CPF 120051003
CPF 120051003
case documentOfficial PDFCPF_NO_1-2005-1003.pdf#
120051003_Final Order_09012006.pdf, page 1Official PDFU.S. Department 400 Seventh Street, S.W. of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration SEP - 1 2006 Mr. Reed Robinson Vice President, Engineering Services Columbia Gas Transmission Co. 1700 MacCorkle Avenue SE P.O. Box 1273 Charleston, West Virginia 25325- 1273 Re: CPF No. 1 -2005- 1003 Dear Mr. Robinson : Enclosed is the Final Order issued by the Acting Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety in the above-referenced case. It makes findings of violations and assesses a civil penalty, I acknowledge receipt of and accept your wire transfer for $246,000 as payment in full of the civil penalty assessed in the Final Order. This case is now closed. Your receipt of the Final Order constitutes service of that document under 49 C.F.R. 5 190.5. Sincerely, James Reynolds Pipeline Compliance Registry Office of Pipeline Safety Enclosure cc: Mr. Darrell A. McKown, Program Manager, Pipeline Safety, Public Service Commission of West Virginia Mr. William Gute, Director, Eastern Region, PHMSA CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED#
120051003_Final Order_09012006.pdf, page 2DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY WASHINGTON, DC 20590 ) In the Matter of ) ) Columbia Gas Transmission Company, ) CPF No. 1-2005-1003 Respondent FINAL ORDER On August 18 and September 26,2003, in accordance with 49 C.F.R. 8 190.207, the Director, Eastern Region, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Administration's (PHMSA'S)' Office of Pipeline Safety, issued to Respondent a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty (Notice). The Notice proposed finding that Respondent had violated 49 C.F.R. $9 192.75 1, 192.745, 192.739, 192.605(a), 192.603(a) and 192.491 (c), and proposed assessing a civil penalty of $246,000 for the alleged violations. Respondent responded to the Notice by providing information concerning its payment of the proposed civil penalty on April 27,2005. Respondent submitted a wire transfer in the amount of the proposed civil penalty ($ 246,000), waiving further right to respond and authorizing the entry of this Final Order. FINDINGS OF VIOLATIONS Pursuant to 49 C.F.R. 8 190.213 and 49 U.S.C. 8 60122, I find that Respondent violated the following sections of 49 C.F.R. Part 192, as more fully described in the Notice: 49 C.F.R. 8 192.75 1 -failing to minimize the potential danger of accidental ignition in the presence of natural gas; and 49 C.F.R. 8 192.745 -failing to provide evidence of the inspection and partial operation of valves; and ' Effective February 20,2005, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) succeeded Research and Special Programs Administration as the agency responsible for regulating safety in pipeline transportation and hazardous materials transportation. See, section 108 of the Norman Y. Mineta Research and Special Programs Improvement Act (Public law 108-426, 118 Stat. 2423-2429 (November 30,2004)). See also, 70 Fed. Reg. 8299 (February 18,2005) redelegating the pipeline safety authorities and functions to the PHMSA Administrator.#
120051003_Final Order_09012006.pdf, page 349 C.F.R. 5 192.739 -failing to provide evidence of an inspection; and 49 C.F.R. 5 192.605(a)-failing to comply with its own operations and maintenance manual; and 49 C.F.R. 5 192.603(a)-failing to operate a pipeline in accordance with Subpart L - Operations of 49 C.F.R. Part 192; and 49 C.F.R. 5 192.49 1 (c) -failing to produce evidence that the external corrosion control monitoring under 5 192.465(c) was performed. These findings of violation will be considered prior offenses in any subsequent enforcement action taken against Respondent. Having reviewed the record and considered the assessment criteria, I assess Respondent a civil penalty of $246,000, already paid by Respondent. WARNING ITEMS The Notice did not propose a civil penalty or corrective action for Items 4.C and 4.D in the Notice; therefore, these are considered warning items. Respondent is warned that if it does not take appropriate action to correct these items, enforcement action will be taken if a subsequent inspection reveals a violation. The warnings were for - 49 C.F.R. $192.605 -failing to mark their facilities within 48 hours as specified in their O&M plan; and 49 C.F.R. $192.605 -failing to patrol within the time limits specified in their O&M plan. The terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective on receipt. SEP - 1 2006 Date Issued#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.