CPF 52021016WL
CPF 52021016WL
52021016WL_Warning Letter_04142021_(20-173102)_text.pdf, page 1Official PDFWARNING LETTER VIA E-MAIL TO MR. BRIGHAM MCCOWN April 14, 2021 Mr. Brigham McCown President Alyeska Pipeline Service Company 3700 Centerpoint Drive P.O. Box 196660 Anchorage, Alaska 99515 CPF 5-2021-016-WL Dear Mr. McCown: During the week of August 17 through 21, 2020, representatives of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code (U.S.C.), performed a virtual inspection of the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company's Control Room located in Anchorage, Alaska. This inspection included procedures, records, and virtual observations associated with the Control Room Management Program. As a result of the inspection, it is alleged that you have committed probable violation of the Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The items inspected and the probable violation is: 1. § 195.446 - Control room management. (a) … (h) Training. Each operator must establish a controller training program and review the training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months. An operator’s program must provide for training each controller to carry out the roles and responsibilities defined by the operator. In addition, the training program must include the following elements:#
52021016WL_Warning Letter_04142021_(20-173102)_text.pdf, page 2(1) … (6) Control room team training and exercises that include both controllers and other individuals, defined by the operator, who would reasonably be expected to operationally collaborate with controllers (control room personnel) during normal, abnormal or emergency situations. Operators must comply with the team training requirements under this paragraph no later than January 23, 2018. During a review of Alyeska’s records for the team training requirement, the records demonstrated that at least one qualified controller participated in the training. However, the records failed to identify the other personnel who attended, or a complete list of attendance to adequately show compliance of the team training exercise. Records were incomplete and failed to demonstrate that control room team training and exercises included both controllers and other individuals, defined by the operator, who would reasonably be expected to operationally collaborate with controllers (control room personnel) during normal, abnormal or emergency situations. Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 CFR § 190.223, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $222,504 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,225,034 for a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after July 31, 2019 and before January 11, 2021, the maximum penalty may not exceed $218,647 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,186,465 for a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after November 27, 2018 and before July 31, 2019, the maximum penalty may not exceed $213,268 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,132,679. For violation occurring on or after November 2, 2015 and before November 27, 2018, the maximum penalty may not exceed $209,002 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,090,022. We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case, and have decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this time. We advise you to correct the item identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in Alyeska Pipeline Service Company being subject to additional enforcement action. No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer to CPF 5- 2021-016-WL. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Sincerely, Dustin Hubbard Director, Western, Office of Pipeline Safety Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration cc: PHP-60 Compliance Registry PHP-500 D. Fehling (#20-173102)#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.