11-0074
11-0074
Page 1U.S. Deportment of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue. SE Washington, DC 20590 fJAY 1 9 2011 Mr. Tom Ferguson Technical Consultant Currie Associates, Inc. 10 Hunter Brook Lane Queensbury, NY 12804 Ref. No.: 11-0074 Dear Mr. Ferguson: This responds to your March 29, 2011 letter concerning the aircraft quantity limitations ofthe Hazardous Material Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to lithium ion batteries contained in equipment. Specifically, you asked if § 172.102(c), special provision AI04limits the total net quantity oflithium ion batteries contained in equipment to 5kg (11 lbs) per package for transport aboard passenger aircraft. Yes, the HMR limit the net quantity of lithium batteries contained in equipment to 5 kg (11 lbs) per package when transported aboard passenger aircraft. This per package quantity limit is consistent with the quantity limits for lithium ion batteries shipped alone and lithium ion batteries packed with equipment. I hope this answers your inquiry. If you need additional assistance, please contact the Standards and Rulemaking Division. Sincerely, 0~ S4-Ben Supko Acting Chief, Standards Development Branch Standards and Rulemaking Division#
Page 2ka~ ~ 112. lot., ~PAIO¥ 3pe rA~1 Pvo VI SI on!> CURRIE ASSOCIATES, INC. (I-oJ 71 THE GLOBAL COMPLIANCE PROFESSIONALS U.S. Department of Transportation PHMSA Office of Hazardous Material Standards Attn: PHH-10 East Building 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, D.C. Re: Letter of Interpretation, Secondary Lithium Ion Batteries in Equipment Dear Sir/Madam, On behalf of a major supplier of lithium ion-powered equipment, we are requesting a Letter of Interpretation. Question Does 49 CFR, § 172.102, Special Provision A 104 limit the total net quantity of all batteries contained in equipment to no more than 5 kg per package for passenger aircraft? Background Lithium battery transport has been an important topic during the last 5+ years and significant changes have been made to both domestic and international transport requirements during that span. As a result, harmonization of global regulations is often compromised. The requirements of 49 CFR, Subchapter C, Part 172, §172.102, Special Provision A104 states: A 104 The net weight of secondary lithium batteries or cells contained in equipment may not exceed 5 kg (11 pounds) in packages that are authorized aboard passenger carrying aircraft. The International Civil Aviation Organization Technical Instructions for the Safe Transportation of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO TI) 2010-2011 Edition provides guidance as to the amount of lithium ion batteries contained in equipment in Packing Instruction 967. The limitation is detailed in the following table: Net quantity per piece of equipment (Section I) Contents Passenger I Cargo Lithium ion batteries contained in E!..quipment 5 ~ I 35 kg In comparing the two citations noted above, ICAO clearly indicates by reference in the table that the net quantity per piece of equipment is limited to 5 kg. The ICAO Packing Instruction does not limit the number of pieces of equipment per package. Therefore it is possible to have more than 1 piece of equipment per package. Per PI 967, it appears that a single package may contain up to 40 kg or more (for example) of lithium ion batteries contained in equipment as long as each piece of equipment does not contain more than 5 kg each. I 10 HUNTER BROOK LANE QUEENSBURY, NY 12804' TEL: (518) 761-0668· FAX: (518) 792-7781 www.currieassociates.com·mail@currieassociates.com#
Page 3In 49 CFR. Special provision A 104, the text is slightly different. It indicates the net weight of lithium ion batteries contained in equipment may not exceed 5 kg in packages intended for passenger aircraft. While the wording is slight. the impact is significant. PHMSA appears to indicate the net wieight limitation to be per piece of equipment and per package. Thus if a piece of equipment contained a 4 kg lithium ion battery (using the previous example). then only 1 piece of equipment would be permitted per package and be eligible for transport by passenger aircraft. Guidance on this question would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely. Tom Ferguson#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.