CPF 520121017W
CPF 520121017W
520121017W_warning letter_08152012_text.pdf, page 1Official PDFWARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL [7010 2780 0001 0586 2946] - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED August 15, 2012 Mr. Kevin Peretti Vice President QEP Field Services Company 1955 Blairtown Road Rock Springs, WY 82902 CPF 5-2012-1017W Dear Mr. Peretti: On June 26, 2012, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, inspected your Public Awareness Program at your office in Rock Springs, Wyoming. As a result of the inspection, it appears that you have committed a probable violation of the Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The items inspected and the probable violation is: 1. §192.616 Public Awareness (i) The operator's program documentation and evaluation results must be available for periodic review by appropriate regulatory agencies. QEP Field Services did not have program documentation for 2009, 2010, or 2011. Per 49 CFR §192.616(c), the operator must follow the general program recommendations, including baseline and supplemental requirements of API RP 1162, unless the operator provides justification in its program or procedural manual as to why compliance with all#
520121017W_warning letter_08152012_text.pdf, page 2or certain provisions of the recommended practice is not practicable and not necessary for safety. API RP 1162, Section 8.3 recommend guidance states, “Has the operator performed an audit or review of its program implementation annually since it was developed? If not, did the operator provide justification in its program or procedural manual?” QEP Field Services Company did not have documentation of annual audits from 2009, 2010, and 2011. QEP Field Services Company only had documentation for 2008 and for 2012. Under 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $100,000 for each violation for each day the violation persists up to a maximum of $1,000,000 for any related series of violations. We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case, and have decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this time. We advise you to correct the item(s) identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in Vintage Production California LLC being subject to additional enforcement action. No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer to CPF 5-2012-1017W. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Sincerely, Chris Hoidal Director, Western Region Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration cc: PHP-60 Compliance Registry PHP-500 T. Finch (#139518) 2#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.