PHMSA Report 20190055
PHMSA Report 20190055
Gas transmission and gathering incident in SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO County, CA. Reported cause: MATERIAL FAILURE OF PIPE OR WELD. Reported consequences: 0 fatalities, 0 injuries, 25.2 NATURAL GAS released, $201,636 reported property damage. Operator-reported incident data submitted to PHMSA, generally within 30 days. Records may be supplemented or corrected and do not represent final agency causal findings.
Report number: 20190055.
Operator ID: 15007.
Reported incident date: 4/3/2019 15:48.
Location detail: 2.45
Cause detail: ORIGINAL MANUFACTURING-RELATED (NOT GIRTH WELD OR OTHER WELDS FORMED IN THE FIELD)
Cause detail: ON APRIL 3, 2019 AT 1548 HOURS, PG&E IDENTIFIED A GRADE 1 LEAK ALONG DFM 0609-02 AT 6434 FLORIN RD, SACRAMENTO. PG&E CREWS WERE ONSITE AND FINISHED MAKING REPAIRS TO THE LEAKS DISCOVERED ON A SAVE-A-VALVE AND PCF ON APRIL 4, 2019 AT 0414 HOURS. A LEAK SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED FOLLOWING THE REPAIRS AND FOUND AN ADDITIONAL LEAK ON THE WELD OF DFM 0609-02. ON APRIL 6, 2019, PG&E CUT OUT THE FOLLOWING: LEAKING MITER ELBOW, PCF, SAVE-A-VALVE, 6IN ELBOW AND INSTALLED A NEW 6IN PCF AND MAIN. THE APPARENT CAUSE WAS DETERMINED AS METALLURGICAL FAILURE OF THE MITER WELD, LIKELY DUE A CONSTRUCTION-RELATED DEFECT. THERE ARE NO KNOWN INJURIES OR FATALITIES. CUSTOMER IMPACT IS UNKNOWN. NO POLICE OR FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORTED. ON APRIL 5, 2019, THIS INCIDENT WAS REPORTED TO DOT (1241929) AND CPUC (190405-9141) DUE TO MEDIA PRESENCE (FOX NEWS) AND THE EXPECTED REPAIR COSTS BEING ESTIMATED AT OVER $50K.
PHMSA trend classification: significant incident, not serious.
PHMSA standardized cause: MATERIAL FAILURE OF PIPE OR WELD — MANUFACTURING-RELATED.
PHMSA indexed costs: $201,781 reported total cost, $94,627.404 in 1984 dollars, $232,852.542 in current-year dollars.
PHMSA trend flags, standardized causes, and indexed costs are analytical fields added to operator-reported incident data. They do not represent final agency causal findings.
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.