13-0009
13-0009
Page 1U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 FEB ~ 8 10ll Mr. Harold DePriest Bway Corporation 3737 Miller Park Drive Garland, TX 75042 Reference No.: 13-0009 Dear Mr. DePriest: This is in response to your November 1, 2012 email to the Hazardous Materials Information Center requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the UN specification packaging marking on drums. You package a 5-gallon open head drum with the UN1A2/Y1.5/50 specification marking. A customer has asked you to test this container with a sheet of plastic film applied over the pail curl before applying the lid with a crimper. You have tested this configuration in accordance with Part 178, Subpart M ofthe HMR and the package has passed the tests. You ask whether the specification packaging marking would change due to the addition of the plastic film. Under the selective testing provisions of§ 178.601(g)(5), Variation 5 allows for a single packaging that differs from a tested design type only to the extent that the closure device or gasketing differs from that used in the originally tested design type , may be used without further testing, provided an equivalent level of performance is maintained subject to the specific qualifying test conditions. If the package, with the additional plastic film applied meets the requirements of Variation 5, then the packaging may be used without further testing. The original specification marking remains applicable and does not need to be changed. In addition, you are correct that, in accordance with HMR § 178.2(c) you are required to revise the packaging closure instructions to include the application ofthe plastic film in the procedure. I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us ifwe can be of further assistance. IT2 · Delmer Billitzt. Senior Regulatory Advisor Standards and Rulemaking Division#
Page 2~b·,~i1 ~17 8 ./o66 _o_ra_k_e_fo_r_d_,_c_ar_o.ly_n_(_P_H_M_s_A_) ______________________________________________ __ From: Sent: To: Subject: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:30 PM Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA) FW: letter of interpretation Tesh\~ l3 -oooC[ From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 4:04 PM To: Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA) Subject: FW: letter of interpretation Hi Carolyn, We received the following request for a formal letter of interpretation. Thanks, Victoria From: Harold DePriest [mailto:Harold.Depriest@BWAYCorp.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:27 AM To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) Subject: letter of interpretation I talked to your information center desk today and am asking for a letter of interpretation based on our conversation. Here is the question. We currently package a 5-gallon open head using the UN1A2/Y1.5/50 marking. Recently a customer requested that we test this container, but they wanted us to put a sheet of material similar to Saran Wrap on the pail curl before applying the lid with a crimper. We have tested this configuration per the protocol in 178.600 and it passes the testing. I asked what the marking should be since we added the plastic film. The response I received is that the marking stays the same. We need to add the plastic film and application procedure to our closing instructions. I would like a letter of interpretation explaining this. Thanks for your assistance. Harold DePriest Bway Corporation 3737 Miller Park Drive Garland, TX 75042 Harold.depriest@bwaycorp.com 972-535-1116 1#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.