PHMSA Report 20150124
PHMSA Report 20150124
Gas transmission and gathering incident in Not Within a Municipality, UNION County, AR. Reported cause: EXCAVATION DAMAGE. Reported consequences: 0 fatalities, 0 injuries, 0.5 NATURAL GAS released, $350,000 reported property damage. Operator-reported incident data submitted to PHMSA, generally within 30 days. Records may be supplemented or corrected and do not represent final agency causal findings.
Report number: 20150124.
Operator ID: 602.
Reported incident date: 9/17/2015 15:22.
Location detail: 389+10
Cause detail: PREVIOUS DAMAGE DUE TO EXCAVATION ACTIVITY
Cause detail: MISCELLANEOUS ROOT CAUSES
Cause detail: PREVIOUS DAMAGE
Cause detail: ON 9/16/15 AT 17:33 AN ENABLE EMPLOYEE WITH THE EL DORADO DISTRICT REPORTS A POSSIBLE LEAK WAS FOUND DURING A LOCAL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LEAK SURVEY OF THEIR PIPELINE. THE ENABLE EMPLOYEE REPORTED THE POSSIBLE LEAK TO SYSTEM CONTROL. ENABLE'S KT-1, THE DISTRIBUTION COMPANY AND 2 FOREIGN PIPELINES ARE NEAR THE POSSIBLE LEAK. THE ENABLE EMPLOYEE COULD NOT CONFIRM WHICH OF THE 4 PIPELINES IN THE AREA IS LEAKING. LEAK INDICATIONS WERE SMALL. ON 9/17/15 11:15 ENABLE EMPLOYEES CONFIRMED KT-1 IS LEAKING TO SYSTEM CONTROL. AT 15:22 LOCAL EMPLOYEES CALCULATED AND PROVIDED SYSTEM CONTROL A COST ESTIMATE FOR REPAIRS OF $300,000. ON 9/17/15 16:10 SYSTEM CONTROL NOTIFIED THE NRC (REPORT # 1128754) AFTER DECIDING AND DETERMINING THEY WOULD REPLACE THE CROSSING. ON 9/19/2015 PERFORMED A LINE STOP TO ELIMINATE THE LEAKING VALVE AND PIPE CROSSING. THE CROSSING PIPE WAS LEFT IN PLACE AND A NEW SECTION OF PIPE WAS INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING PIPELINE CROSSING.
PHMSA trend classification: significant incident, not serious.
PHMSA standardized cause: EXCAVATION DAMAGE — PREVIOUS DAMAGE DUE TO EXCAVATION.
PHMSA indexed costs: $351,152 reported total cost, $176,225.995 in 1984 dollars, $433,816.351 in current-year dollars.
PHMSA trend flags, standardized causes, and indexed costs are analytical fields added to operator-reported incident data. They do not represent final agency causal findings.
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.