CPF 120100005M
CPF 120100005M
case documentOfficial PDF120100005M_NOA_10132010.pdf#
case documentOfficial PDF120100005M_NOA_10132010_text.pdf#
party submissionOfficial PDF120100005M_Operator Response to NOA_10272010.pdf#
party submissionOfficial PDF120100005M_Operator Response to NOA_Attach 1_10272010.pdf#
party submissionOfficial PDF120100005M_Operator Response to NOA_Attach 2_10272010.pdf#
party submissionOfficial PDF120100005M_Operator Response to NOA_Attach 3_10272010.pdf#
120100005M_Closure Letter_03082011_text.pdf, page 1Official PDFU.S. Department 820 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 103 of Transportation West Trenton, NJ 08628 Pipeline and 609.989.2171 Hazardous Materials Safety Administration OVERNIGHT EXPRESS MAIL March 8, 2011 Mr. Robert Steidel Interim Deputy Director – Gas & Light City of Richmond - DPU 730 E. Broad Street, 6th Floor Richmond, VA 23219 CPF 1-2010-0005M Dear Mr. Steidel: Between September 25, 2007 and August 8, 2008, a State Inspector from the Virginia State Corporation Commission (VA SCC) acting as Agent for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of City of Richmond’s (City) procedures in Richmond, Virginia. As a result of the inspection, the City was issued a Notice of Amendment on October 13, 2010, which proposed amendment of your procedures. The City submitted its amended procedures on October 27, 2010. My staff, in conjunction with VA SCC, reviewed the amended procedures and it appears that the inadequacies outlined in this Notice of Amendment have been corrected. This letter is to inform you no further action is necessary and this case is now closed. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Byron Coy, PE Director, Eastern Region Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration#
120100005M_Closure Letter_03082011_text.pdf, page 2CC: Jim Hotinger, VA SCC 5.9 Sample NOA Closure Letter (7/5/95)#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.