installed with adequate protection to withstand external pressures and loads that will be imposed on the pipe after installation? References: 192.103, 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.112, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPprocedurePage 51DC.DP.PIPEDESMAOP.PDoes the operator have written procedures in place for steel pipe design so that the wall thickness is sufficient for the intended maximum operating pressure as required by 192.105? References: 192.105, 192.103, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.113, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPrecordPage 51DC.DP.PIPEDESMAOP.RDo design records and drawings indicate the design pressure of steel pipe is established in accordance with 192.105(a)? References: 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.113, 192.115#

DC.DPprocedurePage 51DC.DP.CLASSLOCATION.PDoes the operator have written procedures for determining the class location for the new (or converted) pipeline immediately prior to design? References: 192.111, 192.5, 192.105, 192.609#

DC.DPrecordPage 51DC.DP.CLASSLOCATION.RDoes the operator have complete records showing the determination of class location(s) for the new (or converted) pipeline? References: 192.111, 192.5, 192.105, 192.609#

DC.DPobservationPage 51DC.DP.CLASSLOCATION.ODo field verifications confirm the operator’s class location determinations for the new pipeline? References: 192.111, 192.5, 192.105, 192.609#

DC.DPprocedurePage 52DC.DP.PIPEDESFACTOR.PDoes the operator have written procedures for determining the Design Factor to be used for steel pipe as required by 192.111? References: 192.111, 192.103, 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.112, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPprocedurePage 52DC.DP.PIPEDESAMAOP.PDoes the operator have written procedures for the additional design requirements needed to be eligible for the alternative maximum allowable operating pressure (AMAOP) covered by 192.112 and calculated using 192.620? References: 192.112, 192.103, 192.105, 192.107, 192.109, 192.111, 192.115, 192.121, 192.123, 192.125, 192.303, 192.305, 192.307#

DC.DPrecordPage 52DC.DP.PIPEDESAMAOP.RDo design records indicate alternative MAOP replacement pipe and components meet the additional design requirements of 192.112? References: 192.112, 192.303#

DC.DPprocedurePage 52DC.DP.HCAIDENTIF.PDoes the process include the methods defined in 192.903 High Consequence Area (Method 1) and/or 192.903 High Consequence Area (Method 2) to be applied to each pipeline for the identification of high consequence areas? References: 192.905(a)#

DC.DPprocedurePage 52DC.DP.PMPLANNING.PDo the procedures include requirements to identify additional measures to prevent a pipeline failure and to mitigate the consequences of a pipeline failure in a high consequence area (HCA)? References: 192.907, 192.935(a), 192.935(f)#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPBLDGLOCATE.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring compressor stations be designed and constructed in accordance with 192.163? References: 192.163, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPBLDGLOCATE.RDo the operator’s records indicate that the compressor station has been designed and constructed to comply with 192.163? References: 192.163, 192.143, 192.163(e)#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 52DC.DPCCMP.CMPBLDGLOCATE.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of compressor station buildings meet the requirements of 192.163? References: 192.163, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPLIQPROT.PDoes the operator have written specifications that require compressors be protected from liquids? References: 192.165, 192.143, 192.153(e), 192.505(b)#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPLIQPROT.RDoes the operator have records to indicate that compressors are protected from liquids in accordance with 192.165? References: 192.165(a), 192.615(b), 192.153(e), 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPLIQPROT.ODo field observations confirm that compressors are protected from liquids and, as applicable, liquid separators for compressors installed in accordance with 192.165? References: 192.165, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPESD.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring that compressor station emergency shutdown systems meet the requirements of 192.167? References: 192.167, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPESD.RDo the operator’s records indicate that compressor station emergency shutdown systems meet the requirements of 192.167? References: 192.167, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPESD.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of compressor station emergency shutdown systems meet the requirements of 192.167? References: 192.167, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPPRESSLIMIT.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring that compressor stations have pressure relief or other suitable protective devices that meet the requirements of 192.169? References: 192.169, 192.141, 192.143, 192.199#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPPRESSLIMIT.RDoes the operator have records to indicate that compressor stations have pressure relief or other suitable protective devices in accordance with 192.169? References: 192.169, 192.141, 192.143, 192.199#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 53DC.DPCCMP.CMPPRESSLIMIT.ODo field observations confirm design and construction of compressor station pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.169? References: 192.169, 192.141, 192.143, 192.199#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 54DC.DPCCMP.CMPSAFETYEQUIP.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring additional compressor station safety equipment be designed and constructed in accordance with 192.171? References: 192.171, 192.143, 192.167(a)(3)#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 54DC.DPCCMP.CMPSAFETYEQUIP.RDo the operator’s records indicate that additional compressor station safety equipment is designed and constructed in accordance with §192.171? References: 192.171, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 54DC.DPCCMP.CMPSAFETYEQUIP.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of additional compressor station safety equipment meet the requirements of 192.171? References: 192.171, 192.141, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPprocedurePage 54DC.DPCCMP.CMPVENTILATE.PDoes the operator have written specifications requiring ventilation of compressor buildings in accordance with 192.173? References: 192.173, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPrecordPage 54DC.DPCCMP.CMPVENTILATE.RDo operator records indicate that the design and construction of compressor buildings meet the ventilation requirements of 192.173? References: 192.173, 192.143#

DC.DPCCMPobservationPage 54DC.DPCCMP.CMPVENTILATE.ODo field observations confirm that design and construction of compressor buildings meet the ventilation requirements of 192.173? References: 192.173, 192.143#

DC.DPCOPPprocedurePage 54DC.DPCOPP.OVERPRESSURE.PDoes the process require the pipeline have pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices that are required of 192.195(a), and that they meet the requirements of 192.199 and 192.201? References: 192.303, 192.143(b), 192.195(a), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.201, 192.201(b), 192.201(c), 192.143(a)#

DC.DPCOPPrecordPage 54DC.DPCOPP.OVERPRESSURE.RDo records indicate that the pipeline has pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices that are required by 192.195(a), and that they meet the requirements of 192.199 and 192.201? References: 192.195(a), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201#

DC.DPCOPPobservationPage 55DC.DPCOPP.OVERPRESSURE.OAre required pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices being installed, and do they meet the requirements of 192.199 and 192.201? References: 192.195(a), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201#

DC.DPCOPPprocedurePage 55DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMIT.PDoes the process require that pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.199? References: 192.303, 192.143(b), 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h), 192.143(a)#

DC.DPCOPPrecordPage 55DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMIT.RDo records indicate that pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.199? References: 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h)#

DC.DPCOPPobservationPage 55DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMIT.ODo field observations confirm pressure relieving or pressure limiting devices meet the requirements of 192.199? References: 192.199(a), 192.199(b), 192.199(c), 192.199(d), 192.199(e), 192.199(f), 192.199(g), 192.199(h)#

DC.DPCOPPprocedurePage 55DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMITCAP.PDoes the process require that pressure relief or pressure limiting stations being installed comply with 192.201? References: 192.201(a), 192.143(a), 192.143(b), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

DC.DPCOPPrecordPage 55DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMITCAP.RDo records indicate that pressure relief or pressure limiting stations being installed comply with 192.201? References: 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

DC.DPCOPPobservationPage 55DC.DPCOPP.PRESSLIMITCAP.ODo field observations verify pressure relief or pressure limiting stations comply with the requirements of 192.201? References: 192.201(a), 192.201(b), 192.201(c)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 55MO.GM.TRAPSAFETY.PDo the procedures require all launchers and receivers to have adequate safety devices in accordance with 192.750 and to ensure the safety devices are working properly just prior to each use? References: 192.750, 192.605(b), 192.801, 192.805#

MO.GMrecordPage 56MO.GM.TRAPSAFETY.RDoes the operator have records to demonstrate whether all launchers and receivers have safety devices that were utilized prior to each use? References: 192.750, 192.605(b), 192.801, 192.805#

MO.GMobservationPage 56MO.GM.TRAPSAFETY.ODo field observations confirm selected launchers and receivers have safety devices installed and whether the safety devices were inspected prior to each use? References: 192.750, 192.605(b), 192.801, 192.805#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 56DC.DPC.METALCOMPONENT.PDo the procedures require certain metallic components to be qualified for use in accordance with 192.144? References: 192.144, 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 56DC.DPC.METALCOMPONENT.RDo records indicate that certain metallic components are qualified for use in accordance with §192.144 and §192.205? References: 192.144(a), 192.144(b), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 56DC.DPC.VALVE.PDo the procedures require that valves comply with the requirements of §192.145? References: 192.145, 192.145(a), 192.145(b), 192.145(c), 192.145(d), 192.145(e), 192.145(f), 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 56DC.DPC.VALVE.RDo records indicate valves comply with the requirements of §192.145 and §192.205? References: 192.145, 192.145(a), 192.145(b), 192.145(c), 192.145(d), 192.145(e), 192.145(f), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCobservationPage 56DC.DPC.VALVE.ODo valves comply with the requirements of 192.145? References: 192.141, 192.145(a), 192.145(b), 192.145(c), 192.145(d), 192.145(e), 192.145(f), 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 56DC.DPC.FLANGE.PDo the procedures require that flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of §192.147? References: 192.147, 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c), 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 57DC.DPC.FLANGE.RDo records indicate flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of §192.147 and §192.205? References: 192.147, 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCobservationPage 57DC.DPC.FLANGE.ODo flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of 192.147? References: 192.147, 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c), 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 57DC.DPC.STANDARDFITTING.PDo procedures require that standard fittings are in compliance with §192.149? References: 192.149(a), 192.149(b), 192.143(a), 192.143(b), 192.607#

DC.DPCrecordPage 57DC.DPC.STANDARDFITTING.RDo records indicate standard fittings are in compliance with §192.149 and §192.205? References: 192.149(a), 192.149(b), 192.143(a), 192.143(b), 192.205, 192.607#

DC.DPCobservationPage 57DC.DPC.STANDARDFITTING.ODo field observations confirm standard fittings are in compliance with §192.149? References: 192.149(a), 192.149(b), 192.143(a), 192.143(b), 192.607#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 57DC.DPC.ILIPASS.PDoes the process require that certain transmission pipeline components are designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 192.103, 192.150(a), 192.150(c)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 57DC.DPC.ILIPASS.RDo records indicate that certain transmission pipeline components are designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 192.150, 192.150(a), 192.150(c), 192.493#

DC.DPCobservationPage 57DC.DPC.ILIPASS.OAre certain transmission pipeline components designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 192.150, 192.150(a), 192.150(c)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 57DC.DPC.TAP.PDoes the process require pipeline hot taps (or taps) and tapping fittings to comply with the requirements of 192.151? References: 192.143, 192.151(a), 192.151(b), 192.151(c)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 58DC.DPC.TAP.RDo records indicate that tapping fittings and taps comply with the requirements of §192.151 and §192.205? References: 192.151, 192.151(a), 192.151(b), 192.151(c), 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 58DC.DPC.TAP.ODo field observations confirm each length of pipe and each tapping component are being visually inspected for sufficient installation of taps in accordance with 192 192.151? References: 192.141, 192.151(a), 192.151(b), 192.151(c)#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 58DC.DPC.WELDFABRICATE.PDoes the process require components fabricated by welding, such as branch connections, assemblies of standard pipe, or prefabricated units utilized in the construction of a pipeline, are to be in accordance with 192.153? References: 192.143(a), 192.153(a), 192.153(b), 192.153(c), 192.153(d), 192.155#

DC.DPCrecordPage 58DC.DPC.WELDFABRICATE.RDo records indicate that components fabricated by welding, such as branch connections, assemblies of standard pipe, or prefabricated units utilized in the construction of a pipeline, are in accordance with §192.153 and §192.205? References: 192.153(a), 192.153(b), 192.153(c), 192.153(d), 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 58DC.DPC.WELDFABRICATE.ODo field observations confirm that components fabricated by welding, such as branch connections, assemblies of standard pipe, or prefabricated units, are in accordance with §192.153? References: 192.141, 192.153(a), 192.153(b), 192.153(c), 192.153(d)#

DC.DPCrecordPage 58DC.DPC.WELDEDBRANCH.RDo records demonstrate that each welded branch connection in the form of a single connection, or in a header or manifold as a series of connections, were designed in accordance to §192.155 and §192.205? References: 192.155, 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 58DC.DPC.WELDEDBRANCH.OWelded Branch Connections As applicable to the project, do field observations verify that each welded branch connection in the form of a single connection, or in a header or manifold as a series of connections, was installed as designed in accordance to §192.155? References: 192.155#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 58DC.DPC.EXTRUDEOUTLET.PDoes the process require each extruded outlet to be suitable for anticipated service conditions and designed in accordance to §192.157? References: 192.149(b), 192.157#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 58DC.DPC.FLEXIBLE.PDoes the process require pipeline and pipe components to be designed for flexibility in accordance with §192.159? References: 192.143(a), 192.159#

DC.DPCrecordPage 59DC.DPC.FLEXIBLE.RDo records indicate pipeline and pipe components are designed for flexibility in accordance with §192.159? References: 192.143(a), 192.159#

DC.DPCobservationPage 59DC.DPC.FLEXIBLE.ODo field observations verify that observed pipe and pipe components meet the flexibility design for thermal expansion/contraction and unusual loading or forces? References: 192.143(a), 192.159#

DC.DPCprocedurePage 59DC.DPC.SUPPORT.PDoes the process require piping and associated equipment to have sufficient anchors or supports to prevent undue strain on connected equipment, resist longitudinal forces, and prevent or dampen excessive vibration in accordance with §192.161? References: 192.161#

DC.DPCrecordPage 59DC.DPC.SUPPORT.RDo records indicate piping and associated equipment have sufficient anchors or supports to prevent undue strain on connected equipment, to resist longitudinal forces, and to prevent or dampen excessive vibration in accordance with §192.161? References: 192.161(a), 192.161(b), 192.161(c), 192.161(d), 192.161(e), 192.161(f), 192.205#

DC.DPCobservationPage 59DC.DPC.SUPPORT.ODo field observations confirm each length of pipe and each component is being visually inspected for sufficient installation of anchors or supports to prevent undue strain on connected equipment, to resist longitudinal forces, to prevent or dampen excessive vibration, and is in accordance with §192.161? References: 192.141, 192.161(a), 192.161(b), 192.161(c), 192.161(d), 192.161(e), 192.161(f)#