11-0116
11-0116
Page 11200 New Jersey Avenue SE U.S. Department Washington. DC 20590 of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous AUG 22 2011 Materials Safety Administration Mr. Paul A. Luther, P.E. EHS Manager Land Q'Lakes Purina Feed, LLC 555 Maryville University Dr, Suite 950 St. Louis. MO 63141 Ref. No. 11-0116 Dear Mr. Luther: This responds to your May 17,2011 request for clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). In your letter, you state that your company has two locations in Texas that manufacture liquid cattle feed. An ingredient of the cattle feed is anhydrous ammonia. On average, two to three nurse tanks containing anhydrous ammonia (1,000 gallons each) are delivered to these locations weekly. According to your letter, recently an inspector advised that you may not receive nurse tanks under the provisions of § 173.315(m). Specifically, you ask if the provisions of § 173.315(m) permit the transportation of nurse tanks containing anhydrous ammonia, which is an implement of husbandry, to be transported to the facilities involved in the manufacturing of liquid cattle feed. The answer is no. The transportation ofthe nurse tanks, as described in your letter, does not satisfy the condition in § 173.3 15(m) that the transportation be conducted by a private carrier exclusively for agricultural purposes. Section 173.315(m) authorizes the transportation of anhydrous ammonia in a cargo tank that does not meet the specification requirements of part 178 (commonly known as a nurse tank and considered an implement of husbandry), and is operated by a private carrier exclusively for agricultural purposes provided that all the specified conditions are met. A private carrier is a carrier who transports the business's own material and does not provide such transportation services to other businesses. I hope this answers your inquiry. If you need additional assistance, please contact this office at (202) 366-8553. Si~S-~ Ben Supko Chief. Standards Development Standards and Rulemaking Division#
Page 2Land Q'Lakes Purina Feed LLC . E:,Mlen lQ.J.ih 2S I,S· 5/5 em) t\J U is-eo TC({) k~ 11-0"6 May 17,2011 Charles Betts Division Director Standards and Rulemaking Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Betts: I am Paul A. Luther, P.E., Environmental Health and Safety Manager, for Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLC. One ofour company's facilities in Hereford, Texas as well as their supplier of anhydrous ammonia recently experienced a DOT Hazardous Materials inspection and I am requesting an official interpretation from your agency on what we have been told. Land O'Lakes Purina Feed is a diverse agricultural company with manufacturing locations in 28 states. In Texas, we have two facilities that manufacture liquid cattle feed. They are located in Herford and Rosenberg, Texas. A critical ingredient in our liquid cattle feed is anhydrous ammonia. Our Hereford, Texas facility does not have permanent fixed storage so Land O'Lakes Purina Feed receives the anhydrous ammonia by nurse tanks. On average two to three nurse tanks, with a capacity of 1,000 gallons each, are received weekly. We have operated in this manner for over two decades at each location. The inspector has advised that we cannot receive nurse tanks under the provisions in 49 CFR 173.315(m). Nurse tanks do not meet the specifications in 49 CFR Part 178 and for that reason 173.315(m) was adopted. We are requesting an interpretation of 49 CFR 173.315(m) to allow the use of non-DOT specification cargo tanks (commonly referred to as nurse tanks and considered an implement of husbandry) for transportation of anhydrous ammonia to facilities involved in the manufacturing ofliquid cattle feed. If you have any questions regarding this issue, I can be reached by telephone at (636) 742-6235 or via email at 12luther(ti)landolakes.com. Sincerely, Paul A. Luther, P.E. EHS Manager Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLC#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.